Ole Gunnar Solskjaer's interview

Kush

Hyperbolic and will post where they like!!
Joined
Mar 30, 2010
Messages
3,447
But why? We were still 3rd overall since Ole took over last season. And even including Mourinho's terrible start and Ole's relegation form near the end, we didn't finish that far off 4th. We spent a fortune on a CB and a RB and now people are saying 4th was never happening and 8th would be okay. We're just dropping our standards for no reason.
You clearly know the answer to that.

For the entirety of summer we didn't stop hearing how the rolling table from when Ole took over would have us finishing 3rd in the PL. Yet, two months into the season we apparently have the worst squad out of Top 6 as well as likes of Wolves, Leicester, West Ham etc. and how 8th is best we can do this year.

Hilariously daft post. Lukaku was 19 goals shipped from the squad. Regardless of his weight concerns, the man could put the ball in the back of the net better than anyone we currently have. Selling him with no one established line up was naieve and well, stupid.

Glossing over your ridiculous bias, being "hungry" or having a potentially "greater upside" means feck all if you haven't established anything, or if it's not realised. You're just sitting on an armchair, assuming there is greater upside. Obviously most of the players he has named aren't ready to take the mantle completely from established players, so yes it isn't rocket science to keep Lukaku. And after selling Lukaku, it made no sense to sell Sanchez. The man was nearing in on fitness, was always hungry to kick on, had a decent copa America and AT WORST would be a decent squad option to look to in stages such as this. We still pay half his wages for fecksake it's beggars belief.

And you conveniently forgot Fellaini and Herrera. Selling two players who would make an impact on your midfield and at least allow Pogba to be deployed further up was again, daft. Now here we are, 2 midfielders unreplaced, 2 attackers unreplaced and still no fecking right winger. So yes, it's pretty fecking stupid to say the least.

The argument of us needing to do it in other windows is half baked. Sell when you have the replacement, and buy when right players are available. There were multiple options for us in these positions outright ignored because we were dicking around or reportedly after a Brexit FC side. If Ole knew he wasn't getting a single attacker this window, then don't sell 2 for fecksake. If he knew we weren't getting a single midfielder then again, don't sell 2.

Changing the squad is fine, but do it while buying the right players. Don't rip us into a skeleton side and have us even less competitive. He could have sold one attacker one midfielder Smalling, Darmien and that's still progress in the cull.
Right on the money. Even if we were to believe (like many backing Ole) that Woodward locked Ole into a room and promised number of key signings but didn't deliver in the end. He still chose to get rid of Sanchez AFTER the buying window had closed. Keep in mind, this is when Woodward had apparently 'broken' a promise and not delivered him his Lukaku replacement. What logical reasoning was behind that decision? Especially when we are paying majority of his wages and the loan deal has no obligation at all? Sanchez has been very poor for us but despite being ravaged by injuries he's still a better player than likes of Lingard, Mata and Pereira who are getting regular minutes for us this season. He has 2 goals in less than 80 minutes of football played at Inter. I'm willing to bet that his productivity at Inter won't be matched by any of the three players which I've mentioned.
 

Rendezvous with Ronaldo

New Member
Newbie
Joined
May 25, 2019
Messages
161
Supports
Hartlepool
It's very, very simple:

If the manager is losing, it really does not matter what you say or do, much of redcafe will tear it to pieces. If necessary, moving goalposts and performing spectacular mental gymnastics to do so.

If the manager is winning, it really does not matter what you say or do, much of redcafe will cheer and defend it to the max. If necessary, moving goalposts and performing spectacular mental gymnastics to do so.

It's pretty lame, guys.
 

Enigma_87

You know who
Joined
Aug 7, 2008
Messages
27,655
Let’s not forget that even despite the transfer ban Chelsea has one of the most well balanced squads in the league although lacking a bit of top quality. He’s got at least 2 competent options for every position in his team so he’s clearly got an advantage over Ole at this point in time.

Giroud/Abraham/Batshuayi

Pulisic/CHO- Willian/Pedro

Mount/RLC- Barkley/Kovacic-Jorginho/Kante

Alonso/Emerson- Azbilicueta/James

Andersen/Zouma- Rüdiger/Tomori

Kepa/Caballero

That’s a damn solid squad to be honest. They’ve had a few injuries themselves but you really couldn’t tell apart anyone’s been missing apart from Rüdiger and Kante of course but they can still make due.
RLC is out for the season, not sure why you are including him.
Rudiger has started once this season I'm not sure how long he's out for.

They have Abraham as prime goalscorer who had one season on loan at Swansea before this season.

Pulisic is very young and most likely won't kick it for at least another season or two.

Apart from midfield their team/squad is actually worse than ours.
 

Enigma_87

You know who
Joined
Aug 7, 2008
Messages
27,655
Unbelievable that so many on here would rather we kept Lukaku, Sanchez and even Fellaini ffs!

Do you all not recall watching them play for us? They ALL HAD LEAVE replaced or not! Lukaku scored only 12 league goals last season, he and his poor attitude, donkey first touch and love in with Conte will not be missed. He's scored 20 league goals once btw.
It's not about shipping senior players out. It's about replacing them without drop of quality.

You can moan all over Lukaku but still he was our best goalscorer. Rashford achieved 5,7 and 10 goals in the league playing over 30 games in the last 3 seasons.

Martial managed 34 goals in 113 games before this season with the highest tally being 11 goals in his debut season. Most he reached since 15/16 is 10.

It doesn't take much to see that you need a top goalscorer and you can't rely on two that barely reached double figures once or twice in 2-3 seasons.

Before you start with lack of money we spent 150m on 3 players. There were ton of options for 40m or around that players that have scored 20+ in top leagues.
 

JohnnyLaw

Full Member
Joined
Jun 1, 2013
Messages
2,060
Location
Sweden
RLC is out for the season, not sure why you are including him.
Rudiger has started once this season I'm not sure how long he's out for.

They have Abraham as prime goalscorer who had one season on loan at Swansea before this season.

Pulisic is very young and most likely won't kick it for at least another season or two.

Apart from midfield their team/squad is actually worse than ours.
Theyir midfield depth is still better than ours.

Even with him out they've Barkley/Mount/Kante/Jorginho/Kovacic to choose from. Apart from Mount (who's still into his third season playing senior football) they're all seasoned and solid pros. When Pogba is out we have Fred/Mctominay/Matic. The drop in quality in our squad is by far deeper.

How can you say we have a stronger attack either? James/Rashford/Martial vs CHO/Willian/Pulisic/Abraham (Who scored 25 goals for Aston Villa last year I'll remind you)/Giroud/Pedro/Batshuayi

I'd grant you that our defence might be a bit better but even that's arguable.
 

Leftback99

Might have a bedwetting fetish.
Joined
Jan 11, 2015
Messages
14,553
RLC is out for the season, not sure why you are including him.
Rudiger has started once this season I'm not sure how long he's out for.

They have Abraham as prime goalscorer who had one season on loan at Swansea before this season.

Pulisic is very young and most likely won't kick it for at least another season or two.

Apart from midfield their team/squad is actually worse than ours.
How can you look at the two set of forward options and say that ours is better?
Abraham scored 25 goals in the Championship last year. Giroud is a proven PL striker. Batshuayi a decent 3rd back up.
And then the wing options Pedro, Willian, Hudson Odoi. It's a no contest.
 

Mainoldo

New Member
Joined
Sep 17, 2004
Messages
22,965
How can you look at the two set of forward options and say that ours is better?
Abraham scored 25 goals in the Championship last year. Giroud is a proven PL striker. Batshuayi a decent 3rd back up.
And then the wing options Pedro, Willian, Hudson Odoi. It's a no contest.
Would you swap any of there strikers Forbes Rashford and Martial? Honest question.
 

VP89

Pogba's biggest fan
Joined
Dec 6, 2015
Messages
31,863
It really didn't take long for the ''fans'' on here to turn against Ole.
In fairness the evaluation of his coaching has been in our minds for 11 months now. The last few games have been quite damning in that regard.
 

Enigma_87

You know who
Joined
Aug 7, 2008
Messages
27,655
How can you look at the two set of forward options and say that ours is better?
Abraham scored 25 goals in the Championship last year. Giroud is a proven PL striker. Batshuayi a decent 3rd back up.
And then the wing options Pedro, Willian, Hudson Odoi. It's a no contest.
Easy. Abraham scored those in the Championship. Neal Maupay and Billy Sharp scored 25 and 23.

Giroud has scored 2 goals more than Alexis playing 10 or something games more since joining Chelsea.

Batshuayi is average. Hudson-Odoi is 18 years old teenager yet to score in PL.

90% of the caf was against signing Willian and Pedro is on the slide since he joined Chelsea.

Rashford and Martial will walk in their attacking lineup when fit.

Put Giroud, Abraham and Batshuayi in our side and everybody will call them being shipped in dozen games.

It's an odd argument that we have a worse side than Chelsea. With Hazard yes, but since last year and their transfer ban...
 

Leftback99

Might have a bedwetting fetish.
Joined
Jan 11, 2015
Messages
14,553
Easy. Abraham scored those in the Championship. Neal Maupay and Billy Sharp scored 25 and 23.

Giroud has scored 2 goals more than Alexis playing 10 or something games more since joining Chelsea.

Batshuayi is average. Hudson-Odoi is 18 years old teenager yet to score in PL.

90% of the caf was against signing Willian and Pedro is on the slide since he joined Chelsea.

Rashford and Martial will walk in their attacking lineup when fit.

Put Giroud, Abraham and Batshuayi in our side and everybody will call them being shipped in dozen games.

It's an odd argument that we have a worse side than Chelsea. With Hazard yes, but since last year and their transfer ban...
Giroud scored 11 in the Europa league as well. Willian and Pedro would still start on our right wing every game whether the Caf wanted them 3 years ago or not.

Interesting the only two you feel worth even talking about are Rashford and Martial. Martial has only played 3 games so how do you rate the back ups?

Batshauyi might be average, but an average striker is better than a 17 year or Lingard up front.
 

Bulldog United

New Member
Joined
Feb 18, 2019
Messages
1,226
Location
Liverpool
Worrying for Ole he has Arsenal, AZ (away), Newcastle (away) before the next international break. Tomorrow night is going to be a very difficult game obviously, but a win would be massive for everyone involved. AZ are no pushovers but we should win, and Newcastle is absolutely a match we have to be winning - so the pressure will be on us. Next game back after the international break - Liverpool at Old Trafford. :eek:

My fear is this has the possibility of ending horribly quickly for Ole.
 

Sweet Square

Full Member
Joined
Jun 6, 2013
Messages
23,787
Location
The Zone
Well he is crap at what he does. What do you expect?
Considering the shite that gets posted on here I shouldn't be surprised but Ole not even being in charge for 12 months. When you actually take a step back at look at things, its really odd that people have no interest in him and are calling for the sack.

But thats modern football fans I guess.

8 months is a long time, when you see the team regressing instead of improving, when you see the team looking well under coached, I don’t see any other choice, maybe hopeless optimism and wishful thinking but it ain’t my jam.
Its really not thought is it. I'm not arguing that Ole has been anything other than rubbish but people talk on here as if he's been here for years and they've finally reach breaking point. The reality being its took them less than a year to turn on a United legend. Which we have to admit is pretty dam quick.
 
Last edited:

OrcaFat

Full Member
Joined
Jul 29, 2013
Messages
5,672
Giroud scored 11 in the Europa league as well. Willian and Pedro would still start on our right wing every game whether the Caf wanted them 3 years ago or not.

Interesting the only two you feel worth even talking about are Rashford and Martial. Martial has only played 3 games so how do you rate the back ups?

Batshauyi might be average, but an average striker is better than a 17 year or Lingard up front.
Yeah. If we get Martial and Rashford on the pitch and have Pogba and Shaw fit as well, we are better than Chelsea and should beat them, 4-0, I’d say.
 

Enigma_87

You know who
Joined
Aug 7, 2008
Messages
27,655
Giroud scored 11 in the Europa league as well. Willian and Pedro would still start on our right wing every game whether the Caf wanted them 3 years ago or not.

Interesting the only two you feel worth even talking about are Rashford and Martial. Martial has only played 3 games so how do you rate the back ups?
Well if we use 4-3-3 that's Rashford and Martial starting when all are fit. Pedro or Willian will start simply because we don't have a right winger. Although going off the start of the season I'm pretty sure most will have James there, to me it's too early to say.

James looks good and probably as good as all their attacking options on the wing - they are young as well.

Both United and Chelsea are well off the standard to start the season in the attacking third in a highly competitive league.

Mason is no worse than their youngsters.

All in all we have much better defence - and we should - spending 130 on it alone. DDG is probably still better than Kepa, our attack IMO is better when fit and average as theirs when having issues with injuries.

They have better midfield and we have the best midfielder alongside Kante.

It's ingenious to say we have the worse side.
 

Leftback99

Might have a bedwetting fetish.
Joined
Jan 11, 2015
Messages
14,553
Well if we use 4-3-3 that's Rashford and Martial starting when all are fit. Pedro or Willian will start simply because we don't have a right winger. Although going off the start of the season I'm pretty sure most will have James there, to me it's too early to say.

James looks good and probably as good as all their attacking options on the wing - they are young as well.

Both United and Chelsea are well off the standard to start the season in the attacking third in a highly competitive league.

Mason is no worse than their youngsters.

All in all we have much better defence - and we should - spending 130 on it alone. DDG is probably still better than Kepa, our attack IMO is better when fit and average as theirs when having issues with injuries.

They have better midfield and we have the best midfielder alongside Kante.

It's ingenious to say we have the worse side.
Starting XI i'd agree it's close but squad wise it's not and that's been our problem because of the injuries. Chelsea's drop off in quality isn't as much a problem.

You can't dismiss Abraham from the Championship but then big up James. Hudson Odoi is ahead of Greenwood at this point.
 

Leftback99

Might have a bedwetting fetish.
Joined
Jan 11, 2015
Messages
14,553
Okay. So no to Martial.. and who would you swap from that team instead of Rashford? From the strikers that is.
As a number 9? I'd be more confident in Giroud or Abraham scoring goals, better in the air, hold up play.

As a left wing, i'd rather Rashford than any Chelsea player but he's not exactly brilliant there yet.
 

Enigma_87

You know who
Joined
Aug 7, 2008
Messages
27,655
Starting XI i'd agree it's close but squad wise it's not and that's been our problem because of the injuries. Chelsea's drop off in quality isn't as much a problem.

You can't dismiss Abraham from the Championship but then big up James. Hudson Odoi is ahead of Greenwood at this point.
I didn't big up James ;) This is why I said they will have either Willian or Pedro in the pecking order for the third attacking spot.

I'm not sure if Hudson Odoi is ahead of Greenwood either. He has played 27 mins in PL this season and 90 mins in LC.

Chelsea's drop off in quality isn't much of a problem because it isn't that good to start with.

Abraham is a good player but still he's not better than Martial or Rashford and it would be a knee jerk reaction to say he is.

To me both attacks are full of youngsters and we have the best two when fit - Martial and Rashford.

If we make a combined 11 we will have Pogba in midfield Martial/Rashford up front and Chelsea will probably have a RW, 2 CM's and LB at a push when all are fit.
 

Mainoldo

New Member
Joined
Sep 17, 2004
Messages
22,965
As a number 9? I'd be more confident in Giroud or Abraham scoring goals, better in the air, hold up play.

As a left wing, i'd rather Rashford than any Chelsea player but he's not exactly brilliant there yet.
Alright fair enough. Makes sense from what you are saying. But as an overall package.. i still think you'd keep Martial. We'd all moan if Abraham or Giroud played for us.
 

Sky1981

Fending off the urge
Joined
Apr 12, 2006
Messages
30,097
Location
Under the bright neon lights of sincity
Worrying for Ole he has Arsenal, AZ (away), Newcastle (away) before the next international break. Tomorrow night is going to be a very difficult game obviously, but a win would be massive for everyone involved. AZ are no pushovers but we should win, and Newcastle is absolutely a match we have to be winning - so the pressure will be on us. Next game back after the international break - Liverpool at Old Trafford. :eek:

My fear is this has the possibility of ending horribly quickly for Ole.
We lose against arse and newcastle were bottom 4. Hard to get back from that on our current form.

Must win for ole, this will decide the momentum of the season. Win against arse were join 4th and it doesnt look so bad.
 

He'sRaldo

Full Member
Joined
Jan 10, 2019
Messages
3,203
It's very, very simple:

If the manager is losing, it really does not matter what you say or do, much of redcafe will tear it to pieces. If necessary, moving goalposts and performing spectacular mental gymnastics to do so.

If the manager is winning, it really does not matter what you say or do, much of redcafe will cheer and defend it to the max. If necessary, moving goalposts and performing spectacular mental gymnastics to do so.

It's pretty lame, guys.
Sounds about right. Mourinho defenders will probably be the same ones talking about style of play later.
 

Enigma_87

You know who
Joined
Aug 7, 2008
Messages
27,655
As a number 9? I'd be more confident in Giroud or Abraham scoring goals, better in the air, hold up play.

As a left wing, i'd rather Rashford than any Chelsea player but he's not exactly brilliant there yet.
I wouldn't big up Giroud that much. He has 5 goals in 43 in the league. Looked shocking in some games and his 11 goals run in EL is probably the only reason not to call him one of the worst transfers since the PL era began.