You are doing the exact same as you did in the post where
@Fox outside the box replied to. A very simple way of looking at something. The poster makes some very good and valid points and you qualify them as excuses because it doesnt fit what you want. You want Pogba out of the club so you will use the stat of 3pts of 4th but wont mention it is also 3pts of 10th. With Pogba Manchester United never ended 10th so if you look at it that also very simple way he is missed a lot.
How you can say ''lack of impact'' really does puzzle me. Pogba was literally top in every stat last last season. Goals, assists, key passes.. whatever way there is to measure impact, Pogba was top of the list. Even during a season where he has hardly played he is still amongst the best players when it comes to creating chances. Not per minute but in total. How that qualifies as a lack of impact... i dont know.
It is fine that you want Pogba gone because you think it is good for Manchester United to get rid of their best and most talented player. That is your opinion, pretending like Pogba isnt a good player or that he didnt have any impact or downplay his impact is just not supported by any facts. You miss McT more than Pogba, i dont think anyone in the world would choose a pretty average player (certainly when compared to Pogba) like McT over Pogba when they arent part of the ''Pogba out'' group.
I think it is fair to asume that Manchester United would be higher on the table if Pogba had been fit the whole season. The main problem is creating chances for the strikers. I dont think many midfielders in the world are better at creating chances than Paul Pogba. He can create a chance out of nothing. Even during a bad game he will most likely still create atleast one chance.