Who is the greater player: Ryan Giggs vs Gareth Bale

Who is the greater player?


  • Total voters
    599

Ludens the Red

Full Member
Joined
Jul 27, 2009
Messages
17,485
Location
London
That’s a new way of describing a goalscorer. I guess goals are ‘highlight moments’ tbh.

That said, I agree that Bebestation’s post was a bit overboard.

P.S - of course Giggs wouldn’t have gone for £85m back when Bale did. He was almost fecking 40 for a start, and had about a year left of his career. In fact, I think he retired the same summer.
Bales goal scoring is actually massively over rated as well. As a modern day inside forward/winger his goal stats are actually not that impressive. Obviously better than Giggsys but that’s a given. Which adds to the point, highlights reel player.

105 goals in 249 games is hardly superhuman and I don’t know why it’s used to elevate him. Salah and Mane post better figures for Liverpool, Sterling for City. Son has a similar rate for Spurs, Hazard same as his time at Chelsea. Next best thing players like Rashford and Gnabry are starting to post strong figures.

You’ve misread the Giggs 85 mill comment. I said when Giggs was at his peak. Basically meaning if Giggs at his peak was around in 2013 he’d go for 85 million.
 

Rozay

Master of Hindsight
Joined
Oct 22, 2012
Messages
27,197
Location
...
Bales goal scoring is actually massively over rated as well. As a modern day inside forward/winger his goal stats are actually not that impressive. Obviously better than Giggsys but that’s a given. Which adds to the point, highlights reel player.

105 goals in 249 games is hardly superhuman and I don’t know why it’s used to elevate him. Salah and Mane post better figures for Liverpool, Sterling for City. Son has a similar rate for Spurs, Hazard same as his time at Chelsea. Next best thing players like Rashford and Gnabry are starting to post strong figures.

You’ve misread the Giggs 85 mill comment. I said when Giggs was at his peak. Basically meaning if Giggs at his peak was around in 2013 he’d go for 85 million.
I agree, it isn’t superhuman, and it is massively let down by the last two seasons which have been tumultuous.

As for the peak you speak of, what would you say was Giggs’ peak? It’s an interesting angle to bring into such conversation, because when United legends are discussed the best bits from various different phases are stuck together to make one player. Giggs was an up and down player - and whenever you feel his peak was, I strongly doubt it was as good as Bale’s peak, which had him as the best player in England and one of the best in the world.

It’s also interested you referenced Mané as doing much better than Bale. When I dared to suggest that he too was a better player than Giggs, impossible as that seems to be - it was met with similar ridicule. I think Giggs was a very good player, but I don’t think Woodhouse’s comments are too far from the truth.

If you stick together every high point over a period of 22 seasons and delete every low, you will be left with an all-time great. It’s misleading though, as if you paused it at any point over that period - you would get a very different player.
 

OrcaFat

Full Member
Joined
Jul 29, 2013
Messages
5,672
Bale at his best was extremely effective. I haven’t seen much of him over the last few years but what I have seen has been nothing particularly special apart from his goal in the champions league final.

Giggs had some average games for sure, but his best level was every bit as dazzling as Bale’s best.

Giggs was better as an all round player but Bale was a better finisher.

The real shame about Giggs is that by the time his end product was peaking, his top speed was reduced a bit by injuries (although he could still dribble through half a team when he felt like it). Bale pretty much had all his attributes maxed out at the same time for two years which was a thing to see.
 

Tom Cato

Godt nyttår!
Joined
Jan 3, 2019
Messages
7,582
Peak Gareth Bale was a different animal than Ryan Giggs. One of the very best players in the world the season he was sold. But for longevity you just can't compete with Giggs
 

Bebestation

Im a doctor btw, my IQ destroys yours
Joined
Oct 9, 2019
Messages
11,862
Bales goal scoring is actually massively over rated as well. As a modern day inside forward/winger his goal stats are actually not that impressive. Obviously better than Giggsys but that’s a given. Which adds to the point, highlights reel player.

105 goals in 249 games is hardly superhuman and I don’t know why it’s used to elevate him. Salah and Mane post better figures for Liverpool, Sterling for City. Son has a similar rate for Spurs, Hazard same as his time at Chelsea. Next best thing players like Rashford and Gnabry are starting to post strong figures.

You’ve misread the Giggs 85 mill comment. I said when Giggs was at his peak. Basically meaning if Giggs at his peak was around in 2013 he’d go for 85 million.
That's because Bales strongest position was never the RW though.

His strongest position had always either been on the left when he had pace (that's where he grew up starting) or Centrally like the way Wales play him. The RW seemed like place they just had to play him because of all the other players like Ronaldo & Benzema - not necessarily because it's getting the best out of Bale. If he was our Player we wouldn't have bought him and put him out on the right, only Real Madrid ever did that. It worked decent for them.

Also I just worked these stats out through (stat bunker) * not sure if accurate.

Giggs total stats - matches played 860, Goals 153, assists 180. Goals or assists per game - 0.387209

Bale total states - matches played - 491, Goals 180, assists 109. Goals or assits per game 0.58859

Bale was a defender as well, this includes his stats for Southampton & if I remember right maybe at the start of Spurs.

And to your previous post about Neymar Xavi etc being better than Bale - I wouldn't argue with that, but BBC & MSN had the same high quality to go out and compete with each other & not seem out of place- Giggs wouldn't be capable of reaching that for me.

Giggs to me was the epitome of consistency, always able to give us atleast an 8 out of 10 performance and he did that for many years too.
 

Ludens the Red

Full Member
Joined
Jul 27, 2009
Messages
17,485
Location
London
I agree, it isn’t superhuman, and it is massively let down by the last two seasons which have been tumultuous.

As for the peak you speak of, what would you say was Giggs’ peak? It’s an interesting angle to bring into such conversation, because when United legends are discussed the best bits from various different phases are stuck together to make one player. Giggs was an up and down player - and whenever you feel his peak was, I strongly doubt it was as good as Bale’s peak, which had him as the best player in England and one of the best in the world.

It’s also interested you referenced Mané as doing much better than Bale. When I dared to suggest that he too was a better player than Giggs, impossible as that seems to be - it was met with similar ridicule. I think Giggs was a very good player, but I don’t think Woodhouse’s comments are too far from the truth.

If you stick together every high point over a period of 22 seasons and delete every low, you will be left with an all-time great. It’s misleading though, as if you paused it at any point over that period - you would get a very different player.
Yeah I see what you mean about the peak argument but it's almost a direct result of the fact Giggs is so unique in that he played for so long and basically was about three different players during that period, using different skill sets every time. Giggs didn't have one season much better than another which Bale did. I'd say Giggs' peak was between 1994 and 1997 when he was that blistering silky winger.

I agree though that Bale's best ever season (last year at Spurs) was better than any individual year Giggs had. The difference between them though is that (in my opinion) every other Bale season wasn't anywhere near his last year at Spurs. His first year at Real Madrid was good but not anywhere near his one at Spurs, I think the goal in the CL final skewed the perception.
He wasn't even in the top three Real players for that season and since then his Real Madrid seasons have been either average, good to very good but nothing like the year at Spurs. Sky lost La Liga so I've not seen much of Bale the last two seasons but from what I've heard he's been pants. I think to suggest Gareth Bale was one of the best players in the world based on one outstanding season is stretching things.

Mane is a funny one, I think he's an excellent player and has a great output but again I think he benefits from the modern day tendency to firstly, make out everything now is better than it was before and the over reliance on stats to form an opinion (Woodhouse being the prefect example). Mane posts great goal scoring figures but when I watch Mane, I don't see a very elegant player. I mean is there anything Mane does which blows your mind? There's no beauty to his play, he's your classic modern day functional, machine like player. Lots of pace, hard working, direct but there's no wow factor which to me you must have as an attacker to be considered one of the greats.

Woodhouse' comments are laughable, maybe you haven't seen all of them but his overall view on Giggs and Scholes should be taken with a pinch of salt as he's clearly just wumming.
As for the bold, I think people will openly state and have done that Giggs wasn't amazing through those 22 seasons, he had some stinkers but it's the fact he would then come back reinvented and as an efficient player again. This is something Bale will not do. There are no signs of Bale reinventing himself.

That's because Bales strongest position was never the RW though.

His strongest position had always either been on the left when he had pace (that's where he grew up starting) or Centrally like the way Wales play him. The RW seemed like place they just had to play him because of all the other players like Ronaldo & Benzema - not necessarily because it's getting the best out of Bale. If he was our Player we wouldn't have bought him and put him out on the right, only Real Madrid ever did that. It worked decent for them.

Also I just worked these stats out through (stat bunker) * not sure if accurate.

Giggs total stats - matches played 860, Goals 153, assists 180. Goals or assists per game - 0.387209

Bale total states - matches played - 491, Goals 180, assists 109. Goals or assits per game 0.58859

Bale was a defender as well, this includes his stats for Southampton & if I remember right maybe at the start of Spurs.

And to your previous post about Neymar Xavi etc being better than Bale - I wouldn't argue with that, but BBC & MSN had the same high quality to go out and compete with each other & not seem out of place- Giggs wouldn't be capable of reaching that for me.

Giggs to me was the epitome of consistency, always able to give us atleast an 8 out of 10 performance and he did that for many years too.
I agree his best position was left wing but still Ronaldo and Bale switched wings plenty when they were playing together, Benzema the same. When you play for these type of teams you can't expect to be parked on the left wing all the time. He should have adapted his game and become more effective in the various roles, like I dunno, Ryan Giggs? Even Mane, who was originally a right winger had to adapt to Salah's arrival and was moved to the left. It isn't really a viable excuse.
To be fair Bale might have played about seven games at Spurs as a left back. He was basically injured his first few years and Harry brought him back in as a left winger.
 

Rozay

Master of Hindsight
Joined
Oct 22, 2012
Messages
27,197
Location
...
Giggs to me was the epitome of consistency, always able to give us atleast an 8 out of 10 performance and he did that for many years too.
I doubt even Giggs would summarise himself like that tbh. He was very much an inconsistent player. In the early 2000s in particular he was poor for quite a bit.


I found this picture the other day from before the 95’ FA Cup Final. Have a look at Brian Glanvile and Patrick Barclay’s words on Giggs from their columns. These are the type of things that nobody remembers when the curtain goes down. His career was far from a straight line of brilliance.

You should also beware that this was an era before football microanalysis. Before anyone was obsessed with stats (good old days) and United invariably won every week too. All that is left from that period are the records and the YouTube highlights of the best bits. When compared to current players, with twitter clips of bad touches shared, with 101 football shows dissecting etc - they stand no chance.

Statistically, Giggs had, in his prime, seasons comparable to these last two poor ones from Bale. In 99’ when we won the treble he scored 3 league goals in 24 games. 96/97 he scored 3 in 26, and 94/95 he scored 1 in 29. He also had some brilliant seasons in the 90s, and had some good 1 in 3 or 4 stats to back it up. I’m just saying that when people speak of longevity, it wasn’t 22 years of consistent quality at all.
 

Bebestation

Im a doctor btw, my IQ destroys yours
Joined
Oct 9, 2019
Messages
11,862
I doubt even Giggs would summarise himself like that tbh. He was very much an inconsistent player. In the early 2000s in particular he was poor for quite a bit.


I found this picture the other day from before the 95’ FA Cup Final. Have a look at Brian Glanvile and Patrick Barclay’s words on Giggs from their columns. These are the type of things that nobody remembers when the curtain goes down. His career was far from a straight line of brilliance.

You should also beware that this was an era before football microanalysis. Before anyone was obsessed with stats (good old days) and United invariably won every week too. All that is left from that period are the records and the YouTube highlights of the best bits. When compared to current players, with twitter clips of bad touches shared, with 101 football shows dissecting etc - they stand no chance.

Statistically, Giggs had, in his prime, seasons comparable to these last two poor ones from Bale. In 99’ when we won the treble he scored 3 league goals in 24 games. 96/97 he scored 3 in 26, and 94/95 he scored 1 in 29. He also had some brilliant seasons in the 90s, and had some good 1 in 3 or 4 stats to back it up. I’m just saying that when people speak of longevity, it wasn’t 22 years of consistent quality at all.
That's fair and I only say that because I think he was clearly a legend player for us because he was always picked by SAF yet seemed more part of an engine at times rather than the player we go for at decisive moments.

Giggs is coming 0.38 goals and assists per game vs Bales 0.58.

If I was a United fan vs Giggs or Bale in a Madrid team I will always feel Bale is scarier to play against any day of the week.
 

RyRoc

Full Member
Joined
Nov 20, 2012
Messages
1,120
Location
Kingston
Peak Gareth Bale was a different animal than Ryan Giggs. One of the very best players in the world the season he was sold. But for longevity you just can't compete with Giggs
Came in to say just this. IMO Giggs wasn't capable of having the season's Bale had between 2010-2012 - there was a genuine argument for him being the third best player in the world at that time which Giggs never came close to IMO. Giggs is a fantastic legend of Manchester United but there are quite a few players who have reached a higher top level than him over the period of say 24 months. Longevity wise he's obviously right up there with the very best but I think that's a different argument.
 

VeevaVee

The worst "V"
Scout
Joined
Jan 3, 2009
Messages
46,262
Location
Manchester
This is full on proof that stats, including good old goal scoring, tell you so little.

Side point - Bale managed to go to one of the biggest clubs in the world and almost become a nobody. He’s already forgotten, nevermind after he retires.
 

MrEleson

Full Member
Joined
Oct 25, 2014
Messages
2,530
Bale’s peak wasn’t even 2011-13 like most people are suggesting as decent as he was then. It was more like 2013-16 at Madrid. He was just unfortunate to be frequently interrupted by injury.

His first season in the capital was his most balanced and productive in terms of goals and assists with 22 goals & 18 assists from RW.

He wasn’t great in his 2nd season but he was one of Madrid’s best and most important players in 15/16 - especially in the 2nd half of the season during their quest for the CL and their late season push for the title under Zidane. He scored countless winning goals in this period and finished the season with 19 league goals in just 23 appearances.

He was one of the reasons Madrid finished only 1 point behind Barca by the end of that campaign after being adrift by double digit points around the time Rafa was terminated and Zidane took charge.

He then continued that form into 16/17 before being interrupted by injury in late 2016 that would rule him out for most of the season.
 
Last edited:

jackal&hyde

Full Member
Joined
Mar 20, 2018
Messages
4,220
I frankly find the comparison insulting. Bale was very good for a number of seasons mainly due to his physical attributes but Giggs was a generational talent like Best. In todays game a young Giggs would get you 30 goals a season no problem with much more limited defensive responsibilities compared to the 4-4-2 he used to play in.
 

cyberman

Full Member
Joined
May 26, 2010
Messages
37,331
This is full on proof that stats, including good old goal scoring, tell you so little.

Side point - Bale managed to go to one of the biggest clubs in the world and almost become a nobody. He’s already forgotten, nevermind after he retires.
Hes basically been retired since 28. Its ridiculous that this is even a question. A fairer question would be if Bale has wasted potential. He was late on the scene as a LB and early off it as a golfer.
People are saying longevity but compare a normal prime between 28 and 32 and Giggs still comes out on top.
 

youngrell

Full Member
Joined
Dec 6, 2016
Messages
3,592
Location
South Wales
Bale himself prefers to play RW of a front 3 so not sure why a few keep staying he’s played out of position. He also plays there for Wales on the whole.

He played more central under Coleman because of the 5-3-2 formation but even then he usually started right and drifted inside.
 

golden_blunder

Site admin. Manchester United fan
Staff
Joined
Jun 1, 2000
Messages
120,082
Location
Dublin, Ireland
Giggs

after seeing him for 20 years how a United fan would argue otherwise is beyond me

always quick to underrate our own players
 

OrcaFat

Full Member
Joined
Jul 29, 2013
Messages
5,672
For those saying Bale’s peak was better, I can understand why but I can’t agree. Giggs at his best was jaw dropping. Highlights reel of him in his early twenties would remind folk how astonishing he was at times. For whatever reason, Giggs never put together a whole season of form and fitness like Bale managed and I think that’s why there is any argument at all about who’s better. I think I would take Bale’s two best seasons over Giggs’ two best but overall Giggs was the better talent and better player by a decent margin.
 

Fortitude

TV/Monitor Expert
Scout
Joined
Jul 10, 2004
Messages
22,836
Location
Inside right
That would likely depend on the average age of the forum's members.
Not sure, tbh. Even if some of it might be recency bias, I do actually think some just regard Bale as the greater player.

Even here, if you removed all the United, Spurs and Liverpool votes from the poll here, it'd give a decent reflection, and it's close.
 

OrcaFat

Full Member
Joined
Jul 29, 2013
Messages
5,672
Not sure, tbh. Even if some of it might be recency bias, I do actually think some just regard Bale as the greater player.

Even here, if you removed all the United, Spurs and Liverpool votes from the poll here, it'd give a decent reflection, and it's close.
It would be a much closer result in the poll I’m sure.

Everyone has a different definition of “better“ and of “more talented” and everyone has some sort of bias.

I don’t have Football Manager for the right years but it would be interesting to compare their attributes as broken down and quantified by that game. It would still be subjective but fun.
 

Bobski

Full Member
Joined
Sep 5, 2017
Messages
9,962
For those saying Bale’s peak was better, I can understand why but I can’t agree. Giggs at his best was jaw dropping. Highlights reel of him in his early twenties would remind folk how astonishing he was at times. For whatever reason, Giggs never put together a whole season of form and fitness like Bale managed and I think that’s why there is any argument at all about who’s better. I think I would take Bale’s two best seasons over Giggs’ two best but overall Giggs was the better talent and better player by a decent margin.
This is actually one of the things that annoy about youtube compilation vids of player from before the late 00's. Tends to be all the same footage, goals and assists, when some of the best pieces of play from any attacker will often lead to neither. Would love for someone with access to all our CL games between 96-03 to put together a vid showcasing those less knows moments of brilliance, just concentrate on the games against Juve, Depor, Madrid 2000, Fiorentina alone and you would have a stunning highlight reel.
 

RedRonaldo

Wishes to be oppressed.
Joined
Aug 17, 2003
Messages
18,996
This video of Giggs is awesome:

I will always regarded Giggs as:
1. The most successful Man Utd player ever (13 league title, 2 CL, 7 domestic Cup, total 35 trophies won, trophy-wise he is up there with any GOAT)
2. the first true definition of wonderkid (at least for me)
3. The best dribbling wing wizard I've ever watched (Maradona/Messi isn't wing wizard)
4. Yoga master!
5. He bang his brother Mrs.
 

RedRonaldo

Wishes to be oppressed.
Joined
Aug 17, 2003
Messages
18,996
310 all competitions, as per Mrs Smoker's fine work. Most assist stats from the PL era only pick up around the turn of the millennium.
310? Should be all time record or something?
 

Scroto Baggins

Full Member
Joined
Jul 20, 2017
Messages
2,344
Supports
Newcastle Jets
Bale pretty much had all his attributes maxed out at the same time for two years which was a thing to see.
dumped all his free points into pace, crossing, strength and left foot shooting. Dribbling? Useless stat, Aggression? Pointless, just put more points in pace.
 

OrcaFat

Full Member
Joined
Jul 29, 2013
Messages
5,672
I will always regarded Giggs as:
1. The most successful Man Utd player ever (13 league title, 2 CL, 7 domestic Cup, total 35 trophies won, trophy-wise he is up there with any GOAT)
2. the first true definition of wonderkid (at least for me)
3. The best dribbling wing wizard I've ever watched (Maradona/Messi isn't wing wizard)
4. Yoga master!
5. He bang his brother Mrs.
Thanks for posting that vid.

Man, I’d give my left nut to have a young Giggs back in this team. It’s a sad fact that memory fades but to be reminded of a player like that is one of life’s pleasures. What a privilege it was to see him. The sight of that lad running with the ball is pretty much as good as it gets.
 

amolbhatia50k

Sneaky bum time - Vaccination status: dozed off
Joined
Nov 8, 2002
Messages
95,767
Location
india
Not sure, tbh. Even if some of it might be recency bias, I do actually think some just regard Bale as the greater player.
Well, Madrid fans themselves don't overly rate him. Of them here picked Giggs and said it was an easy choice.

Also, not sure why his thread refuses to die. Keeps getting bumped for no apparent reason.
 

Rozay

Master of Hindsight
Joined
Oct 22, 2012
Messages
27,197
Location
...
Thanks for posting that vid.

Man, I’d give my left nut to have a young Giggs back in this team. It’s a sad fact that memory fades but to be reminded of a player like that is one of life’s pleasures. What a privilege it was to see him. The sight of that lad running with the ball is pretty much as good as it gets.
I’d still pick Rashford over him if given the choice today.
 

Rajma

Full Member
Joined
Sep 8, 2012
Messages
8,580
Location
Lithuania
Don’t think it’s close call to be honest, Bale for me only had one good consistent season (final year at Spurs). For the rest of the time he was nothing special but his speed and power, I felt that at Real he was never a key player but for a couple of special moments.
 

OrcaFat

Full Member
Joined
Jul 29, 2013
Messages
5,672
I’d still pick Rashford over him if given the choice today.
Rashford is looking very good. I don’t think they would be competing for the same place in a Classic Fergie team - Rash would be one of the front two.

It would be fascinating to see what position a young Giggs would play if he came along now - possibly right side of a front three.

Going back to Rashford, he has a lot to do to get into Giggs’ league. In a “best” 11 since Fergie took charge, Giggs would be in and Rashford wouldn’t.
 

Rozay

Master of Hindsight
Joined
Oct 22, 2012
Messages
27,197
Location
...
Rashford is looking very good. I don’t think they would be competing for the same place in a Classic Fergie team - Rash would be one of the front two.

It would be fascinating to see what position a young Giggs would play if he came along now - possibly right side of a front three.

Going back to Rashford, he has a lot to do to get into Giggs’ league. In a “best” 11 since Fergie took charge, Giggs would be in and Rashford wouldn’t.
Well, you said you would like Giggs back in ‘this team’, and I imagine LW would be his most favoured role. We don’t play a 433.

And I would be highly disappointed if Rashford doesn’t become a better player than Giggs. I think it is well known that Giggs has more natural ability than most players over the past few decades - but the caf doesn’t put things down to touch, technique and talent when it suits their argument, but it is always what is implicitly used regarding Giggs to say he was a ‘better player’ than others. Rashford should be aiming to put himself in a bracket of the best few players/forward in world football for a large part of his career. Given that isn’t where Giggs spent his, I am hoping Rashford will surpass him.

And Giggs wouldn’t be in the best XI you described for me. I’d have Ronaldo on the left and Beckham on the right. Rashford wouldn’t be in it either of course.
 

Bebestation

Im a doctor btw, my IQ destroys yours
Joined
Oct 9, 2019
Messages
11,862
Giggs at Real Madrid would be nothing like his United career. Bale took a harder route going abroad to a club that shows literally 0 long term affection to their players or managers - nor particularly is great at planning anything out, just has the name of Real Madrid to always help them get players like the Ronaldos and the best players to win a CL title when they desire. Giggs would have deteriorated through a couple years at Real madrid and him being able to make a pass wouldn't make a difference to that club or fans.

"To win four, to go to Real Madrid, and be so successful, he's got to be [the best]," said Wales manager Giggs. Calls him the best Welsh Player.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.bbc.co.uk/sport/amp/football/44268013
 

lsd

The Oracle
Joined
Jun 5, 2016
Messages
10,866
You cannot compares players stats in different teams . Giggs played in a team full of superstars there is no way his stats could match up to a guy who was his teams best player by far like Bale was at Spurs .

Giggs wasn't taking every set piece so how could his assists match up to someone who did take all their teams set pieces.
 

cyberman

Full Member
Joined
May 26, 2010
Messages
37,331
Giggs at Real Madrid would be nothing like his United career. Bale took a harder route going abroad to a club that shows literally 0 long term affection to their players or managers - nor particularly is great at planning anything out, just has the name of Real Madrid to always help them get players like the Ronaldos and the best players to win a CL title when they desire. Giggs would have deteriorated through a couple years at Real madrid and him being able to make a pass wouldn't make a difference to that club or fans.

"To win four, to go to Real Madrid, and be so successful, he's got to be [the best]," said Wales manager Giggs. Calls him the best Welsh Player.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.bbc.co.uk/sport/amp/football/44268013
Bale may have won 4 CL but he was the odd man out for 2 of them. I dont see whats so hard about sitting on their bench and being happy to do so
 

Bobski

Full Member
Joined
Sep 5, 2017
Messages
9,962
You cannot compares players stats in different teams . Giggs played in a team full of superstars there is no way his stats could match up to a guy who was his teams best player by far like Bale was at Spurs .

Giggs wasn't taking every set piece so how could his assists match up to someone who did take all their teams set pieces.

Seen a fair bit of understatement of Giggs assist total in this thread and by Woodhouse in the comments that brought it back to activity. Mrs Smoker has it at 310, though I think that includes pens won, so it might be a handful lower given different interpretations. Here is a vid that has him at 125 by 2001.


Many of his most prolific assist years would come after that point. Generally don't like leaning on stats, takes away from the artistry of the game to reduce it to pure numbers but Giggs numbers are still highly impressive, over a 20 year career, with numerous ups and downs he managed a little below a goal or assist every other game.

Here is the Mrs Smoker thread for anyone who is interested, fantastic work,

Manchester United Goals and Assists (1987/88-today) | RedCafe.net
 

Rozay

Master of Hindsight
Joined
Oct 22, 2012
Messages
27,197
Location
...
You cannot compares players stats in different teams . Giggs played in a team full of superstars there is no way his stats could match up to a guy who was his teams best player by far like Bale was at Spurs .

Giggs wasn't taking every set piece so how could his assists match up to someone who did take all their teams set pieces.
I think Real Madrid had a few other useful players tbh.
 

Grande

Full Member
Joined
Jun 22, 2007
Messages
6,339
Location
The Land of Do-What-You-Will
Came in to say just this. IMO Giggs wasn't capable of having the season's Bale had between 2010-2012 - there was a genuine argument for him being the third best player in the world at that time which Giggs never came close to IMO. Giggs is a fantastic legend of Manchester United but there are quite a few players who have reached a higher top level than him over the period of say 24 months. Longevity wise he's obviously right up there with the very best but I think that's a different argument.
The Ballon d’Or kinda backs up your arguments on top level consistency vs longevity: Giggs were if I’m not mistaken nominated eight times, with placements of 9th, 28th, 21st, 28th, 30th and 14th spread over a fifteen year period, while Bale was there five times in six years, 10th, 12th, 15th, 6th and 17th.

You could add that Giggs were not helped by the facts that his first brilliant period 93-97, English football was slowly dragging itself out of the shadow of European expulsion. He also was the kind of defensively tasked attacker that often makes you less appreciated by the journalists and more appreciated by fellow players and coaches (he was like for like compared to Figo by several players and coaches at the time, I remember from a roumd up of interviews. Ferguson also singled him and Scholes out as the two United players most worthy of a Ballon d’Or ever, apart from the four who got it - loyalty bonus no doubt, but also a quality tribute).

Bale were helped by the fact that his best period came as one of two main attackers in a team that won three CLs, and that he was there when Wales had its one appearance in a International Champiinship finals. It’s to his credit too, but I think it’s fair to say he got a disproportionate amount of positive attention from it.

For my money, Giggs at his best was top ten in the world for several seasons, and at his second best was a brilliant player for more seasons than not. Some forget his weak spells in-between injuries, some overplay them in my view.. I’ll take Giggs over Bale at their peaks, just from looking at how they played.
 

RedRonaldo

Wishes to be oppressed.
Joined
Aug 17, 2003
Messages
18,996
Seen a fair bit of understatement of Giggs assist total in this thread and by Woodhouse in the comments that brought it back to activity. Mrs Smoker has it at 310, though I think that includes pens won, so it might be a handful lower given different interpretations. Here is a vid that has him at 125 by 2001.


Many of his most prolific assist years would come after that point. Generally don't like leaning on stats, takes away from the artistry of the game to reduce it to pure numbers but Giggs numbers are still highly impressive, over a 20 year career, with numerous ups and downs he managed a little below a goal or assist every other game.

Here is the Mrs Smoker thread for anyone who is interested, fantastic work,

Manchester United Goals and Assists (1987/88-today) | RedCafe.net
If 310 assist figure is true, then Giggs probably has one of the highest no. of assist of all time?
Officially Messi is on 289 assist, which I think is currently the highest. Maradona I heard has around 300 assists too (or more?), but there’s no official record back then.