Keir Starmer Labour Leader

UnrelatedPsuedo

I pity the poor fool who stinks like I do!
Joined
Apr 15, 2015
Messages
10,547
Location
Blitztown
it's been denied in the same way US police denies this shit "chocking is definitely not a tactic or policy"
My principle point is how that falls under Anti Semitic conspiracy theory.

Why is it not just stupidity?

I assume it’s probably a Political Marker. That they were waiting for an example case.

It just seems really silly. If you tell me that Israeli Police are evil, that’s not a comment with foundations in race. Or, way closer to the mark “Israeli Police protect their pensions at all costs” that’s still not racist but at least it could be interpreted as such.

I don’t much care. But the last couple of years since returning to England I’ve put a magnifying glass on Politics and some shit just doesn’t seem right headed. I’d like to understand.
 

neverdie

Full Member
Joined
Oct 26, 2018
Messages
2,422
I assume it’s probably a Political Marker. That they were waiting for an example case.
This is exactly what this was. Starmer just picked anti-semitism as the best issue to oust her on. It's really a signal that Labour are returning entirely to New Labour.
 

2mufc0

Everything is fair game in capitalism!
Joined
Jan 8, 2014
Messages
17,098
Supports
Dragon of Dojima
I know how sensitive this is, and appreciate that it’s proven to be wrong... but that’s not anti Semitic. Surely? Stupid and wrong, but not racist.

The Israeli Police are not a race.

It’s probably not worth a pedantic rake over of all that went before. But that’s a really weird angle and conclusion and I know very little about her.
Haven't read the article RBL posted, but Amnesty did a piece on US police being trained in Israel.
 

Drifter

American
Joined
Jan 27, 2004
Messages
68,432
So basically ,don't say anything about Jews because it is antisemitic.And support a right wing party in Israel.
 

berbatrick

Renaissance Man
Scout
Joined
Oct 22, 2010
Messages
21,922
An article about police which had one line about training in Israel, linking to an Amnesty report, is more anti-semitic than putting up the state of a Nazi supporter.

Reminds me of Tablet, a publication and writer that has given Ilhan Omar and Jeremy Corbyn the dreaded label, charactersing the pogroms of Stepan Bandera as not "fundamentally anti-semitic".

A big Corbyn weakness was just being weak - unwillingness to purge.
 

Smores

Full Member
Joined
May 18, 2011
Messages
25,659
She clearly didn't do anything wrong here but she's shit anyway and this is great optics which is why it's been done.

It would probably be reasonable to draw concern about culling the left but I'll wait for his policies first before i condemn him.
 

BobbyManc

Full Member
Joined
Aug 2, 2012
Messages
7,750
Location
The Wall
Supports
Man City
Terrible decision but hardly a shock. Clearly an ideological decision, not one of principle. Starmer won’t say if Jenrick should go but he swiftly axes Bailey for retweeting that article. I thought it was Corbyn’s problem that he was a Trotskyist intent on purging all his impure enemies?
 

F-Red

Full Member
Joined
Nov 15, 2008
Messages
11,006
Location
Cheshire
I can't see what other decision he should have made? He can't stand there and condemn anti-semitism and let something like this slide, completely undermines what he's trying to achieve.

At least he's showing some form of leadership on the issue, something Corbyn never managed to do.
 

Mogget

Full Member
Joined
Nov 27, 2013
Messages
6,569
Supports
Arsenal
He's allowing himself to bend toward the will of the right wing British media, who are ironically anti semitic (Miliband headlines?).
This is my reading of it. Let's be honest, Labour is never going to be re-elected in this country unless it moves sharply to the right.
 

Dobba

Full Member
Joined
Nov 10, 2006
Messages
28,797
Location
"You and your paper can feck off."
I can't see what other decision he should have made? He can't stand there and condemn anti-semitism and let something like this slide, completely undermines what he's trying to achieve.

At least he's showing some form of leadership on the issue, something Corbyn never managed to do.
Rachel Reeves has been on the BBC representing his party on the subject of education for weeks.

Maybe she'd have been given the same treatment if she'd retweeted someone praising Nancy Astor rather than doing it herself.
 

jeff_goldblum

Full Member
Joined
Dec 6, 2011
Messages
3,917
It's a pathetic decision which underlines what we already knew - many in the Labour establishment don't give a shit about antisemitism beyond how they can exploit it for political capital.
 

Smores

Full Member
Joined
May 18, 2011
Messages
25,659
I can't see what other decision he should have made? He can't stand there and condemn anti-semitism and let something like this slide, completely undermines what he's trying to achieve.

At least he's showing some form of leadership on the issue, something Corbyn never managed to do.
So you actually think that's anti-semitic?
 

Mogget

Full Member
Joined
Nov 27, 2013
Messages
6,569
Supports
Arsenal
It's a pathetic decision which underlines what we already knew - many in the Labour establishment don't give a shit about antisemitism beyond how they can exploit it for political capital.
The tories and media didn't give a shit about antisemitism either, until it became a useful stick to beat Labour with. This is a countrywide problem, not just one party's issue.
 

F-Red

Full Member
Joined
Nov 15, 2008
Messages
11,006
Location
Cheshire
So you actually think that's anti-semitic?
I think if you read the article it's certainly implying a theory that there is a connection between a death from the police, and Israel influencing that death. This decision, hasn't been made on just this article alone clearly. This was simply enough to give cause and to clear out.

As some said, she's no real loss as a front bench politician.
 

Smores

Full Member
Joined
May 18, 2011
Messages
25,659
I think if you read the article it's certainly implying a theory that there is a connection between a death from the police, and Israel influencing that death. This decision, hasn't been made on just this article alone clearly. This was simply enough to give cause and to clear out.

As some said, she's no real loss as a front bench politician.
She isn't a loss but I'm still failing to see why you'd think it was anti-semitic rather than anti-israel. I don't even think it's anti-israel to be fair as the main point it's calling out is they're using secret service techniques from a country with a poor human rights record. If they'd been trained by Russians i don't think anyone would question the reference as hostile.

I'm not familiar with the author of that article so perhaps there's something there but not that article itself.

Is the independent anti-semitic now?
 

Kentonio

Full Member
Scout
Joined
Dec 16, 2013
Messages
13,188
Location
Stamford Bridge
Supports
Chelsea
I can't see what other decision he should have made? He can't stand there and condemn anti-semitism and let something like this slide, completely undermines what he's trying to achieve.

At least he's showing some form of leadership on the issue, something Corbyn never managed to do.
No, apparently he's supposed to do exactly like Corbyn and virtue signal at all times regardless of whether it leads to the worst electoral kicking in party history or not.
 

Kentonio

Full Member
Scout
Joined
Dec 16, 2013
Messages
13,188
Location
Stamford Bridge
Supports
Chelsea
She isn't a loss but I'm still failing to see why you'd think it was anti-semitic rather than anti-israel. I don't even think it's anti-israel to be fair as the main point it's calling out is they're using secret service techniques from a country with a poor human rights record. If they'd been trained by Russians i don't think anyone would question the reference as hostile.

I'm not familiar with the author of that article so perhaps there's something there but not that article itself.
To be honest I'm more interested in why the supposed party of the UK's working class seems to spend more time talking about a foreign country in the middle east than it does about the needs of its own core supporters. Israel does plenty of things wrong, but so do dozens of other countries around the world. So why is it this constant Israel focus from a party that claims not to harbour anti-semitics?
 

Mogget

Full Member
Joined
Nov 27, 2013
Messages
6,569
Supports
Arsenal
these feckers were railing on milliband for being a jewish revolutionary
It's also not antisemitic to draw cartoons of him with a hooked nose because.. reasons.

And lets not forget their obsession with him eating a bacon sandwich.
 

Kentonio

Full Member
Scout
Joined
Dec 16, 2013
Messages
13,188
Location
Stamford Bridge
Supports
Chelsea
Just need to include more sarcastic comments about being 'woke' and you'll be all set.
It's funny, I'm a hardcore socialist from a northern ex-mining village who was a big fan of Corbyn's original policies, and you lot even manage to make me come across like a Tory.
 

F-Red

Full Member
Joined
Nov 15, 2008
Messages
11,006
Location
Cheshire
She isn't a loss but I'm still failing to see why you'd think it was anti-semitic rather than anti-israel. I don't even think it's anti-israel to be fair as the main point it's calling out is they're using secret service techniques from a country with a poor human rights record. If they'd been trained by Russians i don't think anyone would question the reference as hostile.

I'm not familiar with the author of that article so perhaps there's something there but not that article itself.
It's not even accurate, it's a conspiracy theory at best. To try to connect the actions that resulted of the death of George Floyd is due to Israeli police training techniques is sly anti-semitism, the death had no relevance to Israel - so why mention it? RLB has had issues when pressed in the past on anti-semitism and her position with Corbyn at Jewish hustings in February. The article isn't the main reason and shouldn't be looked in isolation, i think it's a contribution of a number of issues, and this was the last straw.
 

Silva

Full Member
Joined
Apr 2, 2010
Messages
30,756
Location
Smoke crack like Isaac Asimov
To be honest I'm more interested in why the supposed party of the UK's working class seems to spend more time talking about a foreign country in the middle east than it does about the needs of its own core supporters. Israel does plenty of things wrong, but so do dozens of other countries around the world. So why is it this constant Israel focus from a party that claims not to harbour anti-semitics?
yeah, it's definitely this, not the lack of scandal when someone criticises SA's humans rights abuses, chinas, russias etc.
 

Silva

Full Member
Joined
Apr 2, 2010
Messages
30,756
Location
Smoke crack like Isaac Asimov
It's not even accurate, it's a conspiracy theory at best. To try to connect the actions that resulted of the death of George Floyd is due to Israeli police training techniques is sly anti-semitism, the death had no relevance to Israel - so why mention it? RLB has had issues when pressed in the past on anti-semitism and her position with Corbyn at Jewish hustings in February. The article isn't the main reason and shouldn't be looked in isolation, i think it's a contribution of a number of issues, and this was the last straw.
this was the first excuse not the last straw, the labour party is clearly and willingly purging all aspects of the left in the trot hunt pt.2 and it's going to backfire as it will allow the greens and the lib dems to peel off enough voters that they can't form a majority