Jadon Sancho| Staying at Dortmund for now

Status
Not open for further replies.

jackal&hyde

Full Member
Joined
Mar 20, 2018
Messages
4,220
95 Mil. € (I believe in two? installments)+ performance based addons, that were largely very easy to meet (league+CL appearances)+a sell on participation.
Also a clause that has Barca pay out the performance bonuses in case he leaves before the end of his initial contract. Which makes the takes that United are threatening Dortmund with the signing of Dembele a bit amusing.
Out of interest, where do you get this info from?
 

Varun

Moderator
Staff
Joined
Mar 16, 2011
Messages
46,780
Location
Mumbai
So you truly believe that if United offered them a deal equalling €120m in a structured format that they like, they're going to reject it??
Erm, yes? They could accept it ofcourse but hardly outlandish to believe there's no chance they reject. He's a critical part of that team and how they do this season depends quite a bit on his performance. Money can't play football so if they feel it's too late to get a replacement in, they'll hold on. It'll hardly be a shock.
 

Woodenlung

Full Member
Joined
Jun 3, 2013
Messages
2,463
We won't be in the Champions League next season so this was really the only chance we had to sign Sancho. Glazer's and Woodward have screwed the club over again.
 

ElMatador

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Jun 23, 2020
Messages
37
Supports
Zagreb
Guys im a Dortmund fan, at the moment, this squad has a massive talent and depth, but a very bad coach. With a top coach, this team would challenge for every trophy this season, for sure..
But with Favre its a waste of this team unfortunately.
In this situation, i wouldnt mind Sancho go, but that is not happening for sure, there are many reasons for that.
Firat its the worst time to sell now because you want get the mlst you can get, they will get that next summer, next summer he will have 2 years left on his contract and it will def be more that 120M, 99% sure.
Next, that deal is dead from 10th August, its still alive only in England, because they have to write about something, United is so massive, stories about them sell and Sancho is a hot story at the moment..
But believe me if this is true, Kicker, Bild and other German newspaper would write about this also..
3th of all, Dortmund would not sell so late in the window, there are few reasons for that, the FO would lose all credibility, fans would go mad as hell and second they would have to go in some panic shopping, because losing Sancho would be big for their ambitions..
To be honest, this word ambition is so funny when your coach is Lucien Favre...
 

VP89

Pogba's biggest fan
Joined
Dec 6, 2015
Messages
31,673
Erm, yes? They could accept it ofcourse but hardly outlandish to believe there's no chance they reject. He's a critical part of that team and how they do this season depends quite a bit on his performance. Money can't play football so if they feel it's too late to get a replacement in, they'll hold on. It'll hardly be a shock.
I think If 120m came in the structure they want, they take it and run.
 

sammsky1

Pochettino's #1 fan
Joined
Feb 10, 2008
Messages
32,841
Location
London
Who and when?
Of course it's a strategy. United have been pleading poverty all window, you think them slapping £100m on Dortmunds table the first week of the window would have been a good move? What do you think every club in the world would say after that? You think they'd just sell us players for €40m?
Clubs are always looking to sell desperately in the last week, we have the cash to take advantage of that.
Just because you couldn't go out and get yourself a Sancho number 7 shirt in the first week of the window doesn't mean we're inept at doing business.
Its truly baffling that so many fans don't understand this, and then act out because they feel a tiny bit inconvenienced!
 

Womp

idiot
Joined
Jun 23, 2013
Messages
9,262
Location
Australia
Lack of movement on anyone else is as good a guess as anyone`s but we all know Utd traditionally only make 3 summer buys nowadays and it looks like 2 more will come in anyway(LB and RW) so nothing particularly out of the ordinary will/is happening there and there is also a feck tonne of reasons as to why "briefing" that this deal is dead benefits them way more than you think which you can go back to the post I replied to you to and its not at all a baffling obsession but a norm and standard procedure and unless you have actual evidence that we`ve ever pulled off such a PR show for THIS long on a key target for such a big saga you simply can`t claim to be right more evidence in the past which supports my view rather than yours which has NEVER been pulled off by Utd.
The player doesn`t need to publicly pull a hiffy on wanting a transfer till whoever is interested in him actually steps up their pursuit its pointless especially cause Sancho is a better professional than Auba/Dembele. If Utd offer 120m cold cash and it STILL gets rejected we`ll then come back here and discuss how right you are but as it stands thats the asking price and if Utd CAN pay it. A "we tried offer" is when Madrid offerd 27m+James for Pogba 100m euros for Sancho in a pandemic is not a "we tried offer" thats a statement of intent and there is still more legs left to this than you think as cynical as you seem to be
The lack of movement into the last few days of the window is signs of incompetency and/or intent. It wasn't briefed because it wouldn't have been welcomed, it also wasn't briefed because the club does not fecking brief every fecking financial decision they make.

Briefing that the deal is dead 1. provides clarity, which would cause fans to be twice as upset if they aren't pursuing another target of similar quality, which I also don't think they want to do. 2. Is admitting to the fans, shareholders etc. that they openly could not get their primary target, as opposed to letting it play it's course, so they can easily play the 'Dortmund didn't budge' card. 3. Simply put, it would piss off a lot of fans who are already extremely on edge. 4. They won't brief because it's added exposure for them, increased revenue. They have publicly admitted how much they value the exposure and intrigue generated by being linked to high profile players. 5. The longer it drags on, inevitably, the less people begin to give a shit/lose hope. Distractions with the season etc. would idealistically (in their heads), make the downfall a lot easier. 6. If they let it continue boiling, they can use this as justification as to why other deals weren't done.

Also, your second point is a strawman argument. I never once said this was a PR stunt. I of course genuinely believe United want to sign Sancho. I also genuinely believe we pursued/are pursuing Sancho. What I don't believe is that we will pay anywhere near the amount required for Sancho, that's if Dortmund would even be willing to sell any more. They've lost one of their other first team wide players in Hazard for a considerable amount of time and the longer this drags on, the less time they have to get a replacement in, that's without even beginning to account for potential quarantines, time to get integrated into the team etc. Let's not also forget the consistent insistence to the media, both by their board, their players and their media mouthpieces that they won't let him go. Nothing like constant reminders to their fans that they have no intention of letting a player go, only for them to tell em all to get fecked as they supposedly let him go in the next few days. That being said, here are some examples of major targets we spent the majority of the window pursuing to miss out on: Vidal, Thiago, Fabregas(?), Hazard, Griezmann, Dybala - some names off the top of my head in recent memory.

Sancho being a professional has nothing to do with it. I'm glad he is. It's also even more of a reason as to why this will not happen. He is happy to stay and will stay. Once again, justifying my reasoning that it is no way comparable to Auba or Dembele scenarios.

I do believe United can pay it, easily. Where we disagree is on the possibility of them doing so. I don't believe they will. Also no, 100m for Sancho in a pandemic environment is a 'we tried' offer, as you don't spend the good part of 3 months being told what you would need to offer for a player, to delay and stall for the whole window, only to offer considerably less than said amount 4 days before the window opens, making it even more difficult for the selling club to accept due to time constraints. They knew full well that offer was going to be rejected, they ain't idiots.
 

jackal&hyde

Full Member
Joined
Mar 20, 2018
Messages
4,220
Football leaks, via Spiegel, released the details of the contract.
Thanks! Then 90 some mil upfront plus add ons seems like a reasonable fee. If they reject that, it's as well as not wanting to sell as no club in Europe would pay 120mil upfront in this environment.
 

VP89

Pogba's biggest fan
Joined
Dec 6, 2015
Messages
31,673
I wonder if we will get a flurry of briefs in the evening again, once details of another day of talks release.

Although I have a feeling we wont make a second bid before tomorrow for some reason.
 

Chief123

Full Member
Joined
Dec 27, 2013
Messages
12,787
Erm, yes? They could accept it ofcourse but hardly outlandish to believe there's no chance they reject. He's a critical part of that team and how they do this season depends quite a bit on his performance. Money can't play football so if they feel it's too late to get a replacement in, they'll hold on. It'll hardly be a shock.
I have to strongly disagree with you here. I’ll explain why.

50 days ago Dortmund were happy to accept 120m euro guaranteed payments. I don’t see why they would refuse it now. Yes it’s inconvenient as they are running out of time to find a replacement.

But lets say Utd did offer 120m euro at the beginning of August before their "deadline". They would just have lost their best player. There is absolutely no way Dortmund would have replaced Sancho with a player of equal ability for the coming season. They were always going to bring a youngster through or sign a young potential talent to develop. So whether we paid back then or now, Dortmund were always going to be weakened as a football team which would decrease their ability to win a trophy. They know themselves it's incredibly unlikely they'll challenge for Bundesliga or UCL with or without Sancho. I don't accept this notion that they won't sell now because they can't "replace" him. Any replacement was never going to be as good as Sancho. They were always going to spend only a fraction of the Sancho money to bring someone in which they still can, even within a couple of days. A £30-40m bid for Sarr would be easy to do in short notice. Dortmund's end game was never to challenge for honours.
 

MDFC Manager

Full Member
Joined
Dec 26, 2005
Messages
24,311
Lads I think this is over for now. We go again next summer. Everything else is just our club trying to show we tried until the end
 

sammsky1

Pochettino's #1 fan
Joined
Feb 10, 2008
Messages
32,841
Location
London
It’s up to Sancho now to agitate for a move if he really wants it. If not, the rumours of us discussing a deal for Dembele is welcome news, as it legitimately shows Dortmund we have other options. For the first time in this saga, it seems like we’re controlling the narrative and not looking completely inept.
Yes! We have perfectly set up our brinkmanship position. But if its to work, we have to genuinely be prepared to go through with it. But I think BVB will blink first, probably at the weekend.

I wouldn't mind of we went through with the Dembele loan option. The kid has genuine talent, he'd come with a massive point to prove, and as he would be rotated with Greenwood on the right, we could even absorb some of his niggly injuries.
 

sewey89

Incorrectly predicted the de Jong transfer 2022
Joined
Jun 15, 2011
Messages
10,683
Location
Chesterfield
I wonder if we will get a flurry of briefs in the evening again, once details of another day of talks release.

Although I have a feeling we wont make a second bid before tomorrow for some reason.
I feel the same. And I have absolutely nothing to back it up :lol:
 

ElMatador

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Jun 23, 2020
Messages
37
Supports
Zagreb
So why have Dortmund now changed their tune from not for sale to not for sale at anything less than our asking price?
Where did you read that if you can tell me please?
Sure not from german media..
 

Synco

Lucio's #1 Fan
Joined
Jul 19, 2014
Messages
6,459
I did, according to a German newspaper it seems. The same German newspapers that have said its been off for a long time and that Dortmunds 10th August deadline was firm...

Yet Dortmund themselves have reportedly said we won't accept anything except the price we've told United we want. So who's lying? Dortmund or the papers?
So why have Dortmund now changed their tune from not for sale to not for sale at anything less than our asking price?
Dortmund haven't change their tune, they always stated the same before and after August 10th. Same for the local press close to the club. It's (mainly) British & online journos claiming Dortmund counteracted their own stance off the record, which is a difference. You can of course choose to believe these reports, but there's been no contradiction in Dortmund's statements throughout the 'saga'.
 

sammsky1

Pochettino's #1 fan
Joined
Feb 10, 2008
Messages
32,841
Location
London
We will see in the next couple of days won't we?

People love to bash the club for anything and everything at the moment but you don't see people giving themselves a hard time when they nip to the off licence for a couple of beers and a reduced sandwich 5 minutes before it shuts. You don't see people jumping on Twitter and calling themselves inept because they didn't do it yesterday.
:lol: :lol: :lol: One of the best sentences written in this entire thread!
 

Posh Red

Full Member
Joined
Jul 4, 2013
Messages
3,479
Location
Peterborough, England
Dortmund haven't change their tune, they always stated the same before and after August 10th. Same for the local press close to the club. It's (mainly) British & online journos claiming Dortmund counteracted their own stance off the record, which is a difference. You can of course choose to believe these reports, but there's been no contradiction in Dortmund's statements so far.
So you think the Sky Journo who has been hanging round Dortmund the last few days is lying?
 

RedDevil@84

Full Member
Joined
Jun 5, 2014
Messages
21,733
Location
USA
If Utd offer 120m euro as guaranteed payments and Dortmund reject it, then I have absolutely no issues with Utd walking away from the deal
Which we could have done much earlier and looked for other options if we were walking away. Leaving it to the last minute is plain stupidity when we have a position to be filled.
 

glazed

Eats diamonds to beat thermodynamics
Joined
Sep 30, 2012
Messages
7,703
Its truly baffling that so many muppets don't understand this, and then act out because they feel a tiny bit inconvenienced!
Fixed that for you :angel:
I reckon most fans just take a view at the end of the window.
 

Brophs

The One and Only
Joined
Nov 28, 2006
Messages
50,466
This thread has degenerated into a massive sweaty circle of naked men, each dead-eyed and dejectedly masturbating the flaccid penis of the gently sobbing bloke to his right, while repeating the mantra "You love to see it".
 

Synco

Lucio's #1 Fan
Joined
Jul 19, 2014
Messages
6,459
So you think the Sky Journo who has been hanging round Dortmund the last few days is lying?
I don't know. I just say there are no confirmed facts, and the reports contradict. What to make of it is anyone's guess.
 

saivet

Full Member
Joined
Feb 22, 2013
Messages
25,347
If Utd offer 120m euro as guaranteed payments and Dortmund reject it, then I have absolutely no issues with Utd walking away from the deal. I would be gutted but I’d have no issues with the board trying.

I’d be incredibly shocked if Dortmund do turn down a guaranteed 120m euro deal though. Which is why I’ve always believed we will bid the asking price which will be accepted.
You'd have no issues with the board waiting until the final week of the transfer window? It's fine to walk away from the deal but to let this drag on for so long seems crazy. We've potentially left ourselves with just a few days to sort out any alternative deals.
 

sammsky1

Pochettino's #1 fan
Joined
Feb 10, 2008
Messages
32,841
Location
London
This thread has degenerated into a massive sweaty circle of naked men, each dead-eyed and dejectedly masturbating the flaccid penis of the gently sobbing bloke to his right, while repeating the mantra "You love to see it".
:lol: :lol:
 

Womp

idiot
Joined
Jun 23, 2013
Messages
9,262
Location
Australia
Well he wouldn't just be wrong. He would be flat out lying. He is stood there on camera saying he has spoken with people at the club.
He may have done. Doesn't mean 1. they told him the correct information or 2. the people he spoke to have any credibility when it comes to our pursuit of Sancho.
 

Macern

Pee pee pants
Joined
May 11, 2014
Messages
13,538
Location
Oslo, Norway
I have to strongly disagree with you here. I’ll explain why.

50 days ago Dortmund were happy to accept 120m euro guaranteed payments. I don’t see why they would refuse it now. Yes it’s inconvenient as they are running out of time to find a replacement.

But lets say Utd did offer 120m euro at the beginning of August before their "deadline". They would just have lost their best player. There is absolutely no way Dortmund would have replaced Sancho with a player of equal ability for the coming season. They were always going to bring a youngster through or sign a young potential talent to develop. So whether we paid back then or now, Dortmund were always going to be weakened as a football team which would decrease their ability to win a trophy. They know themselves it's incredibly unlikely they'll challenge for Bundesliga or UCL with or without Sancho. I don't accept this notion that they won't sell now because they can't "replace" him. Any replacement was never going to be as good as Sancho. They were always going to spend only a fraction of the Sancho money to bring someone in which they still can, even within a couple of days. A £30-40m bid for Sarr would be easy to do in short notice. Dortmund's end game was never to challenge for honours.
The problem is whoever they want as replacement for Sancho will probably be a lot more expensive or perhaps unobtainable at this stage. They'd also lose all credibility and the fans would rage if they sell him now after being very clear about not selling him after 10th of August. I mean, why would they insist on not selling him after the deadline if their stance always was that 120m would be sufficient regardless of when. Why not just keep their mouth shut after the 10th of August instead of telling everyone on Twitter and even getting all their players to express how happy they are that he's staying for another year.

It just doesn't make sense that they'll accept a 120m bid now after the way they reacted after the 10th of August deadline. It also doesn't seem likely that United will pay what BvB demand which is 120m up front without installments. For me it seems like there's about 5% chance of it happening.
 

saivet

Full Member
Joined
Feb 22, 2013
Messages
25,347
The problem is whoever they want as replacement for Sancho will probably be a lot more expensive or perhaps unobtainable at this stage. They'd also lose all credibility and the fans would rage if they sell him now after being very clear about not selling him after 10th of August. I mean, why would they insist on not selling him after the deadline if their stance always was that 120m would be sufficient regardless of when. Why not just keep their mouth shut after the 10th of August instead of telling everyone on Twitter and even getting all their players to express how happy they are that he's staying for another year.

It just doesn't make sense that they'll accept a 120m bid now after the way they reacted after the 10th of August deadline. It also doesn't seem likely that United will pay what BvB demand which is 120m up front without installments. For me it seems like there's about 5% chance of it happening.
Agree with this. The only thing I would say is they seem like they are fine with guaranteed instalments but aren't interested in potential bonuses that United want to include.
 

DevilsOwn

Full Member
Joined
Jun 27, 2005
Messages
1,418
Location
Maxiumum City
95 Mil. € (I believe in two? installments)+ performance based addons, that were largely very easy to meet (league+CL appearances)+a sell on participation.
95 Mil. € (I believe in two? installments)+ performance based addons, that were largely very easy to meet (league+CL appearances)+a sell on participation.
Thanks guys.

Was wondering whether structured payments work with Dortmund, contrary to their claims of 120M upfront or nothing.

Just hoping our next "bid" is of 90+20 and we close this before the weekend rolls in
 

Posh Red

Full Member
Joined
Jul 4, 2013
Messages
3,479
Location
Peterborough, England
He may have done. Doesn't mean 1. they told him the correct information or 2. the people he spoke to have any credibility when it comes to our pursuit of Sancho.
But the person I was replying to said he only believes info provided by Dortmund rather than the British press. Why is Dortmund talking to a German paper now more reliable than Dortmund talking to a sky journalist? That was my original issue. I never claimed everything they said was definitely factual
 

RUCK4444

New Member
Joined
Feb 3, 2015
Messages
9,553
Location
$¥$¥$¥$¥$
This thread has degenerated into a massive sweaty circle of naked men, each dead-eyed and dejectedly masturbating the flaccid penis of the gently sobbing bloke to his right, while repeating the mantra "You love to see it".
Wow. That's a dark vision.

Disclaimer; I've never mentioned my penis in this thread or others.
 

BlahRules

Full Member
Joined
Jan 15, 2007
Messages
3,918
Location
London
Fully agree what nonsense we try and save every penny on every transfer when we always pay the asking price in the end cant teach an old dog new tricks as the saying goes
Chelsea was in the same position with Harvetz and they signed him as quickly as they can. There is no point trying to play hardball when we need Sancho than any other players available.

If the situation was Telles and Porto is not willing to reduce their valuation then we should try another player. I can see the haggling as he is on his last year of contract.

Liverpool did this with Saar and Jamal Lewis. They are able to do this as the players are not fundamental to them challenging but to allow them to challenge for other cup competition.
 

Mr Pigeon

Illiterate Flying Rat
Scout
Joined
Mar 27, 2014
Messages
26,347
Location
bin
I wonder if we will get a flurry of briefs in the evening again, once details of another day of talks release.

Although I have a feeling we wont make a second bid before tomorrow for some reason.
Ten journos all saying that Ole has decided he doesn't want to disrupt team chemistry this late and is happy with the squad he has, probably.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.