SARS CoV-2 coronavirus / Covid-19 (No tin foil hat silliness please)

Pexbo

Winner of the 'I'm not reading that' medal.
Joined
Jun 2, 2009
Messages
68,724
Location
Brizzle
Supports
Big Days
What happens in countries where 70% of people will refuse to get vaccines? Do you force them to, or limit their rights to travel abroad etc. if they don't have vaccine certificate?
Definitely the latter IMO. Vaccinations are already a common VISA requirement.
 

Sarni

nice guy, unassuming, objective United fan.
Joined
Jan 21, 2004
Messages
57,723
Location
Krakow
Definitely the latter IMO. Vaccinations are already a common VISA requirement.
I'd be perfectly happy with that. All the conspiracy nutters can go even crazier with their theories while I will be able to travel wherever I like. That'd be awesome.
 

UnrelatedPsuedo

I pity the poor fool who stinks like I do!
Joined
Apr 15, 2015
Messages
10,252
Location
Blitztown
I'd be perfectly happy with that. All the conspiracy nutters can go even crazier with their theories while I will be able to travel wherever I like. That'd be awesome.
I’d be interested in the Venn diagram that displayed anti-vaxxers against routine global travellers.
 

SiRed

New Member
Joined
May 27, 2013
Messages
2,748
Location
Manchester
What makes you think there will be no vaccine. It is looking more and more like when rather than if.
Wibble? How close are we to a vaccine? i heard we have a couple in stage 3 testing..... How long would a stage 3 test last for before rolling it out to the masses?
 

Wibble

In Gadus Speramus
Staff
Joined
Jun 15, 2000
Messages
89,043
Location
Centreback
I swear I have reached the point in this thread when I know who the poster is without checking the username :lol:

Now for Pogue to reply to this and state that we are all fecked.

Anyways, thanks for your posts, Wibble, you are bringing some much-needed positivity into this. I mean it.
Pogue is more cautious and he is right that vaccines are a complex things and don't always make it to market when phase 3 testing fails or shows a vaccine isn't worth the cost of taking to matket e g. a vaccine for a non-fatal infection where the effectiveness is low, even if enough to pass minimum regulatory standards.

I'm largely playing a probability game knowing the number of vaccines in development means we are very likely to get multiple ones even if some aren't as effective as we would like and others fail.

I just hope we don't have a high profile failure first as moral isn't great in many countries and a failure would be a huge mental blow even, if later vaccines succeed.
 

Brwned

Have you ever been in love before?
Joined
Apr 18, 2008
Messages
50,848
Totally agree with the point.. just pointing out that the data is from a 20 year old census.
Was trying to find some new data.. couldnt find anything.. but saw some comparisons between 2001 and 2011... while then population increased by 20% (wtf?), the 0-6 yr age group was pretty much the same 10 years apart.
And even that data is 10 years old..

India is still a very young country, but I would imagine the 0-19 would be close to 30% of the population right now.
Yeah I thought it seemed old-fashioned looking! Couldn't see the source. Cheers.
 

Wibble

In Gadus Speramus
Staff
Joined
Jun 15, 2000
Messages
89,043
Location
Centreback
Wibble? How close are we to a vaccine? i heard we have a couple in stage 3 testing..... How long would a stage 3 test last for before rolling it out to the masses?
From what I've read the two most advanced would be ready for licencing for emergency approval in the US in late November as you need at least 2 months after a vaccine is administered to check for side effects. So they can still fail and I'm only going from the mainstream press reports which sometimes aren't that accurate.

I don't know what emergency approval means and what the time frame for distribution in various countries would be - to complicate things some countries will have agreements for one or both of the two vaccines nearing the end of phase 3.

For example, Australia has agreement to make the Oxford vaccine and our own UQ one that is much further off potential final approval but not the Pfizer one as far as I know.
 

SiRed

New Member
Joined
May 27, 2013
Messages
2,748
Location
Manchester
From what I read the two most advanced would be ready for licencing for emergency approval in the US in late November as you need at least 2 months after a vaccine is administered to check for side effects. So they can still fail and I'm only going from the mainstream press reports which sometimes aren't that accurate.

I don't know what emergency approval means and what the time frame for distribution in various countries would be - to complicate things some countries will have agreements for one or both of the two vaccines nearing the end of phase 3.

For example, Australia has agreement to make the Oxford vaccine and our own UQ one that is much further off potential final approval but not the Pfizer one as far as I know.
cool, thanks for the info - A confirmed vaccines would be the best xmas prezzie ever!
 

Wibble

In Gadus Speramus
Staff
Joined
Jun 15, 2000
Messages
89,043
Location
Centreback
So let's say a vaccine is made, how long after its available will stuff go back to "normal" ?
That isn't that simple a question I suspect especially as manufacture, distribution and administration could take some time given how many people there are in the world.

If we went into Christmas 2021/22 with a world well on the way back to something like normality I think that would be a major victory
 

11101

Full Member
Joined
Aug 26, 2014
Messages
21,317
Maybe, but I'm talking about Italy here. It was everywhere before we even knew it had left China. Nobody will be caught out like that again, or at least they shouldn't be. We can all see it coming now.
 

SiRed

New Member
Joined
May 27, 2013
Messages
2,748
Location
Manchester
My guess would be 2 years but I doubt we will see a return to the old normal.
That isn't that simple a question I suspect especially as manufacture, distribution and administration could take some time given how many people there are in the world.

If we went into Christmas 2021/22 with a world well on the way back to something like normality I think that would be a major victory
Surely, once those deemed to be at high risk have been vaccinated we can be back to normal, no? For everyone else its just another illness, without the need for hospitals and so on???
 

Wibble

In Gadus Speramus
Staff
Joined
Jun 15, 2000
Messages
89,043
Location
Centreback
Maybe, but I'm talking about Italy here. It was everywhere before we even knew it had left China. Nobody will be caught out like that again, or at least they shouldn't be. We can all see it coming now.
Thought you were talking about BoJo et al.
 

McGrathsipan

Dawn’s less famous husband
Joined
Jun 25, 2009
Messages
24,700
Location
Dublin
My guess would be 2 years but I doubt we will see a return to the old normal.
Of course we will return to a normal.

We might have to consider the idea of hand hygiene more and be much more aware of our surroundings.
Hopefully the efficiencies we have developed last and the world takes what ever learning we can from this.
 

Wibble

In Gadus Speramus
Staff
Joined
Jun 15, 2000
Messages
89,043
Location
Centreback
Surely, once those deemed to be at high risk have been vaccinated we can be back to normal, no? For everyone else its just another illness, without the need for hospitals and so on???
Not for everyone it isn't. But I think vaccination of high risk people will come first but I think it may take far more than that to return fully to normal sadly.
 

Stack

Leave Women's Football Alone!!!
Joined
Sep 6, 2006
Messages
13,331
Location
Auckland New Zealand
Surely, once those deemed to be at high risk have been vaccinated we can be back to normal, no? For everyone else its just another illness, without the need for hospitals and so on???
I think the roll out of the vaccine and its impact will take longer than some might think. The logisitics of it are going to be somewhat complicated. This is in our local newspaper here today but some of whats written in this can be broadly applied elsewhere. https://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/the-b...-vaccine-roll-out/P7HIVKGYOGVMOMI6XLWK3DIUOU/
 

prateik

Full Member
Joined
Dec 14, 2005
Messages
42,183
Does anyone actually believe China's reporting?
They went crazy with their lockdowns when they first realized it was bad..

We havent seen anything since.. There is no way they are locking down whole cities with the word not getting out..
And they are smart enough to know leaving it unchecked means it can get out of hand pretty quickly..

There is no reason to doubt that China have it under control. Unless you love a conspiracy.
 

McGrathsipan

Dawn’s less famous husband
Joined
Jun 25, 2009
Messages
24,700
Location
Dublin
That isn't that simple a question I suspect especially as manufacture, distribution and administration could take some time given how many people there are in the world.

If we went into Christmas 2021/22 with a world well on the way back to something like normality I think that would be a major victory
The concentrated efforts will certainly speed up the process. To think in 12 months we could be on the way back to life is good.
I really think putting an end to this in sight will help people.
 

Stack

Leave Women's Football Alone!!!
Joined
Sep 6, 2006
Messages
13,331
Location
Auckland New Zealand
Of course we will return to a normal.

We might have to consider the idea of hand hygiene more and be much more aware of our surroundings.
Hopefully the efficiencies we have developed last and the world takes what ever learning we can from this.
I am skeptical that we will see a return to the freedom of travel and ease of movement we have been enjoying for the last 40 years. Airlines have been battered by this, the travel industry has been routed. Going forward portions of the former travelling population will be more conservative, travel insurance will be more complicated, all borders will open again but with a variety of restrictions. There will no doubt be discounted airfares for example to try and lure the travelling public back but those can only last for a short time before the reality of making air travel between countries viable. The cost of flying around the world I think will increase and with that there will be fewer people travelling. I just dont see a return to the normal we got used to.
 

Wibble

In Gadus Speramus
Staff
Joined
Jun 15, 2000
Messages
89,043
Location
Centreback
The concentrated efforts will certainly speed up the process. To think in 12 months we could be on the way back to life is good.
I really think putting an end to this in sight will help people.
I agree and why I really hope a vaccine gets approved before one fails - world moral really needs it
 

SiRed

New Member
Joined
May 27, 2013
Messages
2,748
Location
Manchester
I think the roll out of the vaccine and its impact will take longer than some might think. The logisitics of it are going to be somewhat complicated. This is in our local newspaper here today but some of whats written in this can be broadly applied elsewhere. https://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/the-b...-vaccine-roll-out/P7HIVKGYOGVMOMI6XLWK3DIUOU/
Interesting to read in this link about the percentages of people who will be willing to take the vaccine. I would initially have been against being vaccinated, but they can inject me with whatever they want right now, i just want to go back to normal.
I think it was mentioned earlier in this thread about the consequences of choosing against having the vaccine - no travel etc. I think things like that would say more people to be willing!
 

Hound Dog

Full Member
Joined
Mar 10, 2011
Messages
3,211
Location
Belgrade, Serbia
Supports
Whoever I bet on
My guess would be 2 years but I doubt we will see a return to the old normal.
While I have been proven to be laughably incompetent when it comes to medical stuff and am therefore refraining from making any further guesses, I must say that I think that most people would rather have their life expectancy cut by 10-15 years than live in a way resembling the way they currently do for the rest of their lives.
 

SiRed

New Member
Joined
May 27, 2013
Messages
2,748
Location
Manchester
While I have been proven to be laughably incompetent when it comes to medical stuff and am therefore refraining from making any further guesses, I must say that I think that most people would rather have their life expectancy cut by 10-15 years than live in a way resembling the way they currently do for the rest of their lives.
Here here
 

Wibble

In Gadus Speramus
Staff
Joined
Jun 15, 2000
Messages
89,043
Location
Centreback
While I have been proven to be laughably incompetent when it comes to medical stuff and am therefore refraining from making any further guesses, I must say that I think that most people would rather have their life expectancy cut by 10-15 years than live in a way resembling the way they currently do for the rest of their lives.
10-15 years? I wouldn't trade 10-15 months.

Luckily we almost certainly won't have to live like we are of course.
 

11101

Full Member
Joined
Aug 26, 2014
Messages
21,317
While I have been proven to be laughably incompetent when it comes to medical stuff and am therefore refraining from making any further guesses, I must say that I think that most people would rather have their life expectancy cut by 10-15 years than live in a way resembling the way they currently do for the rest of their lives.
Speak for yourself! Wash your hands a bit more than normal and dont go out as much? Its hardly World War 3.
 

Stack

Leave Women's Football Alone!!!
Joined
Sep 6, 2006
Messages
13,331
Location
Auckland New Zealand
While I have been proven to be laughably incompetent when it comes to medical stuff and am therefore refraining from making any further guesses, I must say that I think that most people would rather have their life expectancy cut by 10-15 years than live in a way resembling the way they currently do for the rest of their lives.
I think maybe the situation Im experiencing has me lacking in the experience others are having to deal with elsewhere. Hopefully I am wrong with what Im expecting going forward.
 

Hound Dog

Full Member
Joined
Mar 10, 2011
Messages
3,211
Location
Belgrade, Serbia
Supports
Whoever I bet on
10-15 years? I wouldn't trade 10-15 months.

Luckily we almost certainly won't have to live like we are of course.
So you would actually rather live to, say, 86 but be unable to go to a cinema, attend public events or a wedding than live freely to 85? Really?
 

Wibble

In Gadus Speramus
Staff
Joined
Jun 15, 2000
Messages
89,043
Location
Centreback
So you would actually rather live to, say, 86 but be unable to go to a cinema, attend public events or a wedding than live freely to 85? Really?
Yes. Not that that is the choice where I live as those things are all allowed (or will be soon).
 

finneh

Full Member
Joined
Jun 28, 2010
Messages
7,318
So you would actually rather live to, say, 86 but be unable to go to a cinema, attend public events or a wedding than live freely to 85? Really?
You only have to look at the turnover of businesses that sell products that collectively considerably shorten the lives of our populace to see that people would prefer an early death over living a subjectively "worse" life. The alcohol industry, the fast food industry, the tobacco industry, hell even the automotive industry; the list goes on.

You could also point to the (lack of) worldwide response to the best part of half a million flu deaths per year.

Yes. Not that that is the choice where I live as those things are all allowed (or will be soon).
Given your willingness to sacrifice the enjoyment of life to moderately increase your life expectancy you must be the healthiest person alive.
 

Hound Dog

Full Member
Joined
Mar 10, 2011
Messages
3,211
Location
Belgrade, Serbia
Supports
Whoever I bet on
You only have to look at the turnover of businesses that sell products that collectively considerably shorten the lives of our populace to see that people would prefer an early death over living a subjectively "worse" life. The alcohol industry, the fast food industry, the tobacco industry, hell even the automotive industry; the list goes on.

You could also point to the (lack of) worldwide response to the best part of half a million flu deaths per year.
This was actually the point I was going to make. And in this case, the difference in quality of life is absolute unless you are a shut-in
 

UnrelatedPsuedo

I pity the poor fool who stinks like I do!
Joined
Apr 15, 2015
Messages
10,252
Location
Blitztown
While I have been proven to be laughably incompetent when it comes to medical stuff and am therefore refraining from making any further guesses, I must say that I think that most people would rather have their life expectancy cut by 10-15 years than live in a way resembling the way they currently do for the rest of their lives.
Why?

If there was a guarantee that this thing wasn’t going anywhere, we’d change society.

It would be better.
 

finneh

Full Member
Joined
Jun 28, 2010
Messages
7,318
This was actually the point I was going to make. And in this case, the difference in quality of life is absolute unless you are a shut-in
The only conclusion I can reach is that you'd have to have a miserable life to begin with if you'd be comfortable living this way perpetually in order to merely survive another 10 months.