Sean_RedDevil
Twitter bot
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Who is that in the photo, if you don't mind elaborating?
In short, ww2 war criminal.
Huge numbers of atrocities were committed on both the Serb and Croat sides. I really don't know what this has to with ND.Draža Mihailović https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draža_Mihailović
He's had some pretty controversial moments over the past year and a half.Draža Mihailović https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draža_Mihailović
He's going to be the prohibitive favourite going into Roland Garros. I think there's a good chance he gets to 21 before Federer comes back in time for the grass court season.Looks like Federer's first realistic chance at winning a Slam will be at Wimbledon then. Really hope Nadal can win one of RG/AO before that and finally get the Slam lead.
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
I'm surprised he elected to go for Ferrer. Zverev is never going to be the best baseliner because he isn't athletic or fast enough to cover the baseline the way most of the elite backcourt players do. I figured he would focus heavily on his serve and try to play more aggressive points. Hugging the baseline and trying to keep up with better backcourt players who would dictate the baseline and move you around just didn't strike me as the best idea.Apparently no problems between both but not a good sign for Zverev that he can't keep coaches for a longer period.
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Two weeks with four kids in a room. I can see why his wife did not want to go.I adore Federer, but I can't believe he skipped the Australian Open because he didn't want to leave his family for a while, and they didn't want to sit in a room.
and getting pounded by Djokovic at the end of the two weeks? Not sure the risk-reward is that good there.I adore Federer, but I can't believe he skipped the Australian Open because he didn't want to leave his family for a while, and they didn't want to sit in a room.
Definitely worth it to extend the lead he already has over the Serb.and getting pounded by Djokovic at the end of the two weeks? Not sure the risk-reward is that good there.
Federer never beat Djoker in Melbourne...
Not at the AO in the year 2021, no chance.Definitely worth it to extend the lead he already has over the Serb.
To have a chance you have to play. Federer's chances would be slim either way at his age but a fit Federer even at 39 has a chance to win it.Not at the AO in the year 2021, no chance.
She'll be fine, the giant spider behind the curtain will take care of it.Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Yes i have no sympathy with them.....to play the tournament under this circumstances is just a bad idea.Melbourne went through a 4 month long lockdown that was one of the harshest in the world to go from 700 cases a day to eliminating it (For the record Melbourne and the whole of the UK had similar case numbers per day in july).
Tennis players can harden the feck up and be happy that after 14 days of shitness they will be in one of the most COVID free places in the world
I agree completely, In Australia the individual states are having to do the quarantine due to the sheer dereliction of constitutional duty and incompetence by the tory federal government and as a result every state has different rules and regulations.Yes i have no sympathy with them.....to play the tournament under this circumstances is just a bad idea.
You seem to be a big specialist of the Balkans in WW2Draža Mihailović https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draža_Mihailović
I just heard about that austere scholar.You seem to be a big specialist of the Balkans in WW2
Amazing the lengths some can go to criticise Djoker.