Frank Lampard's Sack Watch / Sacked

Status
Not open for further replies.

red4ever 79

New Member
Joined
Aug 27, 2015
Messages
9,530
Location
Czech Republic
Wonder what his career path looks like now. He's still a comparatively young manager, but does he drop back down to the Championship or move abroad to try and repair his reputation or maybe take some time away from the game?

Even with his stint at Derby, he's not exactly well credentialed.
He will get other gigs. He is on the same bus as Phil Neville
 

RedDevilzFox

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Dec 28, 2013
Messages
912
This is Chelsea FC so hardly a surprise but I think Frank deserved a bit more time. The signings didn't exactly set the world ablaze but its still their first season in PL. What Frank achieved in the little time he had was by no means trivial.
 

mitchmouse

loves to hate United.
Joined
Oct 8, 2014
Messages
17,577
I do agree. And it was very unfortunate for Lampard because Havertz in particular was the most expensive signing.

what I do not understand is why Lampard wanted to hoard all these attackers in the first place? It was unwise transfer policy to my liking (although I am a Man Utd supporter so my preferences are probably not that relevant)
Have to admit, I thought getting Havertz and Werner in would guarantee them enough goals to make top four a certainty. Maybe they are the sort of players that need a full season to get used to thinks (we've had a few!). Don't think Lampard was helped by Kepa turned out to be unaware what that round white thing is - and that he's meant to stop it!
 

Damien

Self-Aware RedCafe Database (and Admin)
Staff
Joined
Mar 4, 2010
Messages
97,261
Location
Also won Best Gif/Photoshop 2021
We are grateful to Frank for what he has achieved in his time as Head Coach of the Club. However, recent results and performances have not met the Club’s expectations, leaving the Club mid-table without any clear path to sustained improvement.
Really brutal. If they had just finished it at the "not met expectations" bit, it would have been fine. The personal statement from Abramovich himself was great, but the bit that the club put in was poor.

What is very interesting is Lampard is actually doing better (+1 point) than Ole was last season after 19 games (where we started off awfully and the club stuck with him when it seemed he would be sacked) in a relatively similar situation (lots of new 1st team players coming in). I guess we'll have a pretty good idea of which approach is 'better' come May this year!
We signed Maguire, Wan-Bissaka and James at that point, losing Lukaku, Smalling, Herrera, Valencia, Sanchez and Darmian, spending about €70M net.

Chelsea brought in a lot more first team players, spending around €200M net.

We didn't have the squad depth with the players we lost. Prime example being this 1:0 defeat away to Newcastle



The signing of Bruno in January was huge as we just didn't have the player capable of providing the creativity. We had Pogba in the squad but he wasn't providing at the time.
 

Alemar

Full Member
Joined
Jul 11, 2017
Messages
7,617
If The Athletic are to be believed, Lampard was a horrendous man manager - never shied away from making it clear who his favourites were and went months without communicating with those outside his circle.
And who they were, his favourites? Mount is one of course
 

Maluco

Last Man Standing 3 champion 2019/20
Joined
Jan 4, 2014
Messages
5,925
:lol: At Danny Drinkwater thinking that Lampard sacking will somehow mean anything for him at Chelsea.
 

mitchmouse

loves to hate United.
Joined
Oct 8, 2014
Messages
17,577
Well yeah every situation is different, but the approach from clubs tends to stay the same. For our Lingard/Pereira situation they will have a transfer ban to speak of.

I'm not saying that I disagree with the Lampard sacking BTW. You can't spend all that money and be mid-table at the midway point of the season. My comment was simply aimed at those people now crowing about Ole vs Frank (which was never a real thing anyway) and taking an 'I told you so' stance. I'm very grateful to be a fan of a club that gives a manager the time to build something. Ole wouldn't have survived at Chelsea either.
Not sure Sir Alex would have survived under Abramovich - who would want to work for him? Well, other than being given a bucket of money, of course!
 

WeePat

Full Member
Joined
Apr 13, 2015
Messages
17,410
Supports
Chelsea
Yeh I think first time RA did that. Must be very painful to him at personal level given the history.
I think the club hated doing this but, like many fans, have probably felt he doesn't look like he knows how to get us out of this mess, and in that context, sacking him now rather than 3-4 weeks from now was the right move.
 

mitchmouse

loves to hate United.
Joined
Oct 8, 2014
Messages
17,577
:lol: At Danny Drinkwater thinking that Lampard sacking will somehow mean anything for him at Chelsea.
Three times now I've read Drinkwater and thought "Murphy". Only when I saw your post did i remember I was muddling them up! :cool::wenger:
 

Sylar

Full Member
Joined
May 15, 2007
Messages
40,502
The confusing thing is, why they hired Lampard in the first place if they didnt have a plan.
Unless the plan was, Lampard must get top4 without spending in the first season.
If he does, then season 2 he will be given as much money / signings as possible and from there he must challenge for the title.
(But if thats the case, then clearly the signings arent his and they needed Lampard to coach who was bought rather than trying to build a team)

Its a bit bizarre unless they only intended Lampard to be short term and were waiting for the first opportunity of bad results to sack him (and it helped that a manager like Tuchel was available)
 

mitchmouse

loves to hate United.
Joined
Oct 8, 2014
Messages
17,577
I think the club hated doing this but, like many fans, have probably felt he doesn't look like he knows how to get us out of this mess, and in that context, sacking him now rather than 3-4 weeks from now was the right move.
I suppose that's only true if there is a preferred replacement and Abramovich was scared of losing him. Not convince Tuchel is a long-term answer for you guys - but I guess Abramovich doesn't deal in the long term. Jose might be free :devil::nono:
 

adexkola

Doesn't understand sportswashing.
Joined
Mar 17, 2008
Messages
48,477
Location
The CL is a glorified FA Cup set to music
Supports
orderly disembarking on planes
What has never been a thing?:
"Meritorious" managerial appointments in football. And that's fine. If you have your coaching badges, and you can impress in the interview then you're qualified. You don't have to work your way up from League 2 to qualify to be United's manager.
 

Andeva

Full Member
Joined
May 10, 2014
Messages
282
Location
Norway
Supports
FK Haugesund
:lol: At Danny Drinkwater thinking that Lampard sacking will somehow mean anything for him at Chelsea.
I can’t find it. Can someone post it in the interesting tweets by footballers thread?
 

Withnail

Full Member
Joined
Jan 5, 2019
Messages
30,237
Location
The Arena of the Unwell
Have to say, even given Abramovich being a maniac, I am astonished. I thought they'd given him at least until the end of the season if not another 12 months. Mind you, I was a bit amazed they gave him the job in the first place rather than have him as a number two first (if he'd have accepted that).

I hope they don't get Allegri as he might actually a) do a job for them and b) be strong enough to stand up to Abramovich - who the hell would want to work for that man!
Astonished?

The writing's been on the wall for a while now. Abramovich bought all the shiny toys in the Summer and things were getting worse instead of better.

He's not exactly patient.
 

WeePat

Full Member
Joined
Apr 13, 2015
Messages
17,410
Supports
Chelsea
I suppose that's only true if there is a preferred replacement and Abramovich was scared of losing him. Not convince Tuchel is a long-term answer for you guys - but I guess Abramovich doesn't deal in the long term. Jose might be free :devil::nono:
According the Athletic, they tried to sound out Nagelsmann but that was a non-starter until at least the summer and Rangnick turned down the interim gig, so I suppose the choice was between Tuchel or sticking with Lampard.

No manager is a long-term answer for Chelsea it seems. We have tried all kinds of managers from experienced proven winners to young inexperienced novices to whatever the hell Sarri represented. None lasted more than 3 years except Jose 15 years ago and even he lasted just 3.5 years.
 
Last edited:

mitchmouse

loves to hate United.
Joined
Oct 8, 2014
Messages
17,577
Astonished?

The writing's been on the wall for a while now. Abramovich bought all the shiny toys in the Summer and things were getting worse instead of better.

He's not exactly patient.
But 18 months is nothing - given that for the first chunk of that he couldn't get players in. I did say Abramovich is a maniac!
 

Champagne Football

New Member
Joined
Nov 28, 2015
Messages
4,187
Location
El Beatle
The difference between Ole and Lampard is firstly Ole has an assistant manager working under him who has already won 3 premier league titles as Fergie's no. 2, has rich Champions League experience and had experience managing the worlds best players already such as Cristiano, Scholes, Rooney, Van Persie.

Lampard had Jody Morris as his no. 2.

Ole then had 6 years management under his belt, even though it was Molde, he still got great experience there developing young players.

I think Lampard has talent. I think he should work as a no. 2 for a year or two under an experienced coach who plays nice football and who develops youth, or bring in a very experienced no.2 next time at a Championship club and gain more experience.
 

stu_1992

Full Member
Joined
May 8, 2013
Messages
4,888
Location
Ireland
No surprises really, it's been on the cards for a while and it's Chelsea, not exactly the most patient club. Shame they did it as I was enjoying Chelsea not being a threat. Not sure how Tuchel will do but there's a squad there that could get serious results if you manage to put all the pieces together.

But on Frank, probably overachieved in his first season which raised what were previously expectations. Second season was always going to be harder as a result. After that insane transfer window with crazy money spent there were never going to be any excuses allowed at that club to be honest. Not only has he not improved them, they regressed and so it was inevitable. Hard to judge his standing as a manager. I certainly don't think he is bad, but clearly wasn't ready for the top level. His experience at Derby was solid if unspectacular. I honestly have no idea what sort of club he could turn up at next. Can't see it being Premier League but would he drop to a lower division again? I'm not sure about that. Chelsea job seemed too much, too soon for him at best.
 

horsechoker

The Caf's Roy Keane.
Joined
Apr 16, 2015
Messages
52,411
Location
The stable
The difference between Ole and Lampard is firstly Ole has an assistant manager working under him who has already won 3 premier league titles as Fergie's no. 2, has rich Champions League experience and had experience managing the worlds best players already such as Cristiano, Scholes, Rooney, Van Persie.

Lampard had Jody Morris as his no. 2.

Ole then had 6 years management under his belt, even though it was Molde, he still got great experience there developing young players.

I think Lampard has talent. I think he should work as a no. 2 for a year or two under an experienced coach who plays nice football and who develops youth, or bring in a very experienced no.2 next time at a Championship club and gain more experience.
I can't really fault him for leaving Derby to become Chelsea manager but ideally he should have gained experience with Derby, possibly got them a promotion and then he might have been better prepared for a big job.
 

Bojan11

Full Member
Joined
May 16, 2010
Messages
33,115
No surprises really, it's been on the cards for a while and it's Chelsea, not exactly the most patient club. Shame they did it as I was enjoying Chelsea not being a threat. Not sure how Tuchel will do but there's a squad there that could get serious results if you manage to put all the pieces together.

But on Frank, probably overachieved in his first season which raised what were previously expectations. Second season was always going to be harder as a result. After that insane transfer window with crazy money spent there were never going to be any excuses allowed at that club to be honest. Not only has he not improved them, they regressed and so it was inevitable. Hard to judge his standing as a manager. I certainly don't think he is bad, but clearly wasn't ready for the top level. His experience at Derby was solid if unspectacular. I honestly have no idea what sort of club he could turn up at next. Can't see it being Premier League but would he drop to a lower division again? I'm not sure about that. Chelsea job seemed too much, too soon for him at best.
No, he did not. Them scrapping fourth place on the last day is not overachieving considering they had the third-best squad in the league last season. They also had a massive point advantage over us in January and yet finished below us.
 

Judas

Open to offers
Joined
Jun 28, 2010
Messages
36,134
Location
Where the grass is greener.
To quit on him now just seems daft, because what was Roman actually expecting from him? Instant success and winning the title? Surely he wasn't that naive. If there was ever a manager to actually put faith and trust in it was Frank, and he's been binned in the blink of an eye just like the rest.
 

caid

Full Member
Joined
Feb 10, 2014
Messages
8,331
Location
Dublin
Dont think he was ready for the gig. He came in with a what looked like a philosophy of how to play the game but that dissapeared ages ago. Looks like he's been throwing mud at the wall and seeing what sticks for about a year at this point. Think he needs a couple of years experimenting basically and seeing what works for him and Chelsea isn't the place to do that.
Looks he could be a pretty good manager some day to be fair, just looks very inexperienced
 

Glorio

Full Member
Joined
Jun 16, 2020
Messages
4,601
I wanted him to stay there for as long as possible. One less club competing near the top to trouble us. This has been coming for a while now. It’s simply not been good enough. You’re supposed to show progress as the seasons go by. You can’t spend that amount of money and then go backwards the season after.

And as always, I’m of the view that sentimentality has no place in football, and Lampard as a manager shouldn’t have been viewed any differently to Rafa or AVB, and evidently Roman felt the same way.

I am interested to see Tuchel in the PL. I’ve always heard good things about him but the only times I ever actually watched his teams were PSG in the CL.
Sentimentality has no place in football? You know that's what fandom is based on, right? If sentimentality was taken out of football, the professional game wouldn't exist.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.