Is Jadon Sancho really worth the 100 plus million fee?

Status
Not open for further replies.

DannyCAFC

Full Member
Joined
Aug 7, 2014
Messages
2,450
Supports
Charlton Athletic
That's one way to look at it. Here's the other. I'll make a big list of 60m+ players that have been signed post-covid. Here it is:

I believe if United sell Pogba, it won't be for more than that either.

Sancho wants to leave, no other major club appears to be in competition for him, Dortmund need money and his performances up until recently have screamed of a player who had thought he could move in the summer.

So yes, they can keep an unhappy player, for a second consecutive year, potentially outside the CL. Of course they can. He has a contract. But is that what normally happens in football, especially when agents are involved?
There's been 1 summer window since Covid, hardly a great sample size.

And there's actually 3 I believe - Havertz, Dias and Osimhen. Might be forgetting others.

True about Pogba, however he only has a year left on his deal and he'll be 28.

Are Dortmund in need of money? Any more than other clubs? Wasn't aware they had any real financial difficulties.
 

Beachryan

More helpful with spreadsheets than Phurry
Joined
May 13, 2010
Messages
11,799
There's been 1 summer window since Covid, hardly a great sample size.

And there's actually 3 I believe - Havertz, Dias and Osimhen. Might be forgetting others.

True about Pogba, however he only has a year left on his deal and he'll be 28.

Are Dortmund in need of money? Any more than other clubs? Wasn't aware they had any real financial difficulties.
I missed Osihem, that's hugely surprising. Havertz and Dias are right around that mark (and both from clubs that don't need to make money, and owners who will have benefitted financially from this crisis), and similar to what Sancho should cost.

Dortmund just announced an operating loss of 75m Euros, driven by Covid. They need to sell players this summer to plug that.

That's kind of my point - we're holding the cards this time.
 

ROFLUTION

Full Member
Joined
Jan 22, 2009
Messages
7,744
Location
Denmark
80m for a struggling player seems a strange move to me. Plus he will want a big wage. It could end up in a lot of pressure on a young lad that comes from a bad season already and he could totally flop leaving us with another Sanchez mega contract situation, where there is no takers. At least he's young.
 

Denis' cuff

Full Member
Joined
May 13, 2007
Messages
7,775
Location
here
You seem to be extremely petty over the whole saga last summer which is a tad silly. Yeah BVB acted like cnuts about it but after the season he had, his age and nationality they were always going to ask for a huge fee 90% of selling clubs would have done the same what Utd should have done is walk away earlier instead of dragging it till the final weeks of the window. As for Sancho transfer requests nowadays are extremely rare and Sancho not handing in a transfer request is a plus rather than a negative rather have an actual pro at Utd instead of a mercenary who wouldn`t hesitate treating us the same way if he wanted to leave. Once again the same Glazers were willing to invest 80m plus 15m add ons(CRAZY MONEY) on that very same Sancho last summer despite the COVID effect and having a front 3 that outscored the PL champions on top of Van De Beek even though Pogba/Bruno were already in the team its a myth that Pellistri(who will go out on loan next season anyway) and Diallo(still young and new to top flight football) will prevent us from buying Sancho unless the latter has a RIDICULOUS season
There is absolutely zero evidence that we made any offer at all, never mind nearly $100m. That is extremely naive to believe these owners would sanction such a move. You are a victim of media speculation. What makes you think they didn’t walk away, other than media speculation and an interminable thread on Red Cafe? Call it extremely petty all you like but I, amongst thousands of long standing matchgoing reds are extremely pissed off at what was the world’s wealthiest club being used as an investment opportunity. I understand the flip side of Sancho, but it doesn’t alter the fact that he could have exerted more pressure without handing in a transfer request. Despite you having decreed “it is a myth...” again, you haven’t a clue. Ole has already implied Diallo will feature, not next but this season, and making noises about Shoretire. We have gone over a decade since Valencia was our last rw, so waiting another year for 3x current prospects would deem any idea of Sancho unnecessary and expensive. The Glazers are averse to expensive. ...and even if we had purchased Sancho, there is no chance we would’ve brought in vdb.
 

Murray3007

Full Member
Joined
Sep 2, 2015
Messages
1,746
no we wouldn't. our biggest problem is ANYONE can score past us. We are top scorers in the league and had no issue scoring in Europe having scored against RB 5 times for example. Dortmund are not suddenly sorted with him AND Haaland in their side. He is not Messi. We need to sort our our spine. We need our Terry/Rio - Makelele/Essien - Drogba etc. The spine of the team needs to be top class first.
this is clearly rubbish considering how much times we have not scored in games or scored just 1 goal, we need a top ST and RW we have been crying out for both for years, yes we need CB and DM but lets not get clouded by scoring 9 goals the other night or 5 v Leipzig.
 

Stacks

Full Member
Joined
Jul 10, 2015
Messages
10,919
Location
Between a rock and Gibraltar
this is clearly rubbish considering how much times we have not scored in games or scored just 1 goal, we need a top ST and RW we have been crying out for both for years, yes we need CB and DM but lets not get clouded by scoring 9 goals the other night or 5 v Leipzig.
May be more so that we don't have a goal scoring CF. Getting a winger is meaningless unless he scores 20+ goals per season. We need someone who finishes chances.
 

Murray3007

Full Member
Joined
Sep 2, 2015
Messages
1,746
May be more so that we don't have a goal scoring CF. Getting a winger is meaningless unless he scores 20+ goals per season. We need someone who finishes chances.
like Sancho done last season ? and wont be far away come the end of this season considering he has 8 this season and not really performed most of it. even if we didnt get another striker we still need a RW
 

TsuWave

Full Member
Joined
Oct 12, 2013
Messages
14,516
Last season maybe, this season he's been shite for the main part.
good thing my post said:

He's had back to back world class seasons
this season is still on-going so evidently I’m not talking about the current campaign. Sancho was out of form for roughly two months this season. He’s on 21 goal contributions in 25 games. In what world is that “shite”?

He’s an exceptional player
 

RedDevilzFox

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Dec 28, 2013
Messages
912
17 league games, three goals.

World class season :lol:

fecking Dan James numbers.
Fans have lost their minds these days. Hyperbole like "world class", "generational talent", "exceptional player" are throwaway phrases that get overused to the point of being meaningless.
 

GledTheRed

Full Member
Joined
Mar 8, 2005
Messages
15,192
Location
Twitter thread
Fans have lost their minds these days. Hyperbole like "world class", "generational talent", "exceptional player" are throwaway phrases that get overused to the point of being meaningless.
Pulled some bullshit stat about 21 goal involvement in 25 games, feck knows who against and in which competition.
 

RedDevilzFox

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Dec 28, 2013
Messages
912
It's pretty much the sign of a quality player as is also evident with Rashford. Not the best performances but they are productive.
It maybe a sign of a "promising" player but that don't make them worth 60-80M. How many players that look decent in Dortmund setup only to flame out elsewhere.

If Bruno has proved anything, its that we should stop paying over the top money on hype. Greenwood put up better numbers but I doubt anyone is going to pay 60-80M for him just yet, maybe we should just let him develop and be patient. Unfortunately, statboys don't understand football.
 

MadDogg

Full Member
Joined
Apr 24, 2002
Messages
16,121
Location
Manchester Utd never lose, just run out of time
Pulled some bullshit stat about 21 goal involvement in 25 games, feck knows who against and in which competition.
Sancho does have 8 goals and 13 assists this season in 25 games (actually 22 games if we go by minutes). 3 goals and 2 assists were in their cup against lower tier opposition, but the rest of the stats came in the Bundesliga and CL.

He obviously started the season poorly but he does seem to be getting back to normal over the last two months or so. Considering those first 2-3 months of this season is pretty much the only poor form he's had in the last two and a half years, it does show an extremely high level of consistency considering his age. 13 goals and 20 assists at the age of eighteen, 20 goals and 20 assists at the age of nineteen, and now 8 goals and 13 assists in half a season at twenty.

Sancho has been significantly better and more consistent than all the other names that people put forward that have failed like Kagawa, Mkhitaryan, Havertz and Werner (it's still early days for the latter two and might easily come good), and he's done it at a younger age. He's English himself, came through the English youth ranks, and was the best player in an incredibly dominant national youth team ahead of the likes of Foden. Obviously there's still a chance he might fail, but he's far more likely to succeed than any of those other players were.
 

JoeyJoJoJrShabadoo

Full Member
Joined
Apr 28, 2019
Messages
1,761
Location
Norn Iron
It maybe a sign of a "promising" player but that don't make them worth 60-80M. How many players that look decent in Dortmund setup only to flame out elsewhere.

If Bruno has proved anything, its that we should stop paying over the top money on hype. Greenwood put up better numbers but I doubt anyone is going to pay 60-80M for him just yet, maybe we should just let him develop and be patient. Unfortunately, statboys don't understand football.
I love the don't understand football argument. Absolutely no way of knowing to what level any of us played to :lol:
 

mav_9me

Full Member
Joined
Feb 9, 2009
Messages
12,529
I love the don't understand football argument. Absolutely no way of knowing to what level any of us played to :lol:
It doesn't matter. You just don't understand football.

You may be using numbers as objective data to add to your subjective opinion of Sancho as a player. But really you are just a statboy who doesn't understand football. Unless of course you agree with him, he who knows it all.
 

Womp

idiot
Joined
Jun 23, 2013
Messages
9,270
Location
Australia
People rewriting history with Sancho. He's had an underwhelming season so far, but to say his past two seasons weren't world class is just plain wrong. Kid was 20 putting up Messi numbers.

He's a phenomenal talent, in the top tier. I just don't think we will go back in for him. We have signed Amad who is only a few years younger, not to add, I think this season is making it evident to Ole we need a proper CF. He is dropping Martial on occasion for Cavani and has regularly spoke about wanting a striker who will score proper 'striker goals'.

Wouldn't be surprised if Haaland was our major target
 

Raredaredevil

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Oct 11, 2020
Messages
892
With all the recent Bundesliga flops looking at Werner and Havertz in particular, I will be wary of paying an arm and a leg for Sancho. No doubt he is a good player but great? Give me a break. All English players get hyped up so massively.
 

Withnail

Full Member
Joined
Jan 5, 2019
Messages
30,856
Location
The Arena of the Unwell
It appears he's over his bad patch now.

5 goals and 4 assists in the last 8 games, mostly from RW. If rumours are true that Dortmund have lowered their price for this summer, as many thought they would, he might be worth going back in for.
 

RedRonaldo

Wishes to be oppressed.
Joined
Aug 17, 2003
Messages
18,996
People rewriting history with Sancho. He's had an underwhelming season so far, but to say his past two seasons weren't world class is just plain wrong. Kid was 20 putting up Messi numbers.

He's a phenomenal talent, in the top tier. I just don't think we will go back in for him. We have signed Amad who is only a few years younger, not to add, I think this season is making it evident to Ole we need a proper CF. He is dropping Martial on occasion for Cavani and has regularly spoke about wanting a striker who will score proper 'striker goals'.

Wouldn't be surprised if Haaland was our major target
To be fair he is putting up Messi numbers when Messi was just a kid, at around 19-20. But then, like Ronaldo, Messi wasn’t as lethal during his early years.
 

Sean_RedDevil

Twitter bot
Joined
Sep 12, 2004
Messages
21,364
Location
NYC (Before Manchester+Hamburg)
This, this, this.

It is absolutely unbelievable to me that people still don't quite "get" the effect of this virus on football.

Barcelona are going to approach one BILLION euros worth of debt - currently at 700m.
Real Madrid are in 900M worth of debt. That's two of the big superpowers in real trouble of insolvency.

We are £110 million pounds down -per season- solely on the gate

If every club survives this pandemic it would be a miracle at this point. Its unreasonable and basically delusional to imagine football immediately going back to the days of £100million being spent on players. Only Manchester City and Chelsea can, and that's solely because their money comes from outside football. It would be irresponsible at this point to spend a penny without knowing the future of fans at football.
Coronavirus was good for the football because the money on the transfer market was just ridiculous since the transfer of Neymar to Paris........for example a player like Sancho should cost maybe £60-70m in normal times.

The bosses of "The healthiest club" (Rummenigge, Hainer and Dreesen) have said in the last couple of weeks that the club can't make big investments "without knowing the future of fans at football" and the good informed press around Bayern Munich says that the club can only sign one player in the price category of around €40m without the sales of other players.
 

OmarUnited4ever

Full Member
Joined
Jan 1, 2021
Messages
3,478
I would love for Sancho to be signed up to ManUtd, but at 100M, no, that's crazy money even if there no pandemic.

Perhaps we can snap him up once he has only 1 year on his contract and BVB will accept lesser fee, perhaps around 50M-60M.

for Manchester United to have the group of (Bruno, Rashford, Cavani, Martial, Sancho, Greenwood & Diallo), Ole will have plenty of attacking options to pick from, City got (KdB, Aguero, Sterling, B.Silva, Mahrez, Foden, Jesus, Torres)
 

TsuWave

Full Member
Joined
Oct 12, 2013
Messages
14,516
17 league games, three goals.

World class season :lol:

fecking Dan James numbers.
Again. Past two seasons. I am not talking about 20/21 :confused:

Me: He’s had back to back world class seasons.

You: Really?

Me: Evidently I’m not talking about 20/21. This season isn’t even over.

You: 3 goals in 17. Daniel James.

What the feck. It’s OK to say you misread or misunderstood something. You don’t have to play obtuse.

Pulled some bullshit stat about 21 goal involvement in 25 games, feck knows who against and in which competition.
Why are you discussing something that you’re not well informed about?
 
Last edited:

Stacks

Full Member
Joined
Jul 10, 2015
Messages
10,919
Location
Between a rock and Gibraltar
like Sancho done last season ? and wont be far away come the end of this season considering he has 8 this season and not really performed most of it. even if we didnt get another striker we still need a RW
He has 3 league goals. Sorry if I wasn't clear. currently we have only Rashford and maybe Bruno who can get 15-20 league goals so we need another if we want any hope of challenging
 

Judas

Open to offers
Joined
Jun 28, 2010
Messages
36,508
Location
Where the grass is greener.
We still desperately need a RW, so I still desperately want Sancho.

Maybe a certain youngster will make the need to buy a new RW less important, but we're not at that point yet.
 

Berbasbullet

Too Boring For A Funny Tagline
Joined
Nov 3, 2011
Messages
20,515
Is Sancho even a RW? Seems like most of his goals and assists come in Rashford’s position.
 

The United Irishman

"Martial is championship material at best"
Joined
Apr 30, 2014
Messages
2,870
Location
Birmingham
Simple answer is no. Unless we can get him for cut-price around £50m...anything above that and we are getting rinsed and it will also be a huge gamble.

I'd rather spend any big money on Grealish.
 

GledTheRed

Full Member
Joined
Mar 8, 2005
Messages
15,192
Location
Twitter thread
Again. Past two seasons. I am not talking about 20/21 :confused:

Me: He’s had back to back world class seasons.

You: Really?

Me: Evidently I’m not talking about 20/21. This season isn’t even over.

You: 3 goals in 17. Daniel James.

What the feck. It’s OK to say you misread or misunderstood something. You don’t have to play obtuse.



Why are you discussing something that you’re not well informed about?
I'm pretty up to speed on Jadon Sancho thanks very much, i use my eyes and watch football matches he plays in rather than stat websites.

He's a very good player but the jury is out whether he is top tier (100 million quid) as whenever i have seen him for England or in the CL he has underwhelmed.
 

romufc

Full Member
Joined
Apr 30, 2019
Messages
12,788
I'm pretty up to speed on Jadon Sancho thanks very much, i use my eyes and watch football matches he plays in rather than stat websites.

He's a very good player but the jury is out whether he is top tier (100 million quid) as whenever i have seen him for England or in the CL he has underwhelmed.
The problem with judging a player on stats. You don't know exactly how he will fit the team. If people who have watched Dortmund in CL and in BL, they will be aware that alot of his goals have come on the counter, Rashy would score the same if not more in that league.

When it comes to CL, International, teams are defensively better and have lower blocks, in which he starts to struggle a little bit. Not saying he is rubbish but he is not 100m player yet.

Its the same as say, Thiago when everyone wanted him to play DLP, you can see now at Liverpool that there are frailties in his game, he dives in way too much to play that role.

His abilities are amazing but for £20m he was worth it because of what he brings but with Sancho, I do think 100m odd is way too much for a player.
 

TsuWave

Full Member
Joined
Oct 12, 2013
Messages
14,516
I'm pretty up to speed on Jadon Sancho thanks very much, i use my eyes and watch football matches he plays in rather than stat websites.

He's a very good player but the jury is out whether he is top tier (100 million quid) as whenever i have seen him for England or in the CL he has underwhelmed.
feck knows who against and in which competition”. Direct quote from you. Evidently you’re not.

I like how you skipped over the fact you misunderstood a statement, acted a buffoon, and now you’re pivoting our exchange to “he’s not passing my eye test. the jury is still out if he’s worth £100m. Something something England

Respectfully, feck your eye test and all that bullshit you’re talking about. I do not care.

I agreed with someone else’s assessment of Sancho. You quoted me questioning my “he’s had back to back world class seasons” statement. I said go look at 2018/19 and 2019/20, pull up the numbers and compare it against his peers. I even helped you out with a link showing the kind of company he’s found himself next to in terms of productivity.

You randomly started talking about a season that hasn’t even concluded yet, one that’s supposed to be a season in which “he’s been shite”, but even then, the guy has 8 goals and 13 assists in 25. Now it’s “my eye test:lol:

It’s OK though. It’s fine to have different opinions on players. Mine just aligns closer to @Zehner than everybody else’s I’ve read here.
 
Last edited:

Stacks

Full Member
Joined
Jul 10, 2015
Messages
10,919
Location
Between a rock and Gibraltar
The problem with judging a player on stats. You don't know exactly how he will fit the team. If people who have watched Dortmund in CL and in BL, they will be aware that alot of his goals have come on the counter, Rashy would score the same if not more in that league.

When it comes to CL, International, teams are defensively better and have lower blocks, in which he starts to struggle a little bit. Not saying he is rubbish but he is not 100m player yet.

Its the same as say, Thiago when everyone wanted him to play DLP, you can see now at Liverpool that there are frailties in his game, he dives in way too much to play that role.

His abilities are amazing but for £20m he was worth it because of what he brings but with Sancho, I do think 100m odd is way too much for a player.
Simply put. For 100m the player has be THE match winner. A guy who you can rely on to win you games but also push you on to challenge for titles. I am talking like when Real bought Cristiano or even Gareth Bale. Nowadays players move for 100m and they are just an additional piece in the side and rarely justify their cost. That said he is very young so you would get more value from someone like Jadon IF he succeeds
 

GledTheRed

Full Member
Joined
Mar 8, 2005
Messages
15,192
Location
Twitter thread
feck knows who against and in which competition”. Direct quote from you. Evidently you’re not.

I like how you skipped over the fact you misunderstood a statement, acted a buffoon, and now you’re pivoting our exchange to “he’s not passing my eye test. the jury is still out if he’s worth £100m. Something something England

Respectfully, feck your eye test and all that bullshit you’re talking about. I do not care.

I agreed with someone else’s assessment of Sancho. You quoted me questioning my “he’s had back to back world class seasons” statement. I said go look at 2018/19 and 2019/20, pull up the numbers and compare it against his peers. I even helped you out with a link showing the kind of company he’s found himself next to in terms of productivity.

You randomly started talking about a season that hasn’t even concluded yet, one that’s supposed to be a season in which “he’s been shite”, but even then, the guy has 8 goals and 13 assists in 25. Now it’s “my eye test:lol:

It’s OK though. It’s fine to have different opinions on players. Mine just aligns closer to @Zehner than everybody else’s I’ve read here.
Get back to your stats websites for wank mate, failing that fire up Champ Manager.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.