ManchesterYoda
Full Member
- Joined
- Nov 26, 2016
- Messages
- 747
Pathetic decision.
Next goal will get disallowed because Rashford runs faster than their defenders.He's ruled a goal out and given a foul because a player has jumped higher than another player
I’m very pro-Ole as it happens. I’m not blind though. It’s a weird call.Ridiculous. Any stick to beat the manager with though eh?
Yeah I was just saying this to my gf who was sat obviously not listening.I don't get it. Lindelof is just jumping for the ball - what else is he meant to do?
Because the defender stood underneath him?It's clearly a foul, bit silly to even pretend its a dodgy decision.
He had a running start. Usually doesn’t in our box.So when has Lindeloff EVER jumped half that high to defend a ball into our box?
It's really not weird at all.I’m very pro-Ole as it happens. I’m not blind though. It’s a weird call.
What the feck? How can you disallow that? Their player didn't jump, how the feck is that a foul? That's such a load of shit. Yeah he hit him. Because he decided not to jump.
What did lindelof do wrong there ffs??
He led with his knee into the players face. The opponent is not obligated to jump simply to avoid a knee to the face especially when the ball was not within reach of either player.What the feck? How can you disallow that? Their player didn't jump, how the feck is that a foul? That's such a load of shit. Yeah he hit him. Because he decided not to jump.
I feel like it would be - RS player is hit in the head because he doesn't challenge. Lindelof isn't leading with his arms or anything like that. I get that off the ball they should disallow it but surely not if he scores from that jump?Shouldn’t be
Just very weird to hate on players that keep scoring, but ok, you have you breakfast with cold fishstew. As you were.scoring 3 games in a row is supposed to sway my opinion of him as a player despite the multiple times I’ve watched him, and still do, being awful?
But I agree as well. The defender didn't jump. He was never going to get the ball. Lindelof jumped. The knee is there because the defender didn't jump, that shouldn't be ruled out.Nice sarcasm.
Similiar like that Harry's goal which was disallowed. Defender just stands still, other jumps and it is a foul.Seriously need to ask.. what is Lindelof supposed to do. That defender was cluelessly standing looking at the ball going over his head
Not even close.What a fecking useless decision. It's not his fault the defender stood there like a gormless bastard scared of jumping and actually defending. Joke decision. Shades of Nani Real Madrid
But it is his fault that he utterly and completely took him out by jumping himself....Not Lindelof's fault their defender didn't even attempt to jump
Goal incoming?fecking hell martial has improved
He was like Wile E. Coyote turning around just before he gets slammed in the face with an anvil.Feck me, that guy looks his mug straight into Lindelof
Must have been like, what the feck is this that's about to hit me!
Not from a standstill positionSo Lindelof can actually jump????
Since when was flying through the air and kneeing an opponent not a foul? Put the beer down ladWhat a fecking useless decision. It's not his fault the defender stood there like a gormless bastard scared of jumping and actually defending. Joke decision. Shades of Nani Real Madrid
So not weird that it was universally called weird by 99% of this forum?It's really not weird at all.
Lawrence Visser