Brendan Rodgers | Rejoins Celtic on 3 year deal

Water Melon

Guest
I am sure Brendan is a much better manager than Ole, would take a swap in a heartbeat. Leicester fans, however, would riot if their gaffer was to be replaced with OGS. I will not be surprised if Leicester finish above us, while we bottle in EL as well.
 

The Neville wears Prada

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Oct 3, 2019
Messages
139
It’s a well-established footballing idiom to highlight the idea that players or managers playing within Britain get judged by a harsher standard than their compatriots playing elsewhere in the world.

Calling someone racist for it is the reach of all reaches.
Thank you! Exactly my point. I have reported this member for throwing out wild accusations relating to race.

I maintain, if he was an 'exotic' Nationality, I would wager that most of our fans would be all over him! That is obviously an opinion, but on no level is that racist. I think this poster must be a millennial (I work with them), who is offended if someone looks at them the wrong way!
 

SeanyC

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Dec 28, 2020
Messages
386
I like Brendan, think he would do well with united and with more money and supposedly better players but didn’t we say that about Moyes. Brendan had a better style of play, I’ll give him that
 

Zlatan 7

We've got bush!
Joined
May 26, 2016
Messages
11,797
He is tactically excellent, driven, attacking, brings in great signings, improves players and would be more driven to win the big trophies than any other manager I can think of. I cannot think of one good reason that he wouldn't be perfect for United.
Where do you get this from?

here’s some mouth watering signings he’s brought in with some money
https://www.lfchistory.net/Transfers/ByManager/25/1

And why on earth is he more driven than any other manager
 

united_99

Takes pleasure in other people's pain
Joined
Jul 4, 2012
Messages
9,568
I like Rodgers and wouldn’t mind him as our next manager if Ole left. But anyone claiming he would have us much closer to City is daydreaming. How much closer would he have us? Much closer would mean we would be in a title race with City. Rodgers is nowhere close to Pep’s level and our squad is nowhere close to theirs.

At best you could say the first 11 are comparable (and even then they beat us easily in centre midfield), but beyond first 11 it’s no contest. In some games recently we had only attacking teenagers with barely any first team experience on the bench (Amad, Shola). Whereas on City’s bench every game they have at least 3-4 attacking players who could start a lot of games for us.
Rodgers has also “bottled” stuff, end of last season and several 1st round EL exits (people call Ole a bottler because of semi final exits, then it’s only fair to call Rodgers the same because of 1st round EL exits).

So while I rate him I can’t think of any reason how he would have us much closer to City. Unless he would have made sure that Pogba and Cavani were never injured and Rashford was also always fit and not carrying injuries, because we don’t have any replacements for them. But taking into account Leicester’s regular injury crisis I wouldn’t know how he would avoid injuries at United.
 

AgentSmith

Full Member
Joined
May 13, 2019
Messages
1,557
Where do you get this from?

here’s some mouth watering signings he’s brought in with some money
https://www.lfchistory.net/Transfers/ByManager/25/1

And why on earth is he more driven than any other manager
I don’t think that list proves the point you’re trying to make.

Sturridge - £12 million
Gomez - £6 million
Origi - £9.8 million
Ings - £8 million
Coutinho - £8.5 million
Milner - Free
Firmino - £29 million

Those are all either good or fantastic bits of business. The Coutinho signing in particular given the level of contribution he had while at Liverpool and the fact that selling him funded Van Dijk and Alisson.

Most of the big misses (Benteke, Allen, Sakho) they sold for similar prices to what they paid for.

There’s definitely some shockers on there but what manager doesn’t have blots on their transfer record?
 

AgentSmith

Full Member
Joined
May 13, 2019
Messages
1,557
Thank you! Exactly my point. I have reported this member for throwing out wild accusations relating to race.

I maintain, if he was an 'exotic' Nationality, I would wager that most of our fans would be all over him! That is obviously an opinion, but on no level is that racist. I think this poster must be a millennial (I work with them), who is offended if someone looks at them the wrong way!
Yeah I wouldn’t pay that poster much attention, the idea that your post was racist is idiotic.

I’d have to argue against calling people out as millennials though given I’d qualify as one.
 

El Jefe

Full Member
Joined
Dec 28, 2012
Messages
4,915
Simply no way is AWB a better full-back than Ricardo.

From my biased Leicester perspective, the only shoe-ins from Man United would be Bruno (for sure), Rashford and Pogba (if it's the decent Pogba). I'd say the jury is out on Shaw / Justin (I'd say Shaw for longevity, though Justin was nailed on to get our player of the season had he not got injured).

As for center-backs, I'd go for any of Evans/Soyuncu/Fofana over Maguire.

As for the Cavani / Vardy debate. Vardy hasn't been in great form - he's been coming back from his hernia operation - and I can see why people might choose Cavani, but even if you discount goals, Vardy has 7 assists this season, which is nearly as many as Cavani's goals and assists combined (8). I suppose neither are particularly outstanding up front options this season though.

If Rashford could play as a striker, I'd take our Vardy and put another Leicester midfielder in there. Either way, this'd probably be my ideal team (at least player wise - I accept the formation may be a little iffy).

Kasper

Ricardo, Soyuncu, Evans, Shaw
N'didi
Tielemans Pogba
Bruno
Barnes Rashford*

*(Barnes and Vardy have played as a front 2, so maybe Rashford could play the Vardy role)
How do you have it as 7 Leicester players to 4 United players, if we have scored more goals than you, conceded the same number of goals (11 in our first 3 btw) and have more points. Also worth noting people are saying Ole is doing an average job, while Rodgers is doing the lord's work. You even reluctantly included Shaw and Pogba, so there is a chance you'd have 9 players according to you.

Can't have it both ways, if Leicester have better players then how can Rodgers be doing that great a job. The post from @Spiersey was spot on except for AWB and Peirera IMO.
 

mu4c_20le

Full Member
Joined
Jul 7, 2013
Messages
43,837
I don’t think that list proves the point you’re trying to make.

Sturridge - £12 million
Gomez - £6 million
Origi - £9.8 million
Ings - £8 million
Coutinho - £8.5 million
Milner - Free
Firmino - £29 million

Those are all either good or fantastic bits of business. The Coutinho signing in particular given the level of contribution he had while at Liverpool and the fact that selling him funded Van Dijk and Alisson.

Most of the big misses (Benteke, Allen, Sakho) they sold for similar prices to what they paid for.

There’s definitely some shockers on there but what manager doesn’t have blots on their transfer record?
Well done, you picked out 6 or 7 in a list of over 30 players... conveniently ignoring the Fabio Borini's and Joe Allen's (Welsh Xavi)... and what does selling them on for a similar fee has anything to do with his transfer acumen? Do you think if he were United manager, he'd have the same privilege of selling on his duds for a similar fee ?
 

FriendlyFox

Full Member
Joined
Sep 20, 2014
Messages
265
Supports
Leicester City
Who would be your choice of manager between Solskjaer and Rodgers ?
Oh definitely Rodgers. Though Solskjaer has gone up in my estimation from "hopeless" to "maybe he's alright".

I guess the pertinent question would be, if i'd give Leicester more players from a combined XI, and a better manager, then why are United still ahead on points over Leicester (and indeed last season)?

I suppose the answer is

1. Bruno Fernandes. Let's face it, he would be the first name on either team sheet. I'd say a lot of Leicester / United players, you could probably argue the toss over who'd make it into a team, but Fernandes gets into any team in the league. He must be worth a ridiculous amounts of points in a season.

2. We've had a ridiculous injury crisis in both of the past 2 seasons. Just in our back line we've had Evans, Soyuncu, Fofana, Ricardo, Castagne, and Justin all out for significant periods this season. I can only think of Tielemans, Albrighton, Iheanacho and Kasper that haven't been out so far (and 2 of those aren't usually starters).

3. Strength in depth. Our first XI's might be close, but you have a much stronger squad in general. It means that injuries / rotation doesn't leave to as much a drop off in quality as it does for us.

To be fair, I probably also over-rated some of our players a tad too. Probably because I try and block some of the poor games from my memory. :lol:
 

FriendlyFox

Full Member
Joined
Sep 20, 2014
Messages
265
Supports
Leicester City
How do you have it as 7 Leicester players to 4 United players, if we have scored more goals than you, conceded the same number of goals (11 in our first 3 btw) and have more points. Also worth noting people are saying Ole is doing an average job, while Rodgers is doing the lord's work. You even reluctantly included Shaw and Pogba, so there is a chance you'd have 9 players according to you.

Can't have it both ways, if Leicester have better players then how can Rodgers be doing that great a job. The post from @Spiersey was spot on except for AWB and Peirera IMO.
When was the last time Leicester were able to actually play their strongest XI?

It's 2019.

The fact that we have had N'didi, Justin, Fofana, Soyuncu, Evans, Castagne, and Ricardo all out for long lay-offs this season and *still* conceded the same amount of goals as you, isn't a point in United's favour.

I'll give you goals scored, but I've made it clear I think United have a stronger attack. You lot complain about Martial, but you don't have Ayoze Perez, ffs.
 
Last edited:

stefan92

Full Member
Joined
Feb 9, 2021
Messages
6,435
Supports
Hannover 96
Well done, you picked out 6 or 7 in a list of over 30 players... conveniently ignoring the Fabio Borini's and Joe Allen's (Welsh Xavi)... and what does selling them on for a similar fee has anything to do with his transfer acumen? Do you think if he were United manager, he'd have the same privilege of selling on his duds for a similar fee ?
Every manager should try to do that and get as much money back as possible (or at least don't waste to much of the salary budget on them for to long). This is something were United is failing in the last years, collecting deadwood instead of having a budget to really get better players. It's just bad business to keep players you don't need.

It's not a privilege to sell the duds, it is the job of the manager - and if Rodgers does this, while Ole does give contract extensions to questionable players he is better than Ole (at least in that regard).
 

mu4c_20le

Full Member
Joined
Jul 7, 2013
Messages
43,837
Every manager should try to do that and get as much money back as possible (or at least don't waste to much of the salary budget on them for to long). This is something were United is failing in the last years, collecting deadwood instead of having a budget to really get better players. It's just bad business to keep players you don't need.

It's not a privilege to sell the duds, it is the job of the manager - and if Rodgers does this, while Ole does give contract extensions to questionable players he is better than Ole (at least in that regard).
Is it though? The manager makes the decisions on whether to keep or sell a player, other people do the business behind the scenes. I don't think they even control how much to spend on a certain player, though they will obviously have a valuation and watch how they spend their budget. The point is that whether it's because of our reputation, or how we are run as a club, or a combination of both, I dont think the prices would be the same if he were trying to offload a dud who failed at United. Also, Ole did get rid of a ton of deadwood, and imo he inherited a far more broken and unbalanced squad than Rodgers did at Leicester, or any Chelsea manager, etc, but thats not necessarily the discussion at hand...
 

AgentSmith

Full Member
Joined
May 13, 2019
Messages
1,557
Well done, you picked out 6 or 7 in a list of over 30 players... conveniently ignoring the Fabio Borini's and Joe Allen's (Welsh Xavi)... and what does selling them on for a similar fee has anything to do with his transfer acumen? Do you think if he were United manager, he'd have the same privilege of selling on his duds for a similar fee ?
Thanks.
 

Tallis

Full Member
Joined
Dec 23, 2020
Messages
982
I am sure Brendan is a much better manager than Ole, would take a swap in a heartbeat. Leicester fans, however, would riot if their gaffer was to be replaced with OGS. I will not be surprised if Leicester finish above us, while we bottle in EL as well.
Ok - Brendan actually did the biggest bottle of all time last year but let’s ignore it as it’s more convenient.
 

mark clatternburg

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Sep 21, 2014
Messages
235
Supports
Leicester City
Schmeichel

AWB- Maguire - Fofana - Shaw

Pogba - Ndidi

Barnes - Bruno - Rashford

Vardy/Cavani.

It’s predominantly united players. Let’s not forget that Maguire was excellent for them, it’s only under Ole you would maybe not consider him. Shaw is nailed on based on this season. I think AWB is better defensively than any of their full back options but Castagne is obviously much better going forward. Lindelöf would be my pick after Maguire and Fofana

Tielemans would probably be my choice alongside Pogba but would be a very attacking side with him, so I’d lean towards Ndidi. The options after Tielemans would be Matic and Mctom for me.

Bruno and Rashford are shoe ins, Bruno is obviously better than Maddison and Barnes. Barnes over greenwood out wide but I’d have Greenwood over the likes of Perez. Martial also.

Up front it’s probably Cavani, better career and better this season (despite Vardy having more goals, scored a lot of pens, he’s really struggled the last few months). The next option after these would be Martial.

I think a combined United Xi would have more United players and the backups would consist of United players mainly too.
I think people are reading too much into current performances, which is mainly to do with the managers. United squad is comfortably better in terms of quality, they’re just underperforming due to a poor manager whilst Leicester are over performing.
I would also say that you could argue every Leicester players inclusion and provide a decent argument for not including them compared to their United counterpart. Rashford,Bruno, Pogba, shaw are all pretty much nailed on for anyone’s combined team I’d say.
Fair enough, you should back your own. But, hand on heart, the only united defender I see getting in, is Shaw, and that's only because Justin is injured. He is younger, quicker and amazingly versatile. Harry is no way budging any of our centre backs, Evans made him look good. As for Wan Bissaka, a full back who gets nose bleeds in rhe opposition half, is no kind of full back in the modern game. Castagne every time, until Ricardo returns to his previous, near world class level. Bruno, with Ndidi and Tillemans behind him would be the choice midfield. Cavani, Vardy and Rashford up top. Martial would be no where near this team. That all said, my specs are probably as blue, as yours are red.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Grinner

cyberman

Full Member
Joined
May 26, 2010
Messages
37,331
Ok - Brendan actually did the biggest bottle of all time last year but let’s ignore it as it’s more convenient.
Yeah, its a weird take. Their run in is a a shitshow as well so theres every chance theyll miss out in top 4 again.
Are Leicester out of place in 5th? Is that a huge achievement?
 

SAFMUTD

New Member
Joined
Mar 14, 2018
Messages
11,787
His best strengths is his man management and motivation, tactically he is naive and not that much better than Ole. Disagree with the German name which is quite frankly borderline racist tbh, he hasn't been performing in the bundesliga which makes this completely irrelevant.
Cheap shot trying to twist the posters argument into something remotely racist, we all know what he means.
 

mu4c_20le

Full Member
Joined
Jul 7, 2013
Messages
43,837
Cheap shot trying to twist the posters argument into something remotely racist, we all know what he means.
Some posters were joking with the hipster thing, but he clearly meant it when he suggested that some of our fans views are prejudiced based on ethnicity. Which is a rather narrow minded view, if not absolute nonsense. If anything it's his past Liverpool connections that would go against him for our fans, and the fact that he acted like a cringe clown at times back then. To suggest that he would legitimately be higher rated if he were a different nationality is absurd.
 

Spiersey

Full Member
Joined
Feb 15, 2012
Messages
7,386
Location
United Kingdom.
Supports
Chelsea
Fair enough, you should back your own. But, hand on heart, the only united defender I see getting in, is Shaw, and that's only because Justin is injured. He is younger, quicker and amazingly versatile. Harry is no way budging any of our centre backs, Evans made him look good. As for Wan Bissaka, a full back who gets nose bleeds in rhe opposition half, is no kind of full back in the modern game. Castagne every time, until Ricardo returns to his previous, near world class level. Bruno, with Ndidi and Tillemans behind him would be the choice midfield. Cavani, Vardy and Rashford up top. Martial would be no where near this team. That all said, my specs are probably as blue, as yours are red.
I’m a Chelsea fan in fairness, and I like Leicester a lot more than I like United :lol:
 

RedDevilCanuck

Quite dreamy - blue eyes, blond hair, tanned skin
Joined
Feb 22, 2007
Messages
8,429
Location
The GTA
Schooled Ole amd has navigated an injury list as big as Liverpools without skipping a beat.
 

AgentSmith

Full Member
Joined
May 13, 2019
Messages
1,557
Some posters were joking with the hipster thing, but he clearly meant it when he suggested that some of our fans views are prejudiced based on ethnicity. Which is a rather narrow minded view, if not absolute nonsense. If anything it's his past Liverpool connections that would go against him for our fans, and the fact that he acted like a cringe clown at times back then. To suggest that he would legitimately be higher rated if he were a different nationality is absurd.
Nice edit from skin colour to ethnicity so that your criticism doesn’t immediately fall over itself.

The poster was clearly implying that if Rodgers was a German manager in charge of Mönchengladbach and producing the performances and results that he’s achieved with Leicester people would be more enamoured with him at the moment than they currently are.

It was maybe a little clumsily worded but the sentiment of it rings true enough. To label it racist was absolutely ridiculous.
 

Grinner

Not fat gutted. Hirsuteness of shoulders TBD.
Staff
Joined
May 5, 2003
Messages
72,287
Location
I love free dirt and rocks!
Supports
Arsenal
Racism is clearly a sensitive topic so throwing around unwarranted accusations is not cool.

Please move on as the matter has been resolved with the posters in question.
 

Redlyn

Full Member
Joined
Jul 18, 2011
Messages
3,682
Take a look at what you have posted here and realise how stupid a post this is. Yes we want to win stuff, and Rodgers would have us a darn sight closer than Ole. Rodgers is criminally underrated and every team he has managed has HUGELY over-achieved. He had Swansea, Liverpool, Celtic and now Leicester playing scintillating attacking football, and all bar Celtic had/have no right competing near the top (Liverpool were average at that time).

He is tactically excellent, driven, attacking, brings in great signings, improves players and would be more driven to win the big trophies than any other manager I can think of. I cannot think of one good reason that he wouldn't be perfect for United.

Your post is awful in all honesty. And no need to get personal about his appearance. Pathetic.
Pathetic, awful, stupid. All words used in a single post. Calm the feck down, no need to be so aggressive. If everyone posted in that tone it would be a war zone out here not a discussion forum.

I'm not convinced he is necessarily the one to help us match City or take us to deep in the CL. He has had a mixed bag of signings like pretty much your average manager. Nothing exceptional there. I certainly don't know all the managers our there but I hope we can get someone with experience at the highest level.
 

Grinner

Not fat gutted. Hirsuteness of shoulders TBD.
Staff
Joined
May 5, 2003
Messages
72,287
Location
I love free dirt and rocks!
Supports
Arsenal
I wanted Rodgers over Arteta at Arsenal even though he does look like a fecking gargoyle and has weird lips.

I thought he'd have the nous to fix our defence quite quickly which was the number one problem.
 

AshRK

Full Member
Joined
Apr 23, 2017
Messages
12,191
Location
Canada
Simply no way is AWB a better full-back than Ricardo.

From my biased Leicester perspective, the only shoe-ins from Man United would be Bruno (for sure), Rashford and Pogba (if it's the decent Pogba). I'd say the jury is out on Shaw / Justin (I'd say Shaw for longevity, though Justin was nailed on to get our player of the season had he not got injured).

As for center-backs, I'd go for any of Evans/Soyuncu/Fofana over Maguire.

As for the Cavani / Vardy debate. Vardy hasn't been in great form - he's been coming back from his hernia operation - and I can see why people might choose Cavani, but even if you discount goals, Vardy has 7 assists this season, which is nearly as many as Cavani's goals and assists combined (8). I suppose neither are particularly outstanding up front options this season though.

If Rashford could play as a striker, I'd take our Vardy and put another Leicester midfielder in there. Either way, this'd probably be my ideal team (at least player wise - I accept the formation may be a little iffy).

Kasper

Ricardo, Soyuncu, Evans, Shaw
N'didi
Tielemans Pogba
Bruno
Barnes Rashford*

*(Barnes and Vardy have played as a front 2, so maybe Rashford could play the Vardy role)
So you are saying rodgers is underperforming with the squad as United will less talented squad are above them.
 

FriendlyFox

Full Member
Joined
Sep 20, 2014
Messages
265
Supports
Leicester City
So you are saying rodgers is underperforming with the squad as United will less talented squad are above them.
I've answered this a few times now, so I will make my response brief.

I didn't say United have a less talented squad, as a squad is more than a first XI. United have a stronger squad. Also saying I'd have more Leicester players in a first XI doesn't necessarily mean it's "less talented" - a lot of those Leicester players you could probably swap for United players and not notice much difference (for example, while I prefer the Leicester CB's, you could put Maguire in there and not notice a huge difference) whereas some United players are clearly a level above what we have (eg. Bruno or an on-form Pogba).

But most importantly, Leicester haven't been able to play our "strongest XI" since about December 2019, because we've had ridiculous injury after injury ever since.

So no, considering not our hypothetical best XI, but the squad we've actually had available this season, Rodgers is not under performing.
 

AshRK

Full Member
Joined
Apr 23, 2017
Messages
12,191
Location
Canada
I've answered this a few times now, so I will make my response brief.

I didn't say United have a less talented squad, as a squad is more than a first XI. United have a stronger squad. Also saying I'd have more Leicester players in a first XI doesn't necessarily mean it's "less talented" - a lot of those Leicester players you could probably swap for United players and not notice much difference (for example, while I prefer the Leicester CB's, you could put Maguire in there and not notice a huge difference) whereas some United players are clearly a level above what we have (eg. Bruno or an on-form Pogba).

But most importantly, Leicester haven't been able to play our "strongest XI" since about December 2019, because we've had ridiculous injury after injury ever since.

So no, considering not our hypothetical best XI, but the squad we've actually had available this season, Rodgers is not under performing.
For me neither do Leicester have a better squad than United nor is Rodgers underperforming. I feel Rodgers is doing a much better job than Ole. Yes Leicester have a good set of players and I feel most of your players will start for us but overall squad, United's a bit better.

Nothing against your post just that I found your original post a bit odd. Your current post makes much more sense. Thanks for the reply.
 

mu4c_20le

Full Member
Joined
Jul 7, 2013
Messages
43,837
Thank you! Exactly my point. I have reported this member for throwing out wild accusations relating to race.

I maintain, if he was an 'exotic' Nationality, I would wager that most of our fans would be all over him! That is obviously an opinion, but on no level is that racist. I think this poster must be a millennial (I work with them), who is offended if someone looks at them the wrong way!
I disagree with your assessment, but I shouldn't have dropped the R word lightly. If you see this then hopefully you might unblock me someday.
 

Tallis

Full Member
Joined
Dec 23, 2020
Messages
982
For me neither do Leicester have a better squad than United nor is Rodgers underperforming. I feel Rodgers is doing a much better job than Ole. Yes Leicester have a good set of players and I feel most of your players will start for us but overall squad, United's a bit better.

Nothing against your post just that I found your original post a bit odd. Your current post makes much more sense. Thanks for the reply.
Rodgers is doing much better job than Ole but somehow is still below in the league than Utd atm and finished outside top 4 last year.

Also crashed out of Europa while Ole is still in it.

Someone will have to explain it.
 

AgentSmith

Full Member
Joined
May 13, 2019
Messages
1,557
Rodgers is doing much better job than Ole but somehow is still below in the league than Utd atm and finished outside top 4 last year.

Also crashed out of Europa while Ole is still in it.

Someone will have to explain it.
We’re doing well in second. Leicester are only a point behind us and we still have to play each other. 3rd place is is an equally good achievement for them given the quality and cost of the respective squads.

The second part of your post seems poorly-timed given they just knocked us out of the other competition we were both in.
 

AshRK

Full Member
Joined
Apr 23, 2017
Messages
12,191
Location
Canada
Rodgers is doing much better job than Ole but somehow is still below in the league than Utd atm and finished outside top 4 last year.

Also crashed out of Europa while Ole is still in it.

Someone will have to explain it.
To have this Leicester side in top 3 is a good achievement for Rodgers, so in that comparison he is doing better than not only Ole but all other manager in the league bar Pep or maybe Moyes this season. Doesn't mean Ole is not doing a good job himself.
 

Tallis

Full Member
Joined
Dec 23, 2020
Messages
982
We’re doing well in second. Leicester are only a point behind us and we still have to play each other. 3rd place is is an equally good achievement for them given the quality and cost of the respective squads.

The second part of your post seems poorly-timed given they just knocked us out of the other competition we were both in.
The Europa league was my preemptive pushback to the FA cup

If Leicster finish above Liverpool, I guess you would say that Brendan is better than Klopp given the quality and cost of the Liverpool squad ?
 

AgentSmith

Full Member
Joined
May 13, 2019
Messages
1,557
The Europa league was my preemptive pushback to the FA cup

If Leicster finish above Liverpool, I guess you would say that Brendan is better than Klopp given the quality and cost of the Liverpool squad ?
That’s a nice straw man you’ve constructed there.

What would you consider a good achievement for Leicester this season?
 

FriendlyFox

Full Member
Joined
Sep 20, 2014
Messages
265
Supports
Leicester City
For me neither do Leicester have a better squad than United nor is Rodgers underperforming. I feel Rodgers is doing a much better job than Ole. Yes Leicester have a good set of players and I feel most of your players will start for us but overall squad, United's a bit better.
Yeah, I agree. First XI for First XI, I don't think there's too much in it, but we don't have the depth that you do, so injuries and rotation hits the quality of our squad that much harder.

I don't think Ole has done too bad a job, but I think he's been made to look much better by the fact that nearly every top team has absolutely fallen to pieces this season. Based on our performances this season, Leicester wouldn't be near the top 4 in any "normal" season. I don't think we pass the "eye" test, but I think this is where Rodgers deserves credit, because he's scraped wins - even if they're ugly wins - with a threadbare squad, and had to adapt to find a new way to play at various points this season, based on our injuries (eg. hence the current 3-4-1-2, to utilise Vardy, Perez and Nacho).
 

Pink Moon

Full Member
Joined
Aug 20, 2009
Messages
8,283
Location
Glasgow
Supports
Celtic
I like Brendan, think he would do well with united and with more money and supposedly better players but didn’t we say that about Moyes. Brendan had a better style of play, I’ll give him that
Rodgers has also worked at two clubs where the expectation is to win every single game. A lot of people can never properly get to grips with that level of pressure. No disrespect to Everton but Moyes was coming from a totally different culture to what Liverpool, Celtic and Man United have and I think he definitely struggled with that. I don't think he fully understood it.
 

Water Melon

Guest
Ok - Brendan actually did the biggest bottle of all time last year but let’s ignore it as it’s more convenient.
No, not at all. His squad was decimated with injuries. He has knocked us out of FA cup and is just a point behind us in the prem. We will see how the season ends. Will not be surprised to see his team finish above us.
 

B20

HEY EVERYONE I IGNORE SOMEONE LOOK AT ME
Joined
Aug 23, 2003
Messages
27,607
Location
Disney Land
Supports
Liverpool
No you are absolutely right. Rodgers is usually well rated by neutrals, especially when he gets Leicester a good result, but almost every liverpool fan i've seen usually scoffs at this praise. Not to say they hate him, there is still some respect, but I think they know him better than everyone else.
He's a good manager, not very likeable, who had a lot of learning on the job with us.

He didn't deal well with the pressure. I think Stoke especially kinda broke him for us and his dealings with the club were somewhat unsavory to me. He'll do anything to save his job I believe.

I also think he's learned from his successes at celtic and Leicester. He's clearly better than solskjaer. I don't know that he's good enough to clean up your mess, but put him at a more well run top club, I think he'd do really well. Think he'd have been an excellent choice for Chelsea had they not gone for tuchel.

The football he had us playing in 13/14 is still probably the most entertaining run of match day experiences I've ever had.
 

Raredaredevil

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Oct 11, 2020
Messages
892
He's a good manager, not very likeable, who had a lot of learning on the job with us.

He didn't deal well with the pressure. I think Stoke especially kinda broke him for us and his dealings with the club were somewhat unsavory to me. He'll do anything to save his job I believe.

I also think he's learned from his successes at celtic and Leicester. He's clearly better than solskjaer. I don't know that he's good enough to clean up your mess, but put him at a more well run top club, I think he'd do really well. Think he'd have been an excellent choice for Chelsea had they not gone for tuchel.

The football he had us playing in 13/14 is still probably the most entertaining run of match day experiences I've ever had.
I'm not so sure about Chelsea considering their history with managers. Sure he would have done well with them initially but not so sure about long-term. I think he would have been perfect at Arsenal. I am sure he would do a lot better with their current group of players than Arteta. It will be interesting to see if he goes back to Liverpool after Klopp leaves.