European Super League

Do you want the ESL to happen?


  • Total voters
    1,921
  • Poll closed .

Harry190

Bobby ten Hag
Joined
Apr 18, 2010
Messages
7,617
Location
Canada
I don't think Uefa will guarantee places to those 12 teams. So it won't be exactly like ESL. You'd still have to qualify.
The New format announced on Friday was very close to the 12 automatic qualifications. They're tired of having Anderlecht-Spartak or Lille- Generic team from Kazakhstan dragging the product down.
 

stevoc

Full Member
Joined
Jun 11, 2011
Messages
20,343
I don't think Uefa will guarantee places to those 12 teams. So it won't be exactly like ESL. You'd still have to qualify.
I wouldn't be so sure, weren't they already talking about 'wild card' invitations for historic clubs in the CL revamp?
 

Random Task

WW Lynchpin
Joined
Feb 7, 2010
Messages
34,503
Location
Chester
But those six taking part in both the Super League and in the Premier League is untenable. That'd reduce the PL to nothing but a sad farce.
I mean, players and mangers whine about their workload right now, could you imagine asking them to play 70+ games within a single season, which is what will be expected of those teams playing in both leagues?
 

El Presidente

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Aug 1, 2018
Messages
668
Question...

Forgetting your personal preferences..

Who actually thinks the Super League idea will happen?

I can't tell. It seems a lot of effort to be a negotiation tactic. And contracts have been signed. But i can't see many clubs / players wanting to stick with it.
The answer to this question will change by the day, given the amount of new developments and parties involved.
Key factor here is the British government and how willing will they be to intervene.

But ultimately, yeah, I think this is happening.
 

Paul the Wolf

Full Member
Joined
Apr 17, 2014
Messages
17,815
Location
France - can't win anything with Swedish turnips
But those six taking part in both the Super League and in the Premier League is untenable. That'd reduce the PL to nothing but a sad farce.
In the current format yes, but a compromise of sorts would not surprise me like reducing the number of teams in the PL, to say 16 clubs for example.
If there isn't a compromise you can easily see them going their separate ways which would not be beneficial to anyone and I don't see how the SL will be scrapped now or even if it was, the backlash from the other clubs or fans would still be there.

It's been handled terribly but there has to be an outcome whatever it is.
 

Siorac

Full Member
Joined
Sep 1, 2010
Messages
23,815
I mean, players and mangers whine about their workload right now, could you imagine asking them to play 70+ games within a single season, which is what will be expected of those teams playing in both leagues?
There's that, yes, and also imagine one of them pulling away from the rest like Liverpool last season or City this season. What incentive do the others have to compete, to take the league seriously? Absolutely nothing. And as such, their very presence would distort the competition.
 

FreakyJim

90% of teams play better football than us
Joined
Jan 16, 2006
Messages
9,079
Location
Glazers Out
I wouldn't be so sure, weren't they already talking about 'wild card' invitations for historic clubs in the CL revamp?
That'd be ridiculous and daft. They can't make the statements that they did yesterday and form a UEFA ESL the next day. Or can they?
 

Random Task

WW Lynchpin
Joined
Feb 7, 2010
Messages
34,503
Location
Chester
In the current format yes, but a compromise of sorts would not surprise me like reducing the number of teams in the PL, to say 16 clubs for example.
If there isn't a compromise you can easily see them going their separate ways which would not be beneficial to anyone and I don't see how the SL will be scrapped now or even if it was, the backlash from the other clubs or fans would still be there.

It's been handled terribly but there has to be an outcome whatever it is.
The PL would not agree to that in a million years :lol:
 

AshRK

Full Member
Joined
Apr 23, 2017
Messages
12,186
Location
Canada
Is it just me finding all these cnuts eating each other so fantastically entertaining? UEFA, FIFA, state PR clubs, Glaziers, FSG, PL, Sky...burn it all down! Genuinely starting to believe Joel is going to be driven out of town.
The only good thing is this could finally mean United fans and ex players could unite and put more pressure on Glazers.
 

Fanta Stick

Full Member
Joined
Feb 13, 2021
Messages
2,664
Location
It's alright, I'm from the country.
Ah yeah it is that I think - the typo confused me. It say "Sky has chosen to pay £1,193 million per annum under the terms of the new deal, down £199 million per annum. " ... (obviously its not down from £199m!)

As announced by Bloomberg and confirmed by RMC Sport, UEFA is preparing a counterattack in the Super League. UEFA is working with investment fund to come up with new LOC that would have a starting budget of €4.5b but which could go up to €7b.
'LOC' meaning Line of Credit?
 

Tom Cato

Godt nyttår!
Joined
Jan 3, 2019
Messages
7,582
I think the reports that Chelsea and City are the least committed make sense.
In terms of money - their owners haven't got into this to make money directly, but for prestige and branding.
In terms of dominance - they (esp City) have crazy dominance over established teams under the current system. If the money from the new SL materialises, then even Spurs can compete with them on an almost equal footing, and Roman/Mansour will have to put up a lot more cash to keep them ahead.
In terms of fan backlash - for City, I'm not sure how well-established they are in Asia and America yet. Might need a few more successful years to be able to sever all connections at home. This isn't a concern for the other clubs.
All 3 reasons apply to PSG too, and they're officially out.

It makes sense that Perez (club in debt) and Glazer (more money guaranteed, more competitive team with no extra spending) are the two leading men.
Yep I agree with this.

Roman (and frankly all club owners here) is beyond rich and does not need the extra income He is however all about prestige. Owning a English football club is in many ways a new mode of royalty. He wants the prestige and will only have been pulled into this due to fear of missing out.

If the public backlash continues, I can see Chelsea being the first club to back out. There is no way he's going to be happy with how this has been handled by the Americans.
 

Pogue Mahone

The caf's Camus.
Joined
Feb 22, 2006
Messages
133,905
Location
"like a man in silk pyjamas shooting pigeons
But those six taking part in both the Super League and in the Premier League is untenable. That'd reduce the PL to nothing but a sad farce.
What happens if the SL clubs agree to strict salary/spend caps (rumoured to be one of the main reasons the yank owners are so keen) What’s to stop an ambitious wealthy owner (e.g. at Everton) building a better squad than any of the SL teams? I don’t think domestic domination will necessarily follow for the “big six”. Even more so, if signing for a SL club means players can’t compete in World Cups.
 

Ronaldo's Love Child

Full Member
Joined
Aug 2, 2018
Messages
515
What will it look like when 8,000 turn up on a Wednesday to watch Utd vs Milan?
Woodward and co have shown their true colours now, its shit or bust for them. They cannot possibly stay if this doesn't go ahead.
A chilling thought is they have already thought about all of this and they are not bothered about "legacy fans". They are reaching out to the under-25's who may be willing to pay money for these kind of matches.

Hell. They may already have a good idea how much they can see this to the Asian market and beyond. Maybe they think they don't need match going fans anymore
 

FreakyJim

90% of teams play better football than us
Joined
Jan 16, 2006
Messages
9,079
Location
Glazers Out
A chilling thought is they have already thought about all of this and they are not bothered about "legacy fans". They are reaching out to the under-25's who may be willing to pay money for these kind of matches.

Hell. They may already have a good idea how much they can see this to the Asian market and beyond. Maybe they think they don't need match going fans anymore
the under 25s have no money
 

Dr. Dwayne

Self proclaimed tagline king.
Joined
May 9, 2006
Messages
97,588
Location
Nearer my Cas, to thee
What happens if the SL clubs agree to strict salary/spend caps (rumoured to be one of the main reasons the yank owners are so keen) What’s to stop an ambitious wealthy owner (e.g. at Everton) building a better squad than any of the SL teams? I don’t think domestic domination will necessarily follow for the “big six”. Even more so, if signing for a SL club means players can’t compete in World Cups.
Keep in mind those caps will be based on the inflated revenue of the ESL teams. It will take a lot of money for anyone else to go one better.
 

Gambit

Desperately wants to be a Muppet
Joined
Sep 30, 2004
Messages
30,997
The government of ultra capitalism and just last week was pushing 'greed is good'

They don't give a feck... just seen the public outcry and it's an easy win for them to say they are with the fans... but really the tories have always treated football fans as scum
One of the big concerns for this government is keeping the red wall. Its a big discussion within the conservative party. Word from inside the party at the moment is this is the biggest open goal they've been presented with for decades to curry real favour with the working classes.
 

That_Bloke

Full Member
Joined
May 28, 2019
Messages
2,876
Location
Cologne
Supports
Leicester City
If that's correct it shows that the owners understand neither the game, the fans, or the players and I suspect, they would be in for a shock.
It's from Sky so take as you will...

You can either hear it or directly read Sky's comment in the description.
 

sun_tzu

The Art of Bore
Joined
Aug 23, 2010
Messages
19,536
Location
Still waiting for the Youthquake
A chilling thought is they have already thought about all of this and they are not bothered about "legacy fans". They are reaching out to the under-25's who may be willing to pay money for these kind of matches.

Hell. They may already have a good idea how much they can see this to the Asian market and beyond. Maybe they think they don't need match going fans anymore
50,000 fans... hundred quid a time = £5,000,000 (less costs of staffing etc)
sell the stream of the game for £2 to 5 million people = £10,000,000

For sure there are better ways to make money for clubs than getting in more punters - they could probably give the tickets away for free just for the atmosphere and still make more money by cutting UEFA out of TV negotiations
 

Suv666

Full Member
Joined
Feb 11, 2016
Messages
8,759
Reckon City would back out.
No way Pep would have spoken out the way he did if City weren't getting cold feet.
 

Siorac

Full Member
Joined
Sep 1, 2010
Messages
23,815
What happens if the SL clubs agree to strict salary/spend caps (rumoured to be one of the main reasons the yank owners are so keen) What’s to stop an ambitious wealthy owner (e.g. at Everton) building a better squad than any of the SL teams? I don’t think domestic domination will necessarily follow for the “big six”. Even more so, if signing for a SL club means players can’t compete in World Cups.
Even if they don't dominate: they no longer have any incentive to compete if they can't win the league. Six-way title races are incredibly rare (non-existent, really) and with league position being otherwise completely inconsequential, they could just focus on the SL. It distorts the competition when teams around them at the same time are going for Champions League football.
 

Manny

Grammar Police
Joined
Jul 7, 2014
Messages
4,848
I just find it so pathetic from clubs like ourselves and Liverpool.

We have literally handed clubs like Barcelona a lifeline to stop them from going bankrupt and sold a huge amount of our respect to do so. In case it gets lost on anyone, Spanish clubs barely have 2 pennies to rub together and we have played the biggest roll in building a league that means that we are sustainable and yet because they asked nicely and sold the Glazers on bigger dividends we have thrown that all away.
Agree. Years of poor spending and mismanagement. They should have let them crash
 

OverratedOpinion

Full Member
Joined
Sep 4, 2017
Messages
6,511
I had no idea he worked there.

How does someone oversee a huge decline with a bunch of decisions that are roundly criticised over the years and then get a job at another huge club?

God I wish I had one day in my job with the lack of accountability that football executives have.
 

RedDevil@84

Full Member
Joined
Jun 5, 2014
Messages
21,698
Location
USA
Today: It will capture imagination

Tomorrow: We will guarantee entertainment

Day after: We will make sure every match is competitive and fun to watch

Few days after: Hey!! Do you think we should game the system a bit to bring more entertainment to the fans.
 

The Purley King

Full Member
Joined
Mar 26, 2014
Messages
4,268
A chilling thought is they have already thought about all of this and they are not bothered about "legacy fans". They are reaching out to the under-25's who may be willing to pay money for these kind of matches.

Hell. They may already have a good idea how much they can see this to the Asian market and beyond. Maybe they think they don't need match going fans anymore
I'm 100% certain they don't need them financially, but for the spectacle you really do need full stadiums (and not full of tourists on a jolly).
I don't know anyone who particularly enjoys watching games at the moment, I mean we watch them because there is no choice, but it just wouldn't be the same if grounds were only ever 20% full or whatever.

(cue joke about the Emptihad)
 

RedRover

Full Member
Joined
Mar 19, 2007
Messages
8,951
Those clubs can presumably still develop great players and sell them to super league clubs, and they can have the further honour of applying for a guest place in next years super league. However, Perez and Woodward will have to check if they're more financially attractive than say, Everton, and if not they can give up on their lofty dreams of sharing a pitch again with the mighty Real Madrid, Barcelona and Tottenham, and maybe work on their brands, reach more future fans, thank Perez again for saving football, and reapply again next year.
Indeed. Stand up guys the pair of them. Selfless, with only the game at heart. If this new debacle covers up their inability to properly run the clubs they're in charge of then I suspect that's nothing more than a coincidence.

In all seriousness, you wouldn't see Sir Lawrence acting like this...