g = window.googletag || {}; googletag.cmd = googletag.cmd || []; window.googletag = googletag; googletag.cmd.push(function() { var interstitialSlot = googletag.defineOutOfPageSlot('/17085479/redcafe_gam_interstitial', googletag.enums.OutOfPageFormat.INTERSTITIAL); if (interstitialSlot) { interstitialSlot.addService(googletag.pubads()); } });
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Don’t think there’s any chance the likes of Mount or James are Chelsea players now without Frank.They’d be playing for random midtable clubs right now most likely.Lampard thamks also
For what? Being a shit manager
Fair enough.Don’t think there’s any chance the likes of Mount or James are Chelsea players now without Frank.They’d be playing for random midtable clubs right now most likely.
That's 21 CL titles per 90, but these stats are always a bit inflated for subs.Just saw a crazy stat for Kovacic. He's won 4 CL by playing a grand total of 17mins.....
What is the most won by a single individual? 5 or 6? He could potentially match it without playing even 45 mins of football at that rate.Just saw a crazy stat for Kovacic. He's won 4 CL by playing a grand total of 17mins.....
Has to feel a bit weird doesn't it, still counts, but it can't quite feel the same as you know playing a lot of the actual games.Just saw a crazy stat for Kovacic. He's won 4 CL by playing a grand total of 17mins.....
6 by Paco Gento.What is the most won by a single individual? 5 or 6? He could potentially match it without playing even 45 mins of football at that rate.
Thanks for sharing that. A very good read. (Well, 'good' is not really the right word, but I can't really think of a more appropriate one.)Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Some interesting quotes.
Well worth your time reading the entire thing.
How many did Maldini win ?6 by Paco Gento.
CL era, Cristiano has 5.
5How many did Maldini win ?
With his story, from unemployed to cl winner you can bet he learnt a lot about how to be humble and overcome adversity. Very few players like him had the experience of other side of the world.Mendy seems like a nice person.
Bit strange to be flukey and dominant in every single match since the group stages. And that largely applies domestically as well, profligacy from the front line being the leading cause of any domestic failures.It all seems a bit flukey for a team to win the Champions league without being even close to winning their domestic league. Might be just me though.
Giroud and Abraham leaving gives us Werner and Havertz as our only two options so it seems we have to sign at least one striker, but who will it be?Watch Chelsea get a proper striker and showbwhat they are made of these days. Roman is efficient and ruthless.
I won't be surprised if you go all out for Haaland to be honest. He would fit quite well in your system, I guess. We have seen Lukaku play for us, so I do not see him tearing it up in the prem.Giroud and Abraham leaving gives us Werner and Havertz as our only two options so it seems we have to sign at least one striker, but who will it be?
I can't see it being Haaland or Kane, it might be, i just don't think it's likely. Outside of that i wouldn't be bothered about Lukaku, he'd be ok but not much of an improvement on Tammy or Giroud for nearly £80m.
Other than that you're looking at taking a punt on an up and coming striker.
It'd be nice but we'd be talking at least £120m plus £20-30m for Raoila plus £10m signing on and £300k a week salary...I won't be surprised if you go all out for Haaland to be honest. He would fit quite well in your system, I guess. We have seen Lukaku play for us, so I do not see him tearing it up in the prem.
A very, very misinformed post. And I see so many people make similar comments here.Tell you what, ourselves and Liverpool should be pretty damn frustrated at Roman rediscovering his love of football. Given his wealth, you just know he's made a few billion in the past few years just from existing, and why not pump it back into his toys. New yachts, helicopters and of course football players.
In the end, other clubs cannot compete with Chelse and City when the owners choose to spend. Imagine if Chelsea do purchase a top level striker, that'll mean in the past couple of windows they'll have added (all Euros from transfermrkt)
Ziyech (40m)
Werner (53m)
Havertz (80m)
Pulisic (64m)
+ Top level striker (80m or so at least)
Just in the forward positions. Before that Kovacic and Jorginho to midfield, and of course a hefty fee for Chilwell.
For all our dreaming of a big summer - THAT is the kind of spending that only the sugar-daddy clubs can make real.
And it shoudl really scare us, Pool, Arsenal and Spurs imo.
Roman has said for at least 5 years that Chelsea must become self sufficient. Luckily Mariana has some kind of magic selling players for over the market price or at least all of it.... for most players.A very, very misinformed post. And I see so many people make similar comments here.
These are values from the same website you quoted. (with price-inflation ignored and assuming the website you quoted is perfectly correct)
-----
Do you know what is the net Chelsea expenditure on player tranfers in the last 10 years?
From 2011/12 to 2020/21, Chelsea have spent 492m net on player transfers.
Do you know how much we have spent in the same period?
A whopping 861m! That's almost 42% more money than the 'sugar-daddy' club has spent in the last decade.
The whole floating idea of 'benevolent Chelsea's sugar-daddy" is hogwash.
I haven't done the calculations, but Liverpool's owners and most definitely, City's owners have spent more than Roman Abramovich in the last decade.
(p.s. calculation may be off by a few million here and there)
edit: may be not Liverpool.