Gazza
Full Member
Isn’t the most likely scenario that Kane now realizes his hand isn’t that strong and that Levy has the higher card? The interview with Gary Neville was Kane’s big move and it’s not enough.
Exactly, he Zaha'd himself. I'll never understand how these player's agents can't see the big picture and advise them to maybe lose some money for a year to not only gain the freedom to chose but even more money through wages/signing bonus at a bigger club. Even if Tottenham won the Champion's League, you just know they would not be able to compete long term with United and City every single year...His hand has never been that strong. Just a terrible decision to sign such a long term contract with no get out clause. He’d need to more or less down tools to force an exit.
Well, City's team is much better than Shearer's Newcastle so I guess if Kane were to join City he could even eventually get Shearer's PL goalscoring recordI have doubts too. He's obviously a very good striker and would score buckets of goals for City, against teams they already score buckets of goals against. He's a great finisher but he's not somebody that's going to work to create openings, he needs to ball delivered to him in a place where he can fashion a shot. That doesn't happen often against top defenders. I don't see him being the player who makes the difference in the biggest games for them aka he's not going to win them the Champions League.
This below is a great summary of him as a player imo. His solid top 6 record is bumped up by Arsenal and Leicester, teams hardly known for their stellar defences. It's a long time ago and no detailed stats exist for it, but i felt much the same about Shearer. I think our history would be a lot different had we signed him instead of Cantona.
Thrilled to work with Nuno.He sounds thrilled at the prospect
I'm not sure City will end up going for Kane or Haaland given Pep's comments. Even LukakuDon't think City will go more than £100m.
Makes you wonder why players like Kane dont insert release clauses into their contracts, to safeguard them in times like this. Yes Spurs were doing well when he extended, but that was never going to last. If he would have negotiated say a 70meur clause in their he would have been in a far stronger position now. As it is, who is going to spend 100m+ to get him.Signing that big contract at Spurs was certainly a debatable move at the time, though granted Spurs were looking competitive and stable during that period
Also obviously need to factor in the current Covid climate.
They probably prefer the £100m only.Maybe they would take JLingz, Martial, Bailey, Matic, Mata, Jones, Andreas and 100 million.
Don't sugar coat it, mate. Tell us what you really think.If there is any justice in the world this cheating mouthbreathing prick will end his career trophyless. The biggest diver in world football.
If people think it's annoying now, just wait until he is winning points for City with his cheating.
Gormless fecking cnut.
Yeah, this is my prediction too.I think Levy is going to be the one that comes out of this looking worst. While people are saying currently “Kane shouldn’t have signed that contract”, the same people will be saying “Levy had the chance to get over £100m for him, he was stupid to push for £150m when the signs were there that he’s physically degrading”.
I think he may be able to hit Lewandowski numbers if he goes there. If he plays an entire season for them without injury I see 30 as the minimum...I'd hate to see Kane go to City, but I can't help but to be curious to see how many goals he'd get in a top side. No one in Prem history has ever really threatened the 40 goals in a season mark. But Kane really could hit those sort of numbers playing for a team that would create as much for him as City would.
Isn't that just classic Pep though? Claim he'd never buy a player for more than £5m or something about a week before splashing out £500m on a set of backup defenders?Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Well it's also classic City to get priced out of a deal so it's not something that would be without a precedent.Isn't that just classic Pep though? Claim he'd never buy a player for more than £5m or something about a week before splashing out £500m on a set of backup defenders?
The moment that changed Harry’s tournament.
I thought it would of been Martial and Lingard as Bale has gone back to Madrid but heard rumours its DVB plus Martial.https://www.footballinsider247.com/sources-man-united-in-pole-position-to-sign-kane-as-tottenham/
Any other sources reporting this?
Martial + ? For Kane?
Popped up as a cited source on ESPN today, and I hadn’t heard of it before. Seems like no one else is confirming it, so it can’t have any truth to it, no?I thought it would of been Martial and Lingard as Bale has gone back to Madrid but heard rumours its DVB plus Martial.
I've not seen it reported anywhere else thou so I'm thinking its just a rumour.
Well it's also classic City to get priced out of a deal so it's not something that would be without a precedent.
I can’t either. Depends who the two assets are of course. Picking figures out of the air, £80m plus a couple of turkeys might be offered?They will let him go, Levy is all about money. If he were to get a large cash injection plus two players with real value, he would take it.
80 million pounds won’t interest him at all, but 100 million and two assets that could potential rise in value. He is a money man first and foremost.
I just can’t see United putting in what is essentially a 170-180 million pound bid.
I think 80m and Martial plus Lingard would be a good deal for both or even DVB plus Martial and 80m.I can’t either. Depends who the two assets are of course. Picking figures out of the air, £80m plus a couple of turkeys might be offered?
Do people really believe this?)https://www.footballinsider247.com/sources-man-united-in-pole-position-to-sign-kane-as-tottenham/
Any other sources reporting this?
Martial + ? For Kane?