1. That recruitment is down to Ole though. He goes deeper in to the profile of the players he signs and not just look at what they do on the pitch. He also doesn't settle for cheap targets and will wait for the right man like he did with Sancho.
2. You can think that and that's fair enough but Ole has shown in his head to heads with these managers that he has something about him. Tuchel before he came to Chelsea would have been viewed in the Rogers bracket and Poch was seen as the heir apparent, this grass is always greener sentiment doesn't always ring true.
3. I disagree that the other teams like Chelsea and City would need first team additions to the extent that Utd do. We have a gaping hole through the whole squad in midfield. City might need a striker but considering what they had last year was good enough to win the league at a canter, I suspect they'll be just fine with Grealish coming in. Likewise, Chelsea's one big issue was goalscoring and they remedied that with Lukaku and are looking at bolstering their already strong defence with Kounde. Us on the other hand, had 3 (arguably 4 considering Cavani's off this season) gaping holes in its squad, where we essentially have had squad players or square pegs playing. We rectified two of those but the most important one hasn't been fixed. And next season we will still need for it to be resolved, along with a proper striker. The teams around us only have to add a touch here and there, like replacing Mendy as the backup LB at City while we're still trying to build our first XI
I think these are the kind of comments that are the reason people (myself) included believe there will always be a constant stream of excuses and moving of goalposts when it comes to Ole. There will literally never be a time where we can fairly judge him with this logic . He will literally need a 23 man squad of hand picked, world class 50 million plus signings.
The idea that this time a year ago Chelsea just needed a centre forward would be disingenuous so why would it be the case now?
You talk about bolstering a strong defence, I don’t remember anybody raving about Chelsea’s defence last year until Tuchel came in. Christensen and Rudiger are regular starters atm. Absolutely nobody was describing these players as being part of an ‘already strong defence’.
The reason you’re saying now it is because of Thomas Tuchel, you just don’t seem to be aware of it.
I also remember talk of Chelsea needing a winger to replace Hazard. They still haven’t replaced him.
Tuchel simply utilised what he had, changed formation and now they don’t need one.
Liverpool you could easily argue need another centre back, a central midfielder to replace Wijnaldum. They’ve arguably needed a number ten for some time and Firmino is another player Liverpool could upgrade on if the funds were there. Luckily they don’t have the funds so won’t be. But it deffo isn’t a “touch here and there”.
And city “might need a striker” is one hell of an understatement. I mean I’ll fall short of feeling sorry for them but you can’t play it down like you have whilst trying to make out it’ll be a huge thing for us next summer. They literally have one senior striker in their books and essentially played without one half of last season and you’ve acknowledge they managed to win the league without it last year but again this is partly due to having a world class manager who adapted and managed without one. We have four senior players on our books capable of playing centre forward.
Id also add if you’re short a centre midfielder and striker it’s probably not a good idea to spend 45 million on an attacking midfielder who you then never use.