Gentleman Jim
It's absolutely amazing! Perfect even.
I don’t particularly but just blowing everyone out of the water takes away any element of sport about it. There’s not much left as it is.Why would you care about the price as a City fan?
I don’t particularly but just blowing everyone out of the water takes away any element of sport about it. There’s not much left as it is.Why would you care about the price as a City fan?
Kane at 100m total is about right IMO. 150ish is too much.How does that make any difference to you as a fan? You said in another thread that Grealish is fair market value for £100m. But you think Kane isn’t?
Your club wins the lottery, spends billions to setup a squad, blows away every team that used to beat you 8-0 at some point of time and you are thinking now is a good time to take the moral high ground?I don’t particularly but just blowing everyone out of the water takes away any element of sport about it. There’s not much left as it is.
That ship sailed a long time ago.I don’t particularly but just blowing everyone out of the water takes away any element of sport about it. There’s not much left as it is.
City never offered £150m.It seems bizarre that Spurs would turn down £150M, or whatever, for Kane.
I can only imagine that they can't find a replacement top striker in the £60M-£80M price range who actually wants to play for them.
No.Your club wins the lottery, spends billions to setup a squad, blows away every team that used to beat you 8-0 at some point of time and you are thinking now is a good time to take the moral high ground?
A bit rich coming from you, mate or do you put Asterix’s next to your recent honours as many ask us to?That ship sailed a long time ago.
Asterix?A bit rich coming from you, mate or do you put Asterix’s next to your recent honours as many ask us to?
Don't forget Champions League finalistMan, to think one of England's best strikers in a long time (and potentially one of the best strikers over the last few years) will have a pathetic achievements list when he finally becomes a pundit on Sky Sports.
HARRY KANE
Euro 21 finalist & played for Tottenham.
He'll be sitting next to someone like:
MARC ALBRIGHTON
Premier League & FA Cup winner.
That doesn’t include the games when Kane comes back too early and plays like a shadow of himself? May as well double that 56Since 2015 -
Harry "old man glass ankles" Kane:
Games missed - 56
Days missed - 312
Jack Grealish:
Games missed - 58
Days missed - 371
Yes, it's only Kane who doesn't come back at 100% peak sharpness following an injury.That doesn’t include the games when Kane comes back too early and plays like a shadow of himself? May as well double that 56
Not sure what the point of this post is.City never offered £150m.
But goals isn’t the issue and I can’t think of anybody who literally goes out half fit for weeks on end chasing the golden boot.Yes, it's only Kane who doesn't come back at 100% peak sharpness following an injury.
But even if we go along with that idea it still hasn't stopped him putting up numbers that only a handful of players across the world can match.
That would be a great record to get but there's one important person who would prefer the chance to win big trophies elsewhere and that's Harry Kane.HARRY KANE
All time England, Tottenham and Premier League goal scorer
Loads of irrelevant players have medals but only one can claim the above.
Well how can you claim it's bemusing for Spurs to turn down £150m when they weren't offered £150m? That's like me saying I can't believe you turned down a night with Megan Fox.Not sure what the point of this post is.
You're wrong, but I'm not going to tell you what's right?
I did say "or whatever" in my post.
Asterix?
Its not "rich coming from me". It comes from me with experience. I've seen a load of Chelsea fans try to kid themselves about reality.
I don't pretend Chelsea don't spunk a feckload. We did, we do and there's still no asterisk, Obelisk, Getafix or Mickey Mouse next to any of either sides trophies.
Stop being a smart arse and share what you believe the actual offer was, since you seem to know so much about it!Well how can you claim it's bemusing for Spurs to turn down £150m when they weren't offered £150m? That's like me saying I can't believe you turned down a night with Megan Fox.
If you have any evidence of Spurs turning down £150m feel free to post it.
* Just trying to add an element of humour. I’m not so fick as you fink.Asterix?
Its not "rich coming from me". It comes from me with experience. I've seen a load of Chelsea fans try to kid themselves about reality.
I don't pretend Chelsea don't spunk a feckload. We did, we do and there's still no asterisk, Obelisk, Getafix or Mickey Mouse next to any of either sides trophies.
City were widely reported to have made two offers. One in June of £75m + £25m in add ons and then one more recently a deal "potentially totalling £125m".Stop being a smart arse and share what you believe the actual offer was, since you seem to know so much about it!
Says a supporter of a club so squeaky clean that their shit don’t stink.Hilarious to see a Bitter arguing with a Chelsea fan about ‘morals’. One supports a club owned by a questionable Russian who is big mates with a bloke that ordered the murder of British Citizens and the other supports a team that has broken FFP rules twice and got away with it, a team owned by a government that throws anyone that criticises them into jail with no trial, traffics young boys to ride camels until they get too heavy and they are kicked out. A team that ‘takes the knee’ against racism which is rife in the UAE and is managed by a twice convicted drug abuser. Hilarious
Probably shouldn’t have signed a six year deal then should he, it’s been about 60 years since Spurs last won a trophyCompletely different scenarios, one had one multiple PL and a CL and submitted a transfer request as he wasn't sure we'd stay at that level because of our transfers. The other wants to move just to win a trophy because his team are that shit they can't even qualify for the Europa League.
I agree with the Kane > Haaland, for now, I don't think it will be too long before it will be Haaland > Kane. Haaland and Mbappe will be the next superstar strikers as Kane winds down into the twilight of his career and they ascend to dominance.Yeah, that's one reasonable suggestion to have Haaland > Kane.
But for me as a player it's Kane > Haaland, and he comes circus free. In either case I think we'll get 5 years tops of top performances, for differing reasons.
He has just turned 28.For Tottenham I just keep thinking selling him for £150 Million will be very wise business.
He's 29, they're going to have to start to think about potentially replacing him over the next few years whatever happens because he's been overplayed so much he's likely to not age very well IMO.
Point stands...He has just turned 28.
Their owners have spent billions to setup a football club conglomerate known as City Football Group as part of their sporting portfolio. Their flagship club just so happens to be City. It has allowed their ownership and state officials to have visibility and direct business workings with major cities and local governments and leagues around the world.Your club wins the lottery, spends billions to setup a squad, blows away every team that used to beat you 8-0 at some point of time and you are thinking now is a good time to take the moral high ground?
But the above is meaningless. Winning is what matters.Don't forget Champions League finalist
More seriously though, you can paint it that way if you like but he could potentially also be:
HARRY KANE
All time England, Tottenham and Premier League goal scorer
Loads of irrelevant players have medals but only one can claim the above.
Exactly. Well doneTheir owners have spent billions to setup a football club conglomerate known as City Football Group as part of their sporting portfolio. Their flagship club just so happens to be City. It has allowed their ownership and state officials to have visibility and direct business workings with major cities and local governments and leagues around the world.
Football and sport is just an avenue for the owners to make themselves relevant across the world in another way then they traditionally have been.
Harry Kane to PSG , u heard it first
A post about how injury prone players are from a poster named Bale... love it.Since 2015 -
Harry "old man glass ankles" Kane:
Games missed - 56
Days missed - 312
Jack Grealish:
Games missed - 58
Days missed - 371
I predict a blank cheque is on it's way from Manchester to London right about now.