Higher than 6? Really? I'd to hear more about this system.Conceding only one chance with 10 men is unacceptable to you?
I mean I gave AWB and Lingardinho a 2 or 3 in the ratings. But all the others got higher than a 6 from me.
2 freak individual errors cost us. The team defended well as a unit, evidenced by the fact we gave away one fecking chance defending with 10 for 60 mins.
This post is shit.
I rated everybody with 5, except for Lingard and AWB and I think Ronaldo for getting us a goal. He got a 6, AWB and Lingard got a 4 iirc. 5 means, the player did mostly what was expected from him, without notably being bad or good. I think, this is already pretty generous because I think, it is safe to assume that we should expect a bit more from us as a team and therefor its players. I considered Ole's tactics to be responsible for that, so I did not want to rate the players to badly. But "higher than 6"?? For what? DVB higher than 6? Sancho? Shaw?
I actually think, this is an interesting topic because it might show us how much mindsets affect our perception. (both directions of course)
Only way for me to imagine a system like yours, is that applied to Rio and Vida back then, they would have never left the field without a 9 or 10.
Last edited: