Newcastle United now owned by the PIF | PL receives "legally binding assurances that the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia will not control NUFC" ;)

Infra-red

Full Member
Joined
May 4, 2010
Messages
13,428
Location
left wing
They need the infrastructure and develop the pull to attract the players good enough. They aren’t coming into a weakened league ala City, it’ll take them longer to get a foothold.
They have infinite money for attracting players. Initially, that will mean picking up slightly over the hill former greats looking for one last payday (plus a smattering of talented youngsters), but they should be competing at the top of the transfer market within 4-5 years. The stadium and training ground will require significant upgrades of course, but those projects can be completed within 3-4 years.

I'd be absolutely amazed if they weren't challenging for the league by the mid-point of the decade, given the resources they have at their disposal.
 

Zexstream

Anti-anti-racist
Joined
Aug 31, 2011
Messages
2,095
Will this breathe new life into the Superleague?

The Elite clubs knew what was coming, next up will be Norwich to be taken over.
 

glazed

Eats diamonds to beat thermodynamics
Joined
Sep 30, 2012
Messages
7,787
Honestly think it’s Chelsea in the long run. Say it takes 10 years for Newcastle to threaten the top 4, then it takes longer to consistently stay there. How long is Roman going to stick it when he’s nearing 70?
Well he's not getting any poorer or less vain so who knows?
 

Yorkeontop

meonbottom
Joined
Aug 10, 2010
Messages
6,817
Location
Inside Fred the Red
Surely it's just showing what each poster believes, I doubt anyone is 'shaken' unless they are Newcastle fans? Not Tony Blair though, he doesn't give a hoot.
Don't mind me too much, I'm just glad I don't care about things that bother some people. Plenty of other things I care more about.
 

SirAF

Ageist
Joined
Sep 28, 2003
Messages
37,675
Location
Apple claim progress? So still making products in child labour factorities. What's your point? OK what about you TV? Or literally every other technology product in your house.
Did you read beyond the headline? It said no cases.

My point is that your example was wrong.

I've seen first hand the lengths large corporations go to to make sure there are no labour violations amongst their suppliers. There are armies of people working on it and all sorts of checks, but some cases will always slip through. It's vastly different to a country having laws that purposely oppress large swathes of the population.
Exactly.
 
Last edited:

cyberman

Full Member
Joined
May 26, 2010
Messages
37,331
They have infinite money for attracting players. Initially, that will mean picking up slightly over the hill former greats looking for one last payday (plus a smattering of talented youngsters), but they should be competing at the top of the transfer market within 4-5 years. The stadium and training ground will require significant upgrades of course, but those projects can be completed within 3-4 years.

I'd be absolutely amazed if they weren't challenging for the league by the mid-point of the decade, given the resources they have at their disposal.
But there’s still FFP to think about and it’s not as if other clubs aren’t throwing around money themselves. They still have to attract the calibre of players to challenge the top 4 without CL football and that’s a massive hurdle in itself. Plus squads need planning and an ethos needs to built at the club.
Look at the likes of Everton who just throw enormous money around and is doesn’t elevate them to top 4 challenging status.
 

Infra-red

Full Member
Joined
May 4, 2010
Messages
13,428
Location
left wing
But there’s still FFP to think about and it’s not as if other clubs aren’t throwing around money themselves. They still have to attract the calibre of players to challenge the top 4 without CL football and that’s a massive hurdle in itself. Plus squads need planning and an ethos needs to built at the club.
Look at the likes of Everton who just throw enormous money around and is doesn’t elevate them to top 4 challenging status.
FFP will be swept aside by Newcastle, just as it has been by City and PSG. Multiple sponsorship deals with Saudi-based companies and their partners will be imminent.
 

glazed

Eats diamonds to beat thermodynamics
Joined
Sep 30, 2012
Messages
7,787
They need the infrastructure and develop the pull to attract the players good enough. They aren’t coming into a weakened league ala City, it’ll take them longer to get a foothold.
They will first get a high quality director of football as a statement of intent. Then they will get a decent but not elite high press coach and start building out from there. When they reach critical mass of quality they will get an elite high press coach and start challenging. It's pretty much the City textbook
 

matt10000

Full Member
Joined
Dec 6, 2018
Messages
1,336
Location
Salford UK
As I said we in the western world enjoy the fruits of all sorts of products and services which come off the backs of terrible social issues yet we happily look over everyday. It's embarrassing to me people here typing about having the moral high ground whilst typing off a mobile phone made in child labour factorities.
Well many of us are guilty of not knowing the full supply chain history, factory of origin and their working practices for everything we purchase but I am sure there are very few of us who execute journalists and homosexuals, imprison people for protesting, use torture as a punishment and discriminate against women, although to be fair to them it isn't all bad, in June 2021, Saudi Arabia started allowing women to live alone without permission from a male guardian....whoopee
 

11101

Full Member
Joined
Aug 26, 2014
Messages
21,350
My point is countries are still dealing with what the West has done to them over the last 500 years. There are loads of countries including mine which haven't moved on and can't as they are still having things done to them and there has been no attempt at righting the wrongs that have been done to them previously.

Also your second point is hilarious. I said you can complain at the Saudis all you want. But to call a Newcastle fan embarrassing or using it as a way to hold some sort of moral highground over them is ridiculous.
If a country is still dealing with something the West did to them 500 years ago that's on the country, not the West. We were busy cleaning up after a civil war and chopping our Queens' heads off in 1521. The world was a totally different place.

Unless you are French. We had plenty of scraps with them back then.
 

KiD MoYeS

Good Craig got his c'nuppins
Joined
Feb 1, 2010
Messages
33,018
Location
Love is Blind
People are so naive to be referring to FFP as a potential roadblock to stopping the Saudi Arabians finding a way to spend.
 

Charlie Foley

Full Member
Joined
Mar 11, 2012
Messages
18,522
Imagine if they get relegated this season. Very real chance that they do. Signing a conga line of stars won't be easy if you're not even in the top flight. Now imagine if they get relegated and don't secure promotion next season. The fecking banter.
Wolves put together a very strong squad in the championship
 

Kinsella

Copy & Paste Merchant
Joined
Jan 20, 2012
Messages
2,775
What country did that to you? Norway? Sweden? Austria? Finland? Italy? Ireland?

Or... UK? America?

You are trying to exploit general guilt, I'm not buying it.Sorry.
I've really grown to dislike the use of the term 'The West' and if there was a thumbs up emoji available I would insert it here.

Although...I would say that people in certain countries in the so-called West also use the term too casually; perhaps just arrogantly, or to assuage a certain sense of guilt.
 

duffer

Sensible and not a complete jerk like most oppo's
Scout
Joined
Jun 24, 2004
Messages
50,569
Location
Chelsea (the saviours of football) fan.
Are they going to buy out their shirt sponsor? I can't imagine they'll be too happy holding up a shirt with "Fun88" (a Chinese gambling firm who is their current one) on it.
 

Dante

Average bang
Joined
Oct 22, 2010
Messages
25,280
Location
My wit's end
Are they going to buy out their shirt sponsor? I can't imagine they'll be too happy holding up a shirt with "Fun88" (a Chinese gambling firm who is their current one) on it.
It'll be an interesting litmus test for how stereotypically fundamentalist the new Saudi ownership really is.

Part of me thinks that they might run the club in a completely secular way. This takeover is, after all, an attempt to sports wash the negativity around the nation's image.
 

Robbie Boy

Full Member
Joined
Jun 17, 2010
Messages
28,398
Location
Dublin
Glad it was Newcastle, as I already despised them. At least I don't have to go hating on a brand new team.
 

duffer

Sensible and not a complete jerk like most oppo's
Scout
Joined
Jun 24, 2004
Messages
50,569
Location
Chelsea (the saviours of football) fan.
It'll be an interesting litmus test for how stereotypically fundamentalist the new Saudi ownership really is.

Part of me thinks that they might run the club in a completely secular way. This takeover is, after all, an attempt to sports wash the negativity around the nation's image.
There's secular and there's secular. I doubt they'll sack all the gay employees but I think promoting gambling (especially as their main shirt sponsor) might be a bit much.

As you say, it'll be a decent test.
 

FreakyJim

90% of teams play better football than us
Joined
Jan 16, 2006
Messages
9,098
Location
Glazers Out
People are so naive to be referring to FFP as a potential roadblock to stopping the Saudi Arabians finding a way to spend.
It's kind of a roadblock. If there wasn't any FFP you'd probably seen City, Chelsea and PSG spending 10times as much. Haaland and Kane would've been signed on the spot for whatever money.
 

Lentwood

Full Member
Joined
Jan 2, 2015
Messages
6,883
Location
West Didsbury, Manchester
Not 6-months ago, the footballing media, led by Sky Sports, were decrying foreign ownership causing 'grassroots' values and fans to be abandoned.

Not heard a squeak out of them yet about this...

And herein lies my issue. In a sense, I am quite happy for Newcastle fans. I can understand why they are buzzing about this, why wouldn't they be? Previously they had nothing to look forward too, now all of a sudden, it's highly likely that within 4/5 seasons, they will be competing for top domestic and European trophies.

However, how are Sunderland fans feeling right now? Or Middlesbrough fans? Or Derby fans, West Ham fans, Forest fans...

Ultimately, it looks like if you're not already at the top table, your chance of grabbing a seat relies solely on you being bought by a foreign investment fund. Tell me that doesn't take something away from the game as a whole.
 

Dante

Average bang
Joined
Oct 22, 2010
Messages
25,280
Location
My wit's end
Five years from now, the established top 4 will be United, City, Chelsea and Newcastle.

Liverpool bought a good crop of players on the cheap a few years ago, but that kind of luck tends not to repeat itself. They don't have the money to do it the regular way so won't be able to maintain their current status. Arsenal and Tottenham won't get another look-in for the foreseeable future. Leicester can say goodbye to their glory years as well.
 

Dancfc

Full Member
Joined
Oct 28, 2016
Messages
7,417
Supports
Chelsea
Will this breathe new life into the Superleague?

The Elite clubs knew what was coming, next up will be Norwich to be taken over.
The PL and top end of the Championship is a Superleague in all but name anyway.

The UCL is even worse.
 

Dante

Average bang
Joined
Oct 22, 2010
Messages
25,280
Location
My wit's end
They'll be in the next super League proposal
The Premier League pretty much is the Super League now.

Real, Bayern, Juve and PSG will dominate their own domestic leagues for the next decade. But PL will have 4 of its own clubs with just as much money and clout as all of them - in addition to a midtable who could easily go toe-to-toe with anyone in Europe on a good day.
 

nuanced

loves geopolitical narrative
Joined
Oct 14, 2020
Messages
479
Will this breathe new life into the Superleague?

The Elite clubs knew what was coming, next up will be Norwich to be taken over.
City and PSG were invited to the superleague. If NUFC owners have serious dosh they're willing to spend, then they'd also be invited to it.
 

cyberman

Full Member
Joined
May 26, 2010
Messages
37,331
They will first get a high quality director of football as a statement of intent. Then they will get a decent but not elite high press coach and start building out from there. When they reach critical mass of quality they will get an elite high press coach and start challenging. It's pretty much the City textbook
But City didn’t have the quality up against them that Newcastle have now. The year Pep agreed to join City they should have finished 5th if we didn’t bottle the West Ham game.
The standard has raised, in part due to City themselves, which means you have to be elite on and off the pitch to compete. It’s not just getting top 4 but going up against the best sides in Europe who look as if they can only get stronger themselves
 

Sviken

New Member
Joined
Aug 29, 2021
Messages
2,450
Why do these sheikhs never buy Spanish clubs? I've always been curious. Does the league there forbid such a scenario?
 

Dancfc

Full Member
Joined
Oct 28, 2016
Messages
7,417
Supports
Chelsea
The Premier League pretty much is the Super League now.

Real, Bayern, Juve and PSG will dominate their own domestic leagues for the next decade. But PL will now have 4 of its own clubs with just as much money and clout as all of them - plus a midtable who could easily go toe-to-toe with anyone in Europe on a good day.
Not only that the rest of the league and top half of the Championship is effectively a closed shop aswell due to relegation reward money and parachute payment.

The likes of Norwich, Fulham and WBA can just keep going down without any real consequence as their 'reward' money for relegation will trump any dreamer club out of the water and make sure it's not long until they're back. Case in point Barnsley getting play offs against all odds last season but having their manager poached by West Brom as the 'reward' for their efforts. We're only two months in this season and the top 7 are all bar one recent PL clubs.

To put it into context, I read a team has to win the FA Cup for the next 52 years to earn as much out of the competition as SHU did for finishing bottom of the league last season. If that's true that there shows everything that's wrong with football and the fact it's not being scrutinised is even worse.
 

Lentwood

Full Member
Joined
Jan 2, 2015
Messages
6,883
Location
West Didsbury, Manchester
Why do these sheikhs never buy Spanish clubs? I've always been curious. Does the league there forbid such a scenario?
La Liga have gotten pretty strict on FFP. Plus, La Liga is not as marketable. Yes, Barcelona and Real Madrid are iconic clubs, and likely always will be, but arguably that's because of what they have achieved in Europe.

The fact is, La Liga is nowhere near the commercial juggernaught that the PL has become
 

tomaldinho1

Full Member
Joined
Nov 26, 2015
Messages
18,055
Why do these sheikhs never buy Spanish clubs? I've always been curious. Does the league there forbid such a scenario?
I think City's owners also own Girona, I think there's genuinely some kind of dodgy link there given Pep's brother is the other major owner.
 

Someone

Something
Joined
Oct 21, 2007
Messages
7,979
Location
Somewhere
Hi, again, I’m saudi and I’ll try to give an insight on how PIF works and why the figure (10x richer than Man City) is not accurate.

For those who expect that Saudi is in it for image (only) should read more on how PIF operates.

PIF is a sovereign fund. One of the biggest in the world (I think only behind Norway sovereign fund, but I could be wrong)

PIF is one of the main vehicles for Saudi to diversify the economy away from oil. It’s responsible for lots of the biggest projects in the world that cost huge amounts of money (you can read on NEOM, Amala, Red Sea, Qiddeyah … and many other projects inside saudi). As well as a lot of international investments (of which new castle is now one).

PIF has clear announced returns targets that they have to meet (like all other funds). Yes, it has a lot of money, but it also has a lot of projects.

Long story short, PIF expects good returns on their investments. New Castle is not a passion project of some billionaire who liked how the stadium looks or just want to show off against other rich peers. The amount of money PIF has is irrelevant because PIF will cut its losses if returns are below what’s expected.

That being said, I do expect that PIF will invest (within reason) as long as that Investment will generate returns.

I also expect that PIF will invest in the City of New Castle as a measure to maximize returns (beyond the club itself).
If that's true, and the they're really looking for a ROI, then in all likelihood we won't be seeing fake inflated sponsorship deals from other PIF companies. Do you honestly think that won't happen?