yeahhh, totally, that´s why he was player of the tournament, 3 months ago in Copa América and pichichi in Spain. He is injured since Copa and doing preety well, he is not a goalscorer, you people need to stop using goals as if they were the only metric to measure player's performaces. Maradona scored 1/3 of Ronaldo's but he was a much better player.
Messi v Ronaldo | Contains double your daily salt allowance
- Thread starter Rado_N
- Start date
- Status
Messi is totally a goalscorer. It's just not his only metric.
What makes Messi so special, is that he is an elite goalscorer and playmaker, so yeh, he is also a goalscorer.
Messi isn't really setting the World on fire in the Mickey Mouse league. That being said he still has my vote as the more talented of the two.
He can go scoreless and be the best player on the pitch, as Maradona used to be. Scoring is a bonus.
Without goals he will be like Hazard. Best player on the pitch, maybe, but probably not enough to be best in the world, if he doesn’t have goals in his game.
Last edited:
Agreed. 19-20 year old Messi was still something though before he became a goal scoring machine.
Scoring half of what he scores he would be Maradona.
Unless they play each other. Portugal is one of the few teams that has a good record against the dutch. H2H Portugal owns them but i agree that overall the dutch have a better football history.
I think that’s a bit of understatement on Maradona and over-simplification in players comparison, really. Sure they are of similar type of players with similar footballing, but Maradona has something more on being more explosive, playing with more flair/imagination, more leadership/influential, and being able to carry weaker teams in his own and performing in bigger stage, in a way that not even peak Messi could match. Whereas Messi is being more consistent/efficient, better finishing/execution, on top of being as talented. If you take away half of his goals, he would not be Maradona, but he will have similar dribbling and final balls as Maradona.
Last edited:
ok, good point. I think that Messi was better, but I respect your opinión.
Without the goals he'd still have 150 assists more than Hazard so I think that comparison is off.
If it wasn't for Messi, Iniesta and Xavi would have picked up Ballon d'Or's (Modric also won it) and they are not goal scores, so I don't see why Messi wouldn't still be best player in the world.
Obviously without any goals at all it would be a bit daft, but 19-20 year old Messi was still brilliant and one of the most explosive players in the world. I'd say take away half his goals and he would still be one of the best ever, but hard to justify as the goat.
Let's just agree to disagree on this, I've never paid much attention to player of the tournament even before Ronaldo started his career.
Best known for his Real Madrid career?
Scoring a whole bunch in a useless group stage, stuff that legends are made of.
Figo was probably a better player than those you named, so that kind of proves my point.
You need to be a top top dribbler to cost a world record fee, yet somewhat very good strikers already requires a world record fee.
Can't remember if it was you, but your fellow brigade members once claimed Messi great at heading.
Non-existent because they are often lacking in defensive shape or organization, violent because they fly into tackles, don't see why they can't co-exist.
Just because you haven’t, doesn’t mean no one has
I answered your question, you couldn’t answer mine.
You do realise that every single goal Ronaldo has ever scored in a major international tournament apart from 3 has been in the ‘useless group stages’, right?Scoring a whole bunch in a useless group stage, stuff that legends are made of.
Dude, there’s a bunch of dribblers there who had world record fees. You already named them. Dearie me.
a) I obviously never said that, nor am I a member of any ‘brigade’. It’s quite tough to be good in the air when you are 5’6.
b) being good at passing/playmaking is obviously much more important than being good at heading so I don’t know why you are bringing up heading apropos of nothing.
Watch the full games. Starting with the one I suggested. The notion that that England team (and many others at the time) lacked defensive organisation is frankly laughable.
Props to Ronaldo, United fans must be delighted
If Ronaldo in this kind of form was playing for a team like City or Bayern, they’d be gunning for every trophy and he’d take the Ballon D’or. I could see him still scoring 50-60 goals a season for those kind of sides still.
Yes, bundesliga has the worst defense as a whole of the top 5 leagues by far
Debate's over at this point, Ronaldo fecking pisses it. Single handedly at 36 dragging his team and manager to the CL knockouts.
Not actually, Spain and Germany look on the same level right, especially considering Barcelona current state(which will last for a couple of more seasons at least).
As a matter of fact, i don't see how current La Liga is better than Bundesliga... Spain was better, yes 3 years ago with Cr7 and Messi in, but not now.
Judging Bayern Munich goalscoring is useless, they can score for fun against anybody right now, if Lewandowski is fit.
Yeah, like this 15 years long debate is going to get settled by United going to the CL knockouts
It was supposed to be settled by him coming to United to carry the team to a PL title and CL contest, now it's "he would get the ballon d'or if he was playing for City or Bayern".
Viva Ronaldo
Apparently just a poacher.
"It was supposed to blah blah blah", he's scored 9 in 11 ffs in the hardest league in the World and the CL. He's not fecking God .Yeah, like this 15 years long debate is going to get settled by United going to the CL knockouts
It was supposed to be settled by him coming to United to carry the team to a PL title and CL contest, now it's "he would get the ballon d'or if he was playing for City or Bayern".
What can I say. No other player like him I've ever seen, so will forever be my GOAT.
I'm not saying he is, I'm just saying that a lot of people have tuned down their ambitions by a huge margin since the begining of the season."It was supposed to blah blah blah", he's scored 9 in 11 ffs in the hardest league in the World and the CL. He's not fecking God .
Also, unless either Messi or him accomplish something huge this season (PL/CL title for United, CL title for Messi, World cup masterclass for either of them), the debate will never be "over".
Ronaldo could get 20 goals by the new year
Well yeah, because the team is playing like fecking dogshit and 99% of fans want the horrendous manager with zero CV out of the door asap.
The only alternative to not turning down ambitions is to have expected him to score 20 goals in 11. Have a think.
I don’t think so, no City player has scored more than 33 goals in all competitions in a season under Pep. He’s more likely to score more goals for us than City, as we are a moments team and indulge him. City would rotate him and do weird things with him.
Bayern, he’d be good, but not as good as Lewandowski, but he’d hit 30-40.
He's unreal
He just keeps doing it. Ronnie’s the GOAT!
City never had a player like this. Messi scored shit loads under Pep, so did Lewandowski.
Another clutch moment for the history books.
Listen, Ronaldo is having a very good season scoring wise, far better than Messi so far, there's no denying that. I'm just saying that it's silly to think that this 15 years long debate, that went through multiple CL wins, ballons d'or, WC, Copa, Euro etc. is settled because Ronaldo scored goals in the group stage that could potentially take United to the knockouts.
Indeed.
The debate isn't over yet, let's imagine Cr7 gets knocked out of CL second phase without scoring a goal due to United being too rubbish under Ole...would be unfair to criticize him because of that.
The debate will still be alive, especially considering that Messi is most likely winning the next Balloon D'or, which will make 7 - 5 in favor of Messi, and let's not forget that Argentina has way more chances of winning World Cup than Portugal, they don't even need to play fantastic, just be defensively solid.
Thera no doubting they've been the best two players over the last 12/15 years and I wouldn't argue with anyone's choice of the greatest because you can argue cases for them both. However, food for thought.
Ronaldo has done it for every club he's played for across different countries. Messi has only ever done it in Spain and let's not forget as good as Messi is he's always done it in a better side than Ronaldo. Not forgetting Messi was surrounded by world class players all his life.
Will Messi still be doing what Ronaldo does at 36?
Ronaldo has done it for every club he's played for across different countries. Messi has only ever done it in Spain and let's not forget as good as Messi is he's always done it in a better side than Ronaldo. Not forgetting Messi was surrounded by world class players all his life.
Will Messi still be doing what Ronaldo does at 36?
Yep.
Serious question - how has Messi been doing at PSG?
We want less polls, not more.
- Status