FrankDrebin
Don't call me Shirley
*angry*
What is he going to strike? some random greek bloke in the stadium?Maguire as a striker.
Sancho can never do the role Walker does, this is insanity.I wouldn't be at all surprised if the next manager sees Shaw/Telles as the wide left player and Sancho as the wide right one, with Sancho higher up the pitch and a tucked in right-sided defender like Kyle Walker for City or Di Lorenzo was for Italy at the world cup.
If anything they need to stop with the ideas.Ole and his coaches being bereft of ideas. not surprised or shocked
Again you cannot play Sancho as an inverted winger with Ronaldo as a striker.3 years of planning and daydreaming about Sancho. Three fecking years.
How can you say this means he's bereft of ideas when this is clearly an idea? Not necessarily a good one I concede but it's certainly outside of the box thinking and could potentially work in games we are on top and need that bit extra to break defences down...Ole and his coaches being bereft of ideas. not surprised or shocked
Him and Maguire were absolutely awful signings.With the repeated noises about the coaching staff (understandably) unconvinced by AWB's attacking abilities, it has to be asked: Why on earth did we spend 50 million on a right-back so limited in what is arguably the most important area for the modern full-back? Did we seriously only discover his lack of attacking qualities after investing that amount of money?
Huh? Di Maria was tried in multiple positions because his form tailed off, if anything Louis pandered to his needs. His head was never in the game. Strange comparison.reasons like this are why di maria fecked off from here and people absolutely hate him for it. if sancho were to leave for playing out of position and not putting in effort would he be seen the same way?
You can flip it the other way. Why have our coaching team not been able to improve AWB ball control and attacking output in 3 years.With the repeated noises about the coaching staff (understandably) unconvinced by AWB's attacking abilities, it has to be asked: Why on earth did we spend 50 million on a right-back so limited in what is arguably the most important area for the modern full-back? Did we seriously only discover his lack of attacking qualities after investing that amount of money?
Just tell him to play like he's a defender for the other team.What is he going to strike? some random greek bloke in the stadium?
Well, whoever suggested us to sign Ronaldo shouldn't have suggested it then. If Sancho had been in the plan for so long, surely the manager and coaches know who to play him with and who to avoid. As it is it looks to me like we're just buying quality players without any idea if they'd work together and no idea on how to make them work together.Again you cannot play Sancho as an inverted winger with Ronaldo as a striker.
Ronaldo has never played in his prime centrally and he needs a striker partner be Benzema, Rooney or Dybala.
Playing Ronaldo as a lone striker is wrong - if it was right he would have done it when he was 23 and not when he was 36.
He needs a striker partner and that's why the 3 forwards don't work with him as our main man.
We have tried Cavani and him, Rashford and him, Greenwood and him.
Who was the best result? Cavani and Ronaldo - the striker most resembling to the work ethic and passing of players like Rooney, Benzsma and dybala.
It's got nothing to do with 3 years of scouting Sancho, the random unplanned transfer was Ronaldo that we are adapting our tactics to.
Didn't Di Maria make his debut as a holding midfielder away to Burnley or have I completely made that upreasons like this are why di maria fecked off from here and people absolutely hate him for it. if sancho were to leave for playing out of position and not putting in effort would he be seen the same way?
One of the most productive and talented attackers in Europe. Already struggling to produce in his actual position in a poorly coached system. And they want to shift him to a role that suits him far less. Because they can't get the formation they built the squad for to function and they can't get the 50m fullback they bought in an era of attacking fullbacks to function in a more attacking role.If he plays like Hudson Odoi did it, I don't see why there is an outrage here. I don't think this coaching staff is dumb enough to try to make Sancho defend like a RWB.
di maria said himself he was played out of position and that it wasnt his desire.Huh? Di Maria was tried in multiple positions because his form tailed off, if anything Louis pandered to his needs. His head was never in the game. Strange comparison.
Probably because developing basic technique at the age we bought him is fairly difficult and the progress is likely to be incremental.You can flip it the other way. Why have our coaching team not been able to improve AWB ball control and attacking output in 3 years.
Missing a key point that the manager doesn't know what he's doing.I had people telling me we needed a new RW last season to look good in attack, my argument was that Greenwood is a very good RW player and actually one of the better ones in the league.
Fast forward, we sign Sancho and Greenwood plays ahead of him at RW still.
Nothing like this though. He was played on the left, he was played in an attacking midfield role, what more did he want? He's an excuse maker, it's not comparable to an attacker playing wing back and it was also under a completely different manager. It's a weird comparison.di maria said himself he was played out of position and that it wasnt his desire.