Do you really think because he got 1 out of 10 things right, he must have got information directly from the board? Don't be daft.
As I said, if you throw enough shit against the wall, something will stick. He's gotten far too much wrong to be regarded as a high credible tier. That much is obvious.
It's not naivety. I also questioning whether he was actually the very first source to talk of an emergency meeting. Even if he was, maybe he had a good source - but the fact that he has spouted a lot of shit means he's generally not credible. This item doesn't change that.
Having a good source literally makes him more credible than the majority of journalists, that's the point.
9/10 of all them all throw out rumours and stories. The simple fact is though he got this one spot on while nobody else did, and you cannot deny that.
There's no getting lucky with a report like that, he got fed info quite clearly. You can believe whatever you like but that has pushed him up a notch.
The thing is it doesn't really matter whether he actually got the information right this time or not. He throws out so much nonsense that you can't trust that any of it is true.
Of course it does
you can't ignore something he got before anybody else ( and got it spot on ) just because he's said things in the past that hasn't happened.
Football changes a lot and there's lots of different information available. Would you call Romano reliable? He spouts just as much nonsense as anybody.