Who is to blame? - Super thread

devilish

Juventus fan who used to support United
Joined
Sep 5, 2002
Messages
61,716
I don't see Ole's name, Jose's name...but I see Rangnick's name...
the board chose those those managers + they gave them carte blanched to do whatever they want
 

lex talionis

Full Member
Joined
Jul 25, 2017
Messages
14,091
A soul-searching super thread exploring why United have gone belly up is entirely appropriate right now.

It is possible that we’re all overreacting, that but for social media most of us here wouldn’t be as angry as we are with the serial abysmal performances of the squad over the last eight years. Fair enough, but that we’ve been abysmal over the last eight years — and yes, I’m fully away that we landed second place last season — cannot be in dispute.

I’ll drop in various thoughts throughout the day rather than try to build these entire case for our beached whale condition in a single post.
 

RedMilo

Full Member
Joined
Aug 19, 2014
Messages
1,317
Ultimately it's board and owners fault, coupled with the Premier League/FA for allowing such a takeover to occur in the first place.

The Disneyland of football has been devoid of any real control for so long and not learning from their mistakes it keeps making. The way the club has been run since SAF and Gill left has been nothing short of criminal, and yes the fact they were allowed to saddle us with so much debt in the meantime, any other club(company) would have folded by now, the incompetence is staggering. I think us fans should have sued the football authorities for ratifying such a takeover personally.

At the start of the season, there was so much optimism, with what we thought were world class signings in Varane & Sancho. Most of us got a little bit giddy over Ronaldo, and as fans who can blame us but its a deal they shouldn't have done. The RedCafe was almost unanimous in their opinion Varane & Sancho were real improvements, and with our young attacking talent especially Greenwood and with Cavani signing for another year, we dared to believe we might even come close this year to the title.

The season started off okay and Greenwood was firing, then the opportunity to sign Ronaldo came along, and feck the project (that actually looks like it could get us close, for the first time in 8 years), but as always, the commercial side of the business makes the decisions in this club, no one or thing else matters apart from money. I dont blame Ronaldo, I think he is incredible as an individual for his age, but the team can't play high pressing attacking football with him in the team, and the players are not suited to Rangnick's 4-2-2-2 - it's a mess again.

The players are falling out behind the scene's we are led to believe, and you can see why, so the harmony that Ole brought to the squad post-Jose looks to have gone, and we are back to square one. Ole's period in charge, should have lay the foundations for a more experienced manager/coach to come in and adopt world class tactics and motivation in a good group of players, in order for the football team to take the next step. The owners do not learn.

They have spent money, our money, but only after SAF left the club, knowing that if they didn't their asset would de-value without investment. Let's be frank though, the investment is not out of their own pockets is it!

The other two signings haven't yet improved us either, Varane looks good but is very injury prone and we have enough of those players over the years, and Sancho has all the great close control in the world, but the fecker can't run. I must admit I never really watched him, but for all his hype I thought we were signing a special player, I dont see it.

It feels like the club is run based on reaction from fan's and social media trending, it's hard to imagine now, but more than half of the club's social media activities, were banned before SAF left the building, ever asked yourself why? Ever heard of the saying, the blind leading the partially sighted, that's fan and media reaction leading the board who are leading us back to the promised land. It's turning into a joke of a club.

Get a work class manager, and coach set up in asap, weed out the players who dont want to achieve or be here, and build for the future. We cant win any title for the next 3-4 years without going through this process.

P.S. Stop putting players on ridiculous contracts, because you can't shift them, and they get too much too soon. You have to earn your way to be successful, there is no other way for us to be successful, that comes with basic principals - keep it as much about the club and the football, more than the money - you dumb fecks.
 

ThierryHenry14

Full Member
Joined
Dec 30, 2015
Messages
4,255
Supports
Arsenal
The owners have spent a LOT of money. Woodward and co are the ones to blame for this mess.
This. The owner spent over a billion in net transfer fee alone for the past 10 years, let alone sign on fee, agent fee and wages. However they are responsible for the appointment of Woodward though, but definitely it is Woodward to me.
 

Sandikan

aka sex on the beach
Joined
Mar 14, 2011
Messages
53,317
How many of these threads are we going to have over the years?
Every loss is met with a systematic onslaught on every individual player, the Glazers, Woodward, the manager, abuse of Oil teams and so on.

A novel thread would be...who ISN'T to blame.
Bet it'd be shorter!
 

Yakuza_devils

Full Member
Joined
Oct 30, 2016
Messages
2,995
Leave SAF out of this. I wish I could push the blame of my under performance at my job to my predecessor who left 9 years ago.

Ed had enough time to implement any changes or appoint the right person to modernize the club structure but he failed. It's fecking 9 years.
 

Ludens the Red

Full Member
Joined
Jul 27, 2009
Messages
17,497
Location
London
Posted this elsewhere re Ferguson and the absurd aiming of blame towards him.

'You don't get to simultaneously blame Ferguson and the Glazers. The board have been shown up as utterly incompetent, self interested businessmen and the fact that Ferguson managed to wrangle any degree of control while keeping them in check and keeping us successful is a miracle in itself. This in vogue trend of blaming Ferguson is lazy, embarrassing rubbish. What other manager in the world do you place the demand on to babysit the board and oversee the state of the club as well as win games? Because it can't be both, either you wanted Ferguson to surrender power and relinquish control to this incompetent mob earlier, while he was still manager, or you wanted to be successful for all those years we were. Rubbish, one dimensional thinking, the same as the utter myth that wont flush that he wasn't tactically sound, despite winning 13 titles and hitting 7 CL semi finals, winning it twice. Oh, that was just charisma and man management. Give him a dutch sounding name and you'd be creaming yourself in front of youtube highlights.'

Overall it comes from top down and the loss of Ferguson led to a Woodward and Glazer led drop in standards which has permeated through the club, and is now upheld by players who know little else. Average guys piggy backing on the success and reputation built by Ferguson and real footballers
Agree with this. The fact he managed to maintain success is astonishing. On average per season under the Glazers he also spent less than Ole, Mourinho and van Gaal who can’t even use the excuse of not being backed by the Glazers.
On top of that he was ridiculed for saying “no value in the market” when he would refuse to spend stupid amounts on average players. Since he left we’ve been taken to the cleaners by numerous clubs with our last manager in particular paying idiotic amounts for players who now need replacing.
 

Lord of Blackhaven

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Nov 6, 2021
Messages
90
Woodward all day long. He has presided over awful management appointments, terrible recruitment and shambolic contract negotiations. He has turned Utd from the biggest club in England into also rans. The guy is detached from reality. Leaks yesterday saying he feels he has one big football job left in him. What club in their right mind would appoint him? I don't care how good a "mergers and acquisitions man" he is. He has been at the helm during a decade of decline for the club. Nobody comes close to him when it comes to apportioning blame.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: oates

alexthelion

Full Member
Joined
Sep 7, 2019
Messages
3,625
It has nothing to do with being a cult, it’s about being self aware and actually having an understanding of why the club is even the massive draw it is now. Clueless supporters like yourself blaming an 80 year old legend for our club’s problems need to sit down and shut it. You’re cowards bleeping on about it on red cafe, have the guts to say it in person then. Blind and coward supporters like you don’t have it in you to do that.
Why should we not be allowed to say anything against SAF?

He obviously still wields influence behind the scenes as evidenced by the signing of Ronaldo. We had this problem before with Sir Matt hanging around, we've obviously not learned anything from that.

IMO, Sir Matt was the one who built the reputation of United, not SAF.
 

Green_Red

New Member
Joined
May 29, 2013
Messages
10,296
I can't entertain a "who's to blame" list that doesn't include Boris.
 

minoo-utd

New Member
Joined
Jan 28, 2014
Messages
8,723
Location
Egypt.
1-Board had no plans after SAF although it seeks they are finally trying to put one.

2- I blame Ole who seemed to me spoiled these players more than they ever deserve.
 

Jackal981

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Sep 26, 2019
Messages
983
You’re not a real United supporter, end of.
Such a bollox. Is SAF a god that cannot do any wrong ? This is cult like behaviour. Maybe him signing duds like Bebe, Manucho and friends also a right move too.He's a human after all. Him hiring Moyes was already a mistake in the first place.
 

Relevated

fixated with venom and phalluses
Joined
May 3, 2011
Messages
25,995
Location
18M1955/JU5
Such a bollox. Is SAF a god that cannot do any wrong ? This is cult like behaviour. Maybe him signing duds like Bebe, Manucho and friends also a right move too.He's a human after all. Him hiring Moyes was already a mistake in the first place.
Moves was not 1st, 2nd or 3rd choice.
 

VivaRonaldo85

Full Member
Joined
Nov 24, 2018
Messages
2,004
Just when we were starting to make some progress after 8 years last year, we sign Ronaldo which blows all plans out the water. We now find ourselves with a crazy scientist Coach with a highly unusual formation yet without the players to implement it. So in the space of 5 months, we have self imploded from things starting to look bright in august 2021 to this sad hole now.
 

RORY65

Full Member
Joined
May 28, 2009
Messages
4,537
The biggest issue was having a chief executive, seemingly with an absolutely huge ego, who wanted to run things of which he had minimal knowledge rather than sticking to the areas that he was good at and putting the right people and structures in place for the areas for which he lacked the expertise. It meant he made poor managerial appointments and then seemed enthralled by them doing very little (telling the press that Van Gaal was a genius whose contract we wanted to extend midway through his second season, days before Wolfsburg knocked us out of the Champions League and in the early part of an 8 game winless run) because it seemed impressive to someone who was clueless.

Add that to us not having the right people in place to deal with recruitment and an obsession with social media engagement and the brand that meant that signings weren't always made for the right reasons (Ronaldo is a prime example of someone who was bought because it would be embarrassing if he went to City and he would really appeal to potential sponsors and drive content online rather than it in anyway making sense to buy the cherry when we hadn't finished constructing the cake) and players contracts continually being renewed to protect their accounting value and you end up with a talented but bloated and unhappy squad where players cost more and earn more than they would at clubs run sensibly.

I don't think it's irretrievable though, although my expectations are that the club will find a way to get it wrong and the wait for us to challenge for the league again is going to be a long one. United are a huge club and it seems that Richard Arnold is going to be more willing to empower people with more knowledge of the football side of things and stick to the commercial aspect. The next few months are going to be rough, we've had 3 years of a manager whose CV was success at Molde years before and a disastrous spell at Cardiff and now have a guy who has barely coached in the last decade and whose biggest ever success is the German Cup, these aren't the types of managers that are going to make top level players energised or excited to go to work and the season now is just about getting to the end and making the right decisions for next season. If we make the right appointment in the summer (I believe that to be Ten Hag) and Rangnick is trusted to help rebuild the football club alongside Murtough and Fletcher then things can start to turn around.
 

Jackal981

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Sep 26, 2019
Messages
983
Just when we were starting to make some progress after 8 years last year, we sign Ronaldo which blows all plans out the water. We now find ourselves with a crazy scientist Coach with a highly unusual formation yet without the players to implement it. So in the space of 5 months, we have self imploded from things starting to look bright in august 2021 to this sad hole now.
Thing looked like total shit on August. We just lost the Europa final with one of the most shameful display I have ever seen from United team. The rot had started before this season. People really thought we were playing like prime Barca before Ronaldo came.
 

Eyepopper

Lowering the tone since 2006
Joined
Sep 1, 2006
Messages
66,940
1. The ;Board
2. The Owners
3. The Players

It's been a while, we're on our, what number again, manager in 10 years? The board carries the can for that, 6 year contract for Moyes, extend Jose and then sack him, follow that up with appointing a totally inexperienced manager, and then replace him with a 6 month interim manager who hasn't managed in two years and who has never won anything of note.... then, shocked face, that doesn't work?

Given our horrific record appointing managers, the owners should have stepped in and asked exactly WTF the board were doing years ago, but that would require them to give any level of feck about on field success vs commercials success.

All that said, the players, good god where to start, give them all contracts so big no one will ever want them, then combine it with the above and only then realise, we need to get rid of most of them.

It's a shitshow, from top to bottom, but hey, we bring in a ton of commercial revenue.
 

lsd

The Oracle
Joined
Jun 5, 2016
Messages
10,874
The fans for putting up with it so long. Cheering players who clearly don't care about winning anywhere near as much as they do their wages and social standing.

There's a thread on here about which United player do you dislike the most or least and in all honestly I an finding it increasingly difficult to like any of our players.

I find I have more respect for the players that leave this mess than I do for the ones that stay now as I don't trust their motives for staying.

I don't really judge Ronaldo or Varone just yet as they are not here long but they must know just how far this club has fallen and how far we are from ever challenging the top.

The others though that have been here longer and just show no desire to do anything other than going through the motions on the pitch and pointing the finger at everyone else off the pitch other than themselves.

It just sickens me sometimes how far we have fallen and I don't see any way back with the players we have
 

Bebestation

Im a doctor btw, my IQ destroys yours
Joined
Oct 9, 2019
Messages
11,862
Looks like Rashford the more I look at this forum.
 

VidaRed

Unimaginative FC
Joined
Aug 23, 2007
Messages
29,612
The recruitment for picking inexperienced coaches and players that are not suited to the club. Then the players themselves for being selfish lazy fecks.
 

roonster09

Hercule Poirot of the scouting world
Scout
Joined
May 10, 2009
Messages
36,764
Ferguson deserves a lot more blame than he gets but our fans consider it sacrilege to say anything negative about the man. Even putting aside the Rock of Gibraltar and shielding of the Glazers, the "no value in the market" nonsense as City propelled themselves into a superpower - his recruitment, even for what little United were spending was just not good enough from 2007 on. It left us with an aging squad with inflated expectations. Most of the big hitters were finished at the top level within two years of his departure. Those who we moved on did nothing of note anywhere else. The only top player left behind was De Gea.
If only we had spent close to billion pounds and almost most money since his retirement.

Liverpool, City, Chelsea, Bayern, Madrid and few other clubs completely rebuilt their squads in last 5-8 years spending as much money or even less, it's hilarious that people think what we signed in 2007 had any impact on the state we are in today.
 

ryansgirl

Full Member
Joined
Nov 4, 2001
Messages
2,914
Location
where the sun rises
I think when SAF was here, the players knew his power was absolute so if he gave them some leeway on somethings they knew not to take the piss. When he left and the manager became much more disposable the players started taking advantage.
I always remember a story about Moyes falling out with the players because he told them they couldn't have chips for a pre game supper, it's not that surprising we've ended up where we have.

Rio Ferdinand: 'David Moyes p****d off the lads by taking away our chips' claims former Manchester United defender
When SAF left I've always felt the stupidest move was not appointing Moyes, but to give him the power to dismanlte one of the most successful backroom teams the club has ever had.
No, Moyes' way was toxic, the whole chips thing showed David Moyes' priorities - he was attempting to 'stamp his authority' by focusing on side issues and other matters that were more or less irrelevant. The man was completely unsuited for dealing with a squad of winners who may have been set in their ways but were professional enough to rally around a confident and qualified manager.

David Moyes was nothing of the sort. He also was hopelessly enmeshed in the mindset of somebody who did not know how to use the expertise around him.

As Sir Alex's choice he was gifted the job on a platinum plate but felt he had to go his own way to prove himself. We all know how that ended up - wouldn't use the resources he had correctly, got rid of experience to bring in Everton staff who had won zilch with him - although Phil Nev was a good choice as an ex United player - tried to compensate for his inability to work within the structure of a huge club by proposing 'strategies' such as endless crosses in the game which was contrary to United's passing style, etc etc.
 
Last edited:

BaneIsPain

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Dec 17, 2012
Messages
551
Location
Cave
It seems people really want Fergie to prepare the club forever. It is not his job to select the next manager or recruit after his retirement. Yes, he could give a piece of advice but ultimately the club management has to answer for all the failures.
 

hobbers

Full Member
Joined
Jun 24, 2013
Messages
28,405
Glazers, Woodward, Judge and the rest of the gormless suits who deal with player contracts

All the managers and most of their substandard coaching selections

The truly awful recruitment and scouting department

Majority of the players we've been unlucky enough to suffer through over the last 8 years

United-linked pundits who put pressure on the board to act a certain way despite being just as clueless and orders of magnitude more deluded

Fans who think it's still 1994 and we'll get another manager he'll wave a wand start winning and stay for 5-10 years
 

tenpoless

No 6-pack, just 2Pac
Joined
Oct 20, 2014
Messages
16,363
Location
Ole's ipad
Supports
4-4-2 classic
Our squad is lazy so lets have a manager that will make sure to implement lazy tactics. Doesnt make sense to me. Its a highly competitive game.
 

B. Munich

Full Member
Joined
Mar 26, 2014
Messages
1,441
Location
Philippines
Supports
Bayern Munich
However I do question the wisdom of implementing such demanding tactic with one of the laziest and entitled squads in the EPL mid way into the season especially when we simply lack the personnel to do so and that our players haven't pressed for the past 3 years. Cavani-Ronaldo are ancient, AWB look lost in the opponent's half of the pitch while Maguire has less pace then a frigging tortoise. You don't need to be a genius to acknowledge that this 4-2-2-2 system can't work here, at least, not with the present side
While your point is definitely valid I can't follow the conclusion to blame Rangnick for it.
Shouldn't the blame be addressed towards the lazy and entitled players and the board which should be aware of these issues and appoint managers accordingly.
 

Andy_Cole

Full Member
Joined
Apr 15, 2009
Messages
7,977
Location
Manchester
Wrote this in another thread but probably more relevant here.

The seasons is a write off. A shame as we’ve wasted Ronaldo but oh well. It’s clear there’s poison in the camp. They’ve been on holiday for 10 years it seems and now a new manager wants to up the training they’re kicking off. There’s a huge attitude problem.

We need to clear out the bad attitude. I’d make an example of the ring leader and get rid in January. Hopefully the rest will then behave. But there’s deep lying issues in the camp. I know what it is though. It’s from above. The clubs motives have been commercial so we’ve treated the players like celebrities and divas rather than work horses. We’ve pushed them onto noodle campaigns rather than doing laps around the ground.

Rangnick is the right appointment if he is to stay upstairs and change the motives of the club. Hopefully we persist.
 

Apokalips

Full Member
Joined
Dec 10, 2013
Messages
865
Posted this elsewhere re Ferguson and the absurd aiming of blame towards him.

'You don't get to simultaneously blame Ferguson and the Glazers. The board have been shown up as utterly incompetent, self interested businessmen and the fact that Ferguson managed to wrangle any degree of control while keeping them in check and keeping us successful is a miracle in itself. This in vogue trend of blaming Ferguson is lazy, embarrassing rubbish. What other manager in the world do you place the demand on to babysit the board and oversee the state of the club as well as win games? Because it can't be both, either you wanted Ferguson to surrender power and relinquish control to this incompetent mob earlier, while he was still manager, or you wanted to be successful for all those years we were. Rubbish, one dimensional thinking, the same as the utter myth that wont flush that he wasn't tactically sound, despite winning 13 titles and hitting 7 CL semi finals, winning it twice. Oh, that was just charisma and man management. Give him a dutch sounding name and you'd be creaming yourself in front of youtube highlights.'

Overall it comes from top down and the loss of Ferguson led to a Woodward and Glazer led drop in standards which has permeated through the club, and is now upheld by players who know little else. Average guys piggy backing on the success and reputation built by Ferguson and real footballers
Thank you. The amount of nonsense I hear thrown at Fergie is unreal. Possibly the GOAT but basically just a real good motivator? So disrespectful. As is the trend to blame him for issues of today.

All I constantly see is people hysterically throwing blame at different individuals with such knowing conviction and hate and it's part of the reason I find this place pretty shite now tbh.
 

Red00012

Full Member
Joined
Jan 18, 2018
Messages
12,282
Rangnick is part of the problem after 5 games but Jose and Moyes doesn’t make the list :lol:
 
Joined
Dec 28, 2021
Messages
893
Don't think you can silver bullet this. The more this goes on the more you can that an institution there is something NOT right at United in many parts of the organisation.

- A legacy god like figure still exerting his influence over the club (SAF)

- Mind boggling transfers and contract renewals, e.g. Fellaini, Lingard, Mata, Jones, DDG, Di Maria, Falcao, Smalling

- Letting the bricks and mortar assets effectively rot i.e. Old Trafford and Carrington, while the rest of the teams associated with the club play at Leigh Sports Village and The Cliff. Where is the cohesive strategy.

Maybe the Glazers gave too much power to Woodward and were apathetic to their responsibilities as owners rather than just being absent landlords. Woodward as the leading figure of one of the leading sporting institutions globally was out of his depth, he needed support and was either to blind to ask for it or to naive.

What I will never fathom is, as fans we believe (prob rightly so) that the owners are in it for themselves i.e. $$$ Surely the penny must drop at some point you need to get it right ON The pitch to make the Benjamins off it.

Hopefully with Richard Arnold taking the helm we can see a better balance between commercial activity the pursuit of footballing excellence.
The Glazers are just living off Fergusons inheritance. They bought Utd at the right time when broadcasting money was about to go through the roof and the internet had just began to take off.


They know they need to get it right on the football pitch but the truth is they don’t know how. They have now squandered the inheritance, new fans will start drying up very soon too (anyone born in the last 15 years will question why they should support Utd as they won’t remember the glory days).

Richard Arnold will not have the money Woodward had (less sponsorship money, finishing outside top 4, no players with any value, High contracts and as you identified, a stadium that needs rebuilding).

The worrying thing is that with Newcastle and better managed clubs like Arsenal, Tottenham on the rise. We could become completely irrelevant very soon in footballing terms, some would argue we already are but I know it can get a lot worst yet.
 

MrSingh2002

New Member
Joined
Dec 16, 2013
Messages
4,408
Needs a poll.

The Board, Ed Woodward, Past managers, Ralf Ragnick, The Owners, The Players, The Fans.

All as options.
 

JebelSherif

New Member
Joined
May 31, 2021
Messages
502
Supports
Huddersfield Town
Anyone blaming Sir Alex for our problems now should be facing a permanent ban. He made the club what it is now and it has been widely reported by many credible journalists like Stone that he had virtually no more power at the club. He’s a figurehead and a legend enjoying his retirement. Piss off OP for even including Sir Alex. Piss off to anyone who’a gullible enough to believe that he’s still leading any decisions at the club.

After 27 years, he owed this club nothing else when he retired and any competent club run by good owners would have had a proper succession plan in place. This falls firmly onto the glazers. The fact you made a list and included Sir Alex shows you don’t have a clue. You spout nonsense. The simplest argument is usually the most sensible one and it’s the GLAZERS and only them that are the problem.
I'm sorry but I have to disagree and calling for a permanent ban for the many many people who share this view (and it is steadily growing as Utd's problems continue) is ridiculous and an attack on free speech. Let's work backwards through your post: '....it’s the GLAZERS and only them that are the problem.' but wasn't SAF partly responsible for the Glazers in the first place ? and even if not, he hasn't to my knowledge ever spoken out against them - and why would he whilst he gets £ millions a year in his Club Ambassadors role... when Pep leaves City or Klopp moves on from Liverpool, will either of those clubs keep them on the payroll for even just one more day? NO, so why do Utd. do it? It wasn't as if Fergie was badly remunerated whilst he was the Utd. manager - he was consistently the top earning manager in the league year after year.

Re: 'Piss off to anyone who’s gullible enough to believe that he’s still leading any decisions at the club.' well I'm not gullible and its widely accepted that he was a key motivating factor in the return of Ronaldo - which isn't working out too well in my opinion. He also practically forced Ole to make Ronaldo the 1st name on the team sheet following comments made after the Everton game. Do you not agree? You can't say: oh Ole should have been stronger and done his own thing AND at the same time say 'He’s a figurehead and a legend enjoying his retirement' with no influence over things going on at the club. Both can't be right. Plus look what happened to Moyes who did try to do his own thing and bring in his own people, look how well that worked out... (plus SAF set Moyes up to fail by leaving the club in the state he did - yes you can say as Champions, but it was a weird season and RVP was just winning games on his own.) Consider things now, look at Moyes & West Ham now - above Utd. in the table and without spending billions.

Posted this elsewhere re Ferguson and the absurd aiming of blame towards him.

'You don't get to simultaneously blame Ferguson and the Glazers. The board have been shown up as utterly incompetent, self interested businessmen and the fact that Ferguson managed to wrangle any degree of control while keeping them in check and keeping us successful is a miracle in itself. This in vogue trend of blaming Ferguson is lazy, embarrassing rubbish. What other manager in the world do you place the demand on to babysit the board and oversee the state of the club as well as win games? Because it can't be both, either you wanted Ferguson to surrender power and relinquish control to this incompetent mob earlier, while he was still manager, or you wanted to be successful for all those years we were. Rubbish, one dimensional thinking, the same as the utter myth that wont flush that he wasn't tactically sound, despite winning 13 titles and hitting 7 CL semi finals, winning it twice. Oh, that was just charisma and man management. Give him a dutch sounding name and you'd be creaming yourself in front of youtube highlights.'

Overall it comes from top down and the loss of Ferguson led to a Woodward and Glazer led drop in standards which has permeated through the club, and is now upheld by players who know little else. Average guys piggy backing on the success and reputation built by Ferguson and real footballers
You can blame both if one caused the other - google Rock of Gibraltar racehorse dispute.
 

Reditus

Lineup Prediction League Winner 2021-22
Joined
Aug 10, 2019
Messages
5,583
Find it very odd putting any blame in Ferguson. Managers take over clubs all the time in far, far worse situations. Utd had just finished as champions..

The blame lies due to a litany of errors following his retirement which was all overseen by Woodward…. starting with the very 1st transfer window. It’s been mistake after mistake. And every summer fans still lap it up as we go after the next big star
 

JebelSherif

New Member
Joined
May 31, 2021
Messages
502
Supports
Huddersfield Town
He recommended Moyes, the owners who had no expertise in building a successful club themselves listened. If they had any sense, which they did not, they would’ve took some lessons from elsewhere and tried to modernize the club at that time but they were lazy because success came easily under Sir Alex.
Well that is one view, alternatively they could have stayed true to Man Utd.s history (they were never a club known for numerous management changes) and given Moyes the same amount of time Sir Alex was given, back in the late 1980s.

People can shout me down for saying that, but I doubt the club would be worse off than they are now, Moyes is afterall above Utd. in the current table & with less resources than he would have had at Old Trafford. How many transfer windows was the guy actually given?

People say, he messed up 'cos he changed the backroom staff.... but what if he had not done and been moderately successful: people would have said 'oh he's just a Scottish Manager with a similar background to Sir Alex, and he's only doing well because of the assitants he has around him'.
 

SER19

Full Member
Joined
Apr 15, 2008
Messages
12,733
I'm sorry but I have to disagree and calling for a permanent ban for the many many people who share this view (and it is steadily growing as Utd's problems continue) is ridiculous and an attack on free speech. Let's work backwards through your post: '....it’s the GLAZERS and only them that are the problem.' but wasn't SAF partly responsible for the Glazers in the first place ? and even if not, he hasn't to my knowledge ever spoken out against them - and why would he whilst he gets £ millions a year in his Club Ambassadors role... when Pep leaves City or Klopp moves on from Liverpool, will either of those clubs keep them on the payroll for even just one more day? NO, so why do Utd. do it? It wasn't as if Fergie was badly remunerated whilst he was the Utd. manager - he was consistently the top earning manager in the league year after year.

Re: 'Piss off to anyone who’s gullible enough to believe that he’s still leading any decisions at the club.' well I'm not gullible and its widely accepted that he was a key motivating factor in the return of Ronaldo - which isn't working out too well in my opinion. He also practically forced Ole to make Ronaldo the 1st name on the team sheet following comments made after the Everton game. Do you not agree? You can't say: oh Ole should have been stronger and done his own thing AND at the same time say 'He’s a figurehead and a legend enjoying his retirement' with no influence over things going on at the club. Both can't be right. Plus look what happened to Moyes who did try to do his own thing and bring in his own people, look how well that worked out... (plus SAF set Moyes up to fail by leaving the club in the state he did - yes you can say as Champions, but it was a weird season and RVP was just winning games on his own.) Consider things now, look at Moyes & West Ham now - above Utd. in the table and without spending billions.



You can blame both if one caused the other - google Rock of Gibraltar racehorse dispute.
I don't need to Google it thanks. Life isn't a game of dominoes and one did not 'cause' the other. Its an absurdly simplistic take
 

croadyman

Full Member
Joined
Mar 9, 2018
Messages
34,815
So many different factors to blame from yankee leeching owners to incapable Toy Story puppets and failed previous regimes. Quite honestly right now I don't know how we even begin to fix this
 

Bebe

Full Member
Joined
Aug 12, 2010
Messages
5,581
Location
The true north.
I've seen lots of "blame the players" sentiment recently, but objectively measure the state of United's management over the past number of years to our rivals (Pep, Klopp, Poch, Conte, Tuchel etc) to ours. The gap is absurd and there is no way for the players to not feel that, especially over time.