Russian invasion of Ukraine | Fewer tweets, more discussion

Mr Pigeon

Illiterate Flying Rat
Scout
Joined
Mar 27, 2014
Messages
26,590
Location
bin
I wasn't being pedantic, I was adding to your point. If I wanted to be pedantic I'd just call you a stupid bird and tell you to go shit on a roof.

Edit: Also accuracy is important when explaining to him why the World War would be bad enough to avoid at all costs.

Now go home and get your shinebox.
:lol: fair play
 

GlastonSpur

Also disliked on an Aston Villa forum
Joined
Feb 4, 2007
Messages
17,716
Supports
Spurs
I think Russia/China are trying to re-shape how the world is currently being run, for the good or the bad, yet to be seen, but you can't deny that the whole planet has been a slave to the petro-dollar that started since WW2 finished
You haven't yet twigged that Russian and Chinese totalitarian dictatorship is bad? Oh dear. Do not pass Go, do not collect £200.
 

Fredo

You broke my heart!
Joined
Dec 9, 2015
Messages
710
Location
Fergie's head
You honestly think GHWB & the coalition invaded Iraq under false pretenses, etc.?
Well, you tell me, scum bush junior invaded iraq after afghanistan for what reason? If it was the nuclear weapons as they claimed, well they found shit, they ended up tearing apart a whole country then established their companies in Erbil
 

Fredo

You broke my heart!
Joined
Dec 9, 2015
Messages
710
Location
Fergie's head
You haven't yet twigged that Russian and Chinese totalitarian dictatorship is bad? Oh dear. Do not pass Go, do not collect £200.
I am talking about the economical aspect, both are giants on that front but both are under the influence of the petro-dollar and they believe their coalition can change that, which is yet to be seen, that's what I meant
 

TMDaines

Fun sponge.
Joined
Sep 1, 2014
Messages
14,034
Very good read. The Russian and Belorussian peoples are victims of their own authoritarian / dictatorial regimes.
They are.

But they are also not North Koreans. They have had largely free Internet and possibility of international travel. Many do protest and don’t support their dictators. Many are indifferent though and bury their head in the sand, and many also support. The path to the Holocaust was paved with indifference.
 

hellhunter

Eurofighter
Joined
Aug 5, 2011
Messages
18,138
Location
Stuttgart, Germany
Supports
Karlsruher SC
I am talking about the economical aspect, both are giants on that front but both are under the influence of the petro-dollar and they believe their coalition can change that, which is yet to be seen, that's what I meant
Russia's economy is half the size of France's, and that's before the war.
 

Frosty

Logical and sensible but turns women gay
Joined
Jan 11, 2007
Messages
17,522
Location
Yes I can hear you Clem Fandango!
They are.

But they are also not North Koreans. They have had largely free Internet and possibility of international travel. Many do protest and don’t support their dictators. Many are indifferent though and bury their head in the sand, and many also support. The path to the Holocaust was paved with indifference.
We could also conclude from this that there is a much greater chance of democratic states emerging than in North Korea.
 

GlastonSpur

Also disliked on an Aston Villa forum
Joined
Feb 4, 2007
Messages
17,716
Supports
Spurs
Well then why didnt they mobilize Nato towards Ukraine? Who takes the final decision in the end? It's evident no move can be made unless washington gives the green light
It's already been explained to you several times: NATO hasn't entered into Ukraine because of the risk of a nuclear WWIII

NATO takes collective decisions, which all members then abide by.
 

africanspur

Full Member
Joined
Sep 1, 2010
Messages
9,318
Supports
Tottenham Hotspur
European countries were never the puppets of the British even at the height of the Empire.
What a strange post. Has anyone on here implied that they were?


Both attacked Iraq under a false narrative and killed together more than 1 million people, I suggest you read some history books, should be good for you
What were the false pretences that senior attacked Iraq?

Well then why didnt they mobilize Nato towards Ukraine? Who takes the final decision in the end? It's evident no move can be made unless washington gives the green light
Because NATO are a defensive alliance? And Ukraine are not a member? So many people seem to have a fundamental misunderstanding of what NATO actually is. You can argue about the morality but the reality of the situation is that NATO are not a world or European police force and exists to protect its members if they are attacked (and not if they initiate the attack even).

Of course, there would be nothing stopping France/Germany/Poland/ Italy/Spain mobilising if they wanted to?

You're also missing the rather important point that nobody anywhere has forced anyone to join NATO?
 

Frosty

Logical and sensible but turns women gay
Joined
Jan 11, 2007
Messages
17,522
Location
Yes I can hear you Clem Fandango!
What a strange post. Has anyone on here implied that they were?
The ultimate solution is for european countries that are currently part of NATO to completely draw out from NATO and form their own, being puppets in the hands of the americans/british is clearly showing, if the US doesnt give the green light to engage the russian army in military combat, the current situation will not change.
Here you go.
 

TMDaines

Fun sponge.
Joined
Sep 1, 2014
Messages
14,034
Zelenskyy is now doing all his speeches in governmental offices and on the streets of Kyiv, so must feel fairly secure right now.
 

GlastonSpur

Also disliked on an Aston Villa forum
Joined
Feb 4, 2007
Messages
17,716
Supports
Spurs
Russia's economy is half the size of France's, and that's before the war.
Indeed, it's smaller than Italy's. And if things carry on for much longer, Russia's economy will end up being smaller than Australia's.
 

calodo2003

Flaming Full Member
Joined
Feb 8, 2014
Messages
42,510
Location
Florida
Well, you tell me, scum bush junior invaded iraq after afghanistan for what reason? If it was the nuclear weapons as they claimed, well they found shit, they ended up tearing apart a whole country then established their companies in Erbil
We agree on Iraq with W, I was asking about the 1991 invasion.
 

Balljy

Full Member
Joined
Jan 31, 2016
Messages
3,389
France economy isn't small though, I don't see your point, you don't consider Russia as one of top countries on that front?
You said a giant, and most people would consider France a large economy with the US and China being giants. Russia has an economy half the size of France's and smaller than Italy's. That's not giant by any measure.
 

Fredo

You broke my heart!
Joined
Dec 9, 2015
Messages
710
Location
Fergie's head
What a strange post. Has anyone on here implied that they were?




What were the false pretences that senior attacked Iraq?



Because NATO are a defensive alliance? And Ukraine are not a member? So many people seem to have a fundamental misunderstanding of what NATO actually is. You can argue about the morality but the reality of the situation is that NATO are not a world or European police force and exists to protect its members if they are attacked (and not if they initiate the attack even).

Of course, there would be nothing stopping France/Germany/Poland/ Italy/Spain mobilising if they wanted to?

You're also missing the rather important point that nobody anywhere has forced anyone to join NATO?
Senior decided to intervene during the arab war between Iraq and Kuwait/KSA (don't know what was in it for him except to keep hold of the petrol in Saudi and Kuwait) as this was the bread and butter for the USA in the arab world back then (still to this day)

For NATO, defensive alliance that went all the way to Lybia to attack Gaddhafi and kill him? that shelled Yugoslavia before? Doesn't seem defensive to me, if anything it was driven by specific agendas that found it easy to attack when they see fit until now when they are facing a madman with 6500 nuclear warheads at his disposal..
 

Raoul

Admin
Staff
Joined
Aug 14, 1999
Messages
130,975
Location
Hollywood CA
I am talking about the economical aspect, both are giants on that front but both are under the influence of the petro-dollar and they believe their coalition can change that, which is yet to be seen, that's what I meant
Russia wasn't even a top 10 economy in the world before any of this and will be lucky to be top 30 in a few months. They are light years from being considered anything resembling an economic power.
 

calodo2003

Flaming Full Member
Joined
Feb 8, 2014
Messages
42,510
Location
Florida
Senior decided to intervene during the arab war between Iraq and Kuwait/KSA (don't know what was in it for him except to keep hold of the petrol in Saudi and Kuwait) as this was the bread and butter for the USA in the arab world back then (still to this day)

For NATO, defensive alliance that went all the way to Lybia to attack Gaddhafi and kill him? that shelled Yugoslavia before? Doesn't seem defensive to me, if anything it was driven by specific agendas that found it easy to attack when they see fit until now when they are facing a madman with 6500 nuclear warheads at his disposal..
You do realize that it wasn’t Senior unilaterally going into Iraq, right? What else were we doing in the ME to such a degree in the 80s, the ‘bread & butter?’

This really isn’t the right thread to continue, let’s migrate to the Whataboutery thread.
 

Oly Francis

Full Member
Joined
Oct 3, 2018
Messages
3,944
Supports
PSG
But what is the threat here? You expect Putin to be able to invade all of europe? And for what exactly? There were a lot of business operations and common benefits between russia and european countries, take germany/russia for example, you are making it seem as if Russia is in some other continent, the russians are european as much as any other european country and what the european countries should do, if they care about the future of europe, is to engage the russians directly for cease fire instead of waiting to see what the usa/tells them what to do because they will be the one paying in the end...
Oh, a cease fire, I'm sure nobody tried that, what a great idea!


Well then why didnt they mobilize Nato towards Ukraine? Who takes the final decision in the end? It's evident no move can be made unless washington gives the green light
Nato engaging russian military means all gloves are off, it means a swift defeat for Russia on the ground and a super high risk that Putin's only options are nuclear.

Seems a couple of posters here are really craving atomic bombing, that's pretty odd.
 

Fredo

You broke my heart!
Joined
Dec 9, 2015
Messages
710
Location
Fergie's head
You do realize that it wasn’t Senior unilaterally going into Iraq, right? What else were we doing in the ME to such a degree in the 80s, the ‘bread & butter?’
Ensuring the petrol you discovered in the KSA remains fully within your control maybe? Or the fact that April Glaspie, your US ambassador back then informed Saddam that the USA has no opinion of what happens between Iraq/Kuwait? Only to back on that and go all war on Saddam?
 

Fredo

You broke my heart!
Joined
Dec 9, 2015
Messages
710
Location
Fergie's head
Oh, a cease fire, I'm sure nobody tried that, what a great idea!




Nato engaging russian military means all gloves are off, it means a swift defeat for Russia on the ground and a super high risk that Putin's only options are nuclear.

Seems a couple of posters here are really craving atomic bombing, that's pretty odd.
But you believe arming the ukrainian people to keep fighting will help solve the issue? This is adding fuel to the fire in my opinion and in the end it's the people who will pay the bill. Sanctions can cripple Russia yes, but it still doesn't prevent them from doing the worst and which is using nuclear...
 

Sir Matt

Blue Devil
Joined
Jul 22, 2009
Messages
18,344
Location
LUHG
Russia wasn't even a top 10 economy in the world before any of this and will be lucky to be top 30 in a few months. They are light years from being considered anything resembling an economic power.
Less than half the size of California's economy and smaller than New York or Texas.
 

Oly Francis

Full Member
Joined
Oct 3, 2018
Messages
3,944
Supports
PSG
So the USA that dropped the Hiroshima bomb and the current USA are basically the same?

What a country did 70+ years ago (to a country that committed atrocities of their own) decides how we think about said country now? Even if most of the people in that country now weren’t even alive when the Hiroshima bomb was instructed/dropped (and was a last resort and aimed at net savings of lives)?

And Putins actions now are not so bad because of what another country did decades ago?
I'm pretty sure german people are happy to know that they're still considered jew hating murderers.