I suppose the issue with this is, if he repeats his form, the price increases more and even more clubs become interested.
Bruno is a wannabe playmaker, a hit and hope merchant. If Fred or Mctominay play hit and hope like Bruno does, they would be wannabe playmakers too.
I am also describing Zidane, Iniesta, Laudrup, Riquelme, Litmanen, Maradona, Deco, Veron, Modric and Totti.
Nonsense.
Have to say these kind of posts makes me embarrassed to be a red.
Imagine being this bad at understanding football.
This season Bruno scored 10 goals and made 14 assists in 44 games. If that's not an assist/goal machine then who is? Maybe we should stop expected 1-3 players to pick up the tab for the many serial bottlers and underperformers this squad is well stocked with
Yeah hard to believe some people will say he's had a bad season, yet when you look at Pogbas goals and assists stats over the years which are way lower, they won't have a bad word said about him.
When you take the emotion out there is nothing wrong with what he is saying. Relatively players will hold value to fans at certain levels of our progressio. Bruno as good as his stats are is not elite nor world class. Neither will he ever be.
Interesting. I’m thinking of getting an agent and booking a few trials with a view to becoming a Premier League footballer. Can’t be that hard to boot the ball forward at every opportunity.
Mad enit. To think Bruno’s stats this season is better than Bernardo Silva.
We surround Bruno with overpriced donkeys most of whom are given a pass by the media because of their nationality and yet we expect Bruno to score hat tricks in every game
What? wannabe playmaker? I mean his stats speak for themselves. He has clearly shown he has quality?
Premier League Player Stats - Big Chances Created
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
it was started by a poster who claimed that Bruno and Nunez can't play together in the same team and also can't be coached to play in the same team with a strange reason by saying that Bruno is a link-up player only not an actual playmaker so Bruno can't provide service to someone like Nunez, thus neither can get the best out of each other. I'm still shocked with the claim considering how many assists, xA, and chances created he produced that could benefit Nunez.
Never mind decent team, he hasn't even play in a club that has top manager that can coach player. Imagine a player with technical ability, end product, and high work rate off the ball like Bruno is being coached properly.
What is wrong with Salah's technical ability? If Nunez has Salah's technical ability we should be all over him, no?
Bernardo was crap at Portugal in the Euro last year, but top class in City team under Pep. if you think someone with lack of technical ability like Nunez but has end product and work rate can be coached under ETH, I don't know how someone with those two fundementals + technique can't be coached. A coaching from top manager on player that has technique, end product, and work rate like Bruno would help for sure.
Not really. Bernardo Silva looks better without Pep. Like most players of his ilk. Mahrez and Grealish included. But that’s for another debate.
Bernardo was crap in the Euro last year, I don't know what you were on about. It's all about coaching by an actual proper manager not by Sporting Director or Ole/Carrick/McKenna. If a player with no technical gift like Haller can be coached then a player with technique, end product, and work rate like Bruno can still be coached to perform and provide lot of assists for Nunez or Ronaldo to score lot of goals.
Well on that note. Let’s just blow all our money and Rice and Nunez as ETH can coach the rest. I’m sure Maguire and AWB will improve just like Haller.
Why are you comparing Ronaldo, Nunez, Bruno with Maguire and AWB? If a player has no end product, no technique, and can't defend, what the player is good at? Coaching good at nothing is less possible than coaching good at something. At least a player needs to be good at something to be coached to fit the system.
These are all Middle aged professional footballers. How much coaching you really think is going to improve them. Out if interest what player above 25 improves on their technical attributes. Arsene Wenger famously said after 15 you aren’t getting any technically better.
Coaching these middle aged professional footballers is primary about coaching the players to play their strength into the system. This is why it's weird of you that you mention Bissaka for example because what is he good at other than tackling or the one v one defending situation? How is the manager going to coach the player for having good at tackling only to fit the system like how is only being good at tackling but shit on other defensive aspects will allow the player to at least replica of what Mazraoui does being good at his feet and progressive passing? There is unlikely chance of him to be successfully coached to fit his strength into the system.
Ofcourse, all he had to do is hit and hope.
Same. Would much rather a player like Nkunku who is suited to a fluid front 3.
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
He’s trying to oversell his statsTweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Hope this helps. He’s a winger even according to Salah himself. A striker is like Nunez, the no 9.
This reminds me of our age old debate when I argued Rashford was a winger and not a striker
