TheReligion
Abusive
ugly traitYeah hard not to feel jealous of them
ugly traitYeah hard not to feel jealous of them
Yeah I know it is but he makes me think what might have been had we actually got the right people in recruitment back thenugly trait
you need to try and be positive though or else what’s the point?Yeah I know it is but he makes me think what might have been had we actually got the right people in recruitment back then
He seems a right bell-end though, it's gonna be great to really be able to dislike him, let it all outYeah hard not to feel jealous of them
I bet you anything he would have agreed to an anti city deal or Liverpool etc.This is ridiculous. This club should never sign players with 2 year buy out clauses, we may as well continue signing old strikers like Ronaldo and Cavani if that's the case.
Worst case would be Halaand joining City from Utd this summer and that 100 percent could have happened
Would have control over making a profit at worst and I'm sure he'd have agreed to only be sold abroad.It's not about being afraid to lose them it's about having no control there's a difference
Not every team abroad could pay what City did to his dad and agent, why would he have limited his chances?Would have control over making a profit at worst and I'm sure he'd have agreed to only be sold abroad.
He literally would have joined us if we had given him the release clause. I see no reason we shouldn't have done it.Not every team abroad could pay what City did to his dad and agent, why would he have limited his chances?
Don't forget that they met with all those clubs last year on a tour to find the most profitable club for them, that wouldn't have created a circus in United at all.
There is 0% chance he would have joined us, seeing the utter mess we are in presently. Anyway it just puts more pressure on City to win CL and PL etc next season.Haaland rejected us , we did make him an offer but the sporting project was non existent as it is now before the new manager joins.
Some people just can’t wrap their heads around the fact this deal would have been impossible for us as we stand.
Yes he is. And he will prove it next season.He isn’t better than Ronaldo.
Sometimes you read a reply that is laughably off topic.Sometimes you see a newbie and think ‘you’ll never make it out of there’.
Reading your posts always makes me think that.
Yeah I’m a huge Ronaldo fan but right now, he is likely better than both Ronaldo and Messi. We needs to see how he adapts to the EPL but if he keeps the same level, he is for sure the best young striker in the world right now, just a level below Benzema and Lewa.Yes he is. And he will prove it next season.
Yeah, this place would be absolutely fine with losing the club's main (and 21 year old) striker for £50mHe literally would have joined us if we had given him the release clause. I see no reason we shouldn't have done it.
We are worse off than if we had done.
And then we finished 3rd.This is what is must have felt like for opposition fans when we added Veron and Ruud to treble winning team.
But they all miss chances, big chances. They could have scored 2 or 3 more in both games against Real Madrid. Imagine those chances are falling to Haaland instead of the likes of Grealish and Sterling.Scoring goals isn't Citys problem. They've scored more than anyone in the league.
I guess Jesus will be sold.So what happens with that other promising young striker they also just bought now? Are City definitely selling a couple of their current forwards to make way?
Probably be loaned to one of their dodgy **** clubs they’ve got dotted around the globe.So what happens with that other promising young striker they also just bought now? Are City definitely selling a couple of their current forwards to make way?
It’s £85.5m with fees. Basically the agent making an absolute killing.Why is he so cheap? £50-55m for Haaland is cheaper than us signing AWB & literally any other player we’ve signed over the last 10 years.
They have Jesus who was there for quite a few seasons and was not starting week in, week out. Given that, you can't seriously think that the Argentinian kid would've had a chance to start next season. He'll come in, get a few games from the bench, score a few goals here and there because it's City and in 2 years they'll sell him for 40 mil, easy money.So what happens with that other promising young striker they also just bought now? Are City definitely selling a couple of their current forwards to make way?
There's a reason he went to Dortmund and not a bigger club - no club with aspirations of winning anything would put such a low release clause on a player so young and talented - and rightly so!Yeah, this place would be absolutely fine with losing the club's main (and 21 year old) striker for £50m
This assumes Haaland will help the team in terms of generating those chances, and not hinder itBut they all miss chances, big chances. They could have scored 2 or 3 more in both games against Real Madrid. Imagine those chances are falling to Haaland instead of the likes of Grealish and Sterling.
Our success was earned so they shrugged and said fair fecksThis is what is must have felt like for opposition fans when we added Veron and Ruud to treble winning team.
He would probably struggle if he played for a club like us, who couldn't even put a few pass together against the likes of Brighton. But playing for City, with chances after chances after chances put on plate for him? It near impossible for him to fail there.It'll go one of two ways:
He'll come to the Premier League and smash it completely or
He'll come to the Premier League and struggle big time.
We've seen it happen quite a few times when great players come to the Premier League and struggle/fail. Personally i think he'll do fine though.