A weak league? Sorry I'm not sure I heard that properly over what's being said in every other thread on this board.
Pep's CL record is indeed a weakness, but it also says something that three semi finals in a row are considered "absolutely tanked" for him and I think his insane consistency in his league campaigns stand above everyone else.
And I think the fact that Klopp has been keeping up as well as he did also reflects very positively on him.
The league is weak, anyone telling you otherwise is not versed in what went before. We're in a time where Chelsea, Manchester United (*the* two powerhouses from Jose's time until just after Pep arrived, in Chelsea's case) being a shadow of themselves, and even the strongest teams of the very recent past being pale imitations of themselves (Spurs and Leicester).
Klopp and Pep are running roughshod over a weak league. That is the fault of neither, but it is the reality, add the disparity in squads (both peaking on top of being the strongest sets of individuals) and the tallies are, and should, be a given. Incidentally, the whole of Europe is on the slide until the next round of bolstering, so this really should be the time these two help themselves to the spoils if they are *that* good.
You cannot omit Pep's infinite budget and the relativity of failure in regards to his resources. No obstacles, no restrictions, constantly buying and failing to the point it's expected by now. All this cooing about how dominant he is in the league, yet when met with teams of equal quality in the CL, he comes unstuck. Again, and again, and again. That's a bigger mark against him than any Ferguson has; Pep's only time winning the competition until now is when he had the best of the best of the best lined up for him - those are not good reflections when extrapolated. Pep destroys a weak league with the strongest squad, but then is second-guessing himself and constantly making errors when those resources are negated.
His coaching is aesthetically pleasing, but is it his squad or his genius determining the league? Ferguson matched off with countless opponents with equal teams or superior squads and more than held his own, how many times do we say that about Pep?
I like elements of what he does, but deification belies circumstances and has created a myth or at least a coach who only has the good extracted from his CV with his constant failures brushed under the rug like they're not happening in real time.
Klopp is doing better than Pep in relative terms, and despite that, he isn't overcoming him - he has to do what Ferguson did with Jose, when a seemingly unstoppable juggernaut with superior resources and squad came along and had to be overcome for him to continue winning.
I find discussion about the football either play to be an aside in this discussion; Pep struggled mightily with 'apex' Jose's peak side (Chelsea), and Klopp's football would last about half a season before total burnout in times gone by where teams did everything in their power to accrue points, rather than naively open themselves up to crushing defeats by superior offensive forces. Klopp constantly bemoans teams that don't 'play' as they're the ones that he tends to struggle more against, so good luck when you have a host of teams doing their damndest to not 'play'. I don't believe he tallies like he does now in those iterations of the league.
Anyway, context is vital in objective discussion about their feats vis-a-vis Ferguson's, without it, the conversation is a redundancy with binary lines of thought that have zero nuance or caveats/asterisks to them.