BarstoolProphet
Full Member
- Joined
- Aug 7, 2014
- Messages
- 6,570
Which journalists?United.no has always been a decent source. That's all I can say.
They had some info when LvG was here.
Which journalists?United.no has always been a decent source. That's all I can say.
They had some info when LvG was here.
Maybe this is the action in June - buying these players.De Jong to replace Pogba+Matic
1 CB to for the squad if Bailly/Jones are going..
1 striker, because we dont have any.
Still no proper DM, no full back upgrades and no one to play from the right..
If we addressed just those 3 positions, it would be a pretty underwhelming window.
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Why wouldn't they? He's a unique player with Modrić type potential who just turned 25. How many midfielders can be deep playmakers like him? They're as important as any position on the pitch.Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Are you quoting Ten Hag?We'll be in it next year you prick, now join us and win the Europa League.
Well they can keep him and his wages then….or posture for a couple of weeks then cave in at 50mil1530264397960069121[/MEDIA]
They paid 75M Euros for him and they want 80M Euros. They aren't being unreasonable.Too expensive. I hope they get ripped off with their replacement.
Has he made them successful?They paid 75M Euros for him and they want 80M Euros. They aren't being unreasonable.
We can get that price down a bit. That is the price they name, but with some negotiation, we should get it down to 60-70m for sure. They know this.They paid 75M Euros for him and they want 80M Euros. They aren't being unreasonable.
He said since then we have agreed a fee with Barca. Why would we do that?Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Time to move on then.
It is news. He was hesitant before but as you've read, its now an outright no.He said since then we have agreed a fee with Barca. Why would we do that?
FDJ was hesitant. This isnt news. Main news today is that we have agreed a fee according to the same journalist
Nothing he said is inconsistent. We need to be in agreement with club and player.
That account is aggregator and it translated it wrong. He said initially he said no and then ETH spoke to him. Also that we agreed a fee. Agreeing a fee for a player who doesn’t want to come is bit stupid. Most likely ETH convinced him if we pressed forward with a deal
Arse from elbow…. Frenkie is coming!
He has no clue, same as the Romero twat
Im confused, sorry If you speak Spanish can you translate what he said?That account is aggregator and it translated it wrong. He said initially he said no and then ETH spoke to him. Also that we agreed a fee. Agreeing a fee for a player who doesn’t want to come is bit stupid. Most likely ETH convinced him if we pressed forward with a deal
No thats not what he said. He said initially FDJ said no and then ETH spoke to him. There is no information after that. Then we agreed a fee as well. Looks odd to me that we will agree a fee after a player said no.It is news. He was hesitant before but as you've read, its now an outright no.
Im confused, sorry If you speak Spanish can you translate what he said?
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
This doesn't read like new info but more like a reminder. I'd like to know where this originally came from as no one has pointed out the underlying source on Twitter.Ten Hag called Frenkie De Jong.
Initially Frenkie said no.
He doesn't want to go to a team that is not in the Champions League.
Muppets live onThat account is aggregator and it translated it wrong. He said initially he said no and then ETH spoke to him. Also that we agreed a fee. Agreeing a fee for a player who doesn’t want to come is bit stupid. Most likely ETH convinced him if we pressed forward with a deal