From what I have seen, virtually everyone who actually watched a decent amount of the trial has agreed with the verdict. Those who haven’t watched it, but have just seen the headlines, seem to be those questioning it.
Before all this kicked off, I didn’t know much about the UK case and was under the impression that Depp was a proven abuser. Having now bothered to actually find out a bit about that case, I realise it was heavily flawed and that no such conclusion could reasonably be drawn. All that was proven was that the Sun had reasonable belief that what they were printing was true - and of course they had that belief since Amber was their source. At no point was the validity of the claims or the context really judged.
This time round, I have been following the trial fairly closely, and have come to the conclusion that Amber is trash. Not all women, just her, and that is based on what she has said and done, not and ingrained prejudice or hatred for women.
Depp is absolutely not perfect, but he comes across as more authentic, more open about his own flaws (which on the balance of things, are less harmful to those around him). He lost several big movie contracts as well as his reputation, whilst Heard got all the limelight as a survivor. We now know the reality of the situation better, and that clearly doesn’t seem fair - and that for me is why so many people have sided with Depp.