Frenkie de Jong | The last muppeting lap

Frenkie to United?


  • Total voters
    2,033
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.
Joined
Jul 31, 2015
Messages
22,908
Location
Somewhere out there
Not talking about giving it up. Lump sum vs installments.
8 weeks to get 8-10m in a lump sum post tax rather than say 850k post tax annually is absolutely worth it.
Probably the difference between keeping that 5m euro pad in Barca whilst investing similar in a new place in his new country.
Plus, I wouldn’t be 100% certain they’ll pay it.
 

Oly Francis

Full Member
Joined
Oct 3, 2018
Messages
3,944
Supports
PSG
Do we know if there is a realistic way to resolve this 17 million problem?

I mean, if Barca pays the 17 million now, then this will count towards their wage limit for next year, right? So, perhaps for accounting reasons it is impossible for them to do this, even if they wanted to.

On the other hand, if Man Utd accepts to pay an extra 17 million as wages, then they will want to spread this to multiple years --- basically Frenkie will have an elevated salary for the next few years. But he already has this, so why move? Plus this will mess up the wage structure for Man Utd.
There's many ways to resolve this issue. Barcelona could lower the transfer price and United would give the money as a signing bonus to De Jong. What it comes down to in this situation is the fact that nobody wants to pay these 17M. It's not a legal issue, it's a money issue.
 

Alemar

Full Member
Joined
Jul 11, 2017
Messages
7,617
Frenkie is ideal because a willing buyer is lined up for a very good fee.
Of course it is ideal. Yet it doesn’t mean, that their problems wouldn’t be partially solved via sale of, let’s say, Pedri, Fati or Gavi. They may be unwilling to sell those, but it’s entirely different matter
 

Escobar

Shameless Musketeer
Joined
Jun 8, 2004
Messages
30,212
Location
La-La-Land
There's many ways to resolve this issue. Barcelona could lower the transfer price and United would give the money as a signing bonus to De Jong. What it comes down to in this situation is the fact that nobody wants to pay these 17M. It's not a legal issue, it's a money issue.
It is a legal issue, was explained a few weeks ago. United cant cover that apparently
 

Sarni

nice guy, unassuming, objective United fan.
Joined
Jan 21, 2004
Messages
57,723
Location
Krakow
That’s why he’s not moving until they do. Pretty simple really.
No it’s not. He is owed over €20m a year for the next 4 years because he agreed to earn less in 20-22. If he doesn’t play at Barca in 22-26 they won’t pay him anything.
 

Sarni

nice guy, unassuming, objective United fan.
Joined
Jan 21, 2004
Messages
57,723
Location
Krakow
So they can just scam him?
He agreed to deferred €17m of his salary from 2020-22 to 2022-26. He signed the contract. They cannot pay him his salary of the next 4 years in advance.
 

Sarni

nice guy, unassuming, objective United fan.
Joined
Jan 21, 2004
Messages
57,723
Location
Krakow
It absolutely is. I think Utd giving it to Barca in the fee also causes them problems as they have to announce it in their wage budget, so would screw wage cap ffp too. Might have made that up but it’s definitely a tricky thing to get around.
I don’t think Barca can practically pay him €17m now anyway unless they amend his contract.
 
Joined
Jul 31, 2015
Messages
22,908
Location
Somewhere out there
I don’t think Barca can practically pay him €17m now anyway unless they amend his contract.
Of course they can, Danny Murphy confirmed it the other day, a football with time left on his deal always “settles” with his current club first. That’s why top teams aren’t full of players just sitting on contracts playing in the reserves.

A club and a player always has to agree to a severance package. This entire fecking deal is held up because they cannot agree on that severance package.
 

mu4c_20le

Full Member
Joined
Jul 7, 2013
Messages
43,844
He agreed to deferred €17m of his salary from 2020-22 to 2022-26. He signed the contract. They cannot pay him his salary of the next 4 years in advance.
But they are asking him to leave. How can you ask someone to defer wages to the future and then ask them to leave and give up that money the next year.
 

Cassidy

No longer at risk of being mistaken for a Scouser
Joined
Oct 2, 2013
Messages
31,479
I think you miss understood. His deferred payments kick into gear in a couple of years - he will wait till then and then leave
They kick into gear this season and run till the end of his contract.
 

OrcaFat

Full Member
Joined
Jul 29, 2013
Messages
5,672
They don’t owe him anything. He signed a contract that deferred his wages to 2022-26. He got all the money they were supposed to pay him per his contract until now.

They (might) want to sell him, he doesn’t want to go because 1) he would rather play for Barca, 2) he will get paid better over there for the next 5 years than he would have been anywhere else.
Is it really in any doubt that they want to sell him? Is it really in any doubt that they can’t possibly afford to pay him the salary he will be due in his contract going forward?

Does anyone really think he has been paid what he is due up to this point if he won’t be able to collect the back-weighted salary in the coming years?

He doesn’t have to leave but Barca need him to leave. They have to pay him off. What sum will he accept? Nobody knows but it is the only way this thing ends.
 

Oly Francis

Full Member
Joined
Oct 3, 2018
Messages
3,944
Supports
PSG
It is a legal issue, was explained a few weeks ago. United cant cover that apparently
Nothing was really explained since there's 10 different info regarding his contract. Also, nothing prevents Barcelona from using the money they get from his transfert to United to pay his outstanding wages. They just don't want to.

The issue is simple, De Jong is owed more than what Barcelona is willing to give him and United doesn't want to cover the difference. As long as nobody budges, nothing will happen. Barcelona is trying to make it sound complicated : it's not.
 

Lash

Full Member
Joined
May 3, 2012
Messages
12,146
Location
Buckinghamshire
Supports
Millwall, Saint-Etienne
FDJ would be a serious upgrade on Jorginho (who incidentaly has only a year left on his contract and may move back to Italy) , so I disagree that he wouldn't improve us at all. The reason Chelsea have been concentrating their transfer business on defenders has to do with us losing two centrebacks and two fullbacks and the need to replace them.

I'm sure if Tuchel was offered a chance to sign FDJ, he'd do it in a heartbeat.
It's not a serious upgrade, swapping FDJ for Jorginho would be a marginal improvement to your team. You lack goals and defenders, Frenkie is neither of those things.
 

Redcy

Full Member
Joined
Nov 9, 2014
Messages
2,614
He agreed to deferred €17m of his salary from 2020-22 to 2022-26. He signed the contract. They cannot pay him his salary of the next 4 years in advance.
The crux of it though is that we know he isn’t owed the money legally, however it’s also true that legally he has a contract with them. Barca fabs and press conveniently forget his current contract, hence why it’s never mentioned.

if they want him to leave he can ask for a severance package. If he says I want 17m that’s his price. Of course barca can say no, in which case he can just stay on his legally binding contract. That is his leverage right now

or barca can try to force him to sign a new contract where he gives up his deferred wages, and he goes to half his current
 

Alemar

Full Member
Joined
Jul 11, 2017
Messages
7,617
It's not a serious upgrade, swapping FDJ for Jorginho would be a marginal improvement to your team. You lack goals and defenders, Frenkie is neither of those things.
Chelsea want to upgrade on Kante and Jorginho, while we need to upgrade on McFred. Difference in marginal improvement is huge
 

OrcaFat

Full Member
Joined
Jul 29, 2013
Messages
5,672
He also said he’s gone from 60% likely to 50/50 and that he doesn’t think De Jong wants to sign for United
I don’t think he said that. He said he hasn’t got any evidence that FDJ does want to join Utd which just means he has no idea either way.
 

Oly Francis

Full Member
Joined
Oct 3, 2018
Messages
3,944
Supports
PSG
The crux of it though is that we know he isn’t owed the money legally, however it’s also true that legally he has a contract with them. Barca fabs and press conveniently forget his current contract, hence why it’s never mentioned.

if they want him to leave he can ask for a severance package. If he says I want 17m that’s his price. Of course barca can say no, in which case he can just stay on his legally binding contract. That is his leverage right now

or barca can try to force him to sign a new contract where he gives up his deferred wages, and he goes to half his current
This, a lot of people try to make it sound like a super tricky legal/financial issue. It's really not, the issue is : nobody wants to pay De Jong what he wants (or deserve) and he doesn't want to let it go.
 

Okey

Full Member
Joined
May 11, 2017
Messages
2,436
I hear we've kept the No. 21 free for Frenkie. 2 of our signings who wore 21 last season have been allocated 6 and 14. Hope alive...
 

LawCharltonBest

Enjoys watching fox porn
Joined
May 17, 2012
Messages
15,313
Location
Salford
I don’t think he said that. He said he hasn’t got any evidence that FDJ does want to join Utd which just means he has no idea either way.
He kind of did though. He said he doesn’t think he has a desire to sign for United and thinks he’d rather live in London if given the choice
 
Joined
Jul 31, 2015
Messages
22,908
Location
Somewhere out there
He also said he’s gone from 60% likely to 50/50 and that he doesn’t think De Jong wants to sign for United
feck me, 2+2 doesn’t equal 28.

He has no proof FDJ wants the move, although he later today said “Ten Hag must have received some hope”.

He also has no proof that he would want a move to Liverpool, Bayern or City, but we know he likely would.
 

mu4c_20le

Full Member
Joined
Jul 7, 2013
Messages
43,844
Mitten usually has decent club sources but it's obvious he's got nothing on this besides the club stance of not giving up yet
 

JPRouve

can't stop thinking about balls - NOT deflategate
Scout
Joined
Jan 31, 2014
Messages
65,932
Location
France
Of course they can, Danny Murphy confirmed it the other day, a football with time left on his deal always “settles” with his current club first. That’s why top teams aren’t full of players just sitting on contracts playing in the reserves.

A club and a player always has to agree to a severance package. This entire fecking deal is held up because they cannot agree on that severance package.
To be a bit more accurate they agree on a mutual termination which can include a severance package but isn't necessarily the case. In his case he wants a severance package because he drastically reduced his wage between early 2020 and 2022 and no one is going to pay him what Barcelona were supposed to pay him, he is going to take a "pay cut" in his future club, if he forfeits the "deferred" wage he loses on every fronts.
 

Gandalf

Full Member
Joined
Aug 9, 2018
Messages
4,794
Location
Alabama but always Wales in my heart
Mitten usually has decent club sources but it's obvious he's got nothing on this besides the club stance of not giving up yet
Pretty sure outside of his agent and his girlfriend FDJ isn't talking to anyone so I am not sure even club sources can help. On the basis of both his relationship to ETH and his agent having clients at the club I am fairly sure that if moving to United is ever firmly off the table they would have the decency to let us know so until that point we just watch the interminable staredown with Barca play out.
 

Highfather_24

Full Member
Joined
Sep 20, 2014
Messages
2,725
has eth said anything about eriksen playing as a 10. I havent seen the latest interviews though
Yeah he was asked where he sees Eriksen playing, and he said he primarily sees him as an attacking midfielder, but he can also play deeper.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.