Penalty has to be retaken, Ozcan was in the box!
Champions League Round of 16 (14th Feb - 15th Mar)
- Thread starter Samid
- Start date
Are they fecking joking?!?
A retake?
A retake?
You've got to be kidding
That's fecking harsh
Gerrin
Lucky Chelsea, won't miss it the 2nd time.
If the Chelsea players are encroaching, why is the pen retaken ?
WTF
Absurd
"Until we score"
He’s going to miss isnt he? Yup
That's bollocks. There were players from each team inside.
This is stupid. The penalty will just be retaken until Chelsea score.
Are defenders allowed in the box now? VAR farce again.
This game is fecking rigged
At this point you might aswell just give Chelsea the win with decisions like that
That's fecking pathetic. The furthest player in the area is a bloody Chelsea player.
Game is rigged.
That's actually ridiculous, Chilwell is first inside the box?!
That’s some ridiculous luck Chelsea got. Also there are just as many Chelsea players as Dortmund players in the box??
Match fixing at its finest here, bullshit couple of decisions.
Wtf Chillwell is in front of them all
Because they didn't touch the ball
Football is broken. This is outrageous
He didn't touch the ball so it's irrelevant
Those 2 Dortmund defenders encroaching the penalty area are idiots.
Any Chelsea players in the box?
Absolute joke.
‘Who are ya’ chants. Lads, fecking cringe.
‘Who are ya’ chants. Lads, fecking cringe.
So if Chelsea scored it would have to be retaken because Chilwell was in the box?
Ozcan wasn't even in the box. How was that retaken
Get Reece James on this.
That's a disgraceful decision against Dortmund
That wouldn't have been looked back at If he scored, only used when he missed and not right
That wouldn't have been looked back at If he scored, only used when he missed and not right
What a joke.
Shouldn't even have been a pen to begin with
Dortmund are done.
It’s a simple rule. Players from both teams entered the box before the ball was kicked - the penalty has to be repeated whatever the outcome of the shot
This game is just fecked.
Well no - but if Chilwell had been involved in scoring the follow-up it would have been disallowed
Like they'd even whislte for a retake if Chillwell scored from rebound come on
Platini was a cynic on video refs, and you can see why that was the case.