Club Sale | It’s done!

Status
Not open for further replies.

MUFC OK

New Member
Joined
Oct 14, 2014
Messages
7,216
Glazers and Elliott have an agreement for financing. This has all been a public show but the outcome was predetermined.
 

duffer

Sensible and not a complete jerk like most oppo's
Scout
Joined
Jun 24, 2004
Messages
50,483
Location
Chelsea (the saviours of football) fan.
BBC say two improved bids have been made by qatar guy and ratcliffe. Ratcliffe wants 69% 9f the club i.e. glazers shares and qatar chap wants 100% of the club.

Why would ratcliffe not want 100% of the club?
69% would cost less and he might think the Glaziers would prefer to accept a bid where they keep a chunk of the club
 

Pickle85

Full Member
Joined
Mar 15, 2021
Messages
6,600
Glazers and Elliott have an agreement for financing. This has all been a public show but the outcome was predetermined.
Serious question, what would have been in it for the glazers to make a public show of it if the outcome was predetermined to go as you say?
 

city-puma

Full Member
Joined
Dec 10, 2020
Messages
3,315
Location
NYC
I am sure Kaveh's been sold that line by a few people. However, I struggle to swallow it. If there are so many bidders why did only two delegations turn up at United for the in depth talks?

I am sorry, this feels (once again) like the Glazers refusing to give up on the idea that someone else might outbid Nine Two or INEOS. They are clearly the only two in the race and, based on reports, it doesn't feel like either is interested in making this an auction.
Yeah, it’s hilarious to believe a bidder using zoom and drone for in-depth discussions before making a bid north of 4.5 billion sterling pounds.
 

sglowrider

Thinks the caf is 'wokeish'.
Joined
Dec 27, 2009
Messages
25,223
Location
Hell on Earth
A game of chess being played out between the two public bidders imo. It seems like INEOS asked for a extension to gain a advantage and the Qatari group got wind of it and also took up the offer of the extension.

The merchant bank and the Glazers also seem to be creating a ghost bidding scenario imo.
Or they have some source within Raine and they found out what the other bids have come in? So they need to revise theirs.
 

Plant0x84

Shame we’re aren’t more like Brighton
Joined
Jun 23, 2020
Messages
13,345
Location
Carpark and snack area adjacent to the abyss
BBC say two improved bids have been made by qatar guy and ratcliffe. Ratcliffe wants 69% 9f the club i.e. glazers shares and qatar chap wants 100% of the club.

Why would ratcliffe not want 100% of the club?
You misunderstand I think. Both parties are bidding for the Glazer family shares. That’s 69% of the total, but would give the buyer control of the club. The other 31% is with private shareholders and can be purchased after the main sale.
 

Tiber

Full Member
Joined
Apr 22, 2014
Messages
10,294
Quite enjoy this demonstration of how little critical thought goes into modern journalism. They clearly all get the group text and rush to relay it on twitter and media websites asap without more than a vague check to see if its actually true.

Kevah exposing Kevah is a perfect example.
 

Plant0x84

Shame we’re aren’t more like Brighton
Joined
Jun 23, 2020
Messages
13,345
Location
Carpark and snack area adjacent to the abyss
Quite enjoy this demonstration of how little critical thought goes into modern journalism. They clearly all get the group text and rush to relay it on twitter and media websites asap without more than a vague check to see if its actually true.

Kevah exposing Kevah is a perfect example.
Who the feck is Kevah?
 

#07

makes new threads with tweets in the OP
Joined
Oct 25, 2010
Messages
23,361
69% would cost less and he might think the Glaziers would prefer to accept a bid where they keep a chunk of the club
This is not correct.

The Glazers only own 69 per cent of the club. The rest of the shares are openly traded on the stock market. To take control of the club you only need to buy the Glazers shares.

If you want to own the club as a whole, not just the controlling stake, you would have to find the money to buy the shares that are publicly traded.

PS) Also it may not be cheaper just to buy 69%. It depends on overall valuation.
 

red thru&thru

Full Member
Joined
Mar 2, 2004
Messages
7,657
I'm not too sure how any of this is the fault of the journalists. They've all clearly been told the same thing. It shows that they've not made anything up. They've gone off credible source.
 

MUFC OK

New Member
Joined
Oct 14, 2014
Messages
7,216
Serious question, what would have been in it for the glazers to make a public show of it if the outcome was predetermined to go as you say?
Increase share price, troll/enrage the fanbase that has bashed their image and hindered their commercial interests. We’ve almost been at war with them for years.

It also allows them to state that they conducted a thorough process before picking their desired option. They can also hedge bets on the ESL potentially going ahead, however unlikely.
 

MUFC OK

New Member
Joined
Oct 14, 2014
Messages
7,216
Or the Raine folks have 'leaked' what the accepted selling price is to both parties and so they are scrambling to revise.
Could be a nudge to be like “seriously, they aren’t selling for a penny below £6bn”.
 

#07

makes new threads with tweets in the OP
Joined
Oct 25, 2010
Messages
23,361
BBC say two improved bids have been made by qatar guy and ratcliffe. Ratcliffe wants 69% 9f the club i.e. glazers shares and qatar chap wants 100% of the club.

Why would ratcliffe not want 100% of the club?
Different ownership models, different reporting obligations.

Both INEOS and Nine Two want control. They can achieve this by buying the Glazers' shares.

However, if they don't buy the remaining publicly traded shares they will have to live up to certain obligations placed on publicly traded companies.

If you buy 100 per cent of the shares and take the club private that changes things. Yes there are still a myriad of laws you need to navigate. However, the things that you have to publicly disclose on a regular basis lessen significantly. It gives you a freer hand.
 

Irishman

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Mar 3, 2010
Messages
151
Glazers epitomise farce in everything they do. Clearly trying to squeeze every last drop of money out of a club that they have milked dry. In doing so, I suspect their greed is pricing Utd out of the market hence bids not lodged.
 

Adnan

Talent Spotter
Joined
Oct 5, 2013
Messages
29,893
Location
England
Or they have some source within Raine and they found out what the other bids have come in? So they need to revise theirs.
That could also be the case. But from what's being reported, the Jassim offer was ready and RMC in France reported it to be over €6bn (Euros). But it seems like INEOS asked for a extension and the 92 foundation also took up the offer.
 

TheNewEra

Knows Kroos' mentality
Joined
Jan 20, 2014
Messages
8,293
Got to say kudos to INEOS and Jassim, they really are United fans!

They have what it takes to own United based on today, the deadline has passed and they are "preparing a bid" they really understand the culture of the club in recent transfer windows.
 

Infra-red

Full Member
Joined
May 4, 2010
Messages
13,425
Location
left wing
I'm not too sure how any of this is the fault of the journalists. They've all clearly been told the same thing. It shows that they've not made anything up. They've gone off credible source.
The Qataris hired a PR firm early on in the process, who have been briefing the Mail (Keegan) throughout. I don't think Ineos had anyone doing PR for them, although that might now have changed. Anyway, pretty clear that the journalists reported what the PR firm(s) had told them pre-9:00pm. Raine are seemingly close to the Murdoch press and it appears that Sky and The Times have been getting their information directly from there throughout this process - no surprise it was Sky who subsequently reported 'no bid', which will presumably have come straight from Raine.

Basically, everyone is reporting what they have been told by people who are in a position to know. That can still sometimes get you in to trouble (as is the case tonight).
 

acolyte

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Jan 26, 2021
Messages
336
BBC say two improved bids have been made by qatar guy and ratcliffe. Ratcliffe wants 69% 9f the club i.e. glazers shares and qatar chap wants 100% of the club.

Why would ratcliffe not want 100% of the club?
Simple, it's all he would need. The Glazers own 100% of the voting shares, so buying their share would give him 100% of the control. The other shares (the ones on the stock exchange) don't have any significant voting rights so he could buy them at a later date or not buy them at all, wouldn't make any real difference to his ability to run the club.
 

stevoc

Full Member
Joined
Jun 11, 2011
Messages
20,637
If both bids were around 4.5b...

then that would mean based on the shares INEOS apparently want they are outbidding Qatar by a fair way.
This sale is for the Glazers 69% shares and controlling interest in the club. The rest of the shares could/would be bought later by the winning party.
 

TrebleChamp99

Supports Liverpool
Joined
Dec 27, 2021
Messages
1,080
Uncle Jim up to his old tricks again.
How anyone would want this guy running the club is beyond me.

Pulled the same stunt with Chelsea, come in late with a huge offer hoping to guzump anyone in the process problem is Raine let the game slip.

Imagine Jassim will add a couple of zeros and be favourite again.

What this does indicate is that this is probably the last round of bidding , if people want to put in such intricate details on their bids and need more time I’d imagine they have been told the exclusivity period will start post selection,
 
Status
Not open for further replies.