Club Sale | It’s done!

Status
Not open for further replies.

Alonzo

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Jan 28, 2015
Messages
347
No I mean the twisted logic is that you actually think that's what I meant by what I said, thinking I don't care about the migrant workers, I care mate, and I don't appreciate you making out like I don't with your snide remark when I was simply having a laugh over the way some posters are on here at the moment over this whole thing.

Some people are taking the whole thing way to seriously when there's simply nothing we can do about who ends up owning us, whoever it ends up being will buy us no matter what any of us thinks.
Says “get the feck out” but acts indignant and clutches pearls at what’s said to him. Sounds about right.
 

whitbyviking

Full Member
Joined
Aug 15, 2022
Messages
2,363
They are more likely to go on the list under Labour, who are expected to win the next election.

Not a guarantee but a possibility, especially if the far left hold the balance of power in the next parliament and/or something happens to Starmer and a more left wing leader replaces him.

This is probably the biggest practical issue with being owned by an oil state. They are linked to so much dodgy stuff behind the scenes, the rug could be pulled beneath them at some unspecified point in the future if the government takes aim at them (different circumstances, but just look at what happened with RA and Chelsea)
What makes you think that, all signs from Labour include they will be cosying up to the Davos set. Not just Starmer either.
 

SteveCoppellFan

Full Member
Joined
Jul 17, 2014
Messages
866
Its quite galling to think they bought United with a £550m loan and 18 years later it still stands at £535m.

In 18 years they have paid a capital amount of £15m, I've not checked the profit & loss figures but I wonder how much interest they have paid on that loan in 18 years ?

In theory, they have purchased United without spending a pound and then United have fronted up their interest charges as well.

And now they want to sell for £5b plus ... amazing bit of business by them to be fair.
 

HarryP

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Oct 28, 2021
Messages
400
What? ME money owns Labour as well. That’s a very naive post
I think your post is the naive one.

Russian money actually had a far greater influence on the Conservative party and that didn't stop them banishing RA when it became the politically expedient thing to do. The idea that ME money 'owns' the Labour party and will always protect ME states from sanctions is ridiculous tbh.
 

Mickeza

still gets no respect
Joined
Aug 21, 2012
Messages
14,110
Location
Deepthroating information to Howard Nurse.
They are more likely to go on the list under Labour, who are expected to win the next election.
So Labour are going to add all Saudi, UAE and Qatari royal family members onto the list - stop selling them weapons cancelling billion pound contracts, refuse to buy oil and gas from them causing energy markets and inflation to go off the charts and a huge recession, seize 3/4s of London and Newcastle/City in assets which will make all foreign investors think twice about investing in the U.K. regardless of nationality - and tell them we don’t want the Middle East opening up to the west, we don’t want your money or your energy supplies - run off into the arms of Russia and China - and they’re going to do this alone as a total outlier to Western Europe and the US…weirdly enough these decisions aren’t made on the basis of who people think should own football clubs.
 

HarryP

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Oct 28, 2021
Messages
400
So Labour are going to add all Saudi, UAE and Qatari royal family members onto the list - stop selling them weapons cancelling billion pound contracts, refuse to buy oil and gas from them causing energy markets and inflation to go off the charts and a huge recession, seize 3/4s of London and Newcastle/City in assets which will make all foreign investors think twice about investing in the U.K. regardless of nationality - and tell them we don’t want the Middle East opening up to the west, we don’t want your money or your energy supplies - run off into the arms of Russia and China - and they’re going to do this alone as a total outlier to Western Europe and the US…weirdly enough these decisions aren’t made on the basis of who people think should own football clubs.
I never said any of that. I just said it's more likely that Labour will take a stand against human rights abusers than the Tories. Which is obviously true.

Doesn't mean they will. But it could happen in the future, you'd be naive to think it can't.
 

Oranges038

Full Member
Joined
Oct 19, 2020
Messages
12,226
A lot of truth in that. There is also the issue of the stability of the state in question. The current setup appears to have a pretty strong hold on power at the moment but the nature of that system of government means that things can often change suddenly and dramatically. It's all a bit moot for now though as there is no possibility of any intervention by the British government in this, nor would there be in the future.
Well, we should all remember the apparent messages between the Crown Prince and Boris, telling him to ensure the premier league corrected their decision on the non-state owned/funded Newcastle deal. Which he also allegedly did by sending his old buddy from Barclays down to put pressure on the PL to make it happen.

If it comes down to it, I suspect that similar might happen with Utd. It would be pretty much unstoppable because there's just so much more going on beyond the much simpler business of who owns a football club.
 

stevoc

Full Member
Joined
Jun 11, 2011
Messages
20,417
Does anyone remember as the takeover from the Glazers was happening whether they went on a public charm offensive and made loads of promises or whether they never bothered? I just wonder what recourse fans have if a lot of these promises are hot air by the potential new owners.
Either protest or stop financial support to the club.

That's about it.
 
Last edited:

Pogue Mahone

The caf's Camus.
Joined
Feb 22, 2006
Messages
133,964
Location
"like a man in silk pyjamas shooting pigeons
Does anyone remember as the takeover from the Glazers was happening whether they went on a public charm offensive and made loads of promises or whether they never bothered? I just wonder what recourse fans have if a lot of these promises are hot air by the potential new owners.
They made no promises. Kept their cards close to their chest and barely said anything to anyone.
 

Mou Mou Land

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Feb 22, 2023
Messages
287
I'm looking forward to the Qatari bid being successful, not only for the benefits it may bring to the team, but also because it will frighten the FA to death. It will mean that they actually have to be seen to punish City for repeated breaches of the rules; if not, they merely set a template for us and Newcastle to follow the same business practices as them.
 

HarryP

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Oct 28, 2021
Messages
400
They made no promises. Kept their cards close to their chest and barely said anything to anyone.
The smart thing to do tbf.

The media are always desperate for some kind of pledge or target so they can hang it around your neck and frame every move you make in relation to it.
 

sglowrider

Thinks the caf is 'wokeish'.
Joined
Dec 27, 2009
Messages
25,217
Location
Hell on Earth
You have to wonder about The Glazer bros and their supposed attachment to the club. They sound detached from reality, despite being massively in debt and universally hated by fans they seem to think they're part of the fabric of the club like Sir Alex or Bobby Charlton.
Tbf if you are a billionaire, the chances are, you are detached from reality -- they dont live like common people.
 

devilish

Juventus fan who used to support United
Joined
Sep 5, 2002
Messages
61,708
Tbf if you are a billionaire, the chances are, you are detached from reality -- they dont live like common people.
I doubt they are though. Their net worth is 3.9b and they are 6 Glazers
 

Señor Sloppy

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Dec 25, 2022
Messages
75
And what does the club get? The whole point of this exercise isn't glazers need the money it's that man utd need it.

The glazer siblings who want out are not going to give up 100's of millions so that their 2 idiot siblings who have taken the most successful club in England and turned into a money draining spurs esque team can continue to run into the ground.

The math doesn't check out as much as glazers want everyone to believe it does. Say Elliot are truly crazy and value the club at glazer's 6bn valuation for their shares. That means the club as a whole is valued at 8.7bn. That's 87 mn that glazers lose for every % they give up. Say they sell 12% and get 1bn to invest in stadium and debt and divide it up equally every sibling gives up 2%. That's a straightup loss of 175mn per sibling.

Now if we assume the worst case scenario for glazers and imagine that neither sjr nor Qatar agree to make bids higher than 5bn for their shares. That means every % gets 72 mn. So say a sibling owns 12%, that means under the worst case scenario they get nearly 870mn right now.

If that sibling goes with the minority offer he needs the club to be valued at 10.5bn to break even and if we even apply insane growth to utd, that still is going to take atleast 5 years to achieve and nothing to go wrong.
Why couldn't Elliot Group simply purchase the shares of the Glazers who want out, then separately fund the new infrastructure? The latter should be relatively straightforward to do through a partial contribution of straight investment as proportionate with their shareholding %, then partially as a loan to the remaining Glazers. Elliot Group aren't exactly lacking in their own resources.
 

EireRed_GS

Full Member
Joined
Jul 3, 2018
Messages
552
Been saying since the announcement.. They will play their own game, and the first chance they get to not sell, they will lean toward that.

Over evaluate ... blame interested parties for not paying their price... play the card "we have no option but to look for investment / not sell, due to valuation not being met"

investment works perfect for them. It always have.. they take care of some of the issues with the club that they are unwilling to pay for themselves, all whilst keeping their cash cow.

I didnt celebrate the day of the announcement and wont until we see an official statement saying they are 100% gone..

If they do decide to stay.. it will be utter chaos at OT next season.. Im praying it doesnt come to that, but it doesnt look good at all
 

Mindhunter

Full Member
Joined
Jul 26, 2013
Messages
3,632
How to become a millionaire?

Start off as a billionaire and pay off Man Utd’s debt.

The Glazers have completely ravaged the team. We are in serious trouble if this takeover doesn’t go through. People don’t realise this but we aren’t really far from bankruptcy.
 

wolvored

Full Member
Joined
Jul 6, 2016
Messages
9,949
They would also have to stop funding into infrastructure, banks, supermarkets and everything else the ME has invested in and continues to invest in.

It`s almost an endless list and would be impossible. I don`t think people actually realise the levels that ME are integrated into Britain
This. Both Tories and if Labour get in, will have to dance to their tune. In fact they will embrace more spending, if it helps us move forward.
 

EireRed_GS

Full Member
Joined
Jul 3, 2018
Messages
552
On thing confuses me is that the parasites are looking to walk away and leave the eye watering debt they have accumulated behind them, still on the club.

Surely any bidder / interested party would just say "if thats the case, deduct £980b (or whatever its at now) off the final price and we're sorted"? and that can take care of the debt problem.

Im no financial expert, but surely when buying, inheriting this amount of debt surely has a massive sway on how much you would pay
 

wolvored

Full Member
Joined
Jul 6, 2016
Messages
9,949
Why couldn't Elliot Group simply purchase the shares of the Glazers who want out, then separately fund the new infrastructure? The latter should be relatively straightforward to do through a partial contribution of straight investment as proportionate with their shareholding %, then partially as a loan to the remaining Glazers. Elliot Group aren't exactly lacking in their own resources.
Elliott group would then be the biggest shareholder with about 46% of the share and the 2 parasites left with 23%. Dont think the leeches would agree to this, if they intend to hang on. They wouldnt have any say on matters and no more dividends, which would kill them.
 

Tincanalley

Turns player names into a crappy conversation
Joined
Apr 12, 2011
Messages
10,136
Location
Ireland
They made no promises. Kept their cards close to their chest and barely said anything to anyone.
Different era. All was done in boardrooms and behind closed doors. Also shares had not yet been floated, so it was a different situation. Public and fan sentiment is arguably more of a factor today.
 

stevoc

Full Member
Joined
Jun 11, 2011
Messages
20,417
On thing confuses me is that the parasites are looking to walk away and leave the eye watering debt they have accumulated behind them, still on the club.

Surely any bidder / interested party would just say "if thats the case, deduct £980b (or whatever its at now) off the final price and we're sorted"? and that can take care of the debt problem.

Im no financial expert, but surely when buying, inheriting this amount of debt surely has a massive sway on how much you would pay
Yeah but the Glazers are asking for an inflated price more than the club is realistically worth to begin with. Almost certainly to account for the large amount of debt they saddled the club with that they don't actually want to pay.
 

Señor Sloppy

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Dec 25, 2022
Messages
75
Elliott group would then be the biggest shareholder with about 46% of the share and the 2 parasites left with 23%. Dont think the leeches would agree to this, if they intend to hang on. They wouldnt have any say on matters and no more dividends, which would kill them.
Don't the Glazers employ that Class A/Class B shares system, whereby the Class B shares hold all the voting power? So in theory, they could hold onto power by converting the sold shares to Class A, or - more likely - allow Elliot Group to purchase a limited % of the siblings' shares before providing funding to Avram/Joel to purchase the remainder from their siblings.
 

wolvored

Full Member
Joined
Jul 6, 2016
Messages
9,949
Don't the Glazers employ that Class A/Class B shares system, whereby the Class B shares hold all the voting power? So in theory, they could hold onto power by converting the sold shares to Class A, or - more likely - allow Elliot Group to purchase a limited % of the siblings' shares before providing funding to Avram/Joel to purchase the remainder from their siblings.
I think if Elliott were funding the purchase of the other 4 siblings then they would want the same shares and voting power they had. So the class B shares would be what they want. They are not going to buy 66% of the leeches voting power and not be in control in that scenario.
 

Chief123

Full Member
Joined
Dec 27, 2013
Messages
12,787
I’ve got full confidence absolutely nothing has happened of note since page 900. I’m simply here for page 1000. Waiting in the wings.
 

Señor Sloppy

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Dec 25, 2022
Messages
75
Different era. All was done in boardrooms and behind closed doors. Also shares had not yet been floated, so it was a different situation. Public and fan sentiment is arguably more of a factor today.
The thing here is that Manchester United fans actually seem remarkably placid about this whole situation.

Contrast this for instance with the attitude of the Newcastle United fans during that 2020-2021 period where Newcastle United's takeover by PIF was being blocked by the Premier League. In response, Newcastle United's fans organised multiple pressure movements, including a fan-funded legal challenge to the Premier League for alleged anti-competitive behaviour, mass email campaigns to their MPs, sustained harassment of the Premier League's sponsors, in-person protests at the Premier League headquarters in London. All of which were actually pretty successful towards putting pressure on the Premier League to eventually approve their takeover.

Point being, Elliot Group would likely be highly sensitive to similar pressure tactics from fans, yet I can't see any such attempts being made by fans to utilise their potential influence.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 711

Señor Sloppy

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Dec 25, 2022
Messages
75
I think if Elliott were funding the purchase of the other 4 siblings then they would want the same shares and voting power they had. So the class B shares would be what they want. They are not going to buy 66% of the leeches voting power and not be in control in that scenario.
I'm not so sure, Elliot Group originally just wanted to provide funding for third party buyers rather than purchase any shares themselves.
They only seem to have made an offer for a minority stake after further follow up discussions with the Glazers. If the rates for lending were favourable then why wouldn't they take advantage?
 

stevoc

Full Member
Joined
Jun 11, 2011
Messages
20,417
The thing here is that Manchester United fans actually seem remarkably placid about this whole situation.

Contrast this for instance with the attitude of the Newcastle United fans during that 2020-2021 period where Newcastle United's takeover by PIF was being blocked by the Premier League. In response, Newcastle United's fans organised multiple pressure movements, including a fan-funded legal challenge to the Premier League for alleged anti-competitive behaviour, mass email campaigns to their MPs, sustained harassment of the Premier League's sponsors, in-person protests at the Premier League headquarters in London. All of which were actually pretty successful towards putting pressure on the Premier League to eventually approve their takeover.

Point being, Elliot Group would likely be highly sensitive to similar pressure tactics from fans, yet I can't see any such attempts being made by fans to utilise their potential influence.
Apparently that was all inconsequential to Saudi Arabia finally being allowed to buy Newcasltle. Reportedly all it took was a text from MBS to Boris and Bojo leaned on the Premier League to push through the takeover and approve it.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.