Orkun Kokcu

welshwingwizard

Full Member
Joined
May 1, 2013
Messages
496
Location
London
Muslims believe acting on homosexual urges is sinful. Just as we believe having sex outside of marriage is sinful or drinking alcohol is sinful.

It's funny how nobody gets triggered by Muslims not advocating drinking alcohol or sex outside of marriage - but your only triggered about Muslims refusing to promote homosexual relations.

It's absurd and stems from your own western cultural hangups.

Gay bashing is not common in Muslim countries - you can't assign that baggage to our perspectives.
This isn't a Muslim thing or a western thing. It is easier to try and make it like that but it is actually about fundamentalism within religion.

Fundamentalist Christian churches (the bible belt in the US for example) would agree with your premise about being gay being a sin. It just happens that Wahhabism was backed by oil money and so spread rapidly as a fundamentalist Islamic doctrine in many countries. There are many Muslims who hold a much kinder and inclusive approach to religion and they shouldn't be uniformly considered bigoted.

Fundamentalism however is bigoted no matter how you dress it up or claim it is western bias. No matter what religion they all tend to suppress the rights of minority groups and maintain a patriarchy. Standing up for peoples rights and saying you don't accept those views as ok isn't Liberal hippocracy. If someone says it it is sinful to marry a person of a different race they hold racist views. Similarly if you believe it is sinful to be gay then that is a homophobic view whether you like it or not and no matter how you justify holding that view.
 

Oranges038

Full Member
Joined
Oct 19, 2020
Messages
12,601
I dont undertsand what the fuss is about his opinion not to wear an arm band. It is his belief and I respect that. I am a Christain and I wouldnt want to wear the arm band based on my belief. I have nothing against anyone wo wears it or promote it but I wouldnt and that should be respected. I would want him in united if he is good enough to play for us and I have nothing against his views.
Some players have refused to kneel in the epl while others have refused to wear the puppy in memory of the vets and that is fine because we live in a free world.
Please let us try to continue to stick to football as much as we can.
Me either.

As I said earlier in the thread, that armband thing is just a meaningless piece of cloth. It's just lip service, to say, "look at us, we are doing something". The whole world cup thing proved that.

He's entitled to believe what he wants based on whatever religion he chooses to follow. The hypocrisy of people who can't respect that is amazing.

If he's good enough at football to play for Man Utd, I genuinely couldn't care less what his personal beliefs on anything are.
 

amolbhatia50k

Sneaky bum time - Vaccination status: dozed off
Joined
Nov 8, 2002
Messages
96,008
Location
india
I never understand why people can’t just respect others’ belief. Some Christian and Muslim have this belief that you must be blessed what you have been given by their god. Those same people who are against to wear rainbow armband usually believe if the person is given by god to be male then the person has to be gratitude with what he has been given. I don’t believe refusing to wear rainbow armband should be called sending shite message or immaturity. This society needs to understand the reason why those people are against it and the society shouldn’t call that as negative.

Kokcu can join if ten Hag wants him. I’m not going to against the idea to accept people who are refusing the rainbow armband and we shouldn’t disrespect others’ belief.
Very good post.
 

FriedClams

Full Member
Joined
Oct 14, 2021
Messages
3,692
Me either.

As I said earlier in the thread, that armband thing is just a meaningless piece of cloth. It's just lip service, to say, "look at us, we are doing something". The whole world cup thing proved that.

He's entitled to believe what he wants based on whatever religion he chooses to follow. The hypocrisy of people who can't respect that is amazing.

If he's good enough at football to play for Man Utd, I genuinely couldn't care less what his personal beliefs on anything are.
this is a bit extreme. Of course, there are views someone could hold that you would care about. I think people just need to understand their audience, and keep deeper personal views for your own circle who you know share those views. No need to broadcast them.
 

Oranges038

Full Member
Joined
Oct 19, 2020
Messages
12,601
this is a bit extreme. Of course, there are views someone could hold that you would care about. I think people just need to understand their audience, and keep deeper personal views for your own circle who you know share those views. No need to broadcast them.
Couldn't give a toss to be honest. Unless they believe rape, murder and fiddling with kids is ok.

He and everyone else can believe and choose to believe in, whatever religion/god they want, support/not support whatever political/personal/public causes they wish based off their beliefs or religion.

They are free to do so, anyone who tries to force their views or beliefs on someone or doesn't respect another persons view or beliefs are or can be different is just a hypocrite.
 

Cassidy

No longer at risk of being mistaken for a Scouser
Joined
Oct 2, 2013
Messages
31,667
I never understand why people can’t just respect others’ belief. Some Christian and Muslim have this belief that you must be blessed what you have been given by their god. Those same people who are against to wear rainbow armband usually believe if the person is given by god to be male then the person has to be gratitude with what he has been given. I don’t believe refusing to wear rainbow armband should be called sending shite message or immaturity. This society needs to understand the reason why those people are against it and the society shouldn’t call that as negative.

Kokcu can join if ten Hag wants him. I’m not going to against the idea to accept people who are refusing the rainbow armband and we shouldn’t disrespect others’ belief.
Well said
 

zaafi

New Member
Joined
Aug 5, 2021
Messages
3,373
Location
Oslo, Norway
How is considering homosexual sex sinful persecution? If your gay and you have sex with someone of the same 9gender - I consider that sinful. How is my personal belief persecuting you? I'm not going to treat you any differently because of my believes.

I believe anyone who drinks alcohol committing sin. How am I persecuting you by holding that belief? I don't treat people who drink alcohol any different to those who don't . I don't treat people who have gay sex any different than those who dont.

People need to stop automatically leaping from holding the belief that something is sinful to persecution.
"Sinful" :lol: :lol: :lol: People living their life after made up rules instead of using their own brain
 

Andes85

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Apr 10, 2023
Messages
7
Engage your brain for feck's sake. You're equating not drinking alcohol or not having sex outside of marriage - two completely pro-social/harmless stances - with not persecuting people for who they are. How can you not see this false equivocation?

Also, imagine saying you're not taking the knee in support of BLM because you don't want to promote being black. It'd be rightly ridiculed but yet people on this forum are saying the equivalent about queer people.
I think you are trying to call apples, pears here.. there are plenty of black players who refused to take the knee!
I grew up with mostly black, Jamaican friends and literally none of them support the blm movement..
they do of course stand against racism and certain obstacles they MAY have faced but do not get caught up in the politics..
it’s mostly white, left supporting activists who tie racism and alleged homophobia into the same bracket when it isn’t..

It shows how weak you are at actually arguing your point on said topic.
 

Andes85

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Apr 10, 2023
Messages
7
"Sinful" :lol: :lol: :lol: People living their life after made up rules instead of using their own brain
And some would say living as a man when born a woman and expecting every person in the world to see you as you see yourself, as “made up rules”.

some of you can’t even defend your own arguments.
 

zaafi

New Member
Joined
Aug 5, 2021
Messages
3,373
Location
Oslo, Norway
And some would say living as a man when born a woman and expecting every person in the world to see you as you see yourself, as “made up rules”.

some of you can’t even defend your own arguments.
What are you even talking about? :wenger: I'd much rather have a conversation with a transgender than a person who blindly follow a book because the "Prophet" said so. Delusional.
 

mav_9me

Full Member
Joined
Feb 9, 2009
Messages
12,529
Almost a quarter of the 21st century gone already, and billions of grown ass people are letting this cancer called religion massively influence their lives :lol:



Gotta be utterly brain damaged or completely lack comprehension skills to think that...but yeah, it definitely is the case.

In my country, elderly people will taunt or even spit at a young person if they see them with rainbow umbrella, for example.
Clap clap clap
 

zaafi

New Member
Joined
Aug 5, 2021
Messages
3,373
Location
Oslo, Norway
I think you are trying to call apples, pears here.. there are plenty of black players who refused to take the knee!
I grew up with mostly black, Jamaican friends and literally none of them support the blm movement..
they do of course stand against racism and certain obstacles they MAY have faced but do not get caught up in the politics..
it’s mostly white, left supporting activists who tie racism and alleged homophobia into the same bracket when it isn’t..

It shows how weak you are at actually arguing your point on said topic.
Ah, yes. They are against racism because it's relevant to them, but against LGBTQ. Hypocrites.
 

KirkDuyt

Full Member
Joined
Nov 25, 2015
Messages
24,846
Location
Dutchland
Supports
Feyenoord
All these homophobes can suck my balls honestly.

Can we talk about football now?:(
 

Lynty

Full Member
Joined
Oct 21, 2014
Messages
3,107
Why not? Should politics and social messages be reserved to news updates that come on the TV every few hours, or the papers? What a weird idea. Limiting the reach of political issues is precisely how you end up with an uninformed populace. Football is inherently community driven and has been since its inception. It's the same with entertainment (film, music, documentaries etc.). Or do you only absorb 100% apolitical media? Utterly bonkers.
As I said - “organised” movements.

If a player or group of players feel strongly about something that they wish to display support, raise awareness or send a political message - that’s fine. I have nothing wrong with a player choosing to wear an armband or kneeling. But it shouldn’t be expected and nobody should feel the need to explain why they chose not to participate.

It shouldn’t be imposed on all participants of the sport. It should be a naturally made personal decision, uninfluenced by the pressure of peers or organisations.
 

redcucumber

Full Member
Joined
May 18, 2022
Messages
3,318
As I said - “organised” movements.

If a player or group of players feel strongly about something that they wish to display support, raise awareness or send a political message - that’s fine. I have nothing wrong with a player choosing to wear an armband or kneeling. But it shouldn’t be expected and nobody should feel the need to explain why they chose not to participate.

It shouldn’t be imposed on all participants of the sport. It should be a naturally made personal decision, uninfluenced by the pressure of peers or organisations.
You didn't say organised movements. You said organised political/social messages have no place in football and entertainment. Without being pedantic, that's completely different to what you are now saying.

And it's not being imposed. Is anyone here saying that the likes of Kokcu should be forced to wear the armband? People are questioning the legitimacy of his PR statement and debating whether or not it cuts the mustard.
 

redcucumber

Full Member
Joined
May 18, 2022
Messages
3,318
and maybe it's not that someone doesn't like gays. Only what a person's sexual orientation is is his private matter and it is not nice to flaunt it or support organizations that promote it. football should be far from politics and worldview.
Wearing the LGBTQ armband isn't about flaunting homosexuality ffs. Get a grip.
 

sullydnl

Ross Kemp's caf ID
Joined
Sep 13, 2012
Messages
34,063
You didn't say organised movements. You said organised political/social messages have no place in football and entertainment. Without being pedantic, that's completely different to what you are now saying.

And it's not being imposed. Is anyone here saying that the likes of Kokcu should be forced to wear the armband? People are questioning the legitimacy of his PR statement and debating whether or not it cuts the mustard.
Indeed. He's free to choose not wear the armband. But we're also free to criticise that choice, deem his reasoning to be homophobic and to not want him at our football club as a result.
 

KirkDuyt

Full Member
Joined
Nov 25, 2015
Messages
24,846
Location
Dutchland
Supports
Feyenoord
I think there is also a bit of a missconception on tolerance. Tolerance doesnt mean tolerate everyone despite their beliefs however offensive hurtful or intolerant they may be. You can't tolerate intolerance.
 

KirkDuyt

Full Member
Joined
Nov 25, 2015
Messages
24,846
Location
Dutchland
Supports
Feyenoord
Our best player tonight. We should've scored from that fantastic through ball on Szymanski.
 

UNITED ACADEMY

New Member
Joined
Aug 14, 2018
Messages
13,127
Supports
Erik ten Hag
This is not. He may be saying you're free to do what you want, then says he disagrees with their sexuality, it doesn't square. I know the statement itself doesn't have any harm or hate, because it's a PR crafted statement to do just that.

The problem is the vaguery. What are you disagreeing about? Homosexuals being homosexual? The rainbow armband isn't a good cause? I don't have to agree-to-disagree if you just simply refuse to state your position.
The idea of transgender in religious belief reflects to opposing his god because if the person is given by god to be male then the person has to be gratitude with what he has been given. If he agrees to wear the rainbow armband then it’s the same thing as he’s opposing his god. This is what he cannot agree to wear the rainbow armband. But he remains respectful that whoever choose to be transgender can do whatever they like and he has no intend to harm.

Christians choose to read bible but refuse to read Quran, they can still be respectful to different religious without following others’ different belief.
 

Adnan

Talent Spotter
Joined
Oct 5, 2013
Messages
29,952
Location
England
He's been really good in the first half and is being utilised by Slot as the connector in the first phase. He's threaded some really good passes between the lines that have completely exposed Roma in the half and central spaces.
 

zaafi

New Member
Joined
Aug 5, 2021
Messages
3,373
Location
Oslo, Norway
The idea of transgender in religious belief reflects to opposing his god because if the person is given by god to be male then the person has to be gratitude with what he has been given. If he agrees to wear the rainbow armband then it’s the same thing as he’s opposing his god. This is what he cannot agree to wear the rainbow armband. But he remains respectful that whoever choose to be transgender can do whatever they like and he has no intend to harm.

Christians choose to read bible but refuse to read Quran, they can still be respectful to different religious without following others’ different belief.
This "Show God gratitude for what you have been given" repetition is just tiring. You're replying without reading comments.
His religion doesn't respect homosexuals, so when he comes out with a PR-bullshit public statement that he does, in fact, respect them, it is clearly not how he really feels about it. If your God can't respect that people are born different, then he's a fecking moron.
If the Quran said that dwarves are an abomination, would you be okay with him saying "I respect dwarves, but because of my religion, I can't show my support"?
As a lot of posters have already pointed out, wearing the armband just shows support that you see them as equals, not that you like them.
 

El Jefe

Full Member
Joined
Dec 28, 2012
Messages
5,021
We're finally talking about football in here. But yes he has looked assured on the ball and passes well. Looks to use both feet too which is good.
 

Siorac

Full Member
Joined
Sep 1, 2010
Messages
23,833
The idea of transgender in religious belief reflects to opposing his god because if the person is given by god to be male then the person has to be gratitude with what he has been given.
If God has given you poor eyesight, are you not supposed to wear glasses? Is eye surgery against the holy scripture?
 

3KDré

Full Member
Joined
Feb 24, 2015
Messages
6,661
Looks to be exactly the type of player we need. Seems to be a good vocal player and their captain to boot. For £30m I see no qualms with this.
 

KirkDuyt

Full Member
Joined
Nov 25, 2015
Messages
24,846
Location
Dutchland
Supports
Feyenoord
Fantastic today. Everything goes through him, composed on the ball, some fantastic passes through their lines. Our wings were dogshit today otherwise we could've scored more.
 

redcucumber

Full Member
Joined
May 18, 2022
Messages
3,318
What the hell happened in here.
It's a football forum and people are discussing a controversial statement/position made by a footballer (and one that has been linked with us), and the wider context. Why are some people bothered by a discussion that deviates slightly from direct football chat? There's literally hundreds of threads that talk solely about football. Respectful debate is a positive thing. If you don't like the conversation, don't engage and scroll past.
 

OleGunnar20

Full Member
Joined
Dec 18, 2018
Messages
2,248
It's a football forum and people are discussing a controversial statement/position made by a footballer (and one that has been linked with us), and the wider context. Why are some people bothered by a discussion that deviates slightly from direct football chat? There's literally hundreds of threads that talk solely about football. Respectful debate is a positive thing. If you don't like the conversation, don't engage and scroll past.
It was just a joke Mark.