horsechoker
The Caf's Roy Keane.
No wonder he's so hateful and insecureJoke's on him, it's actually **** choo.
No wonder he's so hateful and insecureJoke's on him, it's actually **** choo.
This isn't a Muslim thing or a western thing. It is easier to try and make it like that but it is actually about fundamentalism within religion.Muslims believe acting on homosexual urges is sinful. Just as we believe having sex outside of marriage is sinful or drinking alcohol is sinful.
It's funny how nobody gets triggered by Muslims not advocating drinking alcohol or sex outside of marriage - but your only triggered about Muslims refusing to promote homosexual relations.
It's absurd and stems from your own western cultural hangups.
Gay bashing is not common in Muslim countries - you can't assign that baggage to our perspectives.
Me either.I dont undertsand what the fuss is about his opinion not to wear an arm band. It is his belief and I respect that. I am a Christain and I wouldnt want to wear the arm band based on my belief. I have nothing against anyone wo wears it or promote it but I wouldnt and that should be respected. I would want him in united if he is good enough to play for us and I have nothing against his views.
Some players have refused to kneel in the epl while others have refused to wear the puppy in memory of the vets and that is fine because we live in a free world.
Please let us try to continue to stick to football as much as we can.
Very good post.I never understand why people can’t just respect others’ belief. Some Christian and Muslim have this belief that you must be blessed what you have been given by their god. Those same people who are against to wear rainbow armband usually believe if the person is given by god to be male then the person has to be gratitude with what he has been given. I don’t believe refusing to wear rainbow armband should be called sending shite message or immaturity. This society needs to understand the reason why those people are against it and the society shouldn’t call that as negative.
Kokcu can join if ten Hag wants him. I’m not going to against the idea to accept people who are refusing the rainbow armband and we shouldn’t disrespect others’ belief.
this is a bit extreme. Of course, there are views someone could hold that you would care about. I think people just need to understand their audience, and keep deeper personal views for your own circle who you know share those views. No need to broadcast them.Me either.
As I said earlier in the thread, that armband thing is just a meaningless piece of cloth. It's just lip service, to say, "look at us, we are doing something". The whole world cup thing proved that.
He's entitled to believe what he wants based on whatever religion he chooses to follow. The hypocrisy of people who can't respect that is amazing.
If he's good enough at football to play for Man Utd, I genuinely couldn't care less what his personal beliefs on anything are.
Couldn't give a toss to be honest. Unless they believe rape, murder and fiddling with kids is ok.this is a bit extreme. Of course, there are views someone could hold that you would care about. I think people just need to understand their audience, and keep deeper personal views for your own circle who you know share those views. No need to broadcast them.
Hahaha an homophobe. In a couple more pages we'll see how much worse it gets I'm sure you guys will find a way to take it even further.I'll be properly depressed if we sign an out-and-out homophobe.
Well saidI never understand why people can’t just respect others’ belief. Some Christian and Muslim have this belief that you must be blessed what you have been given by their god. Those same people who are against to wear rainbow armband usually believe if the person is given by god to be male then the person has to be gratitude with what he has been given. I don’t believe refusing to wear rainbow armband should be called sending shite message or immaturity. This society needs to understand the reason why those people are against it and the society shouldn’t call that as negative.
Kokcu can join if ten Hag wants him. I’m not going to against the idea to accept people who are refusing the rainbow armband and we shouldn’t disrespect others’ belief.
"Sinful" People living their life after made up rules instead of using their own brainHow is considering homosexual sex sinful persecution? If your gay and you have sex with someone of the same 9gender - I consider that sinful. How is my personal belief persecuting you? I'm not going to treat you any differently because of my believes.
I believe anyone who drinks alcohol committing sin. How am I persecuting you by holding that belief? I don't treat people who drink alcohol any different to those who don't . I don't treat people who have gay sex any different than those who dont.
People need to stop automatically leaping from holding the belief that something is sinful to persecution.
Too woke for you innit? Damn snowflakes.Hahaha an homophobe. In a couple more pages we'll see how much worse it gets I'm sure you guys will find a way to take it even further.
I think you are trying to call apples, pears here.. there are plenty of black players who refused to take the knee!Engage your brain for feck's sake. You're equating not drinking alcohol or not having sex outside of marriage - two completely pro-social/harmless stances - with not persecuting people for who they are. How can you not see this false equivocation?
Also, imagine saying you're not taking the knee in support of BLM because you don't want to promote being black. It'd be rightly ridiculed but yet people on this forum are saying the equivalent about queer people.
And some would say living as a man when born a woman and expecting every person in the world to see you as you see yourself, as “made up rules”."Sinful" People living their life after made up rules instead of using their own brain
Exactly my friend. That's my thoughts. Some people are just looking to be offended, doesn't matter how they just want the thrill of it.Too woke for you innit? Damn snowflakes.
Good job you reminded me it was the early kick off.He's playing today against Roma and Mou at 17:45 if anyone wants to scout him
What are you even talking about? I'd much rather have a conversation with a transgender than a person who blindly follow a book because the "Prophet" said so. Delusional.And some would say living as a man when born a woman and expecting every person in the world to see you as you see yourself, as “made up rules”.
some of you can’t even defend your own arguments.
Clap clap clapAlmost a quarter of the 21st century gone already, and billions of grown ass people are letting this cancer called religion massively influence their lives
Gotta be utterly brain damaged or completely lack comprehension skills to think that...but yeah, it definitely is the case.
In my country, elderly people will taunt or even spit at a young person if they see them with rainbow umbrella, for example.
Ah, yes. They are against racism because it's relevant to them, but against LGBTQ. Hypocrites.I think you are trying to call apples, pears here.. there are plenty of black players who refused to take the knee!
I grew up with mostly black, Jamaican friends and literally none of them support the blm movement..
they do of course stand against racism and certain obstacles they MAY have faced but do not get caught up in the politics..
it’s mostly white, left supporting activists who tie racism and alleged homophobia into the same bracket when it isn’t..
It shows how weak you are at actually arguing your point on said topic.
As I said - “organised” movements.Why not? Should politics and social messages be reserved to news updates that come on the TV every few hours, or the papers? What a weird idea. Limiting the reach of political issues is precisely how you end up with an uninformed populace. Football is inherently community driven and has been since its inception. It's the same with entertainment (film, music, documentaries etc.). Or do you only absorb 100% apolitical media? Utterly bonkers.
You didn't say organised movements. You said organised political/social messages have no place in football and entertainment. Without being pedantic, that's completely different to what you are now saying.As I said - “organised” movements.
If a player or group of players feel strongly about something that they wish to display support, raise awareness or send a political message - that’s fine. I have nothing wrong with a player choosing to wear an armband or kneeling. But it shouldn’t be expected and nobody should feel the need to explain why they chose not to participate.
It shouldn’t be imposed on all participants of the sport. It should be a naturally made personal decision, uninfluenced by the pressure of peers or organisations.
Wearing the LGBTQ armband isn't about flaunting homosexuality ffs. Get a grip.and maybe it's not that someone doesn't like gays. Only what a person's sexual orientation is is his private matter and it is not nice to flaunt it or support organizations that promote it. football should be far from politics and worldview.
Indeed. He's free to choose not wear the armband. But we're also free to criticise that choice, deem his reasoning to be homophobic and to not want him at our football club as a result.You didn't say organised movements. You said organised political/social messages have no place in football and entertainment. Without being pedantic, that's completely different to what you are now saying.
And it's not being imposed. Is anyone here saying that the likes of Kokcu should be forced to wear the armband? People are questioning the legitimacy of his PR statement and debating whether or not it cuts the mustard.
Thanks for the reminder, tuning in now to watch him hopefully get dominated by a bunch of sweaty menHe's playing today against Roma and Mou at 17:45 if anyone wants to scout him
The idea of transgender in religious belief reflects to opposing his god because if the person is given by god to be male then the person has to be gratitude with what he has been given. If he agrees to wear the rainbow armband then it’s the same thing as he’s opposing his god. This is what he cannot agree to wear the rainbow armband. But he remains respectful that whoever choose to be transgender can do whatever they like and he has no intend to harm.This is not. He may be saying you're free to do what you want, then says he disagrees with their sexuality, it doesn't square. I know the statement itself doesn't have any harm or hate, because it's a PR crafted statement to do just that.
The problem is the vaguery. What are you disagreeing about? Homosexuals being homosexual? The rainbow armband isn't a good cause? I don't have to agree-to-disagree if you just simply refuse to state your position.
This "Show God gratitude for what you have been given" repetition is just tiring. You're replying without reading comments.The idea of transgender in religious belief reflects to opposing his god because if the person is given by god to be male then the person has to be gratitude with what he has been given. If he agrees to wear the rainbow armband then it’s the same thing as he’s opposing his god. This is what he cannot agree to wear the rainbow armband. But he remains respectful that whoever choose to be transgender can do whatever they like and he has no intend to harm.
Christians choose to read bible but refuse to read Quran, they can still be respectful to different religious without following others’ different belief.
If God has given you poor eyesight, are you not supposed to wear glasses? Is eye surgery against the holy scripture?The idea of transgender in religious belief reflects to opposing his god because if the person is given by god to be male then the person has to be gratitude with what he has been given.
It's a football forum and people are discussing a controversial statement/position made by a footballer (and one that has been linked with us), and the wider context. Why are some people bothered by a discussion that deviates slightly from direct football chat? There's literally hundreds of threads that talk solely about football. Respectful debate is a positive thing. If you don't like the conversation, don't engage and scroll past.What the hell happened in here.
Trolls are gonna troll, nothing new.What the hell happened in here.
It was just a joke Mark.It's a football forum and people are discussing a controversial statement/position made by a footballer (and one that has been linked with us), and the wider context. Why are some people bothered by a discussion that deviates slightly from direct football chat? There's literally hundreds of threads that talk solely about football. Respectful debate is a positive thing. If you don't like the conversation, don't engage and scroll past.
They won't do thatAll these homophobes can suck my balls honestly.
Can we talk about football now?