Kim Min-jae | signed for Bayern

Status
Not open for further replies.

bosnian_red

Worst scout to ever exist
Joined
Aug 13, 2011
Messages
58,082
Location
Canada
He's class but we have bigger priorities than spending big on a CB. I'd be entirely comfortable going into the season with the 4 we have with Shaw being backup LCB, Lindelof backup RCB. Just sell Maguire, use those funds on a cheaper guy and that's fine.
 

MadDogg

Full Member
Joined
Apr 24, 2002
Messages
15,984
Location
Manchester Utd never lose, just run out of time
If we’re using Shaw as a CB option next season then we’ll have to buy a new LB surely? We already want a new RB once ETH decides which one of dalot or AWB to sell.
Shaw would only be used as CB if Martinez is injured and perhaps every now and then to rest him. He'll still play the vast majority of the season at leftback so it's not like we'd have to replace him there. It wouldn't be any different for him in that regard than it has been this season, where we bring in Malacia or Dalot to play leftback when Shaw moves inside.

We'd basically have four top players (Varane, Martinez, Kim and Shaw) to play throughout three positions, which considering they are in positions that normally don't see that much rotation is about as much as you can ask for. After that you are looking more at decent squad level players, so the question is whether we're better off with buying another cheap left footed centreback to cover Martinez while keeping Shaw at leftback, or bringing Shaw into the centre with Malacia/Dalot playing at leftback. The former would require signing another player (who would likely barely play considering Martinez would be expected to play the majority of games), while the latter wouldn't require any more signings.

The same holds true if we keep Lindelof and don't sign Kim or anyone else. While it might be nice to have top quality back-ups, it'd be hard to keep them happy (there's already been rumours this season that Lindelof wasn't happy having to share the back-up role with Maguire) and there are other positions that need that money spent on them far more.
 

LARulz

Full Member
Joined
Dec 21, 2009
Messages
18,201
So him, Rice and Kane. What a window.... Assuming FFP is no longer an issue or we've learnt how to sell players for more than half their value
 

Appletonred

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Feb 15, 2023
Messages
485
Would be a very good acquisition and certainly an upgrade on what we have in defence apart from Varane and Martinez, hopefully this gets done quickly then onto other areas of the squad, with hopefully the new owners in place.
 

amolbhatia50k

Sneaky bum time - Vaccination status: dozed off
Joined
Nov 8, 2002
Messages
95,792
Location
india
He's class but we have bigger priorities than spending big on a CB. I'd be entirely comfortable going into the season with the 4 we have with Shaw being backup LCB, Lindelof backup RCB. Just sell Maguire, use those funds on a cheaper guy and that's fine.
Depends on how good he is. If he’s got top 2-3 CB in the world ability then it makes sense given Varanes age fitness issues.
 

gza the genius

Full Member
Joined
May 10, 2009
Messages
5,108
Location
supply and command
I don't know much about him but this would only make sense if we think he's good enough to be a long term successor to Varane. Varane obviously has fitness issues that need managed and unfortunately the backups we have at RCB are not good enough to cover him when he's out.
 

FerociousCorgis

Full Member
Joined
Jun 20, 2017
Messages
4,362
Only have 3 CBs that will prob be here next year so could make sense. Varane is ridic fragile so having a 3rd top one and then lindelof as cover should allow shaw to stay at LB. Good use of funds considering maguire will fund most of it and then shaving off a lot of CB trash off the books as well this season.
 

NoPace

Full Member
Joined
Jan 20, 2014
Messages
9,424
His passing and aerial numbers seem like what Ten Hag would want for Lisandro's partner long-term.
 

gajender

Full Member
Joined
May 7, 2016
Messages
3,918
He looks like confident version of Maguire We Should steer clear , go back and watch Maguire's highlights at Leicester or Early United career similarities are uncanny .

Assessment is based on just highlights so I may be way off the mark .
 

Isotope

Ten Years a Cafite
Joined
Mar 6, 2012
Messages
23,642
Thanks to the power of marketing and television The PL is a marketing machine on a similar level to the NFL in the US. They are masters in getting eyeballs to watch their league religiously.
La Liga games are free in Asia (some countries) also.
 

lifted

Full Member
Joined
Oct 5, 2009
Messages
636
Location
Salford
He's class but we have bigger priorities than spending big on a CB. I'd be entirely comfortable going into the season with the 4 we have with Shaw being backup LCB, Lindelof backup RCB. Just sell Maguire, use those funds on a cheaper guy and that's fine.
His release clause isn't exactly mega bucks though.
 

Cassidy

No longer at risk of being mistaken for a Scouser
Joined
Oct 2, 2013
Messages
31,533
He's class but we have bigger priorities than spending big on a CB. I'd be entirely comfortable going into the season with the 4 we have with Shaw being backup LCB, Lindelof backup RCB. Just sell Maguire, use those funds on a cheaper guy and that's fine.
Hes not expensive
 

bosnian_red

Worst scout to ever exist
Joined
Aug 13, 2011
Messages
58,082
Location
Canada
His release clause isn't exactly mega bucks though.
Hes not expensive
It's what, 45m? Good deal for his quality, but think if we still get him rather than going for Diogo Costas release clause in goal it'd be a mistake.
We need ST, GK, Casemiro depth, and press resistant #8... Any big spends that stop one of those 4 signings are mistakes imo.
 

Lash

Full Member
Joined
May 3, 2012
Messages
12,188
Location
Buckinghamshire
Supports
Millwall, Saint-Etienne
I've also known Amazon stock when it was still $10/share. Didn't buy any though. :lol:
:lol:. I merely meant if we bothered to scout him in Korea, I'm sure we would have followed his progress into Europe. I can imagine the interest is real, considering his release clause.
 

aeh1991

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Apr 13, 2022
Messages
879
He looks like confident version of Maguire We Should steer clear , go back and watch Maguire's highlights at Leicester or Early United career similarities are uncanny .

Assessment is based on just highlights so I may be way off the mark .
Him and Maguire have nothing in common from my eyes test, aside from the dark hair.
 

Isotope

Ten Years a Cafite
Joined
Mar 6, 2012
Messages
23,642
:lol:. I merely meant if we bothered to scout him in Korea, I'm sure we would have followed his progress into Europe. I can imagine the interest is real, considering his release clause.
Didn't we restructure our scouting unit just last year? But yeah agreed, I think our interest is real, and it seems like we're more proactive now with this.
 

RkkMan

Full Member
Joined
May 16, 2019
Messages
2,179
Shaw would only be used as CB if Martinez is injured and perhaps every now and then to rest him. He'll still play the vast majority of the season at leftback so it's not like we'd have to replace him there. It wouldn't be any different for him in that regard than it has been this season, where we bring in Malacia or Dalot to play leftback when Shaw moves inside.

We'd basically have four top players (Varane, Martinez, Kim and Shaw) to play throughout three positions, which considering they are in positions that normally don't see that much rotation is about as much as you can ask for. After that you are looking more at decent squad level players, so the question is whether we're better off with buying another cheap left footed centreback to cover Martinez while keeping Shaw at leftback, or bringing Shaw into the centre with Malacia/Dalot playing at leftback. The former would require signing another player (who would likely barely play considering Martinez would be expected to play the majority of games), while the latter wouldn't require any more signings.

The same holds true if we keep Lindelof and don't sign Kim or anyone else. While it might be nice to have top quality back-ups, it'd be hard to keep them happy (there's already been rumours this season that Lindelof wasn't happy having to share the back-up role with Maguire) and there are other positions that need that money spent on them far more.
Its not our job to intentionally handicap our depth because of one player's feelings we need to do what's best for the club and that's having two quality players in each position to compete on all fronts like the very top teams. Its on the player to fight for his spot and do his job when he's called upon
If we sold Maguire and decided not to sign a CB we'd be one injury away from an injury crisis in a season we should be trying to compete for the title. See how Saliba's injury completely derailed Arsenal's title hopes and how much we miss Licha. CB might not have much rotation but every bit of depth counts and it takes one injury to undo title hopes.
Not to mention Varane's fitness isn't exactly the best and Lindelof while he's decent quality wise is nowhere near the Frenchman so it wouldn't be wise to bank on an injury prone 30yr old CB to stay fit and bank on a vastly inferior player that's just one year younger to be his understudy. A young CB to be Varane's understudy or a CB in his prime available for an affordable price like KMJ has to be signed. Money can be recouped from selling Maguire+Bailly for whatever we can get
 
Last edited:

Hawks2008

Full Member
Joined
Mar 11, 2015
Messages
4,912
Location
Melbz
Would be totally like us to sign yet another expensive CB instead of addressing actual pressing needs in the team. I think we've signed at least one every summer for 6-7 years now.
 

VanHaal'sRedArmy

Full Member
Joined
Jun 28, 2015
Messages
2,623
I think people are really underrating this potential signing. Our last few games without Licha made us look like a relegation team - Kim is a special defender who can help us transition quickly from defending to an attacking phase.
 

croadyman

Full Member
Joined
Mar 9, 2018
Messages
34,826
Would be totally like us to sign yet another expensive CB instead of addressing actual pressing needs in the team. I think we've signed at least one every summer for 6-7 years now.
Think there is probably concern of how many games Varane could play next season and Erik wants Shaw to stay at LB
 

GoldanoGraham

Full Member
Joined
Jun 20, 2013
Messages
1,285
Think there is probably concern of how many games Varane could play next season and Erik wants Shaw to stay at LB
We will offload MaGuire this summer. Phil the apparition Jones contract ends, Tuanzabe and Bailey will also leave.
Agreed we need elsewhere but a keeper able to play from the back and an extra CB will fix the defence.
CM and CF where it’s at though.
Just not sure how many we can offload though, it’s always suggested but in reality we really struggle.
 

Cloudface

Full Member
Joined
Jan 2, 2014
Messages
454
Location
Amongst The Pigeons
I've not seen this bloke play too much so I can't comment on his ability, but getting a centre back shouldn't really have too much of an effect on our spending ability if we actually trim the fat of the squad.

Out: Maguire, Laird, Bailly, Tuanzebe, Telles, AWB/Dalot, Williams, Jones

In: Kim/New Cb, New RB

Even in this scenario we would be well stocked on defenders. I guess it depends on whether we commit to offloading those players.
 

BorisManUtd

Full Member
Joined
Nov 4, 2013
Messages
3,908
It may be a bit too overambitious to rely on 3 CB first teamers in Varane, Martinez and Kim with Shaw deputising also but I'd go that way too and perhaps promote one of the youth.

Lindelof + cash for Kim may work in our favour as less summer funds spent and Napoli can get a 'decent' defender too. Would be interesting to see Lindelof in a front foot, high line, proactive and possession based team after hearing about how good he is in these hypothetical scenarios for so many years from his fans here.
Yeah, that's a possibility as well. We'd get decent money for both Maguire and Lindelof and have Martinez/Shaw and Varane/Kim options for CBs + youth player. I like it.
 

Andre Kagawa

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Jun 24, 2013
Messages
2,517
I don't think we have CB as a priority. I just think his profile and release clause is too good to pass up on.
 

meamth

New Member
Joined
Jun 3, 2017
Messages
5,946
Location
Malaysia
He looks like FASTER version of Maguire We Should steer clear , go back and watch Maguire's highlights at Leicester or Early United career similarities are uncanny .

Assessment is based on just highlights so I may be way off the mark .
Fixed it for you.

He is very agile and explosive for a big guy.

He is also a front foot defender who doesn't mess around or dwell with the ball. We should sign him and our CB department is the strongest in the league.
 

Conor

Full Member
Joined
Feb 19, 2011
Messages
5,584
If we can shift Maguire and get him in for around 10m net, it would be a decent bit of business. But we really need goals more than another CB, people say we have looked crap without both our starting CBs the last month or so, but that is a rare enough occurrence. Conversely, If we'd had a solid goal scorer all season then top 4 wouldn't even be in question, and at least some of those dodgy performances with our backup CBs would have ended up as wins, most likely. Hopefully we have the budget for both, but if there are FFP issues, then we might need Maguire's sale cash for a striker.
 

DJ_21

Evens winner of 'Odds or Evens 2022/2023'
Joined
Aug 31, 2015
Messages
12,328
Location
Manchester
Bit worried that city may jump in and sign him. Especially if they’re planning on playing that 3 at the back formation that peps trialled.
 

Bubz27

No I won’t change your tag line
Joined
Aug 17, 2009
Messages
21,590
Bit worried that city may jump in and sign him. Especially if they’re planning on playing that 3 at the back formation that peps trialled.
Don't panic mate. Plenty of CBs out there.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.