Mason Greenwood | Please be respectful and stay on topic

AlexUTD

Full Member
Joined
Jan 25, 2014
Messages
3,941
Location
Norway, smashing the F5 button. LUHG
Having experienced that my sister got hit by her ex boyfriend, i find it it distasteful to see that people not standing by this position.

Who cares if someone get abused as long as we win some football games huh? feckin hell...
 

mitchmouse

loves to hate United.
Joined
Oct 8, 2014
Messages
17,709
Only this United board could do the right thing and yet say the wrong thing about it.

It's correct he has been effectively sacked as i don't think any sane person could stomach seeing him in a United shirt again.

However to basically then say he didn't do anything and have him back it up in his own statement that he didn't do what we clearly saw and heard is very wrong.

Still at least he's gone and that's one circus we don't have to worry about
You seem to have missed out this bit:

In a statement in February, the CPS said: "In this case a combination of the withdrawal of key witnesses and new material that came to light meant there was no longer a realistic prospect of conviction."

We don't know what this is and never will but I do know everyone was saying Mendy was guilty from day one but two juries disagreed. We do not know anything like the full story and the evidence was never testing in court - and wasn't strong enough to put to a court
 

EireRed_GS

Full Member
Joined
Jul 3, 2018
Messages
566
I mean, to be fair, the only thing she did was post that story saying “look what he does to me”. Something her father said she regrets doing, soon after this. The audio was leaked to the media, supposedly, not by the victim, and she did not officially press charges, as far as I know.
She leaked all the pics of her with busted lip / bruises etc.. She had only one goal there (if it didnt happen), make it out like he was beating her up. Im assuming she done it late one night with a drink in her and instantly regretted it as i think she tried to delete, but damage was done.

Im not sure how the audio clip got out there.. but its from her phone, so she's def sent that to someone. And for me me theres no debate whats going on in that

My point is, if thats the case, going by this statement, and she has in fact made it out that he beat her up when he didnt. thats pretty damning on her end. If my missus done that, she wouldnt be my missus anymore! simple as!
 

RyRy11

Full Member
Joined
Jan 1, 2014
Messages
1,603
"Based on the evidence available to us, we have concluded that the material posted online did not provide a full picture and that Mason did not commit the offences in respect of which he was originally charged"

Not sure this bit was necessary, but they came to the right decision overall in the end.

Another distraction put to bed finally.
I suspect (or hope) that comes from the player's side to give him wriggle room with other clubs.
 

gaffs

Full Member
Joined
May 10, 2007
Messages
12,879
Location
Moscow 08, Rome 09, London 11
Also the state of some of the posters in this thread. At least it's a handy way of topping up the ignore filter for the future.

Get this straight - even if he is innocent in the eyes of the law, no-one owes him a job. He fecked up enough to never represent United ever again, and that's United's decision as his employer to make. They're not sending him to jail or forcing him to never play football again. He did enough to get sacked, and they've been far more supportive than they had any need to be - damaging their own reputation heavily in the process.

Stop making out like is a victim and politicising the issue.
Exactly.

Any regular workspace would have outed him over a year ago.
 

Cassidy

No longer at risk of being mistaken for a Scouser
Joined
Oct 2, 2013
Messages
31,557
You seem to have missed out this bit:

In a statement in February, the CPS said: "In this case a combination of the withdrawal of key witnesses and new material that came to light meant there was no longer a realistic prospect of conviction."

We don't know what this is and never will but I do know everyone was saying Mendy was guilty from day one but two juries disagreed. We do not know anything like the full story and the evidence was never testing in court - and wasn't strong enough to put to a court
Pretty much, I think this is actually very sad
 

FreakyJim

90% of teams play better football than us
Joined
Jan 16, 2006
Messages
9,103
Location
Glazers Out
A case being dropped doesn't mean that the alleged perpetrator is cleared or that justice determined that he didn't commit the alleged actions. I said it in the Mendy thread and apparently it needs to be said again since some of the quotes are misleading.
Why is then the club saying this? Wouldn't the statement be much easier without it? They're basically siding with Greenwood. "Based on the evidence available to us, we have concluded that the material posted online did not provide a full picture and that Mason did not commit the offences in respect of which he was originally charged".

They're saying he's gone because the public made up their minds about him.

I don't understand this. Then again it's United, we're a shit show of a club.
 

Judas

Open to offers
Joined
Jun 28, 2010
Messages
36,265
Location
Where the grass is greener.
I will forever remember the abuse this boy and his partner received from you vigilantes, as well as cowardly decision from the board. Go away from this toxic fanbase and become the best striker in the world, Mason.
Surely the people who make posts like this can’t be more than 14 years old?
 

pocco

loco
Joined
Mar 17, 2010
Messages
22,663
Location
Keep a clean shit tomorrow, United is my final bus
The correct decision. I said that I felt the 'withdrawal of key witnesses and new information' probably meant that she dropped allegations and made an alternative explanation for the whole thing. And that looks to be true, anything else said by the club is saving face.
 

AFC NimbleThumb

New Member
Joined
Apr 21, 2019
Messages
8,363
The right decision was reached in the end and, based on polling on this forum and other United forums and publications, it is a decision that is supported by the majority of United fans. Time to move on.
You think the majority of United fans post on internet forums & subscribe to The Athletic or are you extrapolating the views of the extreme section that spends days/weeks typing away on their keyboards like we all do on here?
 

Dec9003

Correctly predicted Portugal to win Euro 2016
Joined
Jul 31, 2015
Messages
9,084
It’s for the best, even ignoring the obvious moral standpoint, the club and Mason himself don’t need the scrutiny. Let him go and play his football elsewhere and see how he gets on.

I don’t know if we will be loaning him or selling him, but hopefully he permanently moves and we can reinvest the funds into the squad. If he keeps playing the additional evidence will eventually surface I think, it will be interesting to see how it develops.
 

VanAlden

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Jun 21, 2013
Messages
241
Location
Glasgow
The correct decision.

Can see him heading to Saudi or Turkey.

His career in the UK is over.
 

hobbers

Full Member
Joined
Jun 24, 2013
Messages
28,760
There should never have been any stupid half-baked club-led enquiry into his guilt in the first place.

Tell Greenwood he brought the club into disrepute so can either go out on a season loan or be sold. All Arnold and co should have done.
 

the_cliff

Full Member
Joined
Sep 4, 2013
Messages
5,677
Watch him sign for our rivals and become a world class performer.
If we didn't let him play for us he'll never play in the prem again, so I'm not sure where this comes from.

Imagine the backlash if he joins City or Arsenal when we just ditched him because of what happened. Grow up....
 

Unam333

Full Member
Joined
May 26, 2008
Messages
5,884
We all heard the tape and saw the pics. I dont care what cock and bull story that he and his girlfriend made up after the fact to help clear his name. He did what he was accused of and had she not dropped the charges, i'm sure he would have been found guilty. We all heard him forcing himself on her when she told him to stop. We all saw the pictures.....



Of course, it is her prerogative to stick with him regardless of what he did to her, but you have to wonder, if the money, fame, lifestyle and pressure from family was not there, would she have continued with the charges?

The club have botched the process, but they have come to the right conclusion in the end.
Absolutely correct. The only outcome. Him staying will distract the club's goals this season. Greenwood would be a bigger distraction to the squad than Ronaldo last season.
 

spiriticon

Full Member
Joined
Feb 3, 2013
Messages
7,524
Giggs has definitely suffered because of his scandals. The moment it came out, he's gone from future United manager to almost forgotten. He's not got a chance in hell of becoming United manager now and we barely hear his chants at Old Trafford anymore.
 

Longshanks

Full Member
Joined
Oct 23, 2020
Messages
1,795
As a pure footballing decision it's very regrettable. What we would all give for a fit and firing Mason Greenwood in the side right now.

But the public nature of the case and the trial by social media has done the damage, he is perceived guilty despite never having been found guilty of any wrong doing.

We will never know what truly happened

The brave decision if they genuinely believe no wrong doing, and that the whole sorry affair is behind both Mason and ******* would of been to bring him back. Wouldn't of been popular or easy of course and it would go come with plenty of noise.

They have taken the easy route, maybe it's the best for all parties, and with all the noise around it I understand why the decisions has been taken. But it's the team that will suffer because of it. Someone is going to get a generational talent in Greenwood playing for them, but it wont be us.
 

matsdf

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Dec 6, 2017
Messages
613
I find it hard to understand that people can not accept that there is an overlap between being found "not guilty" by a court, and still not have enough moral to play for United.
 

OrcaFat

Full Member
Joined
Jul 29, 2013
Messages
5,672
It’s pretty clear
Whether it’s a loan now transfer later
Or transfer now
Or terminate contract
Which ever it is he won’t be playing for us again

he’s an absolute idiot
I don’t know why you have to say that. We don’t even know what the hell happened. On the balance of speculation he might have behaved idiotically at times but, quite possibly, it is not as bad as it’s been made out. A large contingent on here have been acting judge, jury and executioner without any of the facts.

It should also be remembered that he’s barely more than a child. Loads of people do stupid stuff when they are young but sometimes there is no serious harm done and those young, foolish people grow up and become good, caring and honest people.
 

Slevs

likes to play with penises
Joined
Apr 5, 2010
Messages
28,435
Location
Boyo
If we didn't let him play for us he'll never play in the prem again, so I'm not sure where this comes from.

Imagine the backlash if he joins City or Arsenal when we just ditched him because of what happened. Grow up....
Have you met Thomas Partey?
 

JPRouve

can't stop thinking about balls - NOT deflategate
Scout
Joined
Jan 31, 2014
Messages
66,211
Location
France
That's fair enough but why the Heck United is putting it out there Greenwood didn't commit the acts he was accused of .
Because the club is led by morons. Think about it this way, the statement from the CPS was that they dropped the case due to a combination of key witnesses withdrawing and new material, not becasue they determined that he was innocent or that anything proved that he was innocent. And for people wondering what "new material" could be, it could simply a different statement from a witness.

The point being that from a legal standpoint there are many ways to get away these things but from a moral standpoint there is only one way, the audio would have to be fake which has been determined by no one and in fact everyone seem to accept the audio as authentic including Greenwood.
 

Smores

Full Member
Joined
May 18, 2011
Messages
25,598
Only this United board could do the right thing and yet say the wrong thing about it.

It's correct he has been effectively sacked as i don't think any sane person could stomach seeing him in a United shirt again.

However to basically then say he didn't do anything and have him back it up in his own statement that he didn't do what we clearly saw and heard is very wrong.

Still at least he's gone and that's one circus we don't have to worry about
I think they had to say it to be fair.

I said a few days ago when a few got their little domestic abuse supporting minds in a tiff that the club investigation was limited. Well they've just confirmed it, once the victim dropped charges the club could not make a reasonable belief determination he was guilty.

That's all that statement is, a reflection that they deem him guilty but can't say it. MG in his statement has basically said the same and as expected the standard tactic of denying guilt but apologsing.
 

horsechoker

The Caf's Roy Keane.
Joined
Apr 16, 2015
Messages
52,726
Location
The stable
There should never have been any stupid half-baked club-led enquiry into his guilt in the first place.

Tell Greenwood he brought the club into disrepute so can either go out on a season loan or be sold. All Arnold and co should have done.
The club probably wanted to sweep it under the rug and not have to replace him.
 

Dec9003

Correctly predicted Portugal to win Euro 2016
Joined
Jul 31, 2015
Messages
9,084
You think the majority of United fans post on internet forums & subscribe to The Athletic or are you extrapolating the views of the extreme section that spends days/weeks typing away on their keyboards like we all do on here?
It’s difficult to ever gauge the majority opinion, but anecdotally all my United supporting mates who are local and attend matches told me they’d stop if he came back into the team.
I’m not sure if they actually would’ve gone that far, but it’s clear that they were unanimously against his return.
 

TheGame

Full Member
Joined
Jul 30, 2002
Messages
19,499
Location
In the Land of Saints and Sinners
You seem to have missed out this bit:

In a statement in February, the CPS said: "In this case a combination of the withdrawal of key witnesses and new material that came to light meant there was no longer a realistic prospect of conviction."

We don't know what this is and never will but I do know everyone was saying Mendy was guilty from day one but two juries disagreed. We do not know anything like the full story and the evidence was never testing in court - and wasn't strong enough to put to a court
The withdrawal of key witnesses which you haven't highlighted is also a key statement. If witnesses do not provided that testimony, there is less chance of conviction.
 

Galactic

Incorrigible pest
Joined
Aug 4, 2006
Messages
8,296
Location
Never Forget
People are so narrow minded and judgmental. But he did brought it upon himself. Best decision for both the club and him.
 

Cloud7

Full Member
Joined
Jan 11, 2016
Messages
12,892
The correct decision.

Man had the world at his feet and he threw it away. He had everything to become a legend here. What a waste.