Think it's more a case of "you can't just go through someone cause the ball's gone". Like, if a defender went through someone off the ball elsewhere on the pitch then he'd probably still get a booking and a foul called against him.
Taken back. Hard to argue Liverpool should be able to take advantage of a pen that should be given against them
Pfff, details, details.
I would invent it if needs be like they do with the 'Pool. !
Penalties aren't about preventing goal-scoring opportunities.
I don't think it has to be preventing a goal-scoring opportunity to be a penalty, it just needs to be a foul in the box
Doesn’t have to be. Loads of penalties are given where the punishment doesn’t fit the crime. How many handballs have we had given against us on the byline where there’s no danger?
I don't think they would've go back to the penalty they'd just let the incident go.
It's baffling how long it took. One of look at the video and it obvious he took out his legs and did not get any of the ball.
Because it's not about preventing a goal scoring opportunity it's about fouling the player, both were clear fouls and clear penalties.
2:0. Ayew to score late goal.
Penalties have never been about DOGSO.
£50
They will win this. Get a cheeky fiver on it and profit.
Why would you say this.As it stands, a win against Bournemouth and we're 4 points behind this lot (who are 2nd)
Don't bloody jinx it!As it stands, a win against Bournemouth and we're 4 points behind this lot (who are 2nd)
You plonker. Why did you do this?As it stands, a win against Bournemouth and we're 4 points behind this lot (who are 2nd)
Well played Liverpool and Bournemouth.
They do seem to, which is even weirder given they’re in the Europa league
Nostradamus
Usually the broadcasters but police may have an impact if they don't want a particular match held at a certain time due to crowd trouble or the police being elsewhere due to an event taking place like with the Queen's funeral or some protests.
