Doesn’t really know how to do anything to be fair.Does Rashford even know how to time a run?
I think it's more the point that a shite team like Everton has managed to get off 22 shots. Okay they've done nothing but let's see how Liverpool fare next week with 20+ shots at our goal. Could be a bloodbath againOh noes, whatever shall we do to defend those pot shots!
I know, I was venting at the universeIt was clearly offside
Fair enough. I just think he's had so many chances and has failed to impress. I'd start giving his minutes to Amad to see what he's got.To give us an extra option and extra energy to our attack
It had it comingI know, I was venting at the universe
He didn’t, TarkovskyDid he not give away the first?
Idiotic comment. The run was perfect. The pass was delayed.Does Rashford even know how to time a run?
I couldn't care if they had 50 shots if 45 of them were long range stat padding pot shots, like vast majority of Everton's was. Only stat Andys can get annoyed at bollocks like that.I think it's more the point that a shite team like Everton has managed to get off 22 shots. Okay they've done nothing but let's see how Liverpool fare next week with 20+ shots at our goal. Could be a bloodbath again
What does that have to do with work rate?Because the players aren't good enough?
Because the players are lazy?What does that have to do with work rate?
Like I said. Meh game with a predictable outcome.We`ve barely won a single game comfortably all season. But now we will?
I guess so, but that does not change much to the Champions League spots as the prospect of England earning a 5th spot for next season in the new 36-team format has been dampened by shitty English performances in Europe, which lowers the country's overall coefficient.Are we hoping Villa beat spurs tomorrow? Surely we aren’t catching them, may as well hope spurs lose
Do you wonder why we regularly have 20 plus shots against us? Do other too half teams in the league regularly have 20 shots against? Genuinely curious if it’s just us or notI couldn't care if they had 50 shots if 45 of them were long range stat padding pot shots, like vast majority of Everton's was. Only stat Andys can get annoyed at bollocks like that.
The thing is that playing shit every game will eventually catch up with usPissed off about the Fulham game, if it wasn't for that feck up, we'd be well placed now.
I don't know, maybe because opposition thinks Onana is a weak link or something. Who cares, they are wasting an attack with those shots, I welcome it.Do you wonder why we regularly have 20 plus shots against us? Do other too half teams in the league regularly have 20 shots against? Genuinely curious if it’s just us or not
Again, I posted NBC half-time commentary/analysis - and you felt persecuted. So much so you tried to pass-up 54% possession as a qualifier that they were wrong - when the statement was they expected a dominant United on the ball. You then went to your good old injuries bag, and I said I've seen us play without so many injuries and we didn't look dominant either.Mate you just had a whinge about us not being completely dominant with an injury plagued side even though we are beating Everton 2-0.
Your agenda is crystal clear. I never said we dominate teams free from injury on the regular, you're just making up an argument in your own head and getting annoyed at it.
I love that line of argument - "I don't have an agenda I promise, I just shared a commentary before following up with a whinge about how we aren't dominant"Again, I posted NBC half-time commentary/analysis - and you felt persecuted. So much so you tried to pass-up 54% possession as a qualifier that they were wrong - when the statement was they expected a dominant United on the ball. You then went to your good old injuries bag, and I said I've seen us play without so many injuries and we didn't look dominant either.
Do you think your agenda isn't crystal clear or something? Like, do you think mine's transparent and yours is hazy? what?
More "woe is me" babble.I love that line of argument - "I don't have an agenda I promise, I just shared a commentary before following up with a whinge about how we aren't dominant".
Jesus wept you're the worst type of supporter.
I dont think it was a 'bad' first half, no way near as bad as you tried to insinuate.More "woe is me" babble.
You seemingly get all flustered when people criticise anything about Ten Hag's team. If you think that first half was good, good for you. Everton were dangerous in the first half, and we weren't as dominant as you'd want us to be against the 16th placed team, at home. I posted a transcript of their half-time discussion - you retorted with that whole injuries thing, and all I said was I've seen us play without XYZ injuries and we weren't dominant then. Now it's all "you're the worst type of-", man save it.
Even weirder because I've not actually said anything/much about today's performance. I mean, there's a search button in this thread. Odd behaviour.
You don't really get it do you?I couldn't care if they had 50 shots if 45 of them were long range stat padding pot shots, like vast majority of Everton's was. Only stat Andys can get annoyed at bollocks like that.
I don't get that mentality, you are right, I am too busy watching an actual football game instead of useless pot shot stats.You don't really get it do you?
You not thinking it was a bad first half means what to me? Won't even entertain your unhinged attempt at adding "levels of bad" to my supposed insinuations - something that you ascertained from me posting half-time punditry. Crazy stuffI dont think it was a 'bad' first half, no way near as bad as you tried to insinuate.
I'm fine with critiquing Ten Hag and have done. In fact I've listed some games I was pissed off with. But to complain when we are 2-0 up at HT with this level of injury is just an idiot post, there's no other word to describe it. "But we aren't dominant today" - I mean what the actual feck? The level of injuries we have is mental, and we were still having more of the ball, threatening on our breaks and organized in the back - and we here whingers still come out. feck sake some of you lot are terrible.
I am actually based it on your silly followup whinging about not being dominant despite the injuries today. You sharing commentary painted to look bad for the manager speaks for itself aside from that.You not thinking it was a bad first half means what to me? Won't even entertain your unhinged attempt at adding "levels of bad" to my supposed insinuations - something that you ascertained from me posting half-time punditry. Crazy stuff
Do you think this pot shot stat is irrelevant?I don't get that mentality, you are right, I am too busy watching an actual football game instead of useless pot shot stats.
This doesn't make those pot shots any more relevant does it. It might show that opposition thinks Onana is a weak link so they try mor elong range shots against us. But that would require thinking about context and not only looking at fecking numbers all the time.Do you think this pot shit stat is irrelevant?
Teams facing 15 or more shots this season:
Arsenal 0
Man City 2
Liverpool 4
Villa 4
Tottenham 7
Man United 14
That explains it. Your habitually poor reading comprehension let you down once more.I actually based it on your silly followup whinging about not being dominant despite the injuries today. You sharing commentary painted to look bad for the manager speaks for itself aside from that.
I know you read it. You tried this before in another thread.By the way I didn't bother reading the nonsense beyond that first paragraph.
Talk about landing a point!Do you think this pot shit stat is irrelevant?
Teams facing 15 or more shots this season:
Arsenal 0
Man City 2
Liverpool 4
Villa 4
Tottenham 7
Man United 14
With the way you spelled pot shot stat, your subconscious is telling you how you really feel about that stat. As long as those shots arent dangerous (which they mostly arent), im happy with opponents taking them.Do you think this pot shit stat is irrelevant?
Teams facing 15 or more shots this season:
Arsenal 0
Man City 2
Liverpool 4
Villa 4
Tottenham 7
Man United 14
That wasn't a response to the dominant bit what on earth are you on about. And you say my comprehension was bad.That explains it. Your habitually poor reading comprehension let you down once more.
The pundits said they expected us to be dominant. You retorted with "54% possession" and I clarified "certainly not dominant - which, I'm assuming is the core part that's conflicting with their expectations", thus said commentary.
I didn't read that post beyond the first paragraph. Not sure what "tried this before" is about, I generally don't give my time to nonsense.I know you read it. You tried this before in another thread.
Not sure it is entirely that. Think they look uninspired and unmotivated.Because the players are lazy?
Simon Hooper