MDFC Manager
Full Member
- Joined
- Dec 26, 2005
- Messages
- 24,761
This is amusing to watch
We will know in a few years.We paid about £50 million too much for Hojlund.
Hojlund passed to him, and then ran into the box (as he should, being the striker). He should have been moving towards the big space at the near post, however, he started running into the crowd of Arsenal players. Was strange.Hojlund was the one who passed to Garnacho in that sequence so he was behind him. Besides as we've seen about 10 times, Garnacho didn't do anything with it anyways.
Hojlund's run are as inconsistent as to whether there is going to be a ball into the box or pass into feet.
TLDR; they're just as bad as each other except Garnacho et al get the ball about 10x as much in a game to do whatever they want.
Clinton?Hillary
Liked said rain and thunderHuh? Doubt it
Dan James was £15 million and we turned a profit on him. What price Hojlund now.We paid about £50 million too much for Hojlund.
And scuffs. (his shots)Rasmus just huffs and puffs
Way too harshI know he’s a young lad but Wheatley looks terrible
Of course. The league needs arsenal to keep things relevant. If we were winning they'd get 20 mins.6 minutes is a joke
Scott again. Just losing the ball all the time.These players are weak as piss. We're losing.
The achievement here is it wasn't embarrassing.Fizzling out for yet another home defeat
Nah, two windows of sales and smart business, get us competent and play our wayThis team is going to take a few years to fix. Very disjointed with random players mixed together with no identifiable style. Ineos will have their work cut out.
Case from 70 yardsHave we had a shot on target?
We had twoHave we had a shot on target?
TwoHave we had a shot on target?
A corner would be niceFootball gods unhappy.
Can Manchester United score? They always score