City and Financial Doping | Charged by PL with 130 FFP breaches | Hearing begins 16th Sep 2024 | Concluded 9th Dec 2024 - Awaiting outcome

Maybe a lukewarm type then with their attempts to cover the cheating by pushing the blame on others.
They could’ve come up with something a bit more believable though, nobody is falling for this red cartel bullshit. They’ve hoovered up every major honour going for the last 5 years.
 
They could’ve come up with something a bit more believable though, nobody is falling for this red cartel bullshit. They’ve hoovered up every major honour going for the last 5 years.
Yeah that’s true. Feels like it’s coming soon and I don’t think it’s hyperbolic to say football the way we know it hinges on the outcome. Can’t see the PL doing so well either way but unsure how Uefa and Fifa would react.
 
What chance is there for them to be punished, really? Just think the PL are going to be strong armed by the UK government (who are in turn strong armed by the oil states) into giving them a favourable verdict.
 
Yeah that’s true. Feels like it’s coming soon and I don’t think it’s hyperbolic to say football the way we know it hinges on the outcome. Can’t see the PL doing so well either way but unsure how Uefa and Fifa would react.
The PL would be worse off if they let them get away with it, as it basically renders them toothless (opening the floodgates for others to do the same) as well as hypocritical for coming down harshly on the likes of Everton and forest.

I get that they probably don’t want to admit that their valuable asset has been essentially corrupt and uncompetitive for the last decade, but the former is much worse imo. Hence why I can see them handing out huge point deductions while still honouring the titles city won. Even if us fans won’t.
 
Are PL (people in charge for final decision) even aware that with delaying decision they will put themselves in shit load of problems? There is a chance that season ends and nobody will know who is in CL, who is relegated, who is promoted....


Unbelievable really.
 
But... but... but... they all wear red, so it must be true! Even though there's zero evidence to support the idea of a 'cartel'!!

The worst thing is I think the very idea of 'red cartel' just emerged on lunatic fan forums. Ive done it to death too many times during the years but the idea of a status quo sort of running football is simply idiotic
 
The worst thing is I think the very idea of 'red cartel' just emerged on lunatic fan forums. Ive done it to death too many times during the years but the idea of a status quo sort of running football is simply idiotic
Yes I agree. It's something they invented out of thin air to make them feel better about themselves, and it's just caught on.
 
The red cartel :lol: Liverpool have 1 title in 35 years, arsenal have 1 in 21 years and we have 1 in 12.

World's. Worst. Cartel.
Exactly and if you look at the recent history (10-15 years) these three clubs have had quite a few bad times of missing out on top 4 for successive seasons or midtable finishes. This ain't exactly Barca and Real Madrid level domination we're talking about.
 
Are PL (people in charge for final decision) even aware that with delaying decision they will put themselves in shit load of problems? There is a chance that season ends and nobody will know who is in CL, who is relegated, who is promoted....


Unbelievable really.
It takes time to figure out what to do with the dozens of money-filled Vuitton bags that landed on their doorstep in the middle of the night.
 
If the PL haven’t figured out by now that they need rid, there is no saving them or football
This.

If City won the 130 charges case, they'd probably sue the league again for 'defamation of character' or something for daring to come after them and trying to tell them 'no'.

No one else hates their own league like City do. Get rid of them already.
 
The red cartel :lol: Liverpool have 1 title in 35 years, arsenal have 1 in 21 years and we have 1 in 12.

World's. Worst. Cartel.
But of those 7 or 8 titles they've won since 2011, who would have won them otherwise? The above 3 teams. That's what their argument is.

But hopefully this "we had no option to compete" nonsense is squashed and they get what's coming.
 
But of those 7 or 8 titles they've won since 2011, who would have won them otherwise? The above 3 teams. That's what their argument is.

But hopefully this "we had no option to compete" nonsense is squashed and they get what's coming.

oh so the parameters have narrowed even more? the red cartel only cares about what happened since 2011, and football is so simple that had city not cheated and fundamentally altered the landscape, everything else would have remained the same? Thats convenient for their argument, as in my lifetime there isnt a single top club in european football that hasnt gone through a spell of relatively less competitiveness (2-3+ seasons). well apart from 1 who comes to mind since a nation state took over.

So who runs the international football cartel that means since 1930, only 8 nations have ever won the world cup? Or is it that success will breed success, but even so, the most dominant international side ever will be guaranteed to go through a spell of natural sporting decline - as brazil are in now. and that these things happen at club level too, apart from when a team cheats to the degree city has.

they cheated, and celebrated it, and sold their souls, and now they need any argument possible to prevent having to admit they were wrong.
 
I wouldn't mind but it's a really shitty shade of Blue. Of all the Blues in the world, Sky Blue is the worst...........................pass me the Malbec
 
But of those 7 or 8 titles they've won since 2011, who would have won them otherwise? The above 3 teams. That's what their argument is.

But hopefully this "we had no option to compete" nonsense is squashed and they get what's coming.


Tell that to Leicester city. Their argument that city and the rest were the kids outside the sweet shop with their noses pressed against the glass, watching the likes of United and Liverpool inside, feeling hopelessly unable to compete is laughable. We built our wealth through success, and spent within our means. We were managed well, in other words, and in the years since Fergie retired we’ve been managed badly. It’s no coincidence where we’ve ended up.

Well run clubs can do great things, things people remember for decades. Actual great sporting achievements, remember those? Nobody gives a shit about city or anything they win because it isn’t real. Of course you won the treble, you broke the rules for so long that it became a forgone conclusion. Where’s the story?

Imagine if post-Munich, instead of rebuilding the club from the ground up through the great work of Sir Matt Busby and Jimmy Murphy, working hard on developing the new busby babes, ultimately culminating in the European cup just 10 years later, we cheated our way back instead. It totally defeats the object of sport and strips it of all romance. We might as well just call the whole thing off and go home if they let them go unpunished.
 
Of course if they hadn't allowed this sort of ownership in the first place then non of this would have happened.

I mean it's a fairly obvious outcome when you allow a tinpot cub with no chance of ever having a genuine revenue stream of making it to the top an ownership model like this.
 
The red cartel :lol: .

If City don‘t get punished severely, I don‘t know if I can keep watching the PL.
 
What chance is there for them to be punished, really? Just think the PL are going to be strong armed by the UK government (who are in turn strong armed by the oil states) into giving them a favourable verdict.
Does feel like the "independent football regulator" was introduced at a very timely moment to get the fingers in.
 
This.

If City won the 130 charges case, they'd probably sue the league again for 'defamation of character' or something for daring to come after them and trying to tell them 'no'.

No one else hates their own league like City do. Get rid of them already.
They hate the league, they boo the CL.

The only thing they do like is daddy's money and toys.
 
I'm trying to imagine if United were in the same situation, would I want the club to contest it as far as possible, or would I want it to just be over and done with? It must be just a little strange to exist in this world of constant litigation while winning all these trophies. Of course I guess it depends on whether you think your club is guilty or not, but it doesn't seem like a satisfying way to go through the most successful period of your club's history.
 
I'm trying to imagine if United were in the same situation, would I want the club to contest it as far as possible, or would I want it to just be over and done with? It must be just a little strange to exist in this world of constant litigation while winning all these trophies. Of course I guess it depends on whether you think your club is guilty or not, but it doesn't seem like a satisfying way to go through the most successful period of your club's history.
A little while back, half the fan base wanted Qatar to buy us.

In my opinion, countries owning clubs is a bad idea and City is the example perfectly illustrating it.

Still, half the fans here wanted Qatar, never mind human rights, cheating and all the rest.

I’m pretty sure many would stick their heads in the sand. They could have been talking about a blue cartel right about now.

For me, I would not be a fan of MU any longer.
 
A little while back, half the fan base wanted Qatar to buy us.

In my opinion, countries owning clubs is a bad idea and City is the example perfectly illustrating it.

Still, half the fans here wanted Qatar, never mind human rights, cheating and all the rest.

I’m pretty sure many would stick their heads in the sand. They could have been talking about a blue cartel right about now.

For me, I would not be a fan of MU any longer.

This was largely what changed my mind about the Qatar stuff. Granted it was after the fact and Jim had already made his moves, but at the time I preferred Qatar (Was happy with either option since anything is better than pure Glazers).

Since then, however, I have seen the way City have gone about all of this, and realized that even if we did not do exactly as they did, if it ever were to come to any kind of vote or consensus, we would likely side with city since our owners would want to do what city have done, or in fact if we were ever called out on it we might have tried these retaliatory lawsuits etc. and realized that that is not something I would ever want for United, so I am firmly against any kind of state ownership now.
 
Conclusion: money rules.

Nothing’s going to happen. We all know it.
I really wish all this wasn’t true, but it feels inevitable.

I’ve spent the last decade hoping that Trump might get what he deserves, but instead he has somehow been rewarded for his criminality and I look at that cheating lot across town in much the same way.

I’m still hoping for justice, but I’m not expecting it.
All the things they’ve won and the impact that has had on all the other clubs who operated within the rules has forever tainted English football. The only outcome of this debacle that I’d be happy with would be their relegation through a points deduction and any trophy they won by the bending of rules should be chalked off. No one else should be awarded a trophy for being the runner up, but they should be compensated heavily.

I’m so fecking sick and fed up with that lot. I love my football. It’s been a large part of my life for the last 45 years or so, but I’m now losing interest. A lot depends on the outcome of this investigation for many football fans. The Premier League must understand that they have to act and do the right thing. For football fans and their own brand.
 
They'll get off with it, many will bitch and moan and then return to watching the football.

The ownership model by itself should make you angry, but look at the appeal of Qatari state ownership on our own fanbase.

Even if they're found guilty, city will just sell a hotel to their youth team's dog or get a Abu Dhabi shell company to sponsor Oasis to some thing or other, and get promoted again. Even with relegation, they'll be back before long.

Their radicalised fans will spout inane conspiracy theories whilst media sources will go along with the party line.
 
Are PL (people in charge for final decision) even aware that with delaying decision they will put themselves in shit load of problems? There is a chance that season ends and nobody will know who is in CL, who is relegated, who is promoted....


Unbelievable really.
That’s what they want though…So any penalties will be applied to the new season

If nothing happens, it’s open season for everyone to spend what they want with questionable in club payments. Just look at Chelsea selling themselves the women’s football team!! Or club hotels being sold to themselves.

And if they are punished accordingly it’ll impact all the teams below them with counter claims being submitted because they shouldn’t have been relegated/should be Europe/should have received X million more for finishing higher

No win situation for football. Football is dead
 
Conclusion: money rules.

Nothing’s going to happen. We all know it.
Am I right thinking that after years of dealing with the goverment (and PL/FA), the Cheats must have a lot of dirt on many a high profile people? Who would face a serious jail time for corruption etc so 130FC simply cant be punished hard. Blackmail and brown envelopes as a sweetener.
 
They'll get off with it, many will bitch and moan and then return to watching the football.

The ownership model by itself should make you angry, but look at the appeal of Qatari state ownership on our own fanbase.

Even if they're found guilty, city will just sell a hotel to their youth team's dog or get a Abu Dhabi shell company to sponsor Oasis to some thing or other, and get promoted again. Even with relegation, they'll be back before long.

Their radicalised fans will spout inane conspiracy theories whilst media sources will go along with the party line.

I'd have thought that if nothing was going to happen then it would have happened already.

Everything is pointing towards some sort of punishment incoming, and for the future of the league it's to be hoped it's severe and they make it stick.

You're right about the last part though, their 'fans' will chant about how much the hate the PL from the terraces at Leyton Orient whilst desperately trying to get back into the PL, and the usual suspects in the media will paint it as a wonderful fightback to the top from a great club.

Heaven forbid they actually do their job and start reporting what everyone else can see staring them in face for once.
 
Am I right thinking that after years of dealing with the goverment (and PL/FA), the Cheats must have a lot of dirt on many a high profile people? Who would face a serious jail time for corruption etc so 130FC simply cant be punished hard. Blackmail and brown envelopes as a sweetener.
Why would City dealing with the Govt, PL and FA mean there must have been corruption and equate to having dirt on people?
 
Based on what?
Think I naively believed many posters on here saying that the Govt (and other institutions) is corrupted.
Thats why I thought with all the deals they have done with Abu Dhabi there might have been something shoddy or worse.
Thank god thats just hearsay and the Cheats can do nothing now but to wait for rightful punishment they deserve.
 
Think I naively believed many posters on here saying that the Govt (and other institutions) is corrupted.
Thats why I thought with all the deals they have done with Abu Dhabi there might have been something shoddy or worse.
Thank god thats just hearsay and the Cheats can do nothing now but to wait for rightful punishment they deserve.

Many institutions are corrupt, I don't think that's naive. A lot of business and politics works on favours for favours and that can quickly get into murky territory.

But there isn't much evidence for a cartel in Premier League football. To be a cartel, United et al would have to have an illegal formal agreement to reduce competitiveness. A shared desire to not want state owned clubs in the league and acting in one's own best interests is not the same as being a cartel.

For anyone interested in the specifics of what they are arguing, this is a decent summary:

https://mancitystuff.co.uk/complain...ractices-in-the-premier-league-and-its-cartel

From what I can see, they're arguing that coordination between clubs to prevent what City are doing constitutes a cartel, which just isn't true, alongside lots of allegations without evidence.
 
This was largely what changed my mind about the Qatar stuff. Granted it was after the fact and Jim had already made his moves, but at the time I preferred Qatar (Was happy with either option since anything is better than pure Glazers).

Since then, however, I have seen the way City have gone about all of this, and realized that even if we did not do exactly as they did, if it ever were to come to any kind of vote or consensus, we would likely side with city since our owners would want to do what city have done, or in fact if we were ever called out on it we might have tried these retaliatory lawsuits etc. and realized that that is not something I would ever want for United, so I am firmly against any kind of state ownership now.
:+1: :+1:
 
At the end of the day whatever way it goes it's going to change football in a big way. Either they get bummed into next week and the pl gets back to a normal or they get away with it and the pl dies.

I just can't see how we and the other law abiding clubs don't do anything major about it if they get away with it.
Hopefully the genuine clubs tell them and the pl to feck off and start a new league without the cnuts!