Hope not, they have more points than we do!
Got my teams mixed up! Their season is done though in terms of winning anything or being relegated, so barring anything unexpected, he looks to be moving to United.
Hope not, they have more points than we do!
Has he missed any penalties?
19 pens scored in a season, is that a record?
Penalties are a rare occasion for United, honestly feels as if we only get a handful a season.Bruno being so good at penalties does knock a few potential goals off the United forwards.
Hojlund could have done with a few this season. Any new arrivals in the summer should plead with Bruno to alternate takers.
Made me chuckle, and panic at the same time!Got my teams mixed up! Their season is done though in terms of winning anything or being relegated, so barring anything unexpected, he looks to be moving to United.
Penalties are a rare occasion for United, honestly feels as if we only get a handful a season.
And hopefully he'll tell them where to go. I mean, I get your point about using pens to boost morale (even though I've always found they've got less kudos than earned ones and don't always miraculously reinvigorate strikers).Bruno being so good at penalties does knock a few potential goals off the United forwards.
Hojlund could have done with a few this season. Any new arrivals in the summer should plead with Bruno to alternate takers.
And hopefully he'll tell them where to go. I mean, I get your point about using pens to boost morale (even though I've always found they've got less kudos than earned ones and don't always miraculously reinvigorate strikers).
Ultimately, they're not a charity - your best penalty taker takes them unless you're 5-0 up and, sadly, that doesn't happen too often.
I don’t know where this guys come from but this was so ridiculous to read that at the first time I thought it was pure trolling, but reading the historic of this poster he really believes his own hype I guess.I don't think he's scored against Porto/Benfica (could be wrong),
How's it a strange take? He's saying he wants a player that wants to play for united specifically, not just one that wants to play CL.
Yeah that's my fear, however if he has really declared he only wants Champions League team that's it. Just worry about Ruben putting all his faith in someone inexperienced like Delap. Mind you they are saying he wants European football too so who knows where we look then.I think Gyökeres is going to be to strikers what VVD was to CBs. Someone who made their big move on the other side of 25 and then dominated.
Really hope Barca or PSG of Bayern sign him rather than one of the English clubs. He would be a nice successor to Lewandowski.
I go back and forth on Gyökeres. He certainly passes the eye test but his numbers are mad to the point of unsustainable this season. He is due some significant regression next season even if he were staying at Sporting never mind trying to make the massive step up from the Portuguese league.I think Gyökeres is going to be to strikers what VVD was to CBs. Someone who made their big move on the other side of 25 and then dominated.
Really hope Barca or PSG of Bayern sign him rather than one of the English clubs. He would be a nice successor to Lewandowski.
Bruno being so good at penalties does knock a few potential goals off the United forwards.
Hojlund could have done with a few this season. Any new arrivals in the summer should plead with Bruno to alternate takers.
I go back and forth on Gyökeres. He certainly passes the eye test but his numbers are mad to the point of unsustainable this season. He is due some significant regression next season even if he were staying at Sporting never mind trying to make the massive step up from the Portuguese league.
I feel like if he signed for Barca or Real he would probably smash it but I am not so sure about him in the Prem. All in all I am more wary of signing him for a big fee and big wages than I am of missing out. We need too much right now to be spending such fees and wages on any one player this summer anyway.
That’s reasonable and probably even likely. But there’s still the chance that he can’t make the step up or handle the pressure. And considering he’ll be 27 this summer if he does pull a Darwin we are completely fecked. I just don’t like the risk factor.For me, the easiest way to look at Gyokeres is to simply half his current numbers if he comes to England - whether Arsenal, United, or Pool.
He will probably finish this year with somewhere close to 55 goals in all comps so anything near half of that would be completely realistic and would be in line with what Isak has done this year.
That’s reasonable and probably even likely. But there’s still the chance that he can’t make the step up or handle the pressure. And considering he’ll be 27 this summer if he does pull a Darwin we are completely fecked. I just don’t like the risk factor.
Yeah admittedly it would take a lot of regression for him to fail here. But then there is GK and CM and 10 to worry about as well as another wide option. As we’ve discussed prior I worry we won’t have the funds to address them all if we spend big on any one player.Completely understandable. For me, the risk is significantly higher with a player who hasn't demonstrated they can score a lot of goals. The reason I think Gyokeres would be a good fit is he's a goal machine and has already proven he can be wildly successful in Amorim's system. The existing relationship they only reinforces this.
I don’t have the same vibe or energy regarding this guy and Darwin. I made just 4 posts in his transfer thread, none of them positive:That’s reasonable and probably even likely. But there’s still the chance that he can’t make the step up or handle the pressure. And considering he’ll be 27 this summer if he does pull a Darwin we are completely fecked. I just don’t like the risk factor.
Don't want to sound harsh, but that OP goal compilation of his is one of the worst I've ever seen. The biggest takeway from it is highlighting a really, really poor standard of defending and positioning. Even the player it is supposed to be highlighting looks average.
Usually a composition on Youtube can make a player look special, perhaps quite a bit better than he actually is, so the biggest question this vid draws from me is: if those are his best bits, how bad are his worst? Also: what is his average level of performance if this is the best they could do with a 'best of' video?
Sounds about right. I keep reading cafites raving about him but for some reason don't have the time to watch Benfica every week.
I was looking forward to his starts for Uruguay and, frankly, meh. Great energy and workrate, better fit to Suárez than Cavani is these days (making up for both not being what they used to be on that front) but while I used to be confident one of Suarez-Cavani would score, I haven't seen anything that makes me expect that from him.
Any buzz around him in terms of upward trajectory? Your bolded, yes, he looks run-of-the-mill (from the tiny piece of cobbled together footage I've seen). If he's always like that, it's some come down from the calibre of forwards your NT is accustomed to this past decade!
The buzz is from people hearing ge scores, did well, etc. Zero buzz as far as him being the next big thing.
We basically have a Suárez-like finisher and pocket tank in Maxi Gómez (but without the dribbling and drive) and a Cavani-like high-intensity and selfless forward in Nuñez (but without the finishing technique and killer instinct).
Shame as we finally do have a world class midfielder in Valverde.
You like watching football or Rugby. That £100m striker couldn't control for shite and was big for nothing.
I would give my two balls to stay well away from them. Bring me the new Benzema any day of the week.
Have to say he is rated far higher here by many posters than he was on North Stand Chat, when Brighton were looking at him 18 months 2 years ago, I haven't watched him alot but I'm not sure he has developed that much.
You can divide it by 10 if he’s got a united shirt on.About the penalties, I would be interested how maby did he won by himaelf. If he does that here too, it will also give us a few more goals, even if he would give then to Bruno.
I think that's the risk with him. It's Portuguese league and he could be the next Mario jardel if he moved to PL.For all the Portuguese league fans, is this lad better than Mario Jardel?
No chance. Bruno rarely misses.For what its worth, Fergie gave the penalties to Sheringham (he missed the first one) in 97 even though Irwin never missed. And in 98 he gave them to Dwight Yorke (missed his first one, too.) Fergie's thing was, the striker should be taking the penalties unless they bottle it, then you give it to Mr Reliable, hence why Denis Irwin kept getting them. If we signed Gyokeres, I can see Bruno handing them over. 99 out of 100 strikers will tell you if they are on the pitch and a player from another position takes them, they're not happy. Strikers need goals. Hopefully we are having this discussion in the summer when if we get a proper one. Bruno is a leader anyway, I doubt he'd mind giving up the pen duties.
Mind you if Ronaldo couldnt get them off him, good luck.
Jardel was a good header but slower (in my memory at least). I think this lad is a better all round footballerFor all the Portuguese league fans, is this lad better than Mario Jardel?
Great post, enjoyed reading that. You've made up my mind about him as not really watched him play.I don’t have the same vibe or energy regarding this guy and Darwin. I made just 4 posts in his transfer thread, none of them positive:
I’m not interested in masters of hindsight, but posts before a player goes on to do anything are always interesting to look back on. As you can see from the run on conversation, the posts about Darwin in that snippet are far from complimentary; I am not inclined to read through that whole thread and dug my own posts because I remember how unimpressed I was with this new “sensation” at the time he was being looked at by us as well as other suitors. I also recall it being at least 50/50 of people in that thread being thoroughly unimpressed with him. It’s, evidently, not just about goals - as he was doing OK on that front - he looked clumsy, cumbersome and unimpressive; nothing you look at and think wow! Or want! Contrast my posts in the Joao Neves thread and I am raving about him from the outset; it was obvious this was a world class player in the making and it’s no surprise whatsoever that he’s now regarded as one of the best midfielders in the world.
You assess by discernment on a case by case basis. I don’t think it’s particularly hard to spot the players who are clearly way above whatever the mean is for the league they are in. Gyokeres has the markers that align with potential “explosion” elsewhere. You can go by the numbers or you can look at how he moves, thinks, executes and ascertain what that would mean against superior defenders with less time and space to operate in. Often with talents performing well above the level of the league they are in, it’s like watching a player in a bubble, like the game going on around them is different to what others are playing. You can see the disparate nature and you can easily factor it into assessment - the harder thing to do in those instances is assess how someone like a Darwin will do; whether what he was doing was as simplistic and cumbersome as it looked or whether you’re the one missing a trick there.
For me, I don’t like the odds and I always call out players who we are linked with who have poor technique and don’t look like they have the prerequisite talent to draw from. It’s important to ask what a player looks like with and without their physicality and athletic prowess. Do they have the kind of technique that will carry, or is it a case of the moment they start to physically decline, they are fecked? You want to “stumble” across players whose brains and technique carry independently; braun should be an asset. You will see it in nearly all the top strikers; they start off usually as some kind of athletic marvel, but even on the wind down, when they are no longer able to utilise any athletic advantage, they remain well above average with their goalscoring because of their technique, intelligence and guile: Shearer, Kane, Lewandowski, Benzema and so many others fit the profile to a tee. By the end, they can barely get around the pitch, yet they remain one step ahead in their heads and execution. Why am I mentioning that in the Gyokeres thread? Because even if he doesn’t end up being an elite striker, he has the markers that state it’s not his physical prowess carrying him, but the other things I mentioned; the physical elements are a bonus, but what grabs the attention is the smarts and execution on display. The antithesis of a Darwin.
It’ll be no surprise to me if Gyokeres goes on to smash it elsewhere. He has the tools I would associate with doing so, whereas if a Darwin did the same I would have been surprised/“shocked”. The same thoughts about Gyokeres revolved around Alvarez before City made him a Haaland backup. That was a player who looked the part and who we could have done with. It was obvious looking at him that he could deliver in Europe if given the chance.
There’s going to be doubts about smaller leagues, but that’s why you take players who look levels above in them, not ones - like Darwin - who don’t.
Well. Look on the bright side. Signing Darwin is how Liverpool ended up with Mac Allister and Gravenberch. Klopp took one try at signing players and was so terrible at it he immediately told Liverpool to hire that German guy to take charge of that insteadThat’s reasonable and probably even likely. But there’s still the chance that he can’t make the step up or handle the pressure. And considering he’ll be 27 this summer if he does pull a Darwin we are completely fecked. I just don’t like the risk factor.
He's did those for Rashford for the sake of his confidence.If we start doing better as a team and having bigger leads, I can see Bruno handing them over (like he's done for Rashford before).
Recently our penalties have been so high pressure that it's a no brainer given Bruno's track record
Bruno should always take our penalties. Not sure there’s anyone better in world football.If we start doing better as a team and having bigger leads, I can see Bruno handing them over (like he's done for Rashford before).
Recently our penalties have been so high pressure that it's a no brainer given Bruno's track record
Bruno should always take our penalties. Not sure there’s anyone better in world football.
Considering we get 2 per season, United would shake hands immediatelyIs his agent negotiating with United and the final stumbling block is he wants penalty duties?
Largely agree with this - good post. People are so lazy and just look at stats rather than use their own eyes and brains when assessing players. Reasonable short-cut when you don’t have time to watch all the players we get linked with yourself, but often steers people wrong.I don’t have the same vibe or energy regarding this guy and Darwin. I made just 4 posts in his transfer thread, none of them positive:
I’m not interested in masters of hindsight, but posts before a player goes on to do anything are always interesting to look back on. As you can see from the run on conversation, the posts about Darwin in that snippet are far from complimentary; I am not inclined to read through that whole thread and dug my own posts because I remember how unimpressed I was with this new “sensation” at the time he was being looked at by us as well as other suitors. I also recall it being at least 50/50 of people in that thread being thoroughly unimpressed with him. It’s, evidently, not just about goals - as he was doing OK on that front - he looked clumsy, cumbersome and unimpressive; nothing you look at and think wow! Or want! Contrast my posts in the Joao Neves thread and I am raving about him from the outset; it was obvious this was a world class player in the making and it’s no surprise whatsoever that he’s now regarded as one of the best midfielders in the world.
You assess by discernment on a case by case basis. I don’t think it’s particularly hard to spot the players who are clearly way above whatever the mean is for the league they are in. Gyokeres has the markers that align with potential “explosion” elsewhere. You can go by the numbers or you can look at how he moves, thinks, executes and ascertain what that would mean against superior defenders with less time and space to operate in. Often with talents performing well above the level of the league they are in, it’s like watching a player in a bubble, like the game going on around them is different to what others are playing. You can see the disparate nature and you can easily factor it into assessment - the harder thing to do in those instances is assess how someone like a Darwin will do; whether what he was doing was as simplistic and cumbersome as it looked or whether you’re the one missing a trick there.
For me, I don’t like the odds and I always call out players who we are linked with who have poor technique and don’t look like they have the prerequisite talent to draw from. It’s important to ask what a player looks like with and without their physicality and athletic prowess. Do they have the kind of technique that will carry, or is it a case of the moment they start to physically decline, they are fecked? You want to “stumble” across players whose brains and technique carry independently; braun should be an asset. You will see it in nearly all the top strikers; they start off usually as some kind of athletic marvel, but even on the wind down, when they are no longer able to utilise any athletic advantage, they remain well above average with their goalscoring because of their technique, intelligence and guile: Shearer, Kane, Lewandowski, Benzema and so many others fit the profile to a tee. By the end, they can barely get around the pitch, yet they remain one step ahead in their heads and execution. Why am I mentioning that in the Gyokeres thread? Because even if he doesn’t end up being an elite striker, he has the markers that state it’s not his physical prowess carrying him, but the other things I mentioned; the physical elements are a bonus, but what grabs the attention is the smarts and execution on display. The antithesis of a Darwin.
It’ll be no surprise to me if Gyokeres goes on to smash it elsewhere. He has the tools I would associate with doing so, whereas if a Darwin did the same I would have been surprised/“shocked”. The same thoughts about Gyokeres revolved around Alvarez before City made him a Haaland backup. That was a player who looked the part and who we could have done with. It was obvious looking at him that he could deliver in Europe if given the chance.
There’s going to be doubts about smaller leagues, but that’s why you take players who look levels above in them, not ones - like Darwin - who don’t.
Jardel is not a good comparation.I think that's the risk with him. It's Portuguese league and he could be the next Mario jardel if he moved to PL.
I probably shouldn’t have mentioned Darwin in retrospect. Wasn’t actually comparing him to Gyökeres as a player so much as painting a picture of where we would be in a worst case scenario where we sign Gyökeres for a big fee, he underperforms as so many other Portuguese league exports have and we are then left with another player on high wages at an advanced age. Admittedly, as I said in other posts, that is highly unlikely as I do rate Gyökeres unlike Darwin at the time.I don’t have the same vibe or energy regarding this guy and Darwin. I made just 4 posts in his transfer thread, none of them positive:
I’m not interested in masters of hindsight, but posts before a player goes on to do anything are always interesting to look back on. As you can see from the run on conversation, the posts about Darwin in that snippet are far from complimentary; I am not inclined to read through that whole thread and dug my own posts because I remember how unimpressed I was with this new “sensation” at the time he was being looked at by us as well as other suitors. I also recall it being at least 50/50 of people in that thread being thoroughly unimpressed with him. It’s, evidently, not just about goals - as he was doing OK on that front - he looked clumsy, cumbersome and unimpressive; nothing you look at and think wow! Or want! Contrast my posts in the Joao Neves thread and I am raving about him from the outset; it was obvious this was a world class player in the making and it’s no surprise whatsoever that he’s now regarded as one of the best midfielders in the world.
You assess by discernment on a case by case basis. I don’t think it’s particularly hard to spot the players who are clearly way above whatever the mean is for the league they are in. Gyokeres has the markers that align with potential “explosion” elsewhere. You can go by the numbers or you can look at how he moves, thinks, executes and ascertain what that would mean against superior defenders with less time and space to operate in. Often with talents performing well above the level of the league they are in, it’s like watching a player in a bubble, like the game going on around them is different to what others are playing. You can see the disparate nature and you can easily factor it into assessment - the harder thing to do in those instances is assess how someone like a Darwin will do; whether what he was doing was as simplistic and cumbersome as it looked or whether you’re the one missing a trick there.
For me, I don’t like the odds and I always call out players who we are linked with who have poor technique and don’t look like they have the prerequisite talent to draw from. It’s important to ask what a player looks like with and without their physicality and athletic prowess. Do they have the kind of technique that will carry, or is it a case of the moment they start to physically decline, they are fecked? You want to “stumble” across players whose brains and technique carry independently; braun should be an asset. You will see it in nearly all the top strikers; they start off usually as some kind of athletic marvel, but even on the wind down, when they are no longer able to utilise any athletic advantage, they remain well above average with their goalscoring because of their technique, intelligence and guile: Shearer, Kane, Lewandowski, Benzema and so many others fit the profile to a tee. By the end, they can barely get around the pitch, yet they remain one step ahead in their heads and execution. Why am I mentioning that in the Gyokeres thread? Because even if he doesn’t end up being an elite striker, he has the markers that state it’s not his physical prowess carrying him, but the other things I mentioned; the physical elements are a bonus, but what grabs the attention is the smarts and execution on display. The antithesis of a Darwin.
It’ll be no surprise to me if Gyokeres goes on to smash it elsewhere. He has the tools I would associate with doing so, whereas if a Darwin did the same I would have been surprised/“shocked”. The same thoughts about Gyokeres revolved around Alvarez before City made him a Haaland backup. That was a player who looked the part and who we could have done with. It was obvious looking at him that he could deliver in Europe if given the chance.
There’s going to be doubts about smaller leagues, but that’s why you take players who look levels above in them, not ones - like Darwin - who don’t.