When you think it apparently cost Dan his job, Beradas job must be on the line with this?
It could be, but not until we see results of next year. If things aren’t on an upward trajectory by Christmas, Ratcliffe may begin questioning things a bit.
When you think it apparently cost Dan his job, Beradas job must be on the line with this?
I have yet met a fan who can explain the benefits of playing our 343 system. We will sign a couple of decent players and become a poorly coached mid table team.
Not sure what we actually gained from bringing him in midseason.
There is no way SJR and the board brought him in expecting potentially 17th in the league. All thats happened is the pressure on him at the start from next season couldn't be higher. All the get out of jail free cards will have already been used up.
Complete conjecture
Amorim has also been linked with Manchester City if Pep Guardiola leaves next summer after it was confirmed that Hugo Viana, his director of football at Sporting, will replace Txiki Begiristain in the same role at the Etihad last season.
Ah sorry, misunderstood and makes sense. Yes that issue is that those CBs seem really rare - I almost wonder if they should sign a CM and convert them.I said CBs (at least one) should push up in Amorim’s system, not in a 433. In essence it forms a similar formation in possession. If you have two CBs push up you get even more numbers forward, but it still comes down to the personnel - Martinez was excellent at it, Yoro has the potential to get there too. Maz is better in that role as well but you wouldn’t want him in a CB pairing.
Hojlund and Garnacho are young and inconsistent. I don’t think you can really say that they performed better last year because it was a different formation. Hojlund had a streaky run but outside of that was essentially the same player. Garnacho has had plenty of opportunities to score this year.
Amorim said he never spoke to City about replacing Pep GuardiolaMost reporting is conjecture and speculation.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/f...d-Ruben-Amorim-Omar-Berrada-Erik-ten-Hag.html
That doesn't contradict the idea that he'd likely be Viana's top target to eventually replace PepAmorim said he never spoke to City about replacing Pep Guardiola
Amorim said he never spoke to City about replacing Pep Guardiola
Most top managers like Pep, Klopp etc are looking for certain formations when in possession in the final 3rd and when defending in your 3rd.I have yet met a fan who can explain the benefits of playing our 343 system. We will sign a couple of decent players and become a poorly coached mid table team.
RA could get off to a bad start next season, losing 4 in a row like Ten Hag did. Where is the point at which the new season is also written off? 5th placed Chelsea have lost 8, drawn 9 league games, winning a mind-blowing 18. I think it would be fair to say if/when RA loses his 9th league game he gets the bullet, or 10th if we are feeling generous.for those who think he’s a pre season and a CF away from turning this around. How long into next season will you say enough if performances don’t change? Genuine question.
I don’t think 4 players make this system any more fruitful and we could have prime Haarland up front and still look toothless.
ETH all over again and I feel many, many of us on here can see this.
I would agree with that. I think the rebuild is going to be far more expensive than we are able to spend, even with sales and end of contracts.If the profiles of this specific system mean we need spend that much more on players, that sounds like a pretty good argument to cut losses now and change the manager.
I would agree with that. I think the rebuild is going to be far more expensive than we are able to spend, even with sales and end of contracts.
Last season when we were flirting with players like Osimhen, his release clause was around €75m, which is £63.8m. Maybe we find two bangers for £75m each. That leaves £50m for the rest of the repairs. Even someone like Ugarte cost us £42.2m (£50.7 with add ons), and I think I'm the only person here who likes him. We need a goal machine, a goal keeper, two wingbacks, and a central midfielder.
The CF position is easily the worst in living memory for every United fan alive I’d wager - and I totally acknowledge that that is a huge burden to RA. But there are members of this squad who have played much better and I don’t see many standouts who have improved under him.Out of curiosity, is there a squad in the past 40 years, SAF until now, that was a worse squad, compared to this one? I agree that they are not playing completely up to their own standards, but also, I look at the squad and see very little thought put into squad construction, more just a hodge podge Frankenstein like approach.
Ah sorry, misunderstood and makes sense. Yes that issue is that those CBs seem really rare - I almost wonder if they should sign a CM and convert them.
I guess maybe they’d be just the same in 343 if we played like palace and basically just fed the front three with direct balls, so it might not solely be 433 vs 343. But I only have last season and this season to compare.
His first pre-match press conference vs Ipswich, back in novemberI’ve actually completely missed this? Where/when did he say this?
This would make me looks very differently on what I perceive as very cowardly tactics (7 defensive players at home to very average teams).
Why would him spelling out his plan change your perception of the tactics?I’ve actually completely missed this? Where/when did he say this?
This would make me looks very differently on what I perceive as very cowardly tactics (7 defensive players at home to very average teams).
We've played February to mid April with 3 attackers for 3 positions. That's insane. No club could do much better playing twice a week under such circumstances.There will likely be less money to spend if we don't win it, so it could easily lead to another frustrating season as I don't think we could sign enough players to fill the holes we desperately need to in our formation?
Even after sacking Ten Hag, I expected a “write‐off” season - but not to this extent. At what point do we draw the line between acceptable growing pains and outright failure? Consider these benchmarks:RA could get off to a bad start next season, losing 4 in a row like Ten Hag did. Where is the point at which the new season is also written off? 5th placed Chelsea have lost 8, drawn 9 league games, winning a mind-blowing 18. I think it would be fair to say if/when RA loses his 9th league game he gets the bullet, or 10th if we are feeling generous.
I am not in favor of writing off back to back seasons. I think we examine the record at 10 played and see how it compares to the list below.
Mourinho = 53.8% win rate
Ten Hag = 51.8% win rate
Ole = 51.4% win rate
LVG = 51.3% win rate
Moyes = 50.0% win rate
Moyes was boss for only 34 matches.
Amorim has been boss for 37 matches, with a win rate of 37.8%.
Bet sporting fans thought the same. Then Amorim came and ended there 19 year wait for a titleI have yet met a fan who can explain the benefits of playing our 343 system. We will sign a couple of decent players and become a poorly coached mid table team.
When we sign some actual quality forwards and still lose majority of our games.Even after sacking Ten Hag, I expected a “write‐off” season - but not to this extent. At what point do we draw the line between acceptable growing pains and outright failure? Consider these benchmarks:
- Title challenge: Writing off the season if we’re no longer fighting for the Premier League.
- Top 4 race: Writing off if we fall out of the Champions League places.
- European qualification: Writing off if we can’t secure any European football.
- Mid-table: Writing off if we finish outside the top 10 (or even top 12).
- Relegation dogfight: Writing off if we’re closer to the drop (16th+) than to safety.
Amorim, after 37 games, is on a 37.8% win rate, which for me is way below expectations.
We're Man Utd in transition, when a new manager arrives in October or November, the bare minimum should be a top 8 finish. At what point do we admit that his niche tactics simply won’t work at United?
Even after sacking Ten Hag, I expected a “write‐off” season - but not to this extent. At what point do we draw the line between acceptable growing pains and outright failure? Consider these benchmarks:
- Title challenge: Writing off the season if we’re no longer fighting for the Premier League.
- Top 4 race: Writing off if we fall out of the Champions League places.
- European qualification: Writing off if we can’t secure any European football.
- Mid-table: Writing off if we finish outside the top 10 (or even top 12).
- Relegation dogfight: Writing off if we’re closer to the drop (16th+) than to safety.
Amorim, after 37 games, is on a 37.8% win rate, which for me is way below expectations.
We're Man Utd in transition, when a new manager arrives in October or November, the bare minimum should be a top 8 finish. At what point do we admit that his niche tactics simply won’t work at United?
Expecting 8th just because of the club's name and success of the past 35 years?Even after sacking Ten Hag, I expected a “write‐off” season - but not to this extent. At what point do we draw the line between acceptable growing pains and outright failure? Consider these benchmarks:
- Title challenge: Writing off the season if we’re no longer fighting for the Premier League.
- Top 4 race: Writing off if we fall out of the Champions League places.
- European qualification: Writing off if we can’t secure any European football.
- Mid-table: Writing off if we finish outside the top 10 (or even top 12).
- Relegation dogfight: Writing off if we’re closer to the drop (16th+) than to safety.
Amorim, after 37 games, is on a 37.8% win rate, which for me is way below expectations.
We're Man Utd in transition, when a new manager arrives in October or November, the bare minimum should be a top 8 finish. At what point do we admit that his niche tactics simply won’t work at United?
Yeah, the CF position is dire. I would say Garnacho is the one true winger and doesn’t fit as a 10. He’s better 1v1 in space on the wings. Almost all of his goal contributions have been from coming in wide.The CF position is easily the worst in living memory for every United fan alive I’d wager - and I totally acknowledge that that is a huge burden to RA. But there are members of this squad who have played much better and I don’t see many standouts who have improved under him.
Do t you think buying players for his rigid system is another huge Frankenstein approach, rather than adjusting what little money we might have into a back 4 system? I do feel that CL qualification will see us stuck with perhaps all 3 of our big players on loan as they aren’t going to walk away after a 25% pay rise, so if we do wi. The EL we have problem players on big wages and don’t fit the system. But they might do a 442/433 manager.
Which is exactly why Ashworth didn’t want Amorim as the squad wasn’t suited for Amorim’s 3-4-2-1 and we don’t have the money to buy the profile of player needed to 1. Improve the squad and 2. Fit Amorim’s system which he refuses to move from in any way at all.The profile of player we need means that’s 2.5 players. £200 million doesn’t go as far as it used to. We can’t half-arse it again with bargain basement signings like Dorgu, hoping they can make the jump up.
Which is exactly what the old hierarchy were lambasted for after going for Maguire, Sanchez and Fred because apparently City were in for them yet Berrada seems to get a pass despite overruling Ashworth who was in charge of the footballing department and the fact that Berrada is a commercial/sponsorship guy.It was a peculiar decision by Berada. Suspect it was driven by not wanting to miss out on Amorim since Hugo Viana was tipped to go to City, and with Pep potentially not extending, the concern was that City could’ve swooped in for Amorim to replace him. So in the end it was probably driven by FOMO, more than anything else.
Which is exactly why Ashworth didn’t want Amorim as the squad wasn’t suited for Amorim’s 3-4-2-1 and we don’t have the money to buy the profile of player needed to 1. Improve the squad and 2. Fit Amorim’s system which he refuses to move from in any way at all.
Which is exactly what the old hierarchy were lambasted for after going for Maguire, Sanchez and Fred because apparently City were in for them yet Berrada seems to get a pass despite overruling Ashworth who was in charge of the footballing department and the fact that Berrada is a commercial/sponsorship guy.
It was yet another piss poor attempt to one up City and hope it’d work out because apparently City were interested even though Amorim himself has said he never at any point spoke to City, I often wonder if City leak stuff out knowing full well our geniuses will fall for the bait each time then piss themselves laughing that they got us again.
An attempt by a guy who’s in his first time as a CEO and specialises in commercial and sponsorship deals, a guy that has no right making footballing decisions over a guy who has experience in building footballing structures and who was brought in to run the footballing department ?If the speculation is correct, it sounds like an attempt to gain the services of a highly rated young manager, and in the process prevent a major rival from doing the same. In this case it was City, in others it could be Arsenal or Liverpool. For example, if Arsenal sign Gyokeres they will (imo) win the league. We need a striker arguably just as much or more than Arsenal, so we should sign him - both to help us and to deny a rival from winning.
An attempt by a guy who’s in his first time as a CEO and specialises in commercial and sponsorship deals, a guy that has no right making footballing decisions over a guy who has experience in building footballing structures and who was brought in to run the footballing department ?
It wasn’t thought through at all and much like when we went after Maguire, Sanchez and Fred it was for the most part to simply one up City like we had done with RVP and Berbatov in the past. We stupidly let Woodward then Arnold run things when they had no right and here we are again doing exactly the same under a different hierarchy, I like Amorim but if he doesn’t win Europa he’ll be gone by Christmas and it’ll have been yet another wasted year due to zero vision by the club.
That is such a low bar to clear that it might not provide much imformation.When we sign some actual quality forwards and still lose majority of our games.
Crystal Palace might win the Portugese title. Brighton would absolutely do it. The PL is much stronger than the Portugese league. It is almost a different sport. I think that is slowly dawning on Berrada and Amorim. Dorgu and Dalot as WBs will not win PL titles.Bet sporting fans thought the same. Then Amorim came and ended there 19 year wait for a title
Crystal Palace might win the Portugese title. Brighton would absolutely do it. The PL is much stronger than the Portugese league. It is almost a different sport. I think that is slowly dawning on Berrada and Amorim. Dorgu and Dalot as WBs will not win PL titles.
Did his sporting side have significantly more resources/a better squad than the opposition? Genuine question as I don’t know.Crystal Palace might win the Portugese title. Brighton would absolutely do it. The PL is much stronger than the Portugese league. It is almost a different sport. I think that is slowly dawning on Berrada and Amorim. Dorgu and Dalot as WBs will not win PL titles.
Amorim's first game was Ipswich, 1-1 on 24-11-2024, right?So why were we in 14th place when Amorim took over?
Exactly, ETH had a weaker squad last season than what we have now and managed to finish 8th despite having to deal with a huge amount of player injuries throughout the season.
Ten Hag's kamikaze football was also more exciting to watch than this version of United, where we aimlessly pass it around a back 3 and then lose possession in a midfield 2 that's outnumbered by the opposition.If Amorim was happy to play chaos ball and throw tactics out the window from the first minute, we probably would finish higher. But he's not, and rightfully so.
If he continues this horrendous form into next season and gets sacked in October, do we write next season off as well, since the new manager wouldn’t have had a summer transfer window? No, we should we expect that whoever comes in is able to improve us, at least somewhat!