EricaNo7
Full Member
maybe HE is andy in disguiseIsn't it funny how every Liverpool fan on here claims to not go on RAWK. A bit too convenient isn't it? I mean if ever there was a forum custom-built to suit a poster, it would be Murph and RAWK.
maybe HE is andy in disguiseIsn't it funny how every Liverpool fan on here claims to not go on RAWK. A bit too convenient isn't it? I mean if ever there was a forum custom-built to suit a poster, it would be Murph and RAWK.
I think he's referring to the finances. You're not off to that bad of a start compared to what we did a couple years ago.How the hell does that logic apply then, and what 'current mess', it's August for feck's sake, we've played three games?
it's actually a twenty page thread devoted to the amazing stupidity of your fans, and our incredulity at it!A 20 page thread about us losing...and you lot say that you're not obsessed. Hilarious!
Oh you must have different feelings then most of my Liverpool friends,their heads are going oh and their mobiles dont seem to be working eitherHow the hell does that logic apply then, and what 'current mess', it's August for feck's sake, we've played three games?
The fact that he didn't understand that makes this post all the more meaningful.it's actually a twenty page thread devoted to the amazing stupidity of your fans, and our incredulity at it!
Horrible word that. Think about the offense you may be causing, or don't, it's up to you.The Liverpool fan whinging about money and blaming the yanks for everything says I've reverted to type.
Good one Murph, you spastic.
Isn't it funny how every Liverpool fan on here claims to not go on RAWK. A bit too convenient isn't it? I mean if ever there was a forum custom-built to suit a poster, it would be Murph and RAWK.
I think he's referring to the finances. You're not off to that bad of a start compared to what we did a couple years ago.
Murph, act like a spastic, and get called a spastic. Don't be so sensitive, it happens to everyone. You should know the caf by now.Horrible word that. Think about the offense you may be causing, or don't, it's up to you.
And by reverting to type I meant shouting the odds LOUDLY so your mates can hear you, behind a key board. Anyway...
Your spending per season has increased under the yanks. Given their only input into the club is releasing those funds, I don't see how they're more of a threat than the shite decisions made by your manager.The Yanks are the biggest threat to the future prosperity and success of Liverpool F.C. since Everton fecked off and moved across the park. I hate the pair of them. rafa meanwhile is the bollocks.
I don't understand, how can Rafa be blamed for the finances, we're in negative spend since 2008?
That. Rafa's transfer activity has blown a lot of money. At least that's Kraft's argument.Your spending per season has increased under the yanks. Given their only input into the club is releasing those funds, I don't see how they're more of a threat than the shite decisions made by your manager.
Buying a player for 20m, selling him for 12m months later........I don't understand, how can Rafa be blamed for the finances, we're in negative spend since 2008?
How the hell does that logic apply then, and what 'current mess', it's August for feck's sake, we've played three games?
murph, act like a spastic, and get called a spastic. Don't be so sensitive, it happens to everyone. You should know the caf by now.
[i]i know but i hate the word, people have disabled kids and stuff, i just don't like the word, i hate Ihni binni dimi diniwiny anitaime too but there you go, you crack on.[/i]
you're on a roll tonight. How the feck do you shout loudly on an internet forum? Are you taking this place too seriously again? That sabbatical you took for your own good doesn't seem to have cured your issues. Settle down murph, it's not a fight, so stop seeing it that way. Honestly, you'd be right at home on rawk. I don't know why you do this to yourself over here.
don't flatter yourself krafty. Just putting you straight when you large it up and show off like a big kid. I'll continue to do so, i see it as a duty to all the normal people. If you want to talk sensibly i'm available for that too.
talking of which. If you're interested like, the yanks spent a heap of money in a flurry on structured deals and borrowed money. They've actually spent feck all, investested nisch. That's unsustainable and the reason leeds went down. They realise this and thought they'd be out by now but the credit crunch has found them out. In the meantime the house of cards is about to fall if they don't feck off soon.
which will obviously make you chuckle and that's fair enough but don't tell me they've spent obscene amounts of money when torres is still our only signing above £20m (even that's up for debate) and you've got rio, rooney,berbatov and veron to your tally not to mention a host of £18m pluses i can't be arsed to look up.
So the next bit is bollocks of course. Do you want to go away and think about this statement?[/i]
your spending per season has increased under the yanks. Given their only input into the club is releasing those funds, i don't see how they're more of a threat than the shite decisions made by your manager.
4 months later actually. he didn't work out and we got most of our money back, how much did you get for Veron?Buying a player for 20m, selling him for 12m months later........
Yes, we lost a fair bit of money on that one, but SAF doesn't go on about how little money he has to spend.4 months later actually. he didn't work out and we got most of our money back, how much did you get for Veron?
That'll be because he went out and bought Ferdinand shortly afterwards?Yes, we lost a fair bit of money on that one, but SAF doesn't go on about how little money he has to spend.
No, he bought Ferdinand a year before selling Veron.That'll be because he went out and bought Ferdinand shortly afterwards?
Yes, we spent a fair penny on Ferdinand. But he has been crucial to our success and is still in the squad. How much money has Senor Benitez signed that never amounted to anything. If he didn't spend so much money on average at best players, he'd have the money to buy the good players. He goes for the quantity not quality route.That'll be because he went out and bought Ferdinand shortly afterwards?
£17m wasn't it, with him forming part of the midfield which won us a league title and a couple of other trophies. So that's an £11m loss, offset by the trophies he helped us win.4 months later actually. he didn't work out and we got most of our money back, how much did you get for Veron?
£15m, and there were no other trophies won with Veron in the team.£17m wasn't it, with him forming part of the midfield which won us a league title and a couple of other trophies. So that's an £11m loss, offset by the trophies he helped us win.
Murph, just because I flag you up on your bullshit (and it is bullshit), doesn't mean I'm showing off or acting like a big kid. It merely means I'm responding to your bullshit. This is why you come across as so sensitive, and why it's obvious you take this place so seriously. You see these arguments against you and take them so personally. If you're going to start whinging about cash, despite the clear fact Liverpool are the biggest spenders outside Chelsea and City, you can expect to be pulled up on it. If I didn't, someone else would have.
There you again with your player price argument. It's a completely null argument because you've had more funds than us (this couldn't be more clear), but have chosen to spend it on multiple lower priced signings, hence why you've got by far the biggest squad in the Premier League, and why Rafa has signed something like 80 players (I'm not even exaggerating here). Taking last summer as an example, we can spend big on single players because we get it right, meaning we only need to buy a Berbatov, whereas Rafa's fecked it up so much for you that you needed to buy a left-back (Dosenna), a striker (Keane), and multiple other signings, spending more than us in total, and when those don't work out having to start all over again. So yes, we have more valuable players, but that's just another stick to beat with you with - why do we have a more valuable squad despite spending less overall? Answer - our respective managers.
I don't care how the yanks structured your deals or managed the finance them, the fact is you've heavily outspent everyone in the league apart from the oil-rich billionaires. Now consider that United (and Arsenal) have won multiple league titles at significant financial disadvantages compared to their rivals, and you don't have a leg to stand on. All this financial disadvantage bullshit. Firstly, it's not even true, and secondly, it shouldn't even matter so long as you're good enough, which Fergie and Wenger have proven time and time again.
Good read and of course I agree with all saidMurph, just because I flag you up on your bullshit (and it is bullshit), doesn't mean I'm showing off or acting like a big kid. It merely means I'm responding to your bullshit. This is why you come across as so sensitive, and why it's obvious you take this place so seriously. You see these arguments against you and take them so personally. If you're going to start whinging about cash, despite the clear fact Liverpool are the biggest spenders outside Chelsea and City, you can expect to be pulled up on it. If I didn't, someone else would have.
There you again with your player price argument. It's a completely null argument because you've had more funds than us (this couldn't be more clear), but have chosen to spend it on multiple lower priced signings, hence why you've got by far the biggest squad in the Premier League, and why Rafa has signed something like 80 players (I'm not even exaggerating here). Taking last summer as an example, we can spend big on single players because we get it right, meaning we only need to buy a Berbatov, whereas Rafa's fecked it up so much for you that you needed to buy a left-back (Dosenna), a striker (Keane), and multiple other signings, spending more than us in total, and when those don't work out having to start all over again. So yes, we have more valuable players, but that's just another stick to beat with you with - why do we have a more valuable squad despite spending less overall? Answer - our respective managers.
I don't care how the yanks structured your deals or managed the finance them, the fact is you've heavily outspent everyone in the league apart from the oil-rich billionaires. Now consider that United (and Arsenal) have won multiple league titles at significant financial disadvantages compared to their rivals, and you don't have a leg to stand on. All this financial disadvantage bullshit. Firstly, it's not even true, and secondly, it shouldn't even matter so long as you're good enough, which Fergie and Wenger have proven time and time again.
Cheers. Still a league title is more than what Liverpool have to show for their recent flops.£15m, and there were no other trophies won with Veron in the team.
That's a bit harsh, isn't it?Isn't it funny how every Liverpool fan on here claims to not go on RAWK. A bit too convenient isn't it? I mean if ever there was a forum custom-built to suit a poster, it would be Murph and RAWK.
You're right, I was only joking. Though Murph is at least a watered down version of all those things, plus you have to factor in the fact he has to restrain himself here, whereas on RAWK he could let go, and probably just be like one of them.That's a bit harsh, isn't it?
I know I'm new, but I've lurked for ages, and Murphman seems to be pretty reasonable, in his own scouse way.
RAWK is more custom built to suit a scouse Osama bin Laden type of fella -- living in his own world where absolutely everything & everyone is fighting against him & his cause; loving the sound of his own voice when he launches into cringeworthy diatribes & pontificating on how it's Their Destiny to win the title this year; worshiping at the shrine of the Rafatollah (NB! True scouse expression!) & reminiscing about Jan Mølby's tight shorts.
A little bit yes but at the end of the day it's Murphman.The best Liverpool fans on this site are Spammy and maybe DumpstarThat's a bit harsh, isn't it?
I know I'm new, but I've lurked for ages, and Murphman seems to be pretty reasonable, in his own scouse way.
RAWK is more custom built to suit a scouse Osama bin Laden type of fella -- living in his own world where absolutely everything & everyone is fighting against him & his cause; loving the sound of his own voice when he launches into cringeworthy diatribes & pontificating on how it's Their Destiny to win the title this year; worshiping at the shrine of the Rafatollah (NB! True scouse expression!) & reminiscing about Jan Mølby's tight shorts.
I think even that would make him feel a little dirty.You're right, I was only joking. Though Murph is at least a watered down version of all those things, plus you have to factor in the fact he has to restrain himself here, whereas on RAWK he could let go, and probably just be like one of them.
I never argued that wasn't the case, but to talk of obscene amounts spent by Liverpool and Chelsea is a joke coming from a manc. Torres cost the same as Hargreaves give or take.At least our signings good and the odd faux pax have produced a regular title winning side,enough said
I never argued that wasn't the case, but to talk of obscene amounts spent by Liverpool and Chelsea is a joke coming from a manc. Torres cost the same as Hargreaves give or take.
You don't get it. It's obscene because for all you've spent in recent years, you've got feck all to show for it.I never argued that wasn't the case, but to talk of obscene amounts spent by Liverpool and Chelsea is a joke coming from a manc. Torres cost the same as Hargreaves give or take.
I would never talk of the obscene amounts spent by Liverpool, as i don't think it is true - I do however take exception to the fans who say he has spent F all at Liverpool.I never argued that wasn't the case, but to talk of obscene amounts spent by Liverpool and Chelsea is a joke coming from a manc. Torres cost the same as Hargreaves give or take.
Only if you include the sale of Luis García to Atleti.I never argued that wasn't the case, but to talk of obscene amounts spent by Liverpool and Chelsea is a joke coming from a manc. Torres cost the same as Hargreaves give or take.
Right, last go, I have a hard day on the golf course.You don't get it. It's obscene because for all you've spent in recent years, you've got feck all to show for it.
You've actually outspent us since the prem began as well, which has to be one of the biggest jokes in football.
Failure is one thing, but failure whilst outspending the side winning the trophies - that's obscene.
True. There would surely be a clearly smaller gap now.Those figures are now out of date. We've got rid of 2 of our biggest earners, whilst you've just increased the contracts of most of your biggest earners, and possibly made Glen Johnson the highest paid full-back in Europe.
One other thing, as a percentage of revenue United have the lowest wage ratio in the entire Premier League. And I don't really mind that we reward our players for success with good contracts. You pay your players £90m a year for feck all. And that's on top of being the biggest transfer spenders outside the billionaires. Obscene, whatever way you look at it Murph.