AXVnee7
Full Member
- Joined
- Jun 11, 2016
- Messages
- 3,393
In which case, how are we going to stop/minimise the gegenpress? Liverpool are very good at itBecause we can just pour water over it.......
In which case, how are we going to stop/minimise the gegenpress? Liverpool are very good at itBecause we can just pour water over it.......
No, they defended better than them in our last game. There's no way Liverpool's defence and keeper are going to keep out as many shots and chances as Stoke somehow managed to. It was a freak defensive performance.Stoke defend better than Liverpool?
So, they conceded many chances and we were vey unlucky not to beat them but they put in a freak defensive performance. Doesn't make any sense.No, they defended better than them in our last game. There's no way Liverpool's defence and keeper are going to keep out as many shots and chances as Stoke somehow managed to. It was a freak defensive performance.
Wow this post says it all really.It's all about damage limitation. If we only lose by two goals, it would be a fantastic result.
It means "counter press" roughly, which basically means it's a way of stopping counter attacks. It's main function though is to win the ball up high while the other team are pushing forward, leaving space and holes in the opponents midfield/defence.What exactly is gegendepressing, what does the word mean and why not just call it pressing?
The question is in the last 15 years (why limit it to 15?) how many time have United gone to Anfield, not played well but still managed to win?In the last 15 years,how many great perfomances can you count from us at Anfield?
In a nutshell, it's basically high intensity running and pressing with a high line across the pitch and fast counter-attacking on the break. This is an example of Klopp's Gegenpressing during his Dortmund days:What exactly is gegendepressing, what does the word mean and why not just call it pressing?
Spielverlagerung provides great insights into gegenpressing, including a proper definition (as Jürgen Klopp would define it). The key element is to win the ball back immediately after it was lost via a structured, coordinated team effort.What exactly is gegendepressing, what does the word mean and why not just call it pressing?
Many more details about gegenpressing and its variations can be found here:Gegenpressing has been a buzzword in football tactics for the last five years and has garnered more and more attention in the media recently. Because of the success of FC Barcelona and Borussia Dortmund, gegen- or counterpressing has been brought up as one of the main reasons for their titles. BVB, in particular, is defined by their style. However, the media often shows a lack of understanding as to what counterpressing really is.
What is Gegenpressing?
Gegenpressing means to press the opposition right after losing possession, i.e. to press as an organized unit the moment you transition to defense. The entire team hunts the ball and, in the ideal case, immediately wins it back from the opponent. The aim is twofold; to prevent the opponent’s counterattack and to win the ball. The English, and even the Spanish and Italians, call it counterpressing and not “Gegenpressing”; in the end the opponent’s counterattack is pressured. In 2008, Jürgen Klinsmann spoke of “immediate ball recovery” and struck at the heart of the matter very well.
IMO, he will get it wrong if he decides to play in this way. What worked vs Brendan in 2015 will harldy work now. We don't even have the players for counter attacks. Ibra and Mata/Rooney aren't the quickest players. Hopefully you are right though.I can see Jose pulling off a tactical masterclass of soaking up pressure and hitting them on the counter. It's his first real test since City he will be determined not to get it so wrong as if we lose this then there could be repercussions.
I certainly hope so. Mourinho is known to be a big game manager as he has an amazing record in the big games. Doesn't he have a great record against Liverpool as well? I remember he always take the piss out of them. If he loses this game, it would just reinforce my belief that he has lost his aura because losing to City and Liverpool, our two biggest rivals doesn't bode well. I couldn't give a toss about losing to City though. I'd rather we lose 1-6 to City again but beat Liverpool home and away. This is why I could still tolerate Van Gaal even though he had us playing so crap because he does well in the big games and if I remember correctly, he has a 100% record against Liverpool in the league.I can see Jose pulling off a tactical masterclass of soaking up pressure and hitting them on the counter. It's his first real test since City he will be determined not to get it so wrong as if we lose this then there could be repercussions.
We've taken 4 points from 4 games and this includes a game against the worst team in the league.The negativity on here is incredible.
How long have some of you been following (a) United and (b) Football.
Wise up lads.
Or four points from two games, to make a less melodramatic selection.We've taken 4 points from 4 games
It does if you use the thing between your ears. Their last-ditch defending and goalkeeping were superb, a one-off compared to their form so far this season. Even with that, we were still probably unfortunate not to get another goal or two.So, they conceded many chances and we were vey unlucky not to beat them but they put in a freak defensive performance. Doesn't make any sense.
If either Rooney or Fellaini plays we will lose.
Agreed. May as well put them in a Liverpool shirt.
Play defensively; play negative football and stop them playing. Mourinho did this against B.Rogers' LFC.In which case, how are we going to stop/minimise the gegenpress? Liverpool are very good at it
I'd want to see this, but Schneiderlin has never really showed up.Martial Zlatan RashfordConcede possession and counter. Classic Mourinho tactics.
Pogba Schneiderlin
Herrera
Blind Smalling Bailly Valencia
deGea
For them yes.Fellaini will play! And he'll be good.
Bollocks!We've taken 4 points from 4 games and this includes a game against the worst team in the league.
Now we will face one of the most in-form teams in the league.
We are not being negative...just realistic.
Last-ditch defending and goalkeeping constitute only a part of a good defence. The more important part is to stop the opposition from creating chances in the first place. Even if one agrees that Stoke's last-ditch defending was freakish (which it wasn't, let us not pretend that their defenders were like Rio and Vida or their keeper like Neuer), their overall defence was anything but solid. There is a reason why they have conceded more goals than any team so far (bar WHam).It does if you use the thing between your ears. Their last-ditch defending and goalkeeping were superb, a one-off compared to their form so far this season. Even with that, we were still probably unfortunate not to get another goal or two.
This is a rubbish argument. Football is not played on paper. Only 3-4 Atleti players would start for Barca or Real or Bayern but as a team they are about the same level as them. It's a game of teams, not of rosters of players. You should have learned more from Leicester winning the league last season. Before the start of the season, no Leicester player would have made the first XI of any top team in England. But they played better football than any top team. Because a team is much more than a roster of footballers.Bollocks!
We were outplayed for a spell by the best team (so far) in the league, we made adjustments and changed the game, should have had a penalty too.
Fair enough we had a bad day at Watford but thats football.How many Liverpool players would get into our team? Personally I might take Clyne and Coutinho but thats it.
Besides we all know the form book goes out the window when we play Liverpool.
He'd be perfect for this kind of game. He's got Pogba for making key passes and Herrera collecting the ball and distributing forwards, he needs to do his thing of running around and tracking players on counters.I'd want to see this, but Schneiderlin has never really showed up.
Like others I think parking the bus and hitting long balls to Zlatan with Rashford and Martial running the channels could do the trick. Liverpool's pressing and counterpressing is best nullified by getting as many bodies behind the ball as possible at all times. Especially their counterpressing is only useful as long as they have space to play into. If United try to build from the back with short passing it could get ugly. United's midfield is simply not on the level of Barca or Bayern in that regard and even those teams have it quite hard at times to move the ball fast enough against sides that are pressing them well. The best chances to score should present themselves when Liverpool try to counterpress and fail at it, because they'll have to commit at least 4 players to the counterpress, which makes them vulnerable. Klopp usually utilizes the fullbacks very high up the pitch so opportunities for United's wingers to exploit the space on either flank should present themselves. For that to result in goalscoring chances it's essential for the first ball to be played accurately and since it's to be expected that the player supposed to play that pass will be pressed intensely that player should be fast on the turn and be able to move the ball on quickly. With that Fellaini, Carrick or Rooney should be nowhere near the starting 11 in that game and Schneiderlin (who turned to shit apparently), too. I'd go with a Herrera, Mata, Pogba midfield with Pogba playing as a #10 to pick up balls won by Zlatan. He can then go for the finish himself or make use of the pacey players on the flanks, with Herrera and Mata covering for him.
--------------------De Gea--------------------
Valencia--------Bailly---------Blind--------Shaw
-----------Mata------------Herrera-------------
Rashford----------Pogba-----------------Martial
--------------------Zlatan---------------------
You may have a point but Arsenal went at Liverpool and were destroyed. The Swansea game was just 45 minutes of discomfort and they couldn't keep it up as they were blown out by 60 minutes.Maybe you are right but Swansea were good vs Liverpool exactly when they pressed them and did not sit back, that is, in the first half. Similarly, Chelsea were good when they started to attack and press them. When they were sitting back, they conceded 2 goals. When both Swansea and Chelsea tried to use the tactics you describe Liverpool had no problems to control the game and were all over them.
But that's my point.The question is in the last 15 years (why limit it to 15?) how many time have United gone to Anfield, not played well but still managed to win?
I struggle to remember any game between the two clubs that could be classed as 'great'.I think the animosity is so great it mitigates against entertaining football.
Off the top of my head I would have to go back to the 3-3 at Anfield in 94 for the last great game.The drawn and replayed cup semis in 85 were great games other than that its been a case of great when we win and horrible when we lose, the result is all.
United are supposed to be better than Swansea and should not be tired already by 60 min.You may have a point but Arsenal went at Liverpool and were destroyed. The Swansea game was just 45 minutes of discomfort and they couldn't keep it up as they were blown out by 60 minutes.
Thanks mateSpielverlagerung provides great insights into gegenpressing, including a proper definition (as Jürgen Klopp would define it). The key element is to win the ball back immediately after it was lost via a structured, coordinated team effort.
Many more details about gegenpressing and its variations can be found here:
http://spielverlagerung.com/2014/10/07/counter-or-gegenpressing/
aye some good matches there! We've been playing pretty well, I tend to run on the notion that form goes out the window for these games though I just don't know what to expect.This one is going to be tough for United... @ArmandTamzarian that's the PES game we keep playing online! LOL.
Mate, you can't use comparisons like this. If we were to go by this logic, then Leicester should have never won the league last season. It's widely acknowledged that Liverpool has already adapted to Klopp's style and they have great team chemistry and are the most in-form team in the league whereas Mourinho has admitted that most of our players are still trapped in Van Gaal's style.Bollocks!
We were outplayed for a spell by the best team (so far) in the league, we made adjustments and changed the game, should have had a penalty too.
Fair enough we had a bad day at Watford but thats football.How many Liverpool players would get into our team? Personally I might take Clyne and Coutinho but thats it.
Besides we all know the form book goes out the window when we play Liverpool.
And you're basing your opinion on the fact that he's Fellaini? Coz under LVG he was good against LivershiteFor them yes.
Anthony Taylor