Recent content by eddiegordo

He needs to go.

Overall by career medals/trophies, longevity etc sure. Actual natural ability and talent I don't think so, R9 is probably the most talented attacking player in history.

Late to the convo, but my take: Brazilian Ronaldo is the most complete forward to ever play football, and injuries aside at his greatest potential would be the most influential player in any team. Reasoning: He came at the end of an era where football was still more physical than present day...

The mods banned me, all the posters are saying I ran away from the debate, including the mods who aren't telling anyone they banned me :) Could make a second account to point out their dishonesty but why bother, it's just amazing how childish that forum is.

Martial and Rashford on the pitch together isn't good imo, at least not without a great striker to be in position for them to lay it off too. Right now they are both good at making runs into the box but there is no end product.

Among the things I said were asking for which of United's penalties shouldn't have been, stating we got 6 to their 5, asking why no one was complaining about penalties in the multitude of seasons where Liverpool got the most, and most in premier league history etc. All the responses either...

They just banned me from the forum for being WUM when I was being pretty civil, pretty shocking I get banned for what I wrote as even the people replying were having a discussion, must have got an arsehole mod.

Bit of reality This one is glorious The videos are being tailored to suit united? I think his brain is trying to say we are actually being awarded fair penalties, he might get there eventually.

Again, I replied your PMs, but you need to stop with all your strawman arguments. No one is denying that social expectations, environment, diet etc effect athletic performance. No one once said that, what people are saying that in despite of this, the numbers are still overwhelming and genetics...

Could it be possible US-Asians study more, because they are more intelligent or are raised by more intelligent people? My point being, it is very likely both genetics and environment, and it's not rocket science to assume smarter parents are going to create a more intelligent learning...

I think you are trying to say genetic differences within human populations have more variance than between populations, which is one of the reason we don't classify races as species.

It depends in what context, I was speaking in regards to individuals in a single population/country, in which environmental factors are going to vary far less. The effect of environment on IQ between someone who lives in a rainforest and someone who has had a modern education is massive, this is...

Because people try overstating factors to justify an inherent bias or belief. Again, all those factors you listed don't explain the disparity in black sporting ability compared to other races. If systematic racism holds black people back so much in education, how come in exactly the same...

Again, someone talking about racism making massive assumptions and generalizations. Shock. No, we don't get to decide when a debate is over, very few people do in reality. But people who generally have an upper hand in an intellectual battle, won't resort to 'because I am smarter than you' OR...

What made you assume I am a casual thinker on this subject? Socrates once said; "when the debate is lost, slander becomes the tool of the loser" Again, if you have an intelligent response to what I said, please state it, if the best response you can come up with is the above, you already lost...