Bale or Cavani, which is the better deal?

sammsky1

Pochettino's #1 fan
Joined
Feb 10, 2008
Messages
32,841
Location
London
Bale is going to be a massive hit at Spurs will help Mourinho get them into top 4.

Have no idea about Cavani.
 

Born2Lose

Full Member
Joined
Feb 8, 2015
Messages
2,554
Depends on injuries, as a Welsh football fan I can't say that Bale is the same player he once was though.

Thing I like the most about Cavani is the graft I see him put in anytime I've seen him for PSG or Uruguay. I do think he'll be a good influence on Rashford, Greenwood and Martial
 

Pink Moon

Full Member
Joined
Aug 20, 2009
Messages
8,283
Location
Glasgow
Supports
Celtic
I think Bale.

He's the better player, has better teammates, a better manager and providing he stays fit will start more games. His fitness is a huge question mark though.

Cavani will be excellent in away games against teams like City and Liverpool imo. He's good on the counter and works incredibly hard for the team but I think he might struggle in the home games against the lesser sides because he needs space to be really effective and teams tend to park the bus at Old Trafford and try and hit on the counter. Although if chances are made for him I back him to put more away than Martial will.
 

Ish

Lights on for Luke
Joined
Mar 10, 2010
Messages
32,190
Location
Voted the best city in the world
Of course he can, I was comparing best case escenarios. There's a good chance Cavani scores 15 goals as a sub while Bale only generates problems in his team.

If Cavani ends up scoring 20 goals this year, or even 30, he will be helping the club and can be extended for another year (an option that Tottenham don't have, right?). What I mean is that he can't turn out to be a perfect signing, because he isn't supposed to be the starting 9 of United, if things go right, that spot is for Martial, younger and potentially better than what a 34 or 35 y/o Cavani could offer. If Cavani turn 10 years back in time this season, it will cost Martial, a player that should be United's future, gaming time and spotlight.

But if Bale goes back to his better level, Tottenham will lose what, a season of Lucas Moura and would leave next year being 29? That's not a great deal, and Moura leaving would be debatable, since if Bale performs like that he will be back at Real Madrid and Moura will become the first option right away.
Yeah, i agree with the overall point that Bale's transfer is, from the off, a much higher advantage for Spurs as he was probably brought in to go straight into improving the first XI. Whereas Cavani wasn't, IMO.
 

UpWithRivers

Full Member
Joined
Dec 30, 2013
Messages
3,651
Bale is the better player at this point in time. But Cavani suited us more. We needed another striker.
 

Mount's Goatieson

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Jun 23, 2020
Messages
545
Supports
Chelsea
I'd say Bale hands down, esp if he can get his fitness up and consistently. Bale will slot in perfectly in Spurs front 3 of Son, Kane and Bale.
Although Cavani is obviously better than everyone United have as CF and should easily make that starting role his own, United’s lack of balance in attack will per his effectiveness a bit. They needed a WC right winger to balance things out. A front three of Martial - Cavani - Sancho/Dembele would have been great with Rashford and Greenwood deputising from the bench.

Cavani will be a great asset to United if they can get the balance right, although its funny to see some posters who were getting their knickers in a twist over Chelsea signing Tiago Silva, a CB apparently happy with United signing 33 yr Cavani, a CF to play in the PL. I think both will do just fine though.
 

harms

Shining Star of Paektu Mountain
Staff
Joined
Apr 8, 2014
Messages
28,027
Location
Moscow
More importantly, Cavani was a panic buy, Bale's transfer was more calculated.
The question is, by whom. By all indications this transfer was Levy’s idea and not Mourinho’s, for whom it’s very much a public statement of Spurs’ new status. Also, Bale has kicked up a fuss at Madrid for being stuck on the wing and not centrally, do people think that he’ll settle for a lesser role at Spurs?

Overall, I think, it’s a question of motivation. If Bale is motivated, he can still become one of league’s best players. I’m not sure if Cavani has it him anymore, but I think we’ll see more effort from him – and he’s probably going to be available for us for more games. Hopefully.
 

HackeyC

Full Member
Joined
Dec 31, 2018
Messages
532
Whichever one ends up injured less is surely the answer.
 

el3mel

Full Member
Joined
Oct 23, 2016
Messages
43,735
Location
Egypt
Gareth Bale. Loan deal + they are only paying 40% of his wages. Brilliant business.
 

GlasgowCeltic

Full Member
Joined
Jan 3, 2006
Messages
5,308
It’s a bit strange to call this when Bale is younger, has obviously been amongst the best in the world at one point and he has tons of experience in the Premier League. Cavani is older and has never played in the Premier League, there is no guarantee with him. Has played the last seasons in a significiantly weaker league against pub teams relative to PSG. Before he rose to the top a few years ago, he was actually ridiculed a lot for missing a lot of chances. Lots of YouTube-videos and memes going about, there was this one match where he missed like eight sitters. Not playing down his highest level 3 years back, I think he was a heavenly player - but not anymore though. When you’re replaced by Choupo-Moting, it kind of sends a message.

Perhaps the word you’re looking for is «hope» rather than «think».
yes no arguments here, mostly hope and the suspicion Bales body won’t hold up. No doubts Bales ceiling is arguably best player in the league level, although I do think Cavani could make an Etoo at Chelsea type contribution
 
Joined
May 22, 2017
Messages
13,122
Gareth Bale. Loan deal + they are only paying 40% of his wages. Brilliant business.
A loan deal and a one year contract are very similar. In terms of costs, by all accounts they are similar.

Both have a lot to prove. Bale has the greater expectation as a guaranteed starter of fit, Cavani doesn’t have that expectation.
 

GazTheLegend

Full Member
Joined
Jul 22, 2014
Messages
3,646
I would prefer to wait until they both have touched the ball for a few times for their clubs, but I suppose Bale is a better deal currently because it's not who we got.
:lol: :lol: :lol:

Spot on. Redcafe logic:. Opposition team gets completely obliterated? It's just a blip. We get obliterated? SIGN OF ROT FROM TOP TO BOTTOM. Opposition team signs player who we were linked with spuriously? Utter failure on scouting team, heads should roll. We sign young wonderkid rated by all top clubs across Europe? Literally who are they anyway, we need players -nnnnnnooooow- (Daddy want want want). Opposition team signs free transfer legend? It's a gamble that will probably pay off, no risk after all. We sign free transfer legend? USELESS, WHAT WERE OUR SCOUTING Team doing it's a HUGE RISK.
 

el3mel

Full Member
Joined
Oct 23, 2016
Messages
43,735
Location
Egypt
A loan deal and a one year contract are very similar. In terms of costs, by all accounts they are similar.

Both have a lot to prove. Bale has the greater expectation as a guaranteed starter of fit, Cavani doesn’t have that expectation.
Spurs aren't paying the full Gareth Bale wages. Madrid will pay most of it. It's very, very low risk signing. Succeeds, great, flops, no problem.
 
Joined
May 22, 2017
Messages
13,122
Spurs aren't paying the full Gareth Bale wages. Madrid will pay most of it. It's very, very low risk signing. Succeeds, great, flops, no problem.
So they are paying 40% of £400-500k per week? By all account Cavani is in the region of £170-200k.

So both are in the same ballpark in terms of costs.

Both are similar, both risks worth taking from both clubs.
 

el3mel

Full Member
Joined
Oct 23, 2016
Messages
43,735
Location
Egypt
So they are paying 40% of £400-500k per week? By all account Cavani is in the region of £170-200k.

So both are in the same ballpark in terms of costs.

Both are similar, both risks worth taking from both clubs.
I'm not saying Cavani is bad business. I'm actually very excited to see him in our shirt here, but I think Spurs made brilliant business with getting Bale at such terms.
 

roonster09

Hercule Poirot of the scouting world
Scout
Joined
May 10, 2009
Messages
36,723
So they are paying 40% of £400-500k per week? By all account Cavani is in the region of £170-200k.

So both are in the same ballpark in terms of costs.

Both are similar, both risks worth taking from both clubs.
As per Whitwell, Cavani earns around 150-155K per week. Simon Stone said Manutd wont be paying the rumored 10 million agent fee, its less than that.
 

treble_winner

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Jun 23, 2020
Messages
288
Bale to Tottenham, Cavani to Utd, two high profile expensive signings.

At this point in time, which football club do you think has made the better signing?
Bale may have an exceptional season with Spurs. May even win this season's top assists prize.
But I'm fairly sure had he come to United, he would have been a crook ravaged with injuries and actually makes Phil Jones looks fit. We are just...cursed.
 
Joined
May 22, 2017
Messages
13,122
I'm not saying Cavani is bad business. I'm actually very excited to see him in our shirt here, but I think Spurs made brilliant business with getting Bale at such terms.
I agree. I like Bale, and did think he would have been a good option for us. I’d really like to see him do well, and stick 2 fingers up to his critics and to Real. I was just really trying to point on that the two players are probably costing similar amounts.

If both can play regularly and play well, then they will be very exciting for the PL.

The interesting question around Bale is that if he does well, do spurs have an option to buy him, and will Bale go for a perm transfer on massively reduced wages?
 

The White Pele

Full Member
Joined
Dec 2, 2006
Messages
4,948
Question is, if Bale had been available yesterday would we have been taking a punt on him rather than Cavani?

And if so should we have acted sooner knowing BVB’s position on Sancho?
 

GlastonSpur

Also disliked on an Aston Villa forum
Joined
Feb 4, 2007
Messages
17,716
Supports
Spurs
The irony is United have a bigger gap for a fit Bale and Spurs have a bigger gap for a fit Cavani. United needed a right winger all summer, Spurs needed another centre forward.
We signed one.
 

marktan

Full Member
Joined
Aug 28, 2017
Messages
6,933
Bale is the better player by far but his legs couldn't support the body of a 2 year old without getting injured, whereas Cavani is a ballerina and is rarely injured so by default will be the better deal
 

Mercurial

Full Member
Joined
Jun 11, 2017
Messages
2,369
Bale to Tottenham, Cavani to Utd, two high profile expensive signings.

At this point in time, which football club do you think has made the better signing?
Bale won it all and play well in the big games, but does he have any hunger left? He is automatically picked for his NT.
If he stays healthy he is great and in an environment where he is loved.

Cavani has a hunger to play in the WC and used to be relentless, and a model pro. Hopefully he is still motivated to excell and will bring his best if he stays healthy. He faded out and never reached the glory he deserved.

I'd pick Bale but its a toss up.
Bale for us wouldn't have been as good as he will be for Spuds I'd reckon.
 

GMoore23

Full Member
Joined
Apr 22, 2014
Messages
3,525
I think Cavani will have a much better season. Bale is an absolute crock, made of glass. Cavani was rarely ever injured in his career up until the last year or so when the game started to catch up with him. I honestly think the fact that Cavani hasn't played in 7 months is a bonus. His body has had plenty of time to recover from season after season of running himself into the ground.
I'm praying we see a fresh and rejuvenated Cavani because he's one of those players who can make others around him look better also. Such a hard worker with the quality to back it up.
 

balaks

Full Member
Joined
Feb 25, 2014
Messages
15,335
Location
Northern Ireland
Supports
Tottenham Hotspur
Too early to say but from the outset I'd say both are potentially very good signings for both clubs but for me Bale has the edge because he is a 100% starter in our first 11 if fit but I'm not sure Cavani is, he is more about squad depth than improving your team.
 

RU Devil

Full Member
Joined
Feb 24, 2008
Messages
2,123
Location
New Jersey, USA
I'd have to lean towards Bale being a better pickup. He has a lot to prove & will not lack motivation, while Cavani is more likely a sub/stop gap. Yeah, we needed another forward, but Ole wasn't using Ighalo that much and I'm not so sure about Cavani's 'motivation' besides a last big payday. Can he fit a role that this team uses? TBH, I haven't watched Cavani over the years, but my impression was of a poacher, not a creator or someone really involved in the buildup. Does he give the team another way to play or can he improve our attack as it stands?

Bale is in a great position to succeed. If he can get relatively healthy, figure he'd be good for 10+ goals, especially if Mou actually eases up on the reins like he did vs Utd on Sunday. Big IF, but still, he'd be a good outlet.
 

Goku23

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Jan 16, 2018
Messages
211
If Cavani stays fir I think Cavani I honestly think Bale has had it in the general sense he can do the odd magical thing still but not consistent like he used to
 

Scroto Baggins

Full Member
Joined
Jul 20, 2017
Messages
2,344
Supports
Newcastle Jets
Both are has beens.

Guess I am going to say Bale, who will play once a week for 60-70mins or just line up to smash Europa League pub teams. Lets face it his body probably cannot take any more than that. On a financial note for Spurs, it is a loan deal so they are not committed on the purchase, and as people have noted RM are still paying 40% of his wages.
 

Champagne Football

New Member
Joined
Nov 28, 2015
Messages
4,187
Location
El Beatle
Bale will be going home. Surrounded by all his old mates and family. Will not need a settling in period or to learn a new language. I think the signing of Bale has single-handedly saved Jose's ass as it has given the Spurs players a huge lift now that the best player Spurs has ever had is returning.

I think Bale will be a revelation if he stays injury free. I wish we'd signed him.

We have no idea if Cavani will be a Falcao or a Zlatan. Somewhere in between i'd imagine. We haven't had too much luck with South Americans. But physically he is a monster so should be able to handle himself right away.
 

shaky

Full Member
Joined
Jan 6, 2014
Messages
2,515
Hard to tell right now. Bale will be quite content to sit on his arse without playing though. Not sure if Cavani will, or if he'll get upset if he's not on the pitch enough.
 

cjj

Full Member
Joined
Apr 15, 2017
Messages
697
Supports
Spurs
Bale will be quite content to sit on his arse without playing though
I very much doubt that. He didn't swap sunny Spain for an English winter to not play.
 

Cloud7

Full Member
Joined
Jan 11, 2016
Messages
12,833
There is literally no possible way to know this until we've seen both players play
 

GlastonSpur

Also disliked on an Aston Villa forum
Joined
Feb 4, 2007
Messages
17,716
Supports
Spurs
Bale will be going home. Surrounded by all his old mates and family. Will not need a settling in period or to learn a new language. I think the signing of Bale has single-handedly saved Jose's ass as it has given the Spurs players a huge lift now that the best player Spurs has ever had is returning.

I think Bale will be a revelation if he stays injury free. I wish we'd signed him.

We have no idea if Cavani will be a Falcao or a Zlatan. Somewhere in between i'd imagine. We haven't had too much luck with South Americans. But physically he is a monster so should be able to handle himself right away.
I guess you've never heard of Jimmy Greaves (for example) ... you know, the man who scored more top flight goals in England than anyone, ever. Or maybe Danny Blanchflower rings a bell? Or Dave Mackay? Or several others I could name.
 

GlastonSpur

Also disliked on an Aston Villa forum
Joined
Feb 4, 2007
Messages
17,716
Supports
Spurs
Both are has beens.

Guess I am going to say Bale, who will play once a week for 60-70mins or just line up to smash Europa League pub teams. Lets face it his body probably cannot take any more than that. On a financial note for Spurs, it is a loan deal so they are not committed on the purchase, and as people have noted RM are still paying 40% of his wages.
60%