Same is true of Arsenal.
Starting to think they were both invited so kicking out the teams that went through with this became harder for the PL
Basically this:
European Super League
- Thread starter esmufc07
- Start date
Starting to think they were both invited so kicking out the teams that went through with this became harder for the PL
Basically this:
We were invited for our stadium no doubt, but I don’t see how it would be more accepted with us out of it. How ANYONE can support a league where the founding teams are treated differently than the other invited clubs is beyond me, it’s just wrong on so many levels.
That makes the idea a nonstarter.
UEFA Congress meeting live stream
Honestly I couldn't give feck who's in it. They're all c*nts as far as I'm concerned.
It's bad public relations for Red Bull, that's the only reason they are not joining. Leipzig, Salzburg, New York RB, Liefering and all their farm teams in the lower Austrian leagues only exist for Red Bull's global image. Joining this Super League after the shitstorm it created in the last couple of days would be the last thing they would want.
Oh completely.
Spurs were invited because they're one of the 10 richest clubs in Europe.
The rest of the top 10 richest clubs were also invited. Shocking, I know.
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Hit the cnuty owners where it'll hurt most; "fine" them the 300m they'll get for participating in the ESL.
On what grounds will the 14 actually kick them out? They dont want to participate in CL and want to play in their own league. Other 14 are free to play in CL organised by UEFA. Nothing is changed in domestic league. If they try to kick out, courts will overrule them and most of the litigation will actually end up on these 14 clubs.
Its exactly what they signed up for.
You would think we'd spend more money the lower we are on the table. That's basic sense. For us t be low it means its a crisis.
My heart bleeds for them.
Disagree about Arsenal being put in the same category as Tottenham
Was done with FC Utd and that hasn’t turned out as badly as some predicted.
If you still want to be invested in a football club then grass roots is the way to go. I get as much pleasure watching my son play U12s as any Utd game, so I’ll go with that.
If you haven’t got a kid, I wouldn’t recommend just turning up at a kids game though
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
no shit!From a sporting perspective, they absolutely are in the same category. In fact, Spurs have been generally better over the last five years or so.
More PR. Every club knew what was going to happen. This is just face saving measure to blame the select few. After all the English press is already decided who the bigger culprit is and who was the saviour of Englisg football.
I’ll wager Utd execs aren’t in that group.. the cnuts
I'd say Gothenberg are raging at not getting the invite.
It just shows how out of touch these guys are, what exactly did they expect would happen. They drop this bomb by a series of written announcements without consulting players, managers or fans.
But you said the only problem is the lack of relegation for founder teams, I read that as you saying it's a minor issue. You also said you want to see more exciting matches in European competition, how do you propose that happens?
We need Ole to come out and say it’s “ not fantastick”
Every club concerned is complicit. If they weren't aware of how big a backlash this would cause they're either woefully ignorant of the feeling of fans and of the wider footballing community, or they just don't care.
But then that’d be unfair on the 14.
I can see our Ed being surprised by the backlash, the gormless kindergartener in a suit that he is.
They know this collapses without the English clubs. City and Chelsea will drop out I think.
I will probably carry on watching football on TV, just not United. Maybe all the players should put in transfer requests or see if their contracts are now binding. Would they have to sign new contracts as in a different league. I would laugh if their contract are voided and they just all walk out.Was done with FC Utd and that hasn’t turned out as badly as some predicted.
If you still want to be invested in a football club then grass roots is the way to go. I get as much pleasure watching my son play U12s as any Utd game, so I’ll go with that.
If you haven’t got a kid, I wouldn’t recommend just turning up at a kids game though
They have been pretty average for the last 15 years though. Historically a much bigger club of course but still a tier below the others in that group, having not won EC/CL in their history (I know City haven't either but they are obscenely rich of course).
So he should just shut up?
I’m glad he’s being so vocal and hopefully many more will follow him
I'm no admirer of UEFA and I thought their plans for the CL were stupid and they clearly didn't address what the big clubs/markets needed. They did indeed forget who is paying for the party. That said, this SL concept is far worse.
A glorified invitation cup calling itself Super and looking enviously at the global gaming market to replace actual fans? And hat if they actually did pull this off - dragged a few more teams into the mire with them - how sustainable is that?
In reality, a whole bunch of the biggest names in football would have nothing to play for by Christmas. Without the novelty value (which is after all, all this is about) Spurs v AC Milan wont mean much, with these structures quite rapidly we'll reach the same point with United v Real Madrid. Initially it'll sounds like the clasico on steroids - play these matches all the time and they're just games. They won't even have the novelty value of playing a Leeds or a Burnley and being pushed to the wire by a local rival who "you should beat".
I don't see the attraction as a matchgoer and season ticket holder. The clubs don't care about their legacy fans? Fair enough, I'll save my money and not care then.
A glorified invitation cup calling itself Super and looking enviously at the global gaming market to replace actual fans? And hat if they actually did pull this off - dragged a few more teams into the mire with them - how sustainable is that?
In reality, a whole bunch of the biggest names in football would have nothing to play for by Christmas. Without the novelty value (which is after all, all this is about) Spurs v AC Milan wont mean much, with these structures quite rapidly we'll reach the same point with United v Real Madrid. Initially it'll sounds like the clasico on steroids - play these matches all the time and they're just games. They won't even have the novelty value of playing a Leeds or a Burnley and being pushed to the wire by a local rival who "you should beat".
I don't see the attraction as a matchgoer and season ticket holder. The clubs don't care about their legacy fans? Fair enough, I'll save my money and not care then.
Fantastic statement.
My money is in Liverpool being the first to drop out.
What a glorious and powerful statement. Respect.
Having the so called top 20 clubs( whom ever they may be) doesn’t guarantee exciting matches. With no relegation or promotion it will just become like the MLB or NFL where if you’re bottom and shite so be it, there’ll just be an overhaul of staff and players and support for you to get major players the following season.
A draft in football for the ESL is the next step
If they do, Utd will as well.
Where will they draft players from though. We don't have a college system here. Any players belong to other professional teams.