Yes, but just because ETH was supposed to be this or that, it doesn't suddenly make Ole's tenure good.
Unfortunately that's what's happened with us every single time: a manager starts to fail badly after maybe showing some promise; people start saying that the previous manager was better; but then it goes too far, the revisionism starts and people genuinely try to make out that maybe the previous manager was actually pretty decent. That's when it gets ridiculous.
The problem with judging worst to least worst is that it's very much subjective and each list will have variations. Its a sad state of affairs that after ten years and multiple managers, we don't actually have one that stands out as being successful. ETH has been a massive disappointment, but that doesn't mean that anyone before him should be painted in a better light. Plenty of managers fail after massive hype, it is what it is. Let's hope now that we've gotten our house in order, things will start to look better. I very much doubt that ETH will be here next season.