Antony image 21

Antony Brazil flag

2023-24 Performances


View full 2023-24 profile

4.7 Season Average Rating
Appearances
36
Goals
3
Assists
2
Yellow cards
6

lsd

The Oracle
Joined
Jun 5, 2016
Messages
10,866
Bad investments in the Premier League, there must always be the Fernando Torres to Chelsea.

Yes but Torres did prove himself and in the premiership as well

Pretty much everyone bar Ten Hag knew Antony wasn't good enough but he insisted on buying him.

Antony is by far the worst transfer in premiership history
 

Wilt

Full Member
Joined
May 22, 2017
Messages
6,721
He’s still under Brazil police investigation. If he ends up in court we’ll be lucky to sell for a bag of chips.

Get rid ASAP.
 

r0663664

Worships Man City
Joined
Aug 9, 2012
Messages
2,681
Location
Singapore
Antony wouldn't even be part of City, Arsenal or Liverpool bench, that's how bad this transfer is. Anyonewho signed off this transfer should be sack and that include ETH. I can't even believe he decided that Antony is United RW for the now and future. He has coached him and seen him trained daily, surely he knows what level Antony is. ETH underestimated the league and now he suffer the consequences. I always think hiring a EPL proven manager is important. There are some successful managers but more often you have many managers that failed. United unfortunately picked many that failed.
 

Yagami

Good post resistant
Joined
Jan 27, 2013
Messages
13,525
Every single person who signed off on this transfer for 80m should be investigated for criminal fraud.
It was celebrated at the time. I remember everyone insulting me after he scored on his debut against Arsenal saying how wrong I was.
 

NotChatGPT

Brownfinger
Joined
Jul 3, 2023
Messages
569
Antony wouldn't even be part of City, Arsenal or Liverpool bench, that's how bad this transfer is. Anyonewho signed off this transfer should be sack and that include ETH. I can't even believe he decided that Antony is United RW for the now and future. He has coached him and seen him trained daily, surely he knows what level Antony is. ETH underestimated the league and now he suffer the consequences. I always think hiring a EPL proven manager is important. There are some successful managers but more often you have many managers that failed. United unfortunately picked many that failed.
Yes, Mancester City, Liverpool and Arsenal have definetely proved the importance of hiring an EPL proven manager.

Also: Just because a player has turned out to be a bit of a disaster, it doesn't mean there weren't logic behind signing him in the first place.
 

TheGhostOfJamesJoyce

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Mar 2, 2024
Messages
9
Location
Sweden
Given the price tag; this has the be on of our worst (if not the worst) transfers ever? I cannot lie, I was excited when we signed him (convinced by carefully curated YT compilations and an abundance of adrenaline), but Jesus Chris, he is bad - like genuinely, absolutely, terribly awful.

Is there anything he can do? He makes Valenica look like he was genetically gifted with two supremely working feet. Just WOW.

What is it with this club and signing the worst Brazilian football players to ever grace the field?

Honestly, 20 millions pounds at this stage and we should bite their hands off if someone is gullible enough to offer even that.

Just awful business all around. Awful, awful, awful. Seriously, the awfulness can not be stressed enough.
 

r0663664

Worships Man City
Joined
Aug 9, 2012
Messages
2,681
Location
Singapore
Yes, Mancester City, Liverpool and Arsenal have definetely proved the importance of hiring an EPL proven manager.

Also: Just because a player has turned out to be a bit of a disaster, it doesn't mean there weren't logic behind signing him in the first place.
What logic? If it is a 20-30M punt and we hope that he adapt well and become successful, not at close to 90M. Ronaldo was a good punt and it works out well. Pellestri was even consider a good gamble even if it doesn't works out, not for 80+M.
 

Blood Mage

Full Member
Joined
Aug 25, 2019
Messages
5,961
Not good enough but I do think he'd look better in a possession oriented team with a clearly defined style of play. This counter-attack, quick transition football does not suit him at all, he doesn't have the pace or strength needed.
 

OL29

Full Member
Joined
Sep 17, 2010
Messages
3,605
Location
Manchester
Is he the biggest flop in PL history considering his fee? Off the top of my head I can't recall a player that made such a low impact, close to zero input since he's arrived.
He and Sancho have been the worst, for United at least.
 

afatzp

Full Member
Joined
Nov 29, 2016
Messages
236
Whenever there is news about Murtough willing to stay and play other role in Man Utd I would be laughing hard. Depends on his skills and knowledge to make this 100M deal + 200K/week salary offer for Anthony, he should have been sacked right away.

The blame is not about ETH wants Anthony but should be on Murtough for no negotiation skills nor sense of value in the football market. ETH might think getting Anthony for 25M then he still had budget to replace GK / MC position last season.
 

amolbhatia50k

Sneaky bum time - Vaccination status: dozed off
Joined
Nov 8, 2002
Messages
95,757
Location
india
160 odd million on this fellow and Sancho. What a complete and utter waste.
 

MadDogg

Full Member
Joined
Apr 24, 2002
Messages
15,966
Location
Manchester Utd never lose, just run out of time
Is he the biggest flop in PL history considering his fee? Off the top of my head I can't recall a player that made such a low impact, close to zero input since he's arrived.
Sancho was much worse.

Antony was decent enough last season. Obviously not worth anywhere near what we paid for him and not as good as what we wanted, but he was rightfully our first choice right winger and played his part in the build-up, defensively and team shape and style. It was comfortably a better season than any Sancho has had here. Antony then started this season terribly, but just as there were signs he was starting to get back to last seasons form he had the issue in Brazil and he's never recovered since then.

If we're talking purely transfer fee then Antony was worse since he was so obviously overpriced (whereas Sancho's fee made sense), but in regards to the impact they had once they joined the club then Sancho was definitely worse.
 

RedRocket9908

Full Member
Joined
Feb 7, 2023
Messages
2,364
Location
Manchester
Is he the biggest flop in PL history considering his fee? Off the top of my head I can't recall a player that made such a low impact, close to zero input since he's arrived.
No he isnt, Sancho is a bigger flop plus Chelsea have 3 or 4 more expensive players like Enzo who've flopped massively.

I honestly dont understand this agenda a lot of our fans have against Antony, its ridiculous.
 

Sarni

nice guy, unassuming, objective United fan.
Joined
Jan 21, 2004
Messages
57,717
Location
Krakow
No he isnt, Sancho is a bigger flop plus Chelsea have 3 or 4 more expensive players like Enzo who've flopped massively.

I honestly dont understand this agenda a lot of our fans have against Antony, its ridiculous.
Enzo is an OK player and came to Chelsea on the back of a great World Cup, considered as one of the best young midfielders in Europe. Also with Sancho you at least knew why we were paying so much, he was great at Dortmund and considered one of the brightest young talents in Europe at the time.

Antony wasn’t even that good at Ajax and was never considered among top talents. There’s no agenda against Antony, he’s just a distinctly mediocre footballer.
 

Lay

Correctly predicted Italy to win Euro 2020
Joined
Jan 29, 2013
Messages
20,036
Location
England
No he isnt, Sancho is a bigger flop plus Chelsea have 3 or 4 more expensive players like Enzo who've flopped massively.

I honestly dont understand this agenda a lot of our fans have against Antony, its ridiculous.
What agenda?
 

dabronxolivera

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Oct 22, 2022
Messages
172
Supports
Al Hilal
Bad investments in the Premier League, there must always be the Fernando Torres to Chelsea.
Torres was ripping the league with the scousers before his injury and eventual move to Chelsea so I think we can excuse them for that one. Also he scored some vital goals and ended up winning CL with them. I cannot foresee a future where Antony won a CL with us ever. Maybe Shevchenko ? Even then he came there with a huge pedigree unlike Antony who was a nothing man. Also iirc he was donezo because of injury not for lack of skills
 

BelfastRed2021

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Oct 26, 2021
Messages
114
As shite as he has been and the ludicris fee to say hes been worse than Sancho is nonsense unlike Sancho the effort is there but still how on earth we got pur pants pulled down for the fee we paid and wages should be investigated thoroughly and the culprits sacked with immediate effect.
 

lex talionis

Full Member
Joined
Jul 25, 2017
Messages
14,018
Antony may well indeed exceed Alexis as the greatest flop in PL history, but Sancho is right on Antony’s heels.
 

NoPace

Full Member
Joined
Jan 20, 2014
Messages
9,419
I looked at it and my guess is in the end it will be

1) Sancho
2) Nicolas Pepe
3) Antony

once they're sold, though it may come down to which of Sancho or Antony will take a pay cut/get an offer they like to get a proper move and restart their careers.
 

Kingofwinners

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Jan 15, 2022
Messages
158
Antony is not the greatest flop ever, his attitude is good, can help the defence, scored a couple of good goals. If we had got him for 20 to 30 M on reasonable wages I think most would be happy to wait and see for a bit longer. If he didn’t work out he could clearly do a great job in a weaker league and be worth the same fee (20 to 30). All in all that would be ok business.

The issue is the stupid fee and wages, maybe Ten Hag should have said not at that price but he is not or should not be the one primarily responsible for setting fees. I can see how late in a window with a weak squad and some under motivated personalities he liked the idea of a motivated young player coming in.

i don‘t like blaming the lad himself either (ignoring for now off the field issues that I know nothing about). Anyone would take the money if offered and whenever he gets a game he tries to the best of his ability. He just isn’t a 50 m + player but there’s probably 100s of worse premier league players that costed 20 m + which is the bracket he should be in if some clown didn’t agree a stupid fee.

The never using his right foot has me completely confused though, no matter how bad he is with it if he even tried cutting right or crossing with it from the right wing even say one time in ten, it would force defenders to cover that option. That’s on the manager, Antony seems to follow instructions so I can only assume he has not been told to do it.
 

didz

Full Member
Joined
May 17, 2014
Messages
1,737
Antony is not the greatest flop ever, his attitude is good, can help the defence, scored a couple of good goals. If we had got him for 20 to 30 M on reasonable wages I think most would be happy to wait and see for a bit longer. If he didn’t work out he could clearly do a great job in a weaker league and be worth the same fee (20 to 30). All in all that would be ok business.

The issue is the stupid fee and wages, maybe Ten Hag should have said not at that price but he is not or should not be the one primarily responsible for setting fees. I can see how late in a window with a weak squad and some under motivated personalities he liked the idea of a motivated young player coming in.

i don‘t like blaming the lad himself either (ignoring for now off the field issues that I know nothing about). Anyone would take the money if offered and whenever he gets a game he tries to the best of his ability. He just isn’t a 50 m + player but there’s probably 100s of worse premier league players that costed 20 m + which is the bracket he should be in if some clown didn’t agree a stupid fee.

The never using his right foot has me completely confused though, no matter how bad he is with it if he even tried cutting right or crossing with it from the right wing even say one time in ten, it would force defenders to cover that option. That’s on the manager, Antony seems to follow instructions so I can only assume he has not been told to do it.
It's not so much the never using his right foot that gets me. It's that he does/did have solutions to his one-footedness in his arsenal but he elects not to use them. At Ajax he used the outside of his boot quite regularly for cutbacks and he has quick enough feet to get enough space for a cross with his instep. When he cuts infield from deeper, he's also got a good disguised through ball on him.

It is just plain weird that he very rarely does any of these things any more. He wants to wind up a full shot and when he can't, it's turnback Tony time.
 

Beachryan

More helpful with spreadsheets than Phurry
Joined
May 13, 2010
Messages
11,690
If Antony had cost the 25m the scouts had apparently recommended, I could just about squint and say he's okay for that (any legal issues aside). He's still young, has some clear talent and has a good work ethic. I feel like we could work with that if he wasn't the huge bet for the future of our right side.

He's nowhere near the worst signing in the prem though. I mean, look at someone like Mendy, or was it Claudio Bravo that basically was 40m straight in and out at City? Hell, City and Chelsea have signed players for big money that basically never even played for them.

But never forget the greatest (financial) signing in history: one Jon Obi Mikel. We made like 12m (a Ronaldo fee, at the time) for like a week's work :)
 

Ibi Dreams

Full Member
Joined
Oct 23, 2010
Messages
6,181
It's not so much the never using his right foot that gets me. It's that he does/did have solutions to his one-footedness in his arsenal but he elects not to use them. At Ajax he used the outside of his boot quite regularly for cutbacks and he has quick enough feet to get enough space for a cross with his instep. When he cuts infield from deeper, he's also got a good disguised through ball on him.

It is just plain weird that he very rarely does any of these things any more. He wants to wind up a full shot and when he can't, it's turnback Tony time.
He used to try crossing but I can't remember a single time that anyone ever got on to one of them. Maybe he's given up on it because of that. It seemed to be a strength of his at Ajax, based on his YouTube highlights
 

Andycoleno9

matchday malcontent
Joined
Mar 4, 2017
Messages
29,002
Location
Croatia
Erik said ; “I have experience knowing he is unstoppable. Within the first ten yards, he is among the fastest players"

:confused::confused:
 

Eugenius

Full Member
Joined
May 10, 2009
Messages
3,933
Location
Behind You
Erik said ; “I have experience knowing he is unstoppable. Within the first ten yards, he is among the fastest players"

:confused::confused:
He's trying to put an arm around him obviously. He's not going to say he's rubbish. But he's firmly been dropped and clearly doesn't have his trust.
 

Valencia Shin Crosses

Full Member
Joined
Sep 30, 2015
Messages
6,787
Location
"Martial...He's isolated Skrtel here..."
No he isnt, Sancho is a bigger flop plus Chelsea have 3 or 4 more expensive players like Enzo who've flopped massively.

I honestly dont understand this agenda a lot of our fans have against Antony, its ridiculous.
Enzo :lol:

He's largely been one of Chelsea's best players since joining. Is this an Antony burner account? He's objectively one of the worst wingers in the entire league (if not the worst), both from a production and pure threat perspective.
 

Valencia Shin Crosses

Full Member
Joined
Sep 30, 2015
Messages
6,787
Location
"Martial...He's isolated Skrtel here..."
If Antony had cost the 25m the scouts had apparently recommended, I could just about squint and say he's okay for that (any legal issues aside). He's still young, has some clear talent and has a good work ethic. I feel like we could work with that if he wasn't the huge bet for the future of our right side.

He's nowhere near the worst signing in the prem though. I mean, look at someone like Mendy, or was it Claudio Bravo that basically was 40m straight in and out at City? Hell, City and Chelsea have signed players for big money that basically never even played for them.

But never forget the greatest (financial) signing in history: one Jon Obi Mikel. We made like 12m (a Ronaldo fee, at the time) for like a week's work :)
Please tell me what his "clear talent" is. Unless you just mean keeping hold of the ball (which is much easier to do as a winger than say a midfielder or striker mind you).
 

Oranges038

Full Member
Joined
Oct 19, 2020
Messages
12,219
Erik said ; “I have experience knowing he is unstoppable. Within the first ten yards, he is among the fastest players"

:confused::confused:
Technically he's not wrong.

FASTEST UNITED PLAYERS 22/23

1. Marcus Rashford: 35.95 km/h
2. Diogo Dalot: 35.76 km/h
3. Antony: 35.29 km/h
4. Luke Shaw: 34.85 km/h
5. Tyrell Malacia: 34.76 km/h
6. Aaron Wan-Bissaka 34.42 km/h
7. Anthony Elanga: 34.27 km/h
8. Jadon Sancho: 33.96 km/h
9. Alejandro Garnacho: 33.92 km/h
10. Anthony Martial: 33.56 km/h

https://www.manutd.com/en/news/deta...ier-league-official-fastest-player-in-2022-23
 

MadDogg

Full Member
Joined
Apr 24, 2002
Messages
15,966
Location
Manchester Utd never lose, just run out of time
Enzo is an OK player and came to Chelsea on the back of a great World Cup, considered as one of the best young midfielders in Europe. Also with Sancho you at least knew why we were paying so much, he was great at Dortmund and considered one of the brightest young talents in Europe at the time.

Antony wasn’t even that good at Ajax and was never considered among top talents. There’s no agenda against Antony, he’s just a distinctly mediocre footballer.
The signing of Antony is arguably the worst, in terms of it being so obviously overpriced whereas you could somewhat understand the fees for some of the others. But the player himself certainly isn't the biggest flop. He did enough last season to put himself comfortably ahead of Sancho and a few others.
 

RedRocket9908

Full Member
Joined
Feb 7, 2023
Messages
2,364
Location
Manchester
Enzo :lol:

He's largely been one of Chelsea's best players since joining. Is this an Antony burner account? He's objectively one of the worst wingers in the entire league (if not the worst), both from a production and pure threat perspective.
Everytime ive watched Enzo for Chelsea he has been terrible, if he has been one of Chelsea's best players then the rest must be absolutely useless.
 

criticalanalysis

Full Member
Joined
Apr 12, 2015
Messages
6,212
The signing of Antony is arguably the worst, in terms of it being so obviously overpriced whereas you could somewhat understand the fees for some of the others. But the player himself certainly isn't the biggest flop. He did enough last season to put himself comfortably ahead of Sancho and a few others.
Yeah same feelings. Horrific fee for what we've got but he's not a bad player at all despite his most recent form. He's got a lot of attributes that would work well in a much more functional team, although that goes without saying for all our players.

He was constantly playing despite bad form and now that he's out of the team, I think he deserves a 'prolonged' chance back in the team or at the very least longer sub appearances that these 1-5 min showings. As usual though with ETH, his rotation of players and giving them the chance to find rhythm is inconsistent and bad. We've seen it with Eriksen, Amrabt, Amad etc. On top of resting/benching Garnacho or Rashford, I'd like to think Antony and Dalot (with his recent really good form) could build something of a good combination on the right with the under and overlaps.

It's not gonna happen but yeah.
 

Telsim

Full Member
Joined
Nov 7, 2021
Messages
4,885
Erik said ; “I have experience knowing he is unstoppable. Within the first ten yards, he is among the fastest players"

:confused::confused:
That's great. Now he needs to explain what purpose does this great speed serve when he cuts back every single time.

He has been dropped and for good reason. Kudos to this manager for actually doing that, at least.
 

Alpha 1

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Jan 18, 2024
Messages
165
Sancho was much worse.

Antony was decent enough last season. Obviously not worth anywhere near what we paid for him and not as good as what we wanted, but he was rightfully our first choice right winger and played his part in the build-up, defensively and team shape and style. It was comfortably a better season than any Sancho has had here. Antony then started this season terribly, but just as there were signs he was starting to get back to last seasons form he had the issue in Brazil and he's never recovered since then.

If we're talking purely transfer fee then Antony was worse since he was so obviously overpriced (whereas Sancho's fee made sense), but in regards to the impact they had once they joined the club then Sancho was definitely worse.
No. Antony is simply terrible. A garbage signing. Period!