F1 2024 Season

klsv

Full Member
Joined
Jun 16, 2016
Messages
1,915
Shanghai next and it’s a sprint weekend.
19th-21sr April
  • PRACTICE 1 FRI 04:30 – 05:30
  • SPRINT QUALIFYING FRI 08:30 – 09:14
  • SPRINT SAT 04:00 – 05:00
  • QUALIFYING SAT 08:00 – 09:00
  • RACE SUN 08:00
Sorry, I'm playing the Superbru thing for the first time this season. Do we also predict the sprint or just the quali and the main race as always?
 

Amar__

Geriatric lover and empath
Joined
Sep 2, 2010
Messages
24,128
Location
Sarajevo
Supports
MK Dons
Decent race, finally some excitement with strategies, I guess rain in practices can make it more interesting because they didn't do a proper test of dry tires.
 

laughtersassassin

Full Member
Joined
Jun 12, 2014
Messages
11,497
McLaren really fecked it up by pitting Norris at same time as Leclerc. Had the potential to fight for a better spot but threw it away
 
Last edited:

F-Red

Full Member
Joined
Nov 15, 2008
Messages
10,917
Location
Cheshire
McLaren really fecked it up by pitting Norris at same time as Leclerc. Had the potential to fight for a better spot but threw it away
McLarens were no where near Ferrari's pace this weekend, 5th was the best they could hope for with Norris. McLaren just can't compete with Ferrari or Red Bull on tyre degradation.
 

laughtersassassin

Full Member
Joined
Jun 12, 2014
Messages
11,497
McLarens were no where near Ferrari's pace this weekend, 5th was the best they could hope for with Norris. McLaren just can't compete with Ferrari or Red Bull on tyre degradation.
Sure but they literally didn't even run the fastest race they could have with Norris.

They pitted for the last stint too soon
 

hobbers

Full Member
Joined
Jun 24, 2013
Messages
28,336
Sucks how clearly separated the top 5 teams are now in terms of pace.

Alonso outdrives his car which is basically the only factor that adds unpredictability to it.
 

dinostar77

Full Member
Joined
Feb 6, 2014
Messages
7,274
Just got around to watching the highlights. So bored that I'm watching while surfing on my phone. Got to lap 11.
 

F-Red

Full Member
Joined
Nov 15, 2008
Messages
10,917
Location
Cheshire
Sure but they literally didn't even run the fastest race they could have with Norris.

They pitted for the last stint too soon
A mega strategy by McLaren would have made no difference tbh. McLaren seemed to be a bit cautious on their calls but Norris' lap times vs Leclerc's for the race were pretty even, which given the strategy that Leclerc was on highlights Ferrari's advantage on tyre wear vs McLaren.
 

Redplane

( . Y . ) planned for Christmas
Joined
Sep 4, 2013
Messages
10,380
Location
The Royal Kingdom of Trumpistan
Just got around to watching the highlights. So bored that I'm watching while surfing on my phone. Got to lap 11.
C'mon it was a pretty good race. For the first time in a while strategy ended up making a big difference in where the teams ended up bc of how close some of them stayed on track. Felt a lot like a 90s race. McLaren and Merc just goofed theirs again, Lewis sounds like he was also unfortunate to pick up damage from getting hit by Charles, and Aston had their usual inexplicable performance drop. Probably the most entertaining one of the season so far.
 
Last edited:

dinostar77

Full Member
Joined
Feb 6, 2014
Messages
7,274
C'mon it was a pretty good race. For the first time in a while strategy ended up making a big difference in where the teams ended up bc of how close some of them stayed on track. Felt a lot like a 90s race. McLaren and Merc just goofed theirs again, and Aston had their usual inexplicable performance drop. Probably the most entertaining one of the season so far.
I binned it off after lap 18. Maybe im just too tired after a long day with the kids.

Maybe try again tomorrow to watch it.
 

redshaw

Full Member
Joined
Jul 17, 2015
Messages
9,709
Not a bad race but too often there's big gaps between each driver for long parts this and last season, the few overtakes in the top 6-8 cars were just very simple DRS, car unable to fight. The cars are too on edge at each track with differing tyre deg. For strategy we had much better races up to 2021 seeing how it would unfold with genuine pace and cars going at it for the last 10 laps.

Piastri seems to be really struggling to keep the tyres alive.

I can only come away appreciating how good Alonso is and it's a shame he hasn't had a top team despite so much talk in the last 10-15 years now about him being one of the best.
 

pauldyson1uk

Full Member
Joined
May 20, 2008
Messages
55,363
Location
Wythenshawe watching Crappy Fims
Formula 1’s tyre supplier Pirelli wants to hold talks with the teams and governing body FIA over the wet-tyre ruling which it appears sparked an alarming lack of action at Suzuka.

Light rain made for a greasy track during the second hour of practice ahead of the Japanese Grand Prix, but despite the threat of rain still lingering for the rest of the race weekend, there was a serious lack of drivers out on the track.

An FIA rule from the 2023 regulations – which granted drivers an extra set of intermediate tyres should they have used a set in a wet FP1 or FP2, or if FP3 carried a high risk of being wet – has been removed, which is therefore being blamed for the lack of running during the FP2 session at Suzuka with teams trying to preserve the tyres they have.

Pirelli’s chief engineer Simone Berra is confident that this was indeed the situation which unfolded, as he called for discussions with the FIA and teams to ensure that there is no repeat.

“This [rule change] was obviously voted by all the teams together with FIA and F1,” said Berra.

“Obviously nowadays a team doesn’t have to return one set of intermediates after it is used in free practice, like it was last year.

“So especially at this circuit, where you have, let’s say, a high level of degradation, and considering that we could have some rain on Sunday, most of them decided to keep the five sets unused apart from RB and other teams that did an out and in-lap.
 

dinostar77

Full Member
Joined
Feb 6, 2014
Messages
7,274
Mercedes are a shambles. Apparently the car is actually producing the "missing" 70 points of downforce that the CFD/Wind Tunnel predict it should (they added more sensors to the car for this specifically). BUT its not resulting in any faster laptime through the highspeed corners. So they now think there is a mis-correlation in the mechanics of the car rather than the aero.

IF and its a big if they figure this out and get the 70p of rear downforce to actual work properly, they should be properly competative (i.e ferrari level).

Just shows that the cars are way too complex if boffins and Mercedes and Ferrari (last season) struggle so much with rear downforce etv.

https://www.autosport.com/f1/news/m...nse-offers-clues-to-w15s-real-fault/10596365/

On a sidenote, the Mercedes of previous seasons (zero sidepods) had 150p of downforce removed which never went back on the car as they were getting extreme porposing. Its mental how much downforce they have been throwing away for past few seasons with these rules.

* 1 point of downforce = 0.01 second (an approximation varies from team to team).
 
Last edited:

pauldyson1uk

Full Member
Joined
May 20, 2008
Messages
55,363
Location
Wythenshawe watching Crappy Fims
Alex Albon feared for his chassis as soon as he realized he was heading into Suzuka’s tyre barrier, and his concerns were justified as Williams has revealed that it will need to send its damaged tub back to Grove for repairs ahead of the Chinese GP.

I know F1 is the pinnacle and all that, but would you be risking your life in a chassis that has been and crashed and repaired twice
 

dinostar77

Full Member
Joined
Feb 6, 2014
Messages
7,274
Alex Albon feared for his chassis as soon as he realized he was heading into Suzuka’s tyre barrier, and his concerns were justified as Williams has revealed that it will need to send its damaged tub back to Grove for repairs ahead of the Chinese GP.

I know F1 is the pinnacle and all that, but would you be risking your life in a chassis that has been and crashed and repaired twice
Cost cap strikes again. The gift that keeps on giving.
 

Amar__

Geriatric lover and empath
Joined
Sep 2, 2010
Messages
24,128
Location
Sarajevo
Supports
MK Dons
Is another chasis even that expensive, in grand scheme of things? I am sure they spend more on catering(ask Red Bull).
 

Amar__

Geriatric lover and empath
Joined
Sep 2, 2010
Messages
24,128
Location
Sarajevo
Supports
MK Dons
Once you take into accounts of operational costs and salaries, then it’s a significant value for the cars budget.
Yeah, but it's also very important. I doubt there is single team apart from Williams that doesn't have reserve chasis. Frankly, I find it ridiculous.
 

F-Red

Full Member
Joined
Nov 15, 2008
Messages
10,917
Location
Cheshire
Yeah, but it's also very important. I doubt there is single team apart from Williams that doesn't have reserve chasis. Frankly, I find it ridiculous.
It’s been discussed already as to the why…

On what planet are they benefitting? Are Williams allowed to build new infrastructure outside of the cost cap like AM and Mclaren? No.

So they have to compromise between spending money on the race car and spending money on improving the infrastructure under the cost cap. So they will remain towards the lower end of the pack for many many years.

They didnt bring a 3rd chassis because of the cost cap. The same way Mclaren chose to take a hit on straight line speed at Saudi Arabia because of the cost cap. Because teams are limited in the number of rear wings they can produce so are down to low and high downforce designs with adjustable gurneys. Its all about compromise because of the cost cap.
 

mariachi-19

Full Member
Joined
Jul 14, 2008
Messages
18,616
Location
I may be the devil, but i'm not a monster
It has feck all to do with cost cap. It’s been explained why they don’t have a spare tub and it’s to do with modernising Williams factory.

Perhaps Albon shouldn’t be an idiot for two weekends in a row and just take it fecking easy. He was going to achieve feck all being where he was on Sunday.
 

dinostar77

Full Member
Joined
Feb 6, 2014
Messages
7,274
It has feck all to do with cost cap. It’s been explained why they don’t have a spare tub and it’s to do with modernising Williams factory.

Perhaps Albon shouldn’t be an idiot for two weekends in a row and just take it fecking easy. He was going to achieve feck all being where he was on Sunday.
Which unlike AMs new facilities or Mclarens new wind tunnel, comes out of Williams cost cap. James Vowles said it was unfair that Williams have to compromise so much on the race car to upgrade facilities.
 

avgp_1

Full Member
Joined
Sep 12, 2021
Messages
3,761
Which unlike AMs new facilities or Mclarens new wind tunnel, comes out of Williams cost cap. James Vowles said it was unfair that Williams have to compromise so much on the race car to upgrade facilities.
Doesn't Williams operate well below the cost cap though?
 

dinostar77

Full Member
Joined
Feb 6, 2014
Messages
7,274
I thought that also, but a post on here said they were updating their factory.
It's not a straightforward clear cut issue. The bit I've highlighted below is a big part of the issue. CapEx is limited to $45mil a season, so it will take Williams many many years to get their infrastructure up to par as the rest.

What the bigger teams did before the cost cap came in, was to spend like mad on infrastructure so they have a built in advantage that smaller teams will struggle to catch.

The older your facilities are, the slower and less economic the processes are. It costs you more more. Therefore something has to give. So you don't produce spare chassis's and concentrate on other areas.

It ends up being a vicious circle. Which is why I think smaller teams should be allowed to break the cost cap ceiling for CapEx so they can bring their infrastructure up to the same standard as the big boys and not have to spend 10+ years trying to do it within a cost cap.

https://www.the-race.com/formula-1/williams-f1-crash-cost-chassis-albon-sargeant/

"...Williams ended up well behind schedule due to a combination of outdated processes and systems, limited facilities, and a big change in the composition and management of its car build.

That gave it more work to do and far more hassle with a lot of the same infrastructure restrictions, so something had to give.

Williams needed to sacrifice spare parts, performance updates, or the back-up chassis for its pre-season focus. It chose to go ahead with only two chassis, hoping it could deal with any damage on-site, with F1’s ultra-competitive midfield demanding more performance focus...."

"...Unsurprisingly the cost is enormous. The repairs, the replacement floors and wings and suspension components, at least two new gearboxes, the unexpected need to transport the chassis - it all adds up, and the three accidents are likely to cost Williams well over $2million once the full extent of Albon’s Suzuka crash is understood.

Williams is no longer in the financial grave it was in a few years ago, but F1’s a budget-capped world now. And all of these costs will come out of that allowance.

Every team does build a crash allowance into its budget cap projections for the season. But we think Williams is going to be pushing up close to that limit if not past it already. That means, more likely than not, Williams’s development budget will take a hit this season at some point.

It’s problematic given Williams is already behind the curve this year thanks to the winter problems which meant some development items that should have been there for the launch spec still aren’t on the car now. That’s partly why its car is only eight-fastest and yet to score a point this season.

The work is going to be either paused or diluted for the second time in a couple of weeks because the focus at the factory will have to be on repairs..."
 

pauldyson1uk

Full Member
Joined
May 20, 2008
Messages
55,363
Location
Wythenshawe watching Crappy Fims
It's not a straightforward clear cut issue. The bit I've highlighted below is a big part of the issue. CapEx is limited to $45mil a season, so it will take Williams many many years to get their infrastructure up to par as the rest.

What the bigger teams did before the cost cap came in, was to spend like mad on infrastructure so they have a built in advantage that smaller teams will struggle to catch.

The older your facilities are, the slower and less economic the processes are. It costs you more more. Therefore something has to give. So you don't produce spare chassis's and concentrate on other areas.

It ends up being a vicious circle. Which is why I think smaller teams should be allowed to break the cost cap ceiling for CapEx so they can bring their infrastructure up to the same standard as the big boys and not have to spend 10+ years trying to do it within a cost cap.

https://www.the-race.com/formula-1/williams-f1-crash-cost-chassis-albon-sargeant/

"...Williams ended up well behind schedule due to a combination of outdated processes and systems, limited facilities, and a big change in the composition and management of its car build.

That gave it more work to do and far more hassle with a lot of the same infrastructure restrictions, so something had to give.

Williams needed to sacrifice spare parts, performance updates, or the back-up chassis for its pre-season focus. It chose to go ahead with only two chassis, hoping it could deal with any damage on-site, with F1’s ultra-competitive midfield demanding more performance focus...."

"...Unsurprisingly the cost is enormous. The repairs, the replacement floors and wings and suspension components, at least two new gearboxes, the unexpected need to transport the chassis - it all adds up, and the three accidents are likely to cost Williams well over $2million once the full extent of Albon’s Suzuka crash is understood.

Williams is no longer in the financial grave it was in a few years ago, but F1’s a budget-capped world now. And all of these costs will come out of that allowance.

Every team does build a crash allowance into its budget cap projections for the season. But we think Williams is going to be pushing up close to that limit if not past it already. That means, more likely than not, Williams’s development budget will take a hit this season at some point.

It’s problematic given Williams is already behind the curve this year thanks to the winter problems which meant some development items that should have been there for the launch spec still aren’t on the car now. That’s partly why its car is only eight-fastest and yet to score a point this season.

The work is going to be either paused or diluted for the second time in a couple of weeks because the focus at the factory will have to be on repairs..."
Cheers for this.
 

hobbers

Full Member
Joined
Jun 24, 2013
Messages
28,336
Maybe the cost cap should be like wind tunnel time.

You get increased cap every place further back you finish out of the top 5
 

pacifictheme

Full Member
Joined
Sep 28, 2013
Messages
7,746
It has feck all to do with cost cap. It’s been explained why they don’t have a spare tub and it’s to do with modernising Williams factory.

Perhaps Albon shouldn’t be an idiot for two weekends in a row and just take it fecking easy. He was going to achieve feck all being where he was on Sunday.
Think it's widely agreed, even by the stewards, that the incident was more Ricciardo's fault but lap one etc prevented him getting a penalty.
 

Ahmer Baig

Full Member
Joined
Jul 8, 2017
Messages
3,181
When asked about his defense in Suzuka, Alonso replied ...

"I don't know what to say anymore after Australia, let's see if I get disqualified for the rest of the championship,” he smiled.
 

dinostar77

Full Member
Joined
Feb 6, 2014
Messages
7,274
Looks like F1 can't actually do anything right? They've fecked up the 2026 active aero (that no one wanted). Cars are spinning out in straights and need to take corners so slowly that laptimes are slower than F2.

https://www.autosport.com/f1/news/f...e-after-alarming-simulator-findings/10596701/

How fecking hard is it to do the basics correctly? Or fix what needs fixing instead of creating crap no one wanted?

Here's an idea, make tyres last the entire race so drivers can go flat out all of the time. But introduce rule for using all 3 compounds in a race weekend. Add ballast for current WC for the entire season and top 6 drivers of the current season. Give smaller teams a chance at points and maybe race wins. Add tyre covers to control tyre wake. So and so on. Loads of things they can fix

But no, let's add movable aero, which one team will nail (no prizes for guessing who) and add more cost and complexity to F1 cars.

Sport run by idiots, who are destroying what F1 used to be.
 

hobbers

Full Member
Joined
Jun 24, 2013
Messages
28,336
Well they've been ruining engines, tyres and aero wash for decades but luckily for them global warming has given them the perfect new excuse for it.