£150 million pounds worth of defenders...

Pogue Mahone

Swiftie Fan Club President
Joined
Feb 22, 2006
Messages
134,682
Location
"like a man in silk pyjamas shooting pigeons
...available for selection but not deemed good enough to start in our biggest game of the season. Instead we went with four defenders who were a) here when Fergie was in charge, and b) were considered a significant downgrade on our previous defenders at that time.

Think about that for a moment. That’s an average of £37.5m invested in each position of a back four (and with the likes of Keane, Evans, Tuanzebe and Fosuh-Mensah coming through we did have decent squad options, had the investment been more focussed).

Only five defenders in the history of football have cost more than £37.5m, yet all of our investment didn’t result in a single starter in the FA Cup Final!

Even if you think the dividing the investment by four is unfair, the individual fees are still outrageous.

Rojo = £18m
Shaw = £34m
Blind = £16m
Darmian = £16m
Bailly = £34m
Lindelof = £32m

Three players on that list would break the record for the most expensive defender ever signed by any Spanish or German club.

I think it’s fair to say these figures sum up the horrific transfer “strategy” we’ve pursued since Fergie retired. Can anyone convince me we can’t expect more of the same for the forseeable future?
 

Pexbo

Winner of the 'I'm not reading that' medal.
Joined
Jun 2, 2009
Messages
69,068
Location
Brizzle
Supports
Big Days
...available for selection but not deemed good enough to start in our biggest game of the season. Instead we went with four defenders who were a) here when Fergie was in charge, and b) were considered a significant downgrade on our previous defenders at that time.

Think about that for a moment. That’s an average of £37.5m invested in each position of a back four (and with the likes of Keane, Evans, Tuanzebe and Fosuh-Mensah coming through we did have decent squad options, had the investment been more focussed).

Only five defenders in the history of football have cost more than £37.5m

Even if you think the dividing the investment by four is unfair, the individual fees are still outrageous.

Rojo = £18m
Shaw = £34m
Blind = £16m
Darmian = £16m
Bailly = £34m
Lindelof = £32m

Three players on that list would break the record for the most expensive defender ever signed by any Spanish or German club.

I think it’s fair to say these figures sum up the horrific transfer “strategy” we’ve pursued since Fergie retired. Can anyone convince me we can’t expect more of the same for the forseeable future?
The two most expensive are still young, relatively new and could come good to be fair. They’re having the same development process Fergie afforded Smalling and Jones.

The other four are Van Gaal signings and three will almost certainly be sold in the summer.
 

Eddy_JukeZ

Full Member
Joined
Aug 21, 2012
Messages
17,276
Startling definitely.

Just everything about the club post-SAF is an inability to succeed in almost every department.

Our transfer success since SAF is probably the worst out of any big European team.

Zero title challenges.

No good CL run.

Plenty of bad records broken.

Though Jose has stabilized us somewhat, even he can't get us back to the top of English football.
 

VorZakone

What would Kenny G do?
Joined
May 9, 2013
Messages
33,522
Startling definitely.

Just everything about the club post-SAF is an inability to succeed in almost every department.

Our transfer success since SAF is probably the worst out of any big European team.

Zero title challenges.

No good CL run.

Plenty of bad records broken.

Though Jose has stabilized us somewhat, even he can't get us back to the top of English football.
#2 in the league is not 'top of English football' ?
 

Pogue Mahone

Swiftie Fan Club President
Joined
Feb 22, 2006
Messages
134,682
Location
"like a man in silk pyjamas shooting pigeons
Startling definitely.

Just everything about the club post-SAF is an inability to succeed in almost every department.

Our transfer success since SAF is probably the worst out of any big European team.

Zero title challenges.

No good CL run.

Plenty of bad records broken.

Though Jose has stabilized us somewhat, even he can't get us back to the top of English football.
And yet Woodward’s job is secure because the club is making loads of money. Miles off the pace amongst Europeans elite but extremely profitable. All feels a bit Arsenal.
 

Eddy_JukeZ

Full Member
Joined
Aug 21, 2012
Messages
17,276
#2 in the league is not 'top of English football' ?
The top of English football to me is challenging for league titles year in and year out and winning a few.

We've not challenged for the league in 5 years. And not only that, but every season we've been out of the race by Christmas! I mean it's absurd.

We need to get back to challenging for the league, because I think the club desperately needs it and we need to win 1 soon. The longer it drags on...
 

Skills

Snitch
Joined
Jan 17, 2012
Messages
42,284
And yet Woodward’s job is secure because the club is making loads of money. Miles off the pace amongst Europeans elite but extremely profitable. All feels a bit Arsenal.
Shouldn't it be? We must be the only club after its CEO's head :lol:
 

Eddy_JukeZ

Full Member
Joined
Aug 21, 2012
Messages
17,276
And yet Woodward’s job is secure because the club is making loads of money. Miles off the pace amongst Europeans elite but extremely profitable. All feels a bit Arsenal.
I do wonder if the club's ambitions match our fans. Like what if top 4 and all is all good for Woodward.

Not securing CL football has seen 2 managers axed only when it was impossible to secure CL football, despite the warning signs being there during their seasons.

Maybe Woodward only cares about the commercial aspect. A lot of our signings seem to lack any thinking behind it from a football point of view.

And if top 4 is enough for the club to be financially successful, then are we indeed Arsenal 2.0?
 

MikeUpNorth

Wobbles like a massive pair of tits
Joined
Apr 26, 2007
Messages
19,954
I don’t think you get a starting 11 player for under £20m any more, so not surprised that Blind, Darmien and Rojo are squad players.

We presumably had much higher hopes for Shaw, Bailey and Lindelof. None of them looks particularly great, but I think Bailey has something about him.
 

VivaObertan

Transfer Voyeur
Joined
Feb 13, 2012
Messages
2,504
Location
Pardew 'wanted pace'
What a weird thread. We had £150m worth of attackers, Mata, Lukaku and Martial on the bench who didn't play either. Your example doesn't highlight a poor transfer strategy, but more shows we're now seeing the effects of Ferguson's lack of planning and reliance on all his star players being over 26-27. (Evra, Rio, Vidic, Valencia, Carrick, Scholes, Giggs, Rooney, RVP... probably some others I missed out).

Shaw was worth the money paid, at the time.
Rojo was/is worth the money paid, at the time.
Blind was/is worth the money paid, at the time.
Darmian was worth the money paid, at the time.
Bailly & Lindelof, who knows.

I kind of see your point but I think in football you need continuity. Something I've realised is that the players Man City have managed to keep are Kompany, Toure, Fernandinho, Silva, Aguero... same with Real Madrid; Marcelo, Ramos, Kroos, Modric, Ronaldo, Benzema - ours are DDG, Smalling, Jones, Young, Valencia, Carrick and Rooney until last year.
 

Wumminator

The Qatar Pounder
Joined
May 8, 2008
Messages
23,234
Location
Obertans #1 fan.
Blind and Rojo for the price have done a decent job IMO.

Shaw looks decent. I don’t know what’s happened there.

The others are poor signings right now. I have no idea why people seem to rate Bailly so highly, he’s deservedly below Jones and Smalling IMO.
 

Treble

Full Member
Joined
Sep 11, 2008
Messages
10,550
Basically, Jose has admitted that Bailly and Lindelof haven't been great signings. Yes, they are young. But why buy them for 30 plus millions and not start them?
 

Pogue Mahone

Swiftie Fan Club President
Joined
Feb 22, 2006
Messages
134,682
Location
"like a man in silk pyjamas shooting pigeons
Blind and Rojo for the price have done a decent job IMO.

Shaw looks decent. I don’t know what’s happened there.

The others are poor signings right now. I have no idea why people seem to rate Bailly so highly, he’s deservedly below Jones and Smalling IMO.
I know you’re still desperately clinging to the delusion that Mourinho’s the only manager who’s been a poor appointment since Fergie retired but Rojo, Blind and Shaw all demonstrated the flaws that have seen them marginalised long before our current manager took over.
 

settembrini

Full Member
Joined
Jan 29, 2015
Messages
3,283
The people I know in real life who waste the most money are the children of the wealthy and our transfer policy reminds me of their shopping habits. Ferguson is the patriarch who made us rich. Moyes, Van Gaal and Mourinho are the children who luck into a massive inheritance and then buy a load of expensive toys they don't need.
 

JPRouve

can't stop thinking about balls - NOT deflategate
Scout
Joined
Jan 31, 2014
Messages
66,756
Location
France
Basically, Jose has admitted that Bailly and Lindelof haven't been great signings. Yes, they are young. But why buy them for 30 plus millions and not start them?
Objectively neither are better than Jones, Smalling and Rojo. I know that it's not in vogue to not lambast our defenders but the only time they actually disappoint is when they are left absolutely alone in situations where every player on earth is at a disadvantage like Jones in 1v1 against Hazard. As a group they are fine and the job of a manager is to make the group coherent and solid which to Mourinho's credit is exactly what he did with this defense. So my point is that Lindelof and Bailly weren't necessary particularly when they are not at their peak and aren't really better than what we have, both are two young defenders with pretty good potential.
 

Camilo

Full Member
Joined
Jan 27, 2014
Messages
2,971
I think we could've started shaw, Bailly, lindelof and darmian yesterday, and it wouldn't have made any difference.

The way we play is the problem, not the personnel. Not every transfer works out, but you'd be hard pushed to say any of our defensive signings have been poor. Rather I think it's more a reflection of the quality (at CB at least) we already had.
 

Skills

Snitch
Joined
Jan 17, 2012
Messages
42,284
Objectively neither are better than Jones, Smalling and Rojo. I know that it's not in vogue to not lambast our defenders but the only time they actually disappoint is when they are left absolutely alone in situations where every player on earth is at a disadvantage like Jones in 1v1 against Hazard. As a group they are fine and the job of a manager is to make the group coherent and solid which to Mourinho's credit is exactly what he did with this defense. So my point is that Lindelof and Bailly weren't necessary particularly when they are not at their peak and aren't really better than what we have, both are two young defenders with pretty good potential.
I'll be surprised if Lindelof ever becomes better than Smalling or Jones. Bailly potentially can, but he's poor aerially. And that's a pretty big target on your back as a CB.
 

Wumminator

The Qatar Pounder
Joined
May 8, 2008
Messages
23,234
Location
Obertans #1 fan.
I know you’re still desperately clinging to the delusion that Mourinho’s the only manager who’s been a poor appointment since Fergie retired but Rojo, Blind and Shaw all demonstrated the flaws that have seen them marginalised long before our current manager took over.
I have not and will not ever hold that position. I just think Mourinho’s done a poor job. Something you used to lambast me for and now seem to agree with. So you’ve now tried to change what my stance is.
 

bazalini

The Baz Man - He made us laugh 2000 - 2012
Joined
May 17, 2000
Messages
24,589
Location
Dines out
when Eric Bailey was signed - you' swear we had signed the Messi of defending by the talk on here.

what has he done???
 

Leftback99

Might have a bedwetting fetish.
Joined
Jan 11, 2015
Messages
14,844
LVG was a disaster in the transfer market with players bought and sold. Rojo was a terrible signing in particular, bought because of his obsession with left footed centre backs, £18m plus a free loan of Nani and then he complained he had no pace and creativity on the wings. The less said about Darmian the better.

Worryingly Mourinho's defensive signings have been no better. Bailly has some decent attributes but the Lindelof signing is baffling.

We wouldn't be worse off if we had just kept Evans, Keane and Rafael and signed no one.
 

cyberman

Full Member
Joined
May 26, 2010
Messages
37,331
Are you sure you haven't confused Euros with Pounds with Bailly and Lindelofs fees? I'm pretty sure both are bang on 30m?

Combined less than VVD, both less than Mustafi, Less than Luiz, don't even mention Citys signings.

Shaw is the transfer that stands out to me.
 

spiriticon

Full Member
Joined
Feb 3, 2013
Messages
7,592
What has happened to Eric Bailly? Did he poke Jose in the eyes or something?
 

kouroux

45k posts to finally achieve this tagline
Joined
Apr 25, 2007
Messages
96,804
Location
Djibouti (La terre des braves)
The club is badly run that is for sure. We buy players expensively and most of them turn out to be bad transfers, it happens onna consistent basis then something is really effed up in the global transfer strategy (if we even have one)
 

Bojan11

Full Member
Joined
May 16, 2010
Messages
33,116
LVG was a disaster in the transfer market with players bought and sold. Rojo was a terrible signing in particular, bought because of his obsession with left footed centre backs, £18m plus a free loan of Nani and then he complained he had no pace and creativity on the wings. The less said about Darmian the better.

Worryingly Mourinho's defensive signings have been no better. Bailly has some decent attributes but the Lindelof signing is baffling.

We wouldn't be worse off if we had just kept Evans, Keane and Rafael and signed no one.
Have you seen Michael Keane play for Everton?

Evans was a train wreck in his final season for us. You’d think he of all defenders would be suited to Van Gaals system because he was decent on the ball.

To be fair you have the back 4/DDG and then Lingard/Rashford.

So where the feck has all the money gone?
 
Joined
Feb 12, 2018
Messages
19,849
Blind was never brought in to be a defender if I remember correctly. LVG bought him to play in midfield as a DM, but that idea went quickly out the window.
 

Romez

Full Member
Joined
Jul 21, 2013
Messages
291
We need a Director of Football so we don’t waste money like LVG did.

Most of his signings have been garbage and probably wont be here next season.
 

VP89

Pogba's biggest fan
Joined
Dec 6, 2015
Messages
32,685
It's in part due to the frequent change in managers.

Mourinho only bought Lindelof and Bailey. I don't care about him not starting players he didn't buy in the first place. He's going to go out this summer and reportedly get his own men for the back line and then we can have a moan about him not starting say, Sandro or Toby or whoever it may be, IF it happens.
 

FreakyJim

90% of teams play better football than us
Joined
Jan 16, 2006
Messages
9,118
Location
Glazers Out
The club is badly run that is for sure. We buy players expensively and most of them turn out to be bad transfers, it happens onna consistent basis then something is really effed up in the global transfer strategy (if we even have one)
spoiler - we don't
 

Castia

Full Member
Joined
Jun 18, 2011
Messages
18,582
It’s shocking isn’t it.

We’ve spent a fortune on 2 CB’s in the last 2 summer windows and neither are getting into the team for one reason or another.

You can see why we’re linked with Alderweireld rather than a youngster like De Ligt it’s because we need a guaranteed starter, we’re not in a position to bed in another defender.

For what it’s worth I think we have 2 very good defenders in Bailly and Rojo but fitness seems to be a major issue.
 

Smores

Full Member
Joined
May 18, 2011
Messages
25,721
Better than him starting only the players he signed out of pure stubbornness. Apart from our fullbacks i don't think our defence is that bad
 

settembrini

Full Member
Joined
Jan 29, 2015
Messages
3,283
Bailly? Am I missing something here, I thought he'd been injured? Whenever I've seen him play he's looked like a phenomenal talent!
He's been fit for a long time. Mourinho claimed he wasn't being picked because he wasn't going to the WC, which is obviously ludicrous.
 

Pogue Mahone

Swiftie Fan Club President
Joined
Feb 22, 2006
Messages
134,682
Location
"like a man in silk pyjamas shooting pigeons
I have not and will not ever hold that position. I just think Mourinho’s done a poor job. Something you used to lambast me for and now seem to agree with. So you’ve now tried to change what my stance is.
I’m coming round to the idea that Mourinho’s the wrong man for the job. Of course this is far less certain and obvious than Moyes and Van Gaal’s incompetence when you were still cheer-leading the pair of them.
 

Acole9

Outstanding
Joined
Feb 17, 2013
Messages
12,507
when Eric Bailey was signed - you' swear we had signed the Messi of defending by the talk on here.

what has he done???
He's done nothing, our fan base just got giddy because he's not limited like all the other defenders we've got. He is the best that we have though.
 

Revaulx

Full Member
Joined
Mar 17, 2014
Messages
6,046
Location
Saddleworth
I do wonder if the club's ambitions match our fans. Like what if top 4 and all is all good for Woodward.

Not securing CL football has seen 2 managers axed only when it was impossible to secure CL football, despite the warning signs being there during their seasons.

Maybe Woodward only cares about the commercial aspect. A lot of our signings seem to lack any thinking behind it from a football point of view.

And if top 4 is enough for the club to be financially successful, then are we indeed Arsenal 2.0?
You are absolutely right. The first sign of this was the appointment of Moyes, who I’m sure was brought in on the basis that if he could consistently hit fifth or sixth while spending hardly anything at Everton, he could get a couple of places higher at United with a bit more money at his disposal.

The irony is that we’ve still ended up outspending all but one other club.
 

Canagel

Full Member
Joined
May 26, 2016
Messages
13,888
Amazing. I was just saying this to a friend of mine. We could sign Alderweireld and Bonucci tomorrow and somehow Jones and Smalling would still be playing next season. This current generation of defenders have been failing for the last 4/5 years and next season we will go into the season with excitement only to be let down again. At this point they are wasting our time. The signings have been average but what's the point in buying them if you aren't going to use them?
LVG made terrible signings but after two years we haven't cleared them out yet. It's his fault for bringing them here but it's not his fault they are still here. At some point you have to look at Mourinho as well. We already have indication that Young isn't going anywhere and might play 50 games again next season. Valencia probably the same. Smalling will still be here and then he'll complain about not having enough money to compete with City. Just clear them out. From top to bottom the entire defence needs to be revamped.
 

el3mel

New Member
Joined
Oct 23, 2016
Messages
43,736
Location
Egypt
Pretty underwhelming. All this money spent on players and managers and we're still playing with Young,Valencia, Jones and Lingard in the main lineup. It's like we aren't moving any forward despite all the money spent.